Very basically this is all a problem becuase highway=track and
highway=bridleway/byway/footway cannot both be tagged >together. They need
to be understood and moved, or duplicated into 'routes' or another key to
state access. Having >them together any longer will knock 10 years off my
life,
RichardB: I'm aware it's appeared before, that means nothing if theres still an
issue.
To class the tagging system as 'the wheel' is giving it far to much praise, the
wheel is what would be great to have.
are the following tags rendering on the main openstreetmap renderers? If so,
can designa
RichardB: This also makes me wonder, why do highway=bridleway or highway=byway
still exist, if designation=public_bridleway is possible? What is a bridleway
if not designated a bridleway?!
___
talk mailing lis
Simon: To put it simply. There is 'can' and there is 'may'. Places one 'can'
go, and places one 'may'.
I can walk across my neighbours lawn, but I may not. I may choose to take a
footway where I 'can' walk on a track, then take another footway where i 'may'
walk where i 'can' on a path.
Ben Robbins wrote:
> [...]
Please take this to talk-gb.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Tracks-and-there-place-in-society-tp6389100p6389114.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Am 21.05.2011 11:45, schrieb Ben Robbins:
Simon: To put it simply. There is 'can' and there is 'may'. Places
one 'can' go, and places one 'may'.
I can walk across my neighbours lawn, but I may not. I may choose to
take a footway where I 'can' walk on a track, then take another
footway wh
Simon:
There is no such thing as a track as an access right in the UK. I merely give
this example becuase I am talking generally, and apparently they do exist
elsewhere, and this has been insistend relentlessly by others in the past, so
I'm just going with that. In the UK there is no use for
I was recently having a discussion about the role of automated imports
and other automated edits to our dataset.
I think we need a simple, concise position statement on the issue.
This video concisely summarizes my view on the issue and I suggest we
adopt it as our official default policy:
http:
are the following tags rendering on the main openstreetmap renderers?
If so, can designation=public_footpath appear without highway=footway.
If so, that does then bring up the issue of good rendering, and
I think you are conflating two things:
in tagging, it makes sense to describe both
>>> are the following tags rendering on the main openstreetmap renderers?
>>> If so, can designation=public_footpath appear without highway=footway.
>>> If so, that does then bring up the issue of good rendering, and
>
> I think you are conflating two things:
>
>>> in tagging, it makes se
Hi,
On 05/21/2011 01:41 PM, Ben Robbins wrote:
If it is a) (just a track), show just a track. If it is b) (a footway
(public access)) show a footway. If it is both, we need to be able to
show both.
A track which does not have access=private or access=no or something is
always accessible and u
Ben Robbins schrieb:
does seem like an incredably hacky way of solving this issue.
Practically everything in OSM is done in a hacky way. And actually,
that's probably the only way that works in a mostly unorganized,
freedom-promoting community. If you want strictly logical organization,
you'
Frederik Ramm writes:
> On 05/21/2011 01:41 PM, Ben Robbins wrote:
> > If it is a) (just a track), show just a track. If it is b) (a footway
> > (public access)) show a footway. If it is both, we need to be able to
> > show both.
>
> A track which does not have access=private or access=no or
Serge Wroclawski writes:
This video concisely summarizes my view on the issue and I suggest we
adopt it as our official default policy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb2Pzl1U0sY
And I always though it's the Klingon you don't trust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0kzI9m6gO0
:)
Stephan
__
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> I was recently having a discussion about the role of automated imports
> and other automated edits to our dataset.
>
> I think we need a simple, concise position statement on the issue.
>
> This video concisely summarizes my view on the is
15 matches
Mail list logo
