I have done some edits to the Open Data Licence Page. I have
1) Created a 'See Also' section with links to other related pages (some
of which were listed previously in the intro paragraph)
2) Edited the criticism section to make it clearer, to remove detail
and link to other places
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:39 PM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, this is not the place for that argument. That argument's
place is the legal-talk mailing list.
Which makes me wonder why you posted the poll here then?
It was your idea - as you said, only asking the legal-talk mailing
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Joseph Gentle escribió:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere, please?
Thanks,
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Un ordenador no es un televisor ni un
Hi,
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Clothing
Thanks
Lulu-Ann
--
Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:03AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Clothing
Thanks Lulu-Ann
I like the idea.
The english term for clothing requirements is a Dress Code. I'm not
sure how this can best fit in - dress_code_min=formal,
dress_code_max=naked ?
-J
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them to keep their own
work in a separate database and combine it with
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:09 AM, OJ W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Erik Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:39 PM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the only way you
will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:21 AM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) Would you like OSM to always be inferior to TeleAtlas and Navteq
and probably die (PD license)
b) Would you like OSM to be the best map on the planet (viral license))
c) This requires more than 90 seconds thought, please let
On Monday 03 November 2008 01:09:41 pm SteveC wrote:
Can't you guys think more than 5 minutes ahead and realise the only
way you will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
projects? That way us viral people will just take all your work and
always have a better map.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't read the whole sentence:
ways that are contributed PD only,
Of course at this point your eye is mysteriously drawn to the elephant
in the room, which is what deserves copyright protection?.
Adding a
public domain will benefit OSM.
Why not, make a list of all people who want public domain, then
download the 16GBs of planet dumps and diffs necessary to get all
history. Analyze all history; extracting the nodes and ways that are
How for example?
Way # 12564789654321
History
* Edited by
Could someone take a look at lake Østensjøvannet near Oslo, and tell me how
to fix the mulitpolygons, so both Osmarender, Mapnik and the Cycle Map
understand them?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=59.8815lon=10.8767zoom=14layers=0B00FTF
Østensjøvannet seems ok, but Nøklevannet is missing on the Mapnik
rendering. Is that the problem?
2008/11/3 Gustav Foseid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could someone take a look at lake Østensjøvannet near Oslo, and tell me how
to fix the mulitpolygons, so both Osmarender, Mapnik and the Cycle Map
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:31 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations#Proposed_uses_of_Relations
has a large number of proposed uses of relations, but there never seems to
be any forward movement on these.
However flawed the voting
Phooee, all these lists to choose from. Probably most sensible on
legal-talk, I think (so followups to there).
Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't read the whole sentence:
ways that are contributed PD only,
Of course
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
public domain will benefit OSM.
Why not, make a list of all people who want public domain, then
download the 16GBs of planet dumps and diffs necessary to get all
history. Analyze all history; extracting the nodes and
a fun way for checking the dataset would surely be to have OSM maps in
3d simulations or games, such as
http://torcs.sourceforge.net/ or
http://sourceforge.net/projects/trigger-rally/ (picked at random,
other targets are welcome)
Imagine roadsigns showing restrictions, place street names,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Groom
I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still considered
as a proposal in the wiki.
Having a quick look on the european statistics about relations in
tagwatch ([1]), the most popular relation is type=boundary (10297),
most of them for
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Bernt M. Johnsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Østensjøvannet seems ok, but Nøklevannet is missing on the Mapnik
rendering. Is that the problem?
Sorry, my mistake. Yes, the problem is Nøklevannet.
- Gustav
___
talk
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:15 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest concentrating on documenting the ones that are in use,
such as multipolygons, cycle route relations. Even better is to
concentrate on the ones that are in the db and widely consumed
by e.g. a renderer),
Is
Large-scale I-plucked-this-out-of-my-ass creative mapping bearing no
relation to the facts on the ground, like someone has just done in
Cheadle, Staffordshire, UK: yeah, that probably deserves copyright
protection. And taking outside and shooting.
cheers
Richard
On a complete tangent to this
On 3 Nov 2008, at 00:12, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Joseph Gentle escribió:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere,
please?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:28 PM, David Ebling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a complete tangent to this conversation... I was curious about the area
Richard mentioned, so looked it up:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.98283lon=-1.99189zoom=15layers=B000FTF
And was amazed that someone has
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
OSM license. Building a community is much more important than any license,
and this is
On Mon, November 3, 2008 14:49, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Groom
I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still considered
as a proposal in the wiki. Having a quick look on the european statistics
about relations in tagwatch ([1]), the most popular
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Sven Rautenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you cannot complete this task until Mapnik gets some software fixes.
I'd suggest tagging your lake correctly and try to get Mapnik fixed,
instead of trying to find a workaround tagging that works in Mapnik and
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:28 PM, David Ebling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On a complete tangent to this conversation... I was curious about the
area
Richard mentioned, so looked it up:
On 3 Nov 2008, at 15:08, Hakan Tandogan wrote:
On Mon, November 3, 2008 14:49, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, David Groom
I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still
considered
as a proposal in the wiki. Having a quick look on the european
statistics
On 3 Nov 2008, at 02:09, Joseph Gentle wrote:
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere,
please?
Thanks,
I'm sorry for reigniting the flamewar. My intention was merely to get
some data. However, I'd rather have some
On 11/3/08, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on what you're wearing - clothes make the man!
clothes = emperors_new
---
Perhaps we can view clothing as we can view other restrictions
dress_code:yes
dress_code:no workwear after 7pm
beach:yes
clothes:permissive
church
2008/11/3 OJ W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them to keep their own
work in a
Hi,
Andreas Fritsche wrote:
So, could someone please help me: Is contributing a good or
a bad thing? *confused*
Depends on what you're wearing - clothes make the man!
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
OSM
80n wrote:
Since street names are one of the harder bits of information to collect,
what this user has done here looks like a very worthwhile contribution to
the project.
Perhaps we should even be encouraging users without GPS units to create this
kind of topological map. It looks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp Klaus Krause
Sent: 03 November 2008 09:55
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A really quick poll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
So, Richard thinks we should take him (just a guess, I suspect there
are more mappers of this gender) outside and shoot him, while Etienne
thinks we should give him a cigar. Me, I'm all for compromise: give
him a cigar and shoot him :-)
elvin
Hello,
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out),
but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render
highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice
to have paths rendered (they can be rendered the same as footways, as
far
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, elvin ibbotson escribió:
So, Richard thinks we should take him (just a guess, I suspect there
are more mappers of this gender) outside and shoot him, while Etienne
thinks we should give him a cigar. Me, I'm all for compromise: give
him a cigar and shoot him
- Original Message -
From: Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed Relations
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:31 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Igor Brejc wrote:
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out),
but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render
highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice
to have paths rendered (they can be rendered the same as
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Gentle
Sent: 03 November 2008 10:10
To: Iván Sánchez Ortega
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] A super quick poll
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
Can't you guys think more than 5 minutes ahead and realise the only
way you will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
projects? That way us viral people will just take all your work and
always have a better map.
Exactly. I mean
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, elvin ibbotson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
So, Richard thinks we should take him (just a guess, I suspect there are
more mappers of this gender) outside and shoot him, while Etienne thinks we
should give him a cigar. Me, I'm all for compromise: give him a cigar and
Wednesday - patch by Bernhard H integrated and submitted yesterday.
Locality has been in mapnik style for a while and should render fine.
Cheers
STEVE
Steve Chilton, Learning Support Fellow
Manager of e-Learning Academic Development
Centre for Learning and Quality Enhancement
Middlesex
The page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations#Proposed_uses_of_Relations
has a large number of proposed uses of relations, but there never seems to
be any forward movement on these.
However flawed the voting system for proposed tags is, at least there is a
recognised procedure,
hello Iván
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Gustav Foseid escribió:
I am really worried, when I see the chairman of the OSM Foundation making
these kind of oversimplified statements regardig a complex issue like the
OSM license. Building a community is much more
Tom Hughes wrote:
Igor Brejc wrote:
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google
out), but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to
render highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it
would be nice to have paths rendered (they can be
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere, please?
Thanks,
I'm sorry for reigniting the flamewar. My intention was merely to get
some data. However, I'd rather have some argument here than Steve's
inflammatory remarks
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:37:06 +0100
From: Jochen Topf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:03AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the license note ffs guys, legal-talk-general i believe,
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-general
It's an entire mailing list set up so this un-resolvable (to a large
extent) discussion can be kept away from
Is it minimum clothing? To me, min_clothing=kippah implies that the
very minimum for me to wear would be a kippah, and not wearing socks,
underwear, vest etc.
similarly with min_clothing=scarf - no indication of the general
clothing rules.
and echoing earlier replies:
Could we extend this to
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Igor Brejc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't we constantly reiterating the fact that tagging is
democratic?
I think democratic is the wrong word. You can do what you like.
There's no tyranny of the masses, for a start - minorities and
majorities are both on equal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
80n wrote:
Since street names are one of the harder bits of information to collect,
what this user has done here looks like a very worthwhile contribution to
the project.
Perhaps we should even be encouraging users
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Stefan Baebler escribió:
a fun way for checking the dataset would surely be to have OSM maps in
3d simulations or games, such as
http://torcs.sourceforge.net/ or
http://sourceforge.net/projects/trigger-rally/ (picked at random,
other targets are welcome)
Gustav Foseid schrieb:
Could someone take a look at lake Østensjøvannet near Oslo, and tell me how
to fix the mulitpolygons, so both Osmarender, Mapnik and the Cycle Map
understand them?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=59.8815lon=10.8767zoom=14layers=0B00FTF
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, elvin ibbotson [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Richard thinks we should take him (just a guess, I
suspect there are more mappers of this gender) outside and shoot him, while
Etienne thinks we should give him
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:15:26 +
80n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a lot more people without GPS units than there are with, and if
they can get pleasure from recording street names like this, then the GPS
mappers job is made much easier.
Isn't this exactly the sort of thing that the
Proposal
An Air traffic obstacle is a tall structure (a node, or linear feature) which
can endanger air traffic. Air traffic
obstacles have to be marked in most cases with red and white colored markings
and with aircraft warning lights at night.
On larger structures blinking lights are
See also:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Kosmos_AirNav_Rules#Obstructions_for_low-flying_charts
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2008-November/031052.html
(Tagging tall buildings)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:18:21PM +0100, Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio wrote:
I agree with Etienne. Assuming that zone was blank, I think that user has
done a great job.
The day will come when we will get rid of all these gps talibans
Well. There's nothing wrong with mapping rough
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Sven Rautenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if the inner way marks something other than nothing? Simply tag
it as such. This works great, too. Example: Lake with wood island.
What if this inner way has holes by itself? Example: Wood with lake
inside, which
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
With two seperate relations I presume, one for the wood, one for the
lake. Offhand I think osm2pgsql should get this right in slim mode
(non-slim has its own problems). Do you have an example?
It is reported as
Thanks for the link (I didn't see it when I searched for existing info in the
wiki - I searched for obstacle and
obstruction ... neither one turned up this page). I think, our tagging schema
would fit fairly well in the obstacles
part of this definition (which is not very detailed in the
Hi,
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Relations are unordered. You could load the relation and all the ways
referenced by it, then check to see if each way has another way that has
the same start and end nodes, through a process of stitching.
1. Shaun is right BUT
2. I want relations to become ordered
Hi,
Pieren wrote:
I'm also surprised that the relation type=boundary is still considered
as a proposal in the wiki.
[...]
This is an example of approved relation which does not require a
vote because it's already widely used.
There are no approved relations; there are those that are
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Relations are unordered. You could load the relation and all the ways
referenced by it, then check to see if each way has another way that has
the same start and end nodes, through a process
Ja Stefan,
Licht eens toe?
Groet,
Floris
Beste Talk'ers,
OpenStreetMap wordt genoemd op Webwereld:
http://webwereld.nl/articles/53395/gratis-postcodetool-gaat--open-source-.html
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bas de Lange
06 - 166 26 950
Software Freedom Day Nederland
hoofdorganisator
Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
Licht eens toe?
Kom je wel eens op OpenStreetMap.nl?
:D
Kees heeft mij benadert naar aanleiding van onze Postcode struin actie.
Daar had ik een berichtje op mijn corporate website over staan. We
hebben elkaar op T-DOSE ontmoet en snode plannetjes gemaakt om de
We zijn dus enkel nog opzoek naar enkele vrijwilligers om post ook
daadwerkelijk te bezorgen zodat TNT helemaal buiten spel komt te staan.
--Roeland
On Monday 03 November 2008 16:31:38 Stefan de Konink wrote:
Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
Licht eens toe?
Kom je wel eens op OpenStreetMap.nl?
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 16:31 +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Freek heeft volgende week weer tijd. Dan is het idee om alle
huisnummers
te gaan importeren in een losse database en hiervoor een aparte app
aan
te bieden. En dan semi-automatisch importeren als volgende stap te
doen.
Interessant.
Roeland Douma wrote:
We zijn dus enkel nog opzoek naar enkele vrijwilligers om post ook
daadwerkelijk te bezorgen zodat TNT helemaal buiten spel komt te staan.
Alle gekheid op een stokje. Er zijn *serieuze* gesprekken met iig een
hele grote bezorger in de wereld :)
Stefan
On Monday 03 November 2008, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Armijn Hemel wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 16:31 +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Freek heeft volgende week weer tijd. Dan is het idee om alle
huisnummers
te gaan importeren in een losse database en hiervoor een aparte app
aan
te
Freek wrote:
Nou, het gaat om de postcode -- straat huisnummer combinatie, en dat is
wel een soort van probleem (tenzij die *serieuze* gesprekken wat opleveren
natuurlijk ;-).
Wij hebben van AND toch huisnummerreeksen + straatnaam? Die straatnaam
linken we aan postcode waar een plaats
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 16:52 +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Interessant. Kees schijnt veel van buurtlink.nl te hebben geschraapt
volgens de postcodedump die hij heeft, maar op buurtlink.nl staan
geen
huisnummers. Waar haal je die dan vandaan?
Die hebben wij dan weer ;)
Uit de AND data
Armijn Hemel wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 16:52 +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Interessant. Kees schijnt veel van buurtlink.nl te hebben geschraapt
volgens de postcodedump die hij heeft, maar op buurtlink.nl staan
geen
huisnummers. Waar haal je die dan vandaan?
Die hebben wij dan weer ;)
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:22 +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Armijn Hemel wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 16:52 +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Interessant. Kees schijnt veel van buurtlink.nl te hebben geschraapt
volgens de postcodedump die hij heeft, maar op buurtlink.nl staan
geen
De grenzen van Nederland zien er nu wel goed uit, maar de zeegrenzen
kloppen nog niet. Als ik het goed heb liggen de gemeentegrenzen 1 km uit
de kust, dat is waar ze nu staan, maar de staatsgrens ligt 12 mijl uit
de kust en dus niet op de gemeentegrenzen. Deze moet dus nog worden
aangemaakt.
Moin moin,
hier gibt es ein Kaufhaus, dessen Dach als Parkplatz genutzt wird,
dort führt so eine außenliegende gewendelte Rampe hinauf.
Gebäudeumriss und Parkfläche sind identisch (abgesehen vom
Treppenhaus/Fahrstuhl).
Male ich da jetzt ein building und tagge das gleichzeitig als
Parkfläche?
Hi,
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Clothing
Thanks
Lulu-Ann
--
Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:14:28PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Ich habe das place=county thema ueberigens durch ein
osmarender:render=no geloest ...
Pfusch ;)
Das problem ist das ich natuerlich jetzt dem osmarender beibringen kann
das dingen nicht mehr zu rendern - Problem ist das da jetzt mal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Clothing
Ist für mich ein Favorit bei der Wahl zum Tag of the
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:03AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please have a look and discuss my proposal about clothing that is expected
to enter a place.
(FKK: Max_clothing, churches etc: min_clothing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Clothing
Thanks Lulu-Ann
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 01:52:29PM +0100, Holger Issle wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:32:22 +0100, Ralf Oltmanns wrote:
Nun, ich finds eh etwas naja, jedem node die ganze Kette mitzugeben,
anstatt jeweils Nodes zu haben, auf die mit is_in verwiesen wird und
die ihrerseits auf andere
Tjabo Kloppenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wir waren bislang von Node:building=shelter ausgegangen, nur werden die
jetzt auf einmal weder in Mapnik noch Osmarender angezeigt. Wie mappt man
die Dinger richtig (amenity=shelter?) -- oder sind sie so richtig
gemappt, und nur die Renderer sind
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 01:43:01PM +0100, Holger Issle wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:46:29 +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Nochmals Polizei, ich hab grad den node Polizeiposten Ehningen
bearbeitet. Dabei habe ich auch eine Beschreibung reingemacht. Wird
die irgendwie ins Garmin transportiert?
Florian Lohoff schrieb:
my %replace=(
baden-wuerttemberg= Baden-Württemberg,
baden-württember = Baden-Württemberg,
vermutlich brauchst du auch noch diese ersetzungen:
baden-würtenberg = Baden-Württemberg,
baden-württenberg = Baden-Württemberg,
Moin Florian,
Das problem ist das der place name nicht eindeutig ist - d.h. ein
verweise im is_in geht schief. Hier gibts nen vorort namens Selhorst der
is_in Langenberg ist - ist da jetzt
Langenberg,Kreis Gütersloh,Regierungsbezirk
Detmold,Nordrhein-Westfalen,Bundesrepublik
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:04:16AM +0100, Holger Issle wrote:
Ok, akzeptiert.
Ich habe derzeit eher weniger das Problem die Daten auszulesen, aber
die Änderungen sinnvoll zurückzuspielen habe ich nicht im Griff :(
Jo - Es geht halt die dinge via OSMXAPI zu holen - im JOSM zu editieren
und
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:04:25AM +0100, Frank Sautter wrote:
Subject: Re: [Talk-de] autobug / is_in + amenity=police slippymap mit bug
overlay
Florian Lohoff schrieb:
my %replace=(
baden-wuerttemberg= Baden-Württemberg,
baden-württember = Baden-Württemberg,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:31:56 +0100
Von: Martin Koppenhoefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] highway = path foot - wie vorgehen
Am 2. November 2008 20:06 schrieb Frank Huebner
Wieso wird http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28169681 in
Osmarender dargestellt und
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28173540 nicht?
Gruß, Stephan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-de mailing list
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 01:25:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 06:39:58PM +0100, Holger Issle wrote:
Ansonsten sollte es auch einfach sein, ein kleines Tool zu schreiben,
das eine Datei im API-Format (also ohne action=modified o.ä.)
nimmt
und jedes Objekt darin
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:53:30 +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Interessant waeren ggfs addr: tags an den Police stations - Die zeigen
die kommerziellen auch an ... Ich weiss aber nicht ob Radomir die Stand
heute konvertiert ...
Wer ist Radomir? Meine Garmin-Karten kommen von Computerteddy.
--
Thomas Hog schrieb:
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
nur sind osm-daten schon prinzipbedingt zur zeit unvollstaendig, und
da ist es durchaus sinnvoll, unterscheiden zu koennen, ob eine
strasse, die ploetzlich aufhoert, wirklich so aussieht, oder ob es nur
ein fall von ich hab nicht mehr in diese
Hallo Bernd,
village (alles kleiner als Stadt, also 10.000 EW)
hamlet (Ansammlung einiger Häuser)
Wie mache ich das:
Die Gemeinde heisst Simmelsdorf (Eingemeindung mehrerer Gemeinden)
Das grösste Dorf heisst Hüttenbach (1000 EW).
Das Dorf Simmelsdorf ist kleiner (500 EW).
Dann gibt es
-
Danke für die schnelle Antwort.
Gruß, Stephan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:53:09AM +0100, Holger Issle wrote:
Stadtkreis Stuttgart, Regierungsbezirk Stuttgart, ...
2x Stuttgart wäre also richtig, denn die Stadt ist ja im village-tag
abgebildet.
Wie werden eigentlich Straßen und POI an die Städte gebunden? Gibt's
da auch ein is_in, oder
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:20:09 +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Wer ist Radomir? Meine Garmin-Karten kommen von Computerteddy.
Radomir ist der der die routingfaehigen karten baut ...
http://emexes.powweb.com/osm/
Guten Morgen, danke. Ich _bin_ wohl schon alt.
--
Ciao,
Holger (GUS-KOTAL, GUS#1100,
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
