I encounter a similar situation all the time - usually in the context of
public footpaths with short foot plank or sleeper bridges over ditches or
very small streams in the countryside.
My practice - which is open to change if there is a better solution that is
widely accepted - is:
1. Split
+1
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 December 2009 03:36
To: Steve Bennett
Cc: openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Ditches
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Anthony
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett [mailto:stevag...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 December 2009 03:38
To: John Smith
Cc: openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Ditches
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:36 PM, John Smith
deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I tend to mark
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett [mailto:stevag...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 December 2009 02:43
To: Anthony
Cc: openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Ditches
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
In a park is a ditch. There is a very
Keepright fusses if highways with different layers meet at junctions
(because it messes up rendering if the highways are drawn differently). So
where you've got a bridge very close to a junction you have to put in a
short way for the bridge and a very short way linking the bridge to the
junction.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com wrote:
Layers are only there to explain the relative heights of
things when they meet. No harm will result from marking the
ditch as layer -1.
See my separate reply - I disagree - what happens when the level=-1 ditch
runs
It feels sometimes ridiculous to add layer tag to ditches and roads because
everybody knows that in majority of cases when road and ditch are crossing, the
road is above. A very typical example is in picture:
http://www.coquillewatershed.org/Project%20photos/pages/lampa-199-culvert-03.htm
There
Anthony wrote:
Ah, but I don't plan on ever visiting the OSM website when and if
they switch to the ODbL.
Best. Reason to switch to ODbL. Ever.
Richard
--
View this message in context:
Fair points ... If it really doesn't matter to routers and other mappers and
doesn't interfere with anything else then I am happy to accept that there is
no fully logical solution and that it shouldn't matter to me either!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Ah, but I don't plan on ever visiting the OSM website when and if
they switch to the ODbL.
Best. Reason to switch to ODbL. Ever.
Richard
+1
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/12/15 Anthony o...@inbox.org
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
So I've used barrier=entrance for the node where the way and the ditch
cross.
More specifically, barrier=entrance and bridge=yes.
No, there's no junction node as the bridge goes over it, so
Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com writes:
Anyway, I'm pretty sure it's already ok to have drain and road cross
(without junction) at layer=0 - they'll be rendered right by any
reasonable renderer. It should be obvious that water is the bottom
layer, and power lines are the top layer,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, I'm pretty sure it's already ok to have drain and road cross
(without junction) at layer=0 - they'll be rendered right by any
reasonable renderer.
No ! That's not ok to rely on any reasonable renderers.
This is
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Asbolutely nothing. You're wy overthinking this, both of you.
Layers are just a hack to make stuff render. It's not like
It's not a hack, it's an easy way to order some elements when
rendering so things look right. A hack would be using the
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:16 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not a hack, it's an easy way to order some elements when
rendering so things look right. A hack would be using the layer tag to
alter the rendering order to make things look better if the rendering
config is
Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com writes:
Always add the layer tag. And don't add a node at the intersection if
they are not at the same layer. Otherwise how any software can guess
if it's an intersection or not ? By going through thousands different
combinations of highways/waterways/railways/etc
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
IMHO, tagging layer=1 bridge=yes for a road going over water is an
example of a hack, and tagging for the renderer. The information
bridge=1 is more than enough to render with, so layer=1 can *only*
be interpreted as giving a renderer a crutch.
2009/12/15 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
IMHO, tagging layer=1 bridge=yes for a road going over water is an
example of a hack, and tagging for the renderer. The information
bridge=1 is more than enough to render with, so layer=1 can *only*
bridge=yes is so that people can render nice parapets
I'd agree that layer tags should not be required for water/highway
crossings. Keepright should keepquiet!
Richard
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fiwrote:
Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com writes:
I guess we have to decide whether culverts or fords are the more common (and
explicitly tag the less-common). I'd plump for culverts being significantly
more common myself, but that might not be true on a whole-world basis.
Richard
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org
2009/12/15 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
If you have a bridge or a tunnel you don't need a layer tag a bridge
infers it goes over a tunnel that it goes over
Let's start with the basics, we're talking about a water way and a
road way, what if neither is tagged with layer or tunnel or bridge
Kylla .. tosi on ...
I wouldn't normally put in a culvert anyway ... it was just an example ...
The only trouble with letting the way and the waterway cross with no layers
is that some of the validators object ... not sure how important that is ...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
bridge=yes is so that people can render nice parapets
I'd agree that layer tags should not be required for water/highway
crossings. Keepright should keepquiet!
Although nothing is required in OSM,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:36 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Without layer information you'd be guessing if the road goes over the
water or the water goes over the road, or the water and road are at
the same level.
You could come up with sane defaults,
That's the right thing
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
Of course I do not place nodes at the road-ditch intersections. But we have
this
kind of intersections where a ditch is goind under a road through a concrete
or
plastic pipe approximately every fine hundred
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Although nothing is required in OSM, the layer tag always helps on a
bridge because you could have multiple bridges passing each other (as in a
highway interchange). In that case, the layer tag specifies at what layer
in the
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
That's the right thing to do.
Right is a preconceived notion, in this case it's the lazy thing to
do, not nessicarily the right thing to do.
Not if you document them. I agree that you can't leave everything up
This is where explicit tagging can
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Um, the layer tag helps specifically *only* in cases with bridges over
bridges...which are exceedingly rare. So I would dispute your premise
that the layer tag always helps on a bridge.
And tunnels over tunnels, possibly multi-story underground car
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:25 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
You could come up with sane defaults,
That's the right thing to do.
Right is a preconceived notion, in this case it's the lazy thing to
do, not nessicarily the right
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:25 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Um, the layer tag helps specifically *only* in cases with bridges over
bridges...which are exceedingly rare. So I would dispute your premise
that the layer tag always
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Carefully talking out what these sane defaults are, documenting, and
using them is not the lazy thing to do.
You are assuming people are going to go to lengths to read such doco
and more to the point understand the implications and as a result
alter
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
My argument stands. There is no need to tag layers *except* in those
situations. And in those situations, layers are absolutely required.
(Well, except that underground car parks are/will be tagged as
underground...and again, a convention should be
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:54 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Carefully talking out what these sane defaults are, documenting, and
using them is not the lazy thing to do.
You are assuming people are going to go to lengths to read
Alight, I've had enough of this. Let's try and resolve the should
layer tags be required at the right place:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:layer#Is_layer_required_for_bridges.2C_tunnels.2C_and_waterways.3F
Steve
___
talk mailing list
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, there's no junction node as the bridge goes over it, so
barrier=entrance is not right here.
Thanks everyone, especially Mike Harris and Martin Koppenhoefer. I'm
convinced that barrier=entrance is wrong in
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
barrier=drainpipe (as an access node), access=yes?
I guess barrier=culvert would be the more general and international term?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
barrier=drainpipe (as an access node), access=yes?
I guess barrier=culvert would be the more general and international term?
Um, a culvert isn't a barrier, by
Hello.
I tried to render a data set of our region which we recently mapped using
Osmarender. The rendering was fine. I could get the svg image. The problem
was that, there where no names in the map, including the highways, buildings
etc.
What could be wrong? Please help out. Thanks!
Regards.
--
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
which I don't see as a bridge. I could go with tunnel=yes on the ditch,
but it's really not a ditch at all at the point it passes under the road.
Before the road:
waterway=drain, barrier=ditch
Under the road:
waterway=drain,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
barrier=drainpipe (as an access node), access=yes?
I guess barrier=culvert would be
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, I've finally understood..oops. You want to map this as a node, not
a way.
Well, my only other alternatives are to screw up the geometry (there's no
gap between the edge of the road and the edge of the tunnel) or to
Steve Bennett wrote:
Alight, I've had enough of this.
You've had enough of it!!! After nearly fifty emails about how to tag a
ditch with a bridge over it in a few hours I think everyone in OSM has
had enough of it. I've rarely seen so much crap in such a small space.
Haven't any of you
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Well, my only other alternatives are to screw up the geometry (there's no
gap between the edge of the road and the edge of the tunnel) or to map the
road as an area.
Not seeing the problem.
--):=|==:(---
-
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
Alight, I've had enough of this.
You've had enough of it!!! After nearly fifty emails about how to tag a
ditch with a bridge over it in a few hours I think everyone in OSM has
had enough of it.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
Alight, I've had enough of this.
You've had enough of it!!! After nearly fifty emails about how to tag a
ditch with a bridge over it in a few hours I think everyone in OSM has
had enough of it. I've
2009/12/15 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
Alight, I've had enough of this.
You've had enough of it!!! After nearly fifty emails about how to tag a
ditch with a bridge over it in a few hours I think
Hi,
Chris Hill wrote:
You've had enough of it!!! After nearly fifty emails about how to tag a
ditch with a bridge over it in a few hours I think everyone in OSM has
had enough of it.
Yes, I thought so too. Maybe we could ditch this discussion?
Bye
Frederik
2009/12/15 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Hi,
Chris Hill wrote:
You've had enough of it!!! After nearly fifty emails about how to tag a
ditch with a bridge over it in a few hours I think everyone in OSM has
had enough of it.
Yes, I thought so too. Maybe we could ditch this
Shalabh wrote:
1. A group of really useless people with nothing better to discuss or
2. A group of really diligent people making the world's map better
and being assinine about it.
3. A group of no doubt lovely people who have temporarily forgotten about
the existence of the tagging list
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Shalabh wrote:
1. A group of really useless people with nothing better to discuss or
2. A group of really diligent people making the world's map better
and being assinine about it.
3. A group of no doubt
If you are going to tag every culvert in the world, you are talking about
adding millions of additional entries to the database. This seems rather
unnecessary.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to
think at
Apparently, OSM is lacking a bus:
http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2009/12/mapping-india-on-googles-internet-bus.html
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
BP have this location on their site:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/585128133
Except when you view it with NearMap the site has been leveled, not
sure if BP is rebuilding it or what
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Two points:
1. The terminology foot=designated and bicycle=designated is confusing,
since the opposite of designated is not no but undesignated or
non-designated. Just leave it as it is on thousands of ways as
bicycle=yes or no and foot=yes or no. There is no need for a change.
2. The idea that
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, swanilli wrote:
2. The idea that every way on which bicycles are permitted should be
designated cycleway implying it is primarily for bicycles, is, in my
opinion either hopeful, naïve or arrogant. If you read, for example, the
extract from the Australian Road Rules for
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:20 PM, swanilli swani...@gmail.com wrote:
Two points:
1. The terminology foot=designated and bicycle=designated is confusing,
since the opposite of designated is not no but undesignated or
non-designated. Just leave it as it is on thousands of ways as
bicycle=yes or
Ok, so who's going to write up a description of licensed_club, so we
can ram through a proposal?
Steve
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:19 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
BP have this location on their site:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/585128133
Except when you view it with NearMap the site has been leveled, not
sure if BP is rebuilding it or what
To be a complete
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Ok, so who's going to write up a description of licensed_club, so we
can ram through a proposal?
Which is mostly a pointless exercise in game theory.
Just document it, add it to the AU tagging guidelines and sneak it
onto the map features page at
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Then again, had a quick look with streetview, looks like BPs on both
sides. Both look pretty established, so I'm guessing it's demolished
rather than new.
The NearMap imagery is very recent, the same can't be said for sat
imagery or streetview,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:12 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Ok, so who's going to write up a description of licensed_club, so we
can ram through a proposal?
Which is mostly a pointless exercise in game theory.
Just document it,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:12 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Ok, so who's going to write up a description of licensed_club, so we
can ram through a proposal?
Which is mostly a
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Liz wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:12 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/12/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Ok, so who's going to write up a description of licensed_club, so we
can ram through a
An idea came to me the other day about some kind of intro to OSM
video, with a noticibly Australian slant to it.
I've seen a couple of intro videos for different editors, but I had
something else in mind, where we could cover things like getting and
using a GPS and encouraging people to upload
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:03 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
An idea came to me the other day about some kind of intro to OSM
video, with a noticibly Australian slant to it.
I've seen a couple of intro videos for different editors, but I had
something else in mind, where we
2009/12/16 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:03 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
An idea came to me the other day about some kind of intro to OSM
video, with a noticibly Australian slant to it.
I've seen a couple of intro videos for different
Oi Flávio,
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:02:19 -0200
Flávio Henrique yoshi...@gmail.com wrote:
até consegui colocar o WMS, com o Yahoo! Imagery, pra funcionar no
JOSM, mas a resolução das imagens dá até dó (ao menos para a região
que pretendo trabalhar).
Eu tive um problema parecido com o JOSM no
2009/12/15 catdevrandom gro...@catdevrandom.com
Oi Flávio,
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:02:19 -0200
Flávio Henrique yoshi...@gmail.com wrote:
até consegui colocar o WMS, com o Yahoo! Imagery, pra funcionar no
JOSM, mas a resolução das imagens dá até dó (ao menos para a região
que pretendo
Olá Maira! Tudo bem?
No começo apanhei muito no JOSM, mas depois que você insiste e pega o jeito
fica fácil. Resolvi até o problema de rotas... rs.
Estou utilizando o Potlach pro grosso e o JOSM para detalhes.
Na verdade eu sou é de Goiânia. Estou em Brasília porque trabalho aqui. Não
pretendo
2009/12/15 Flávio Henrique yoshi...@gmail.com
Olá Maira! Tudo bem?
No começo apanhei muito no JOSM, mas depois que você insiste e pega o jeito
fica fácil. Resolvi até o problema de rotas... rs.
Estou utilizando o Potlach pro grosso e o JOSM para detalhes.
Na verdade eu sou é de Goiânia.
Clicando com o botão direito em cima do layer do WMS há várias opções. Uma
delas é mudar a resolução. Não precisa ficar desativando e ativando de novo.
2009/12/15 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org
2009/12/15 catdevrandom gro...@catdevrandom.com
Oi Flávio,
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:02:19
Agora fiquei curioso: como você resolveu o problema das rotas?
2009/12/15 Flávio Henrique yoshi...@gmail.com
Olá Maira! Tudo bem?
No começo apanhei muito no JOSM, mas depois que você insiste e pega o jeito
fica fácil. Resolvi até o problema de rotas... rs.
Estou utilizando o Potlach pro
Pessoal,
Gostaria de contribuir com o projeto, porém não consigo fazer isso nesse
momento editando os mapas diretamente. Alguém tem interesse em receber logs
em nmea? Tenho um GPS Royaltek RBT-2300 que poder ser usado para registrar
por onde ando na Cidade.
-
Alexandre C Medeiros
Onde vc conseguiu baixar esta versão do plugin?
2009/12/15 Flávio Henrique yoshi...@gmail.com
2009/12/15 Bráulio Bezerra da Silva brauliobeze...@gmail.com
Agora fiquei curioso: como você resolveu o problema das rotas?
Olá Bráulio.
Instalei o plugin routing Version 19066 no JOSM (
2009/12/15 Flávio Henrique yoshi...@gmail.com:
Olá Bráulio.
Instalei o plugin routing Version 19066 no JOSM
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/JOSM/Plugins/Routing).
Após isso e mais alguns minutos apanhando pra entender, consegui verificar
as rotas nas vias que estou trabalhando. Muito
2009/12/15 Rodrigo Avila rodr...@avila.net.br
Oi Flávio,
se for possível, dá um curso aí pra gente... já tentei usar este
plugin, mas nunca consegui fazer ele funcionar.
--
Rodrigo de Avila
Analista de Desenvolvimento
+55 51 9733.3488 • rodr...@avila.net.br • www.avila.net.br
Pessoal,
Hallo Namensvetter,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:53:01PM +0100, Florian Heer wrote:
Hi!
Von euch hat doch bestimmt jemand Erfahrung damit, was der import eines
kompletten Planet-Files so an Resourcen braucht.
1. Postgres-Datenbank wieviel Platz auf der Platte brauche ich für ein
aktuelles
Hallo!
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Hallo André,
meine Rückfragen habe eingefügt - ansonsten vielen Dank.
Grundsätzlich wird pro Richtung eine Relation erstellt, welche dann in
einer Oberrelation wieder zusammengefasst werden.
== wie wird eine Oberrelation erstellt? noch nie gemacht (JSOM)?
Mirko Küster webmas...@ts-eastrail.de writes:
Und weil es ja sowieso egal ist, trägst du jetzt Mist ein?
Ich trage das ein was ich sehe und Sinn macht. Ein Arzt dessen Fachrichtung
nicht erkennbar ist nützt dir in der Karte im Notfall wenig. Wenn es einen
entsprechenden Tag gibt, der auch
Mirko Küster webmas...@ts-eastrail.de writes:
Im ärztlichen Notfall schaust du auf die OSM-Karte? Ich würde das anders
machen ;-)
Wenn ich mir während der Tour den Hinter prelle rufe ich nicht gleich den
Notruf. Da ist es gut auf der Karte den nächten Arzt sehen zu können. Und
dann
Am 15. Dezember 2009 09:44 schrieb Sebastian Niehaus
nieh...@nospam.arcornews.de:
specialty:de, anyone?
Ich würde specialty bevorzugen, wobei mit entsprechenden Umsetzungslisten
auch specialty:de international kein Problem wäre.
Gruß Martin
___
Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2009, 03:10 +0100 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 15. Dezember 2009 03:04 schrieb geo.osm geo@googlemail.com:
Was ich meine ist dann wohl sowas wie ein Maurer, der auch
andere Sachen macht. Also vielleicht nen bricklayer oder
mason.
ja, das
Moin!
Hat jemand schon an den ganz normalen Klempner gedacht? Also Gas-,
Wasser- und Abwasser-Installateur.
craft=plumber
Gruß
Andre
Am Mittwoch, den 02.12.2009, 09:38 +0100 schrieb Peter Körner:
Hi
Ich tagge hier auf dem Land und wir haben im Ort 2 Tischler [1], 3
Metallbauer [2] und
Hallo,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:53:01PM +0100, Florian Heer wrote:
Hi!
Von euch hat doch bestimmt jemand Erfahrung damit, was der import eines
kompletten Planet-Files so an Resourcen braucht.
1. Postgres-Datenbank: wieviel Platz auf der Platte brauche ich für ein
aktuelles Planet-file?
Sehe ich auch so. Daher votiere ich dafür, dass der Landmaschinenbau,
der bereits in der Liste enthalten ist, in eine andere Kategorie fallen
sollte.
Najaa.. das Beispiel, das ich vor Augen habe, ist ein Familienbetrieb
mit ~5 Mitarbeitern, die vor allem Tanks für die lokalen Weinbaubetriebe
Ich habe den Planeten kürzlich auf einer Dual-Core-CPU mit
2GB RAM in 30 Stunden mittels osmosis importiert. Das war allerdings auch
ohne Erstellung von bbox und linestrings. Ein Tagesupdate braucht ca.
2 Stunden. Platzverbrauch in dieser Version ca. 190 GB.
Der Import per osm2pgsql dauert
Leider sind die beiden Rechner, die ich fuer den Zweck eruebrigen
koennte, doch zu schmalbruestig.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am 15. Dezember 2009 11:59 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Was haltet ihr davon, sich an einer solchen Liste [1] zu orientieren? Da
ist z.B. auch der Klempner aufgeführt, direkt neben Klavierstimmer und
Konditor.
[1]
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:59:59AM +0100, Peter Körner wrote:
Ich habe den Planeten kürzlich auf einer Dual-Core-CPU mit
2GB RAM in 30 Stunden mittels osmosis importiert. Das war allerdings auch
ohne Erstellung von bbox und linestrings. Ein Tagesupdate braucht ca.
2 Stunden. Platzverbrauch
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 01:09:08PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:59:59AM +0100, Peter Körner wrote:
Ich habe den Planeten kürzlich auf einer Dual-Core-CPU mit
2GB RAM in 30 Stunden mittels osmosis importiert. Das war allerdings auch
ohne Erstellung von bbox und
Hallo,
Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
Diese Anfrage stellst du aber nicht auf einer Datenbank, die den kompletten
Planeten enthält, oder? Wenn ich den SELECT-Teil auf meinem
(zugegebenermassen etwas schwachbrüstigen) Rechner laufen lasse, braucht
die Anfrage knapp 15 Minuten.
Wenn Du den
Hat es im Checker zufällig irgendwas gerissen oder war der Planet defekt?
Ich habe in den letzten Tagen rund 200 Bibliotheken nachgetragen, einige
davon waren auch schon in der Karte. Nun fehlen aber einige in Karte und
Liste, in den Daten selber und der Slippy sind die aber unberührt
Moin,
im Moment wird bei OSM in erster Linie das eingetragen, was da im Augenblick ist
(und damit haben wir auch schon ziemlich viele Probleme).
Es gibt auch immer wieder Bestrebungen, Sachen einzutragen, die frueher mal
waren oder in Zukunft mal sein werden. Wirklich durchsetzen konnte sich da
Am 15. Dezember 2009 16:55 schrieb Torsten Leistikow de_m...@gmx.de:
Es gibt auch immer wieder Bestrebungen, Sachen einzutragen, die frueher mal
waren oder in Zukunft mal sein werden. Wirklich durchsetzen konnte sich da
aber
bisher nichts, und es gibt auch Stimmen, die der Meinung sind, dass
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:49:52PM +0100, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
Hier ein Beispiel:
drop view powerlineview;
create view powerlineview AS
SELECT ways.id,
voltage.v as voltage,
ways.linestring as geom
fromways left outer join (
Hallo,
Ich habe nen bischen mehr indexe als das standard osmosis schema - IIRC
sieht osmosis auf way_tags keinen index ausser auf way_id vor - ich habe
da noch nen index auf k
Magst Du vielleicht auf der FOSSGIS in Osnabrueck einen kleinen Vortrag
darueber halten, wie man Mapnik zu mehr
Andre Hinrichs schrieb:
Hat jemand schon an den ganz normalen Klempner gedacht? Also Gas-,
Wasser- und Abwasser-Installateur.
craft=plumber
gedacht schon ;-)
Gehört auf jeden Fall auch dazu. Nur meist sind die gleichzeitig auch
noch Heizungsmonteure und Solar und Klima
Vielleicht
Hi!
Am 15.12.2009 08:24, schrieb Andreas Pothe:
Die Reit- und Wanderkarte für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz und
Norditalien ist in einer neuen Version mit den Daten vom 8.12. verfügbar.
Und wo findet man die?
Hm, war wohl schon etwas spät gestern. Die Karte findet man unter
Moin !
kann mir einer nochmal sagen wie ich eine Wiki-Seite löschen kann ?
Gruß Jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo,
durch großes Missgeschick habe ich eine leere Relation erzeugt.
Na ja, nicht leer, hat schon ein paar Tags, aber keine Ways oder
Nodes oder ...
Wie kann ich zu dieser Route nun Wege hinzufügen?
In JOSM habe ich keine Möglichkeit gefunden die ID der
Relation einzugeben um sie zu
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
