I don't totally disagree with Greg's characterization of "unreasonable," as
"standardized / hashtagged" changeset comments are curt (even a touch rude) if
they are not super-well-documented (widely vetted, spoken about...) as to
what's going on, and easily have the ability to hide errors or
I suspect the National Trust of which I happen to be a member is much more
centralised and top down than OpenStreetMap which tends to be more bottom
up. It is a different culture and the OSM side has evolved over time.
I'd ask you to be nice to us and work with us where possible. The OSM
"Ragone, Olivia via talk" writes:
> We tend to use a standard changeset comment as it would be very
> difficult to capture details of every change. However, since receiving
> feedback on the Talk-GB mailing list, we have amended our standard
> comment to be more representative of the type of
Thank you for providing feedback on some of the edits made by National Trust
staff as part of our organised editing activity, on the representation of
paths. We'd like to apologise that it has taken some time to provide a
response. We are always open to constructive feedback that helps us to
(English version below)
Bonsoir,
Je publie ici ma réponse au
[commentaire](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SeverinGeo/diary/401231#comment54516)
de Guillaume, président de l'OSMF, sur mon billet initial :
Je te remercie Guillaume pour ta réponse et précise de suite que je ne cherche
pas à
Den sön 2 apr. 2023 kl 16:03 skrev Snusmumriken <
snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com>:
> On Sun, 2023-04-02 at 11:22 +0200, Christoffer Holmstedt wrote:
> > Hej
> > Inne och mappar igen efter några års uppehåll, nu i ett bostadsområde
> > uppe i Luleå. Jag får antingen error på en multipolygon saknar
On Sun, 2023-04-02 at 11:22 +0200, Christoffer Holmstedt wrote:
> Hej
> Inne och mappar igen efter några års uppehåll, nu i ett bostadsområde
> uppe i Luleå. Jag får antingen error på en multipolygon saknar tagg
> eller så får jag varningar på att det är "dubbeltaggat" med
> "landuse=residential"
Bonjour,
Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 662 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître
*en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur :
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/16399/
Bonne lecture !
Saviez-vous que vous pouvez vous aussi soumettre des messages pour la note
hebdomadaire sans être
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 662,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/16399
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 662,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/16399
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in
Hej
Inne och mappar igen efter några års uppehåll, nu i ett bostadsområde uppe
i Luleå. Jag får antingen error på en multipolygon saknar tagg eller så får
jag varningar på att det är "dubbeltaggat" med "landuse=residential" på
både relation och way.
Jag skickade in changeset
On 1/4/23 09:50, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Don't know if this helps. or makes it worse!
More data = good.
The fact that the data is confusing, to me, simply means that a simple
assumptions of using the high tide as the boundary for all is a problem.
Had a thought so looked at Gold
12 matches
Mail list logo
