Hi,
chahalgurpinde...@gmail.com wants to follow you.
** Is chahalgurpinde...@gmail.com you friend? **
If Yes please follow the link below:
http://invites.fliporamail.com/signup_e.html?fullname=&email=talk@openstreetmap.org&invitername=chahalgurpinde...@gmail.com&inviterid=31940581&userid=
Thanks again for providing this great resource to the community, Manfred
and team!
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Manfred A. Reiter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the weekly Nr. 219 with all important news from the OpenStreetMap
> ecosystem is published.
>
> http://ww
Hi,
the weekly Nr. 219 with all important news from the OpenStreetMap ecosystem
is published.
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/
Have a lot of fun.
--
## Manfred
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://list
We still move forward.
Now, we added two parts of United Kingdom into Osmose : Scotland and Wales.
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/map/#zoom=12&lat=55.9864&lon=-3.2963&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFT&item=&level=1
England not covered, we can't support a so big data-area on French
Am 07.10.2014 11:05, schrieb moltonel 3x Combo:
> [...] In other words, for that template's usecase,
> ways/area/relations are separate sets, despite sharing primitives.
>
> Is that everyone else's understanding too ?
Yes, I agree with this. Any changes should also be propagated to the
Descriptio
Hi Ben,
Thanks for sharing this here. If you are interested in hosting your own
Missing Maps event we'd love to support. Having experienced OSM mappers
really is key for helping get new people started. Thanks to all the London
OSM people who have been assisting in the series of mapathons that have
Hi Andy,
actually no, it's currently not possible to query other sources.
The only thing that's possible is to define a bounding box and using the
Map() method of osampi to get everything that's inside that boundary.
But of course this is not good enough for more complex regions or if you
actuall
On 07/10/2014 16:23, Stefan Oderbolz wrote:
just a quick information that I just releases osmapi 0.4.0 which
finally supports the Notes API (add, comment, close, reopen, search).
For those who have never heard if it, it is a python wrapper for the
OpenStreetMap API (version 0.6).
Thanks -
Hi there,
just a quick information that I just releases osmapi 0.4.0 which finally
supports the Notes API (add, comment, close, reopen, search). For those who
have never heard if it, it is a python wrapper for the OpenStreetMap API
(version 0.6).
The osmapi package is on PyPI [1], which means it
On 07/10/2014, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> In this case this is correct: non-closed ways shouldn't be tagged
>> area=*, because "no" is implicit for non-closed ways and "yes" would
>> by definition turn the object into an "area" rather than a "way".
>
> it is not correct for the reason I have wr
On 07/10/2014, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> On 07/10/2014, Pieren wrote:
>> I think it is very confusing for new comers. The description uses the
>> OSM primitives vocabular "node", "way", "relation" where the "area" is
>> mixing them. It could be improved by saying "point" instead of node,
>> or "
Am 07.10.2014 um 14:43 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> For landuse nodes are not "allowed", but there are 220.000 of these in the
> data.
Mines are tagged as Landuse=quarry, a feature where nodes are perfectly
resonable. So not all
landuse-nodes are wrong. And if an area has only low-res image co
Il giorno 07/ott/2014, alle ore 15:31, moltonel 3x Combo
ha scritto:
>> the setting is currently "not on ways", but that's nonesense because you
>> need this key on some ways (e.g. linear closed barriers) with area=no to
>> avoid confusion.
>
> In this case this is correct: non-closed ways
On 07/10/2014, Pieren wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, moltonel 3x Combo
> wrote:
>
>> Is that everyone else's understanding too ? In that case, I'll mention
>> that fact in the template's documentation, and keep an eye out for
>> misdocumented tags.
>
> I think it is very confusing for
The wiki is not in great shape (arguably in worse shape than the osm
data itself), but if less than perfect data was a blocker, OSM would
never have goten off the ground. The wiki is the 2nd most important
source of OSM docs, after all the in-editor stuff. It should be well
cared for.
Tools to cro
On 07/10/2014, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Besides this, in the past I have so often encountered wrong/incomplete
> settings (compared to what is actually done, and to what should / can be
> done according to my own understanding) that I generally ignore these
> icons.
In my view, they are more
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> Is that everyone else's understanding too ? In that case, I'll mention
> that fact in the template's documentation, and keep an eye out for
> misdocumented tags.
I think it is very confusing for new comers. The description uses the
OSM
Thanks for the answer, I will check and join the ml group
On Oct 7, 2014 3:55 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer"
wrote:
>
> 2014-10-06 22:46 GMT+02:00 Badita Florin :
>
>> What tag / sub-tag you say it should be used / created for doing this ?
>
>
>
> I think this question would be better suited for the t
2014-10-06 22:46 GMT+02:00 Badita Florin :
> What tag / sub-tag you say it should be used / created for doing this ?
I think this question would be better suited for the tagging-ML.
You could use a generic subtag like "sells=cigarette_papers" or
"sells=cigarette_tobacco". The "sells" key is not
2014-10-07 14:21 GMT+02:00 Jochen Topf :
> For phone booths, everybody uses nodes, everybody understands
> that, the software understands that. For practical purposes this is what we
> do and what we document.
>
actually I think that the software (i.e. osm-carto) does also understand
and render
On Di, Okt 07, 2014 at 01:20:14 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Besides this, in the past I have so often encountered wrong/incomplete
> settings (compared to what is actually done, and to what should / can be
> done according to my own understanding) that I generally ignore these
> icons. Do w
2014-10-07 11:05 GMT+02:00 moltonel 3x Combo :
> Hi List,
>
> all tag pages on the wiki have a sidebar[1] that tells which element
> (node, way, area, relation) the tag applies to. Since an "area" is
> either a closed way or a multipolygon relation, my understanding has
> always been that if a tag
On Di, Okt 07, 2014 at 11:05:30 +0200, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> all tag pages on the wiki have a sidebar[1] that tells which element
> (node, way, area, relation) the tag applies to. Since an "area" is
> either a closed way or a multipolygon relation, my understanding has
> always been that if a
Hi List,
all tag pages on the wiki have a sidebar[1] that tells which element
(node, way, area, relation) the tag applies to. Since an "area" is
either a closed way or a multipolygon relation, my understanding has
always been that if a tag is only meant for an area (for example most
landuse tags),
Hello all,
I spotted this yesterday:
http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/oct/06/missing-maps-human-genome-project-unmapped-cities
It ends with: "Guardian Cities will host a Missing Maps party next month to
map an African city. Get involved: cit...@theguardian.com"
Regards,
Ben
__
25 matches
Mail list logo
