Re: [OSM-talk] LINZ import

On 16 April 2010 11:48, John Smith wrote: > On 16 April 2010 09:39, Robin Paulson wrote: >> do oyu have any suggestions how to keep the metadata when importing? i >> presume it is a non-manual method, i.e. uploading a .osm file - how do >> you merge the two data sets? > > You open the area as nor

Re: [OSM-talk] Marina discussion transcript (Was: Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed)

On 19-4-2010 21:37, Jonas Häggqvist wrote: > Why? The tag can still be used just as before. It can *also* be used to > tag land areas, or areas covering both land and sea. I really don't see > the issue here. That's my idea too. Retag the water-based part of the marina with an appropriate water

Re: [OSM-talk] Making alternative tiles with no administrative borders or administrative names

You want to render your own maps from OSM data: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rendering http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Creating_your_own_tiles Then you will want to display them on a website: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_on_your_own_website On 19 April 2010 08:13, elf Pavlik

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] viral attribution and ODbL

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 20:08, Frederik Ramm > I think there is a difference, certainly morally but even legally. If > you submit, under CC-BY-SA, data to an online map which clearly does not > give the names of all contributors, and later claim that the map was > violating your terms, that is som

Re: [OSM-talk] Military objects in RU: warning about status

> I've locked the following 2 pages for edits at the moment. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:military > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dmilitary ok. > Now lets all cool off and re-analyse the problem. I checked http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3D

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] viral attribution and ODbL

Hi, TimSC wrote: > What is the point in paragraph 4.3, if it can be easily side stepped? I think it is perfectly ok to state things you would like to see even if they can be sidestepped legally. If someone deliberately sidesteps 4.3 by creating an interim version he releases as PD (but never d

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

[set reply back to list] On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Dan Yamins wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Richard Weait wrote: [ trimmed ] >> You might check with talk-us to see if somebody is already working on >> zip codes. The first problem might be finding a source for the zipcode >> da

Re: [OSM-talk] Marina discussion transcript (Was: Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed)

(reply from off-list) On 19-04-2010 21:18, Dave F. wrote: > > Thanks for posting that. > > I've no idea where they got the idea that the tag is for landuse. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Marina http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Harbour#Harbour_as_an_area > > Clues on that page: > Moori

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] viral attribution and ODbL

On 19/04/10 20:19, TimSC wrote: > > This issue also applies to OS opendata, as it requires attribution. OS data is CC-BY compatible. They state this explicitly. BY is BY-SA compatible. OSM is currently BY-SA. Allegedly. ;-) > Is > work afoot to get OS to agree to compatibility with ODbL? (Pr

[OSM-legal-talk] viral attribution and ODbL

Frederik Ramm wrote: > > 1) Create a produced work under ODbL term 4.3 with proper attribution > > 2) Release produced work as public domain with proper attribution > > 3) Strip off legal notices and attribution (which I think is > allowed, />/ almost by definition, for public domain works) > > 4)

Re: [OSM-talk] Marina discussion transcript (Was: Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed)

Thanks for posting that. I've no idea where they got the idea that the tag is for landuse. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Marina Clues on that page: Mooring place - you moor on water. A place for your boat. add number of ships Water features. I think those on IRC have made a mistake & hav

Re: [OSM-talk] Authorisation problems uploading changes from JOSM

On 19/04/2010 20:05, Richard George wrote: > On 19/04/2010 12:51, colliar wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Richard George schrieb: >> >> >>> Sebastian Klein wrote: >>> >>> Richard George wrote: > I just mapped a bunc

Re: [OSM-talk] Military objects in RU: warning about status of voting

On 16 April 2010 19:55, Cartinus wrote: > On Friday 16 April 2010 20:29:41 Upliner wrote: >> Current situation is real edit war. I consider some interference is needed. > > Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one > side gets bored with it. > I've locked the foll

Re: [OSM-talk] Authorisation problems uploading changes from JOSM

On 19/04/2010 12:51, colliar wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Richard George schrieb: > >> Sebastian Klein wrote: >> >>> Richard George wrote: >>> I just mapped a bunch of back-roads& footpaths I walked along on holiday last week (near Agen

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

> Well, you should try .../api/0.6/*[... (notice the *) to get also ways and > relations, which contain the tag "addr:postcode". http://osmxapi.hypercube.telascience.org/api/0.6/*[addr:postcode][bbox=-74,40,-72,42] > Some users tag the address > information to the buildings and those are ways.

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

Hi, Am Montag 19. April 2010 19:41:05 schrieb Dan Yamins: > The call > > http://osmxapi.hypercube.telascience.org/api/0.6/node[addr:postcode][bbox=- >74,40,-72,42] > > clearly does NOT produce the list of all zipcodes in new york city. Well, you should try .../api/0.6/*[... (notice the *) to get

[OSM-legal-talk] viral attribution and ODbL

Hi all, I am back to trying to get my head around ODbL. I am now wondering about attribution and the viral nature of it. Apologies if this has been raised before. Many licenses have a term stating the copyright notice must be preserved (ignoring for a moment that copyright is probably not app

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

Try > > http://osmxapi.hypercube.telascience.org/api/0.6/node[addr:postcode][bbox=-85,40,-72,47] > > Works like a champ. zip codes got added to the Karlsruhe Schema for > addressing data. > I see -- that makes -- thank you! >From looking at

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

[you sent direct, rather than to the list. I fix. ;-)] On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dan Yamins wrote: > >> > >> > /node[place=postal_code][bbox=W,S,E,N] >> >> Try it.  You should find that it works, but that zip code coverage is >> uneven. >> > > Hm ... either it's not working, or zip code c

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Dan Yamins wrote: > Thanks Carsten and Ciprian for your quick responses.  I really appreciate > it. > > I'm assuming that you both are suggestion that I do something like: > > /node[place=county][bbox=W,S,E,N] > > This seems like it definitely works.   Thank you f

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

Thanks Carsten and Ciprian for your quick responses. I really appreciate it. I'm assuming that you both are suggestion that I do something like: /node[place=county][bbox=W,S,E,N] This seems like it definitely works. Thank you for your help! Is there some way of doing this for US postal_codes

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

Hi, Am Montag 19. April 2010 16:57:48 schrieb Dan Yamins: > What I would like to do is to be able to limit the request to only return > lists of features of a particular type, e.g. county, state or posal code -- > and, consequently, be able to query much larger regions. have a look at the XAPI, <

[OSM-talk] Making alternative tiles with no administrative borders or administrative names

Hello, I want to setup a server which will serve alternative tiles to those used on osm.org I would like to use in my projects tiles without any administrative borders or names of administrative units (like states/countries, provinces etc.) I welcome any help with information about howto or actu

Re: [OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

Hi Dan, You should have a look at XAPI: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/XAPI --Ciprian On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Dan Yamins wrote: > I'm trying to determine whether the open Street map API can be used to > extract lists of large high-level geographic features -- e.g. US states, > cou

[OSM-talk] features of a given type within bounding box

I'm trying to determine whether the open Street map API can be used to extract lists of large high-level geographic features -- e.g. US states, counties, or postal codes -- within a given bounding box. As far as I can tell by looking here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features

Re: [OSM-talk] Authorisation problems uploading changes from JOSM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Richard George schrieb: > Sebastian Klein wrote: >> Richard George wrote: >>> I just mapped a bunch of back-roads & footpaths I walked along on >>> holiday last week (near Agen, France) in JOSM, but I'm not able to >>> upload it. Every time I try I

Re: [OSM-talk] Authorisation problems uploading changes from JOSM

Sebastian Klein wrote: > Richard George wrote: >> I just mapped a bunch of back-roads & footpaths I walked along on >> holiday last week (near Agen, France) in JOSM, but I'm not able to >> upload it. Every time I try I get an error message of: >> >> "Authorisation at the OSM server with the OAuth

Re: [OSM-talk] Authorisation problems uploading changes from JOSM

Richard George wrote: > I just mapped a bunch of back-roads & footpaths I walked along on > holiday last week (near Agen, France) in JOSM, but I'm not able to > upload it. Every time I try I get an error message of: > > "Authorisation at the OSM server with the OAuth token '{redacted}' failed. >