David Groom writes:
> > But all theories of law aside, as a practical matter, if someone
> > hasn't bothered to decline, they're not going to bother to sue. You
>
> The argument "hey, we understand we don't know if we have any right to use
> this data, buts lets leave it in and hope no one
- Original Message -
From: "Russ Nelson"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
> > It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted or
> > declined are having their copyright respected. If yo
> -Original Message-
> From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:21 PM
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
>
> Paul Norman writes:
> > > It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted
> o
Paul Norman writes:
> > It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted or
> > declined are having their copyright respected. If you don't post your
> > land *with your name and address* in New York State, you cannot
> > successfully pursue a claim of trespass.
>
> Copyri
> -Original Message-
> From: David Groom [mailto:revi...@pacific-rim.net]
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
> - Original Message -
> From: "Russ Nelson"
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
>
>
> > Paul Norman writes:
> > > I have been running a nightly
Stephan Knauss writes:
> Users not agreeing or not responding have to be treated the same way,
> regardless of their nick known or not.
Non-responsive.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:42 AM
> To: Paul Norman
> Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
>
> Paul Norman writes:
> > I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my
Simon Poole writes:
> http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License#What_Are_The_Choices.3F
What if someone refuses to choose? What is the policy there? "If you
choose not to decide you still have made a choice", and the
implications of that choice are not described.
>
On 24.03.2012 19:12, Russ Nelson wrote:
David Groom writes:
> more error free. Had I now been a CT decliner I see no legal difference
> between the resulting data in this instance and data which "If it was
> subsequently edited by a decliner, well, that's different".
How would we ever k
David Groom writes:
> more error free. Had I now been a CT decliner I see no legal difference
> between the resulting data in this instance and data which "If it was
> subsequently edited by a decliner, well, that's different".
How would we ever know? They're anonymous. If they want to come
f
Since no one has mentioned this yet on the OSM lists that I follow, I thought
I'd pass it along:
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/design/2012/03/online-map-youll-actually-want-look/1579/,
which refers to the originator at
http://maps.stamen.com/#terrain/12/37.7706/-122.3782, which has code for u
Am 24.03.2012 16:42, schrieb Russ Nelson:
> Simon Poole writes:
>
>
> > b) the meaning of the PD-checkbox can't be reinterpreted after the fact
>
> Yes, it can, and it should be. If I make a public declaration that I
> do not intend to pursue copyright claims against anybody, or that I
> th
Am 24.03.2012 16:42, schrieb Russ Nelson:
Sorry to keep pushing so hard on this, but why delete map data
unnecessarily? Why delete MY data unnecessarily?
The first question you ask here I can take as serious: good one, and
IMHO you're right, I cannot say, why the OSMF don't want to count data
f
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Simon Poole writes:
> > We've been through this multiple times, but here we go again:
>
> Obviously not enough times, because I hadn't heard of this before. I
> was under the impression that when I said that my edits were in the
> public doma
- Original Message -
From: "Russ Nelson"
To: "Paul Norman"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
> I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using
> the
> latest data from my jxapi serv
Simon Poole writes:
> We've been through this multiple times, but here we go again:
Obviously not enough times, because I hadn't heard of this before. I
was under the impression that when I said that my edits were in the
public domain, everybody believed me. I think other people probably
think th
Paul Norman writes:
> I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the
> latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I switched it over to filter out
> data that WTFE reports as dirty. This is somewhat more aggressive than the
> rebuild will be, but the results are worri
>
> One advantage of remapping is the possibility that there are now better data
> sets available for import than the PGS data which was originally used. I'm
> particularly thinking here of the US & Canada.
This is exactly what I've been doing – non-safe coastline in the UK using the
OS OpenD
I was just going to suggest this, while it limits you to CC_by-SA 2.0
as a licence for tiles (or similar), there is no reason that you
couldn't use a pre-licence change coastline for rendering (in the case
of the main OSM site, the tiles are going to remain CC-by-SA 2.0 anyway).
Simon
Am 24.03.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Norman"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:34 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the
latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I switched it over to filter out
data tha
Hi Graham,
I downloaded the svn and I have a decent idea of how to implement a UI,
which I think I could propose in next few mails & discuss with the
community.
Regarding the svn, I cant figure out which module to start from, as I can
see the applications & extensions folders. Could you guide me
From the sounds of this tweet:
https://twitter.com/#!/cyclestreets/status/183262141237833728
It looks like Cyclestreets are very close to opening up their source code.
Cheers
Chris
On 23/03/12 07:50, Graham Jones wrote:
Pryanka,
If you have not heard from the author of cyclestreets, it wou
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the
latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I switched it over to filter out
data that WTFE reports as dirty. This is somewhat more aggressive than the
rebuild will be, but the results are worrisome.
A PNG showing the OSM coa
23 matches
Mail list logo
