Re: [talk-au] Duplicate of the same airport

I agree with cleary, that I think these are two different airports but share the same runway, but likewise I'm also not familiar enough to say for sure. On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 19:32, cleary wrote: > > > I think the air force base and civilian airport share the same runway but > they are two

Re: [OSM-talk] Flashing school speed limit sign

On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 17:31, Maarten Deen wrote: > maxspeed:conditional=20 @ flashing? > It is free form, so you can fill in anything you like. If it catches on, > the people who make the navigation will start to use it. > That sounds good and seems in line with what people are already doing.

Re: [OSM-talk] Flashing school speed limit sign

On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 12:51, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:23 PM Jack Armstrong > wrote: > >> How would this be tagged? I can't seem to find anything about this on the >> wiki. Perhaps I'm just not looking in the right place. Thanks. >> > > The sign itself would be

Re: [OSM-talk] Announcing Daylight Map Distribution

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 21:14, Volker Schmidt wrote: > I expect this Facebook operation to produce much more changes or potential > changes (=suspected errors). > What we need for both cases and similar ones in the future is a way of > being able to identify such changes, which by their nature

Re: [talk-au] Feedback to ARA on their SA bushfire imagery made available to OSM

As far as I can tell I've loaded up all the flights they've done. On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 17:13, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > That imagery is amazing! > > Is it available for anywhere else? :-) > > Thanks > > Graeme > > >> ___ > Talk-au mailing list >

[talk-au] Feedback to ARA on their SA bushfire imagery made available to OSM

You may have seen the SA bushfire imagery made available to OSM from ARA. They put out a survey to the people who downloaded their data, I've forwarded my responses here for full visibility for anyone interested. ** What data did you actually download ? RGB-imagery, Lidar data or hyperspectral

Re: [talk-au] highway=motorway_junction

If you're using the destination sign relation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign, then you'd map whatever the sign says. In this case: type=destination_sign destination=Nerang;Murwillumbah;Natural Bridge; Hinze Dam If you wanted you could create two destination_sign

Re: [talk-au] highway=motorway_junction

I think it's only worth adding to exits from grade separated roads. On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 10:44, Ian Steer wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 14:33, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > > In that particular example I don't think it's needed, since it's only an > entrance to the

Re: [talk-au] highway=motorway_junction

y wouldn’t they be using destination= ? > > > > Ian > > > > > > *From:* Andrew Harvey > *Sent:* Monday, 24 February 2020 11:14 AM > *To:* Ian Steer > *Cc:* OSM Australian Talk List > *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] highway=motorway_junction > > > >

Re: [talk-au] highway=motorway_junction

I don't really see the point of motorway_junction unless that exit has a name or number (ref), however it's still valid per the wiki as on nodes at which you can exit the highway, I think to avoid putting it on absolutely every intersection we should reserve it's use for highway=motorway or

Re: [talk-au] TfNSW Cycleways use in OSM

Here is one example https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/-5rwFtTR_nrfWkuhzWtwJg On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 11:50, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, 11:34 Ben Kelley, wrote: > >> Don't forget the blue and white signs! >> >> Practically I'd map a lcn=yes tag (or relation) for blue & white

Re: [talk-au] TfNSW Cycleways use in OSM

Yes from what I observed, these appear to be signposted cycle routes. On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 09:34, Ben Kelley wrote: > Don't forget the blue and white signs! > > Practically I'd map a lcn=yes tag (or relation) for blue & white signs. > > > - Ben. > > On 24/2/20 02:59, Mateusz Konieczny via

Re: [talk-au] TfNSW Cycleways use in OSM

Hi Ash, it's great to see some interest in improving bicycle infrastructure in OSM! On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 15:46, Ash Logan wrote: > Hey all! > TfNSW's recent waiver-signing gave us access to their Cycleways dataset > ( https://opendata.transport.nsw.gov.au/dataset/cycleway-data ) which >

Re: [talk-au] Show grounds

Happy with recreation_ground. Agreed that amenity=exhibition_center is probably not the best fit for these. On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 11:14, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > A remote mapper has tagged a showground as > > > landuse=commercial > > with > > amenity=exhibition_center > >

Re: [talk-au] foot/bicycle = yes/designated (was Re: TfNSW Cycleways use in OSM)

On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 17:38, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On 18/02/2020 5:11 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > I hold the view that access=yes just means either physical or legal > > access is allowed (or at least not forbidden), whereas access=designated > > implies that it's si

Re: [talk-au] foot/bicycle = yes/designated (was Re: TfNSW Cycleways use in OSM)

On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 15:59, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On 18/02/2020 3:44 pm, Ash Logan wrote: > > In line with this, I've drafted an osmosis TagTransform file that can > > turn the raw TfNSW dataset (after being run through JOSM's OpenData > > plugin, for example) and turn it into the usual OSM

Re: [talk-au] South Australian bushfire imagery

I've added new imagery and changed the URL for iD/JOSM, see https://osmlab.github.io/editor-layer-index/ for the latest. On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 12:29, Ewen Hill wrote: > A big thank you to Andrew Harvey and ARA Airborne Research Australia for > their bushfire imagery of the Adelaide

Re: [talk-au] Opening hours for scheduled tours

ausing a validation error. I am not certain if this is a false > positive so might leave it unless anyone has any cunning plans. I do like > the service_hours though. > > Ewen > > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 09:46, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > >> If it's only open for tours t

Re: [talk-au] Opening hours for scheduled tours

If it's only open for tours then I think this is a reasonable use of opening_hours. If however it's open all the time (or just other opening_hours) but then has tours at certain times you can choose to join I'd use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times. Alternatively you could use

Re: [talk-au] South Australian bushfire imagery

at http://gitlab.com/andrewharvey/ara-cogeo. On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 12:29, Ewen Hill wrote: > A big thank you to Andrew Harvey and ARA Airborne Research Australia for > their bushfire imagery of the Adelaide hills and Kangaroo Island. > > Will the Geotiffs be updated overtime Andrew a

Re: [talk-au] Remote mapping of a fence

Warin, thanks for raising. I've asked the mapper to confirm their sources, I'll see what they say first. Mike, good point. As it stands due to reasons given at https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ we need a waiver to use CC BY data in OSM. In Queensland as listed at

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

The SSSI organiser shared their proposed "training guide" with me and gave me permission to share it here in the list. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EhdKG2IctNODA6IuCfPJTrDjqOQZZk0lLp1KjprZxD4/edit?usp=sharing On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 14:43, Andrew Harvey wrote: > On Thu, 6 F

Re: [talk-au] A22 route Sydney

On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 12:49, Andrew Harvey wrote: > In the meantime I just emailed the RMS contact email with this evidence to > ask if any of the signs are wrong or if the map they have for the route > refs is wrong. > Case reference number

Re: [talk-au] A22 route Sydney

Hi Aleksander, Great question. The sign just before the turn off to Wattle Street would suggest A22 continues past Wattle Street. The sign on Ambercombie could just indicate A22 is in this direction, not necessarily that as soon as you take that left turn you're immediately on A22, but this is

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:25, Andrew Harvey wrote: > I finally managed to get in touch with one of the organisers, and raised > the licensing/waiver issue. They've said they asked Planet Labs for the > waiver, I've also independently reached out to the Planet Labs disasters

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:52, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On 6/2/20 8:39 pm, Ewen Hill wrote: > >The states have sent out a rapid impact assessment teams to all areas > > now and have followed up with detailed analysis in most. We know what > > has been damaged, destroyed and what was inhabited,

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:39, Ewen Hill wrote: > I will be attending Melbourne however I have deep reservations about this > and that doesn't include the Waiver which is key to the entire project. > > The states have sent out a rapid impact assessment teams to all areas > now and have followed

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

bruary 2020 12:37:16 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey < > andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I was corrected by someone off list, looks like they are planning on >> mapping within OSM https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/7893. Now I have to >> scrabble to validate Planet La

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

has been widely used in past international events > > > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=damage > > > > Oh for a standardised tagging system! > > > > > > *From:* Andrew Harvey > *Sent:* Thursday, 6 February 2020 1:44 PM > *To:* Phil W

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

n impacted by fire. If you are unsure do not enter a tag at all.* > > > > Cheers - Phil > > > > > > *From:* Andrew Harvey > *Sent:* Thursday, 6 February 2020 12:37 PM > *To:* Stephen Backway > *Cc:* talk-au > *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recover

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

I was corrected by someone off list, looks like they are planning on mapping within OSM https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/7893. Now I have to scrabble to validate Planet Labs has provided the necessary permission for their imagery to be traced into OSM. On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 12:12, Andrew Harvey

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

I sent an email to the contact email to ask for more information, but by the looks of it they aren't uploading anything to OpenStreetMap, they are creating their own datasets (which may or may not be released as open data, they haven't stated yet). It's unclear how they are planning on consuming

Re: [talk-au] Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 10:58, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 09:34, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > >> >> >>> 2. Depending on the answer to the above, do we need to add TfNSW to the >>> List of Conributors in the wiki? and d

Re: [talk-au] Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 10:09, cleary wrote: > > Some Sydney bus routes have changed and I have modified a few by survey > (catching buses and recording routes and stops). Using TfNSW data would be > much easier. > > 1. Can I use the TfNSW data now to modify/add some local bus routes or do > we

Re: [talk-au] Airborne Research Australia South Australia Bushfire Imagery

You can now find it at https://osmlab.github.io/editor-layer-index/ and click the add to JOSM button. On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 22:16, Andrew Harvey wrote: > They've agreed to the imagery tracing waiver! PR to add this into editors > is at https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/pu

Re: [talk-au] Airborne Research Australia South Australia Bushfire Imagery

), Cygnet Park, Western River (Kangaroo Island), and more coming soon. On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 14:52, Andrew Harvey wrote: > Airborne Research Australia has been flying aerial imagery around Adelaide > Hills and Kangaroo Island released under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 > https://www.airborneresear

[talk-au] Airborne Research Australia South Australia Bushfire Imagery

Airborne Research Australia has been flying aerial imagery around Adelaide Hills and Kangaroo Island released under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 https://www.airborneresearch.org.au/fires-2020. I've sent an email with the imagery tracing waiver to ask for permission to use for tracing into OSM. I'll update

Re: [talk-au] Australian guidelines for mapping landuse-landcover?

I'm for just deleting this page. While I agree the Australian Tagging Guidelines is getting long, I'd be concerned splitting it up would make it harder to find content, so I'm on the fence on that. On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 13:28, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There is a page on

Re: [talk-au] traffic_calming=choker and table

You could use "traffic_calming=choker;table", but "traffic_calming=chocked_table" sounds good too. With the latter it wouldn't hurt to create a new section on talk https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:traffic_calming, hopefully it will catch on. On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 22:37, Sebastian

Re: [talk-au] OSM automation projects? (Road surface)

JOSM hasn't updated the URL since it was changed, you'll need to manually updated it to https://cogeoxyz.b-cdn.net/6b6f479fbacd9a42e9e38bc5c0c6889f009beae13b07742ec4a1648f/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpg On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 08:31, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30/1/20 5:56 pm, Andr

Re: [talk-au] OSM automation projects? (Road surface)

On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 17:11, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > The LPI Imagery has the best resolution. Maxstar was more up to date but > there was a problem with overuse of it so it has been withdrawn for the > time being. > Did you check out the bushfire imagery from Maxar, it's fairly

Re: [talk-au] Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

We just received the CC BY waiver from TfNSW. That includes their GTFS feed (transport routes and stops), cycle network data, boat rames (those seem more directly useful to OSM). On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 11:42, Runarsson, Sigurjon < sigurjon.runars...@transport.nsw.gov.au> wrote: > Hi Sebastian, >

Re: [talk-au] OSM automation projects? (Road surface)

The Microsoft Open Maps team did add a lot of road surfaces based on machine learning a little while back. A lot of that was just adding surface=paved on roads where most people would have assumed by default it was paved, but still useful to have it explicitly set regardless. Though you'd need to

Re: [talk-au] tagging burnt areas

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=brownfield is absolutely not correct, have you reverted? Which changesets? They are still wood even if burnt so natural=wood should apply. I have thought about if we should map burnt areas, it's tricky because while it is surveyable, it changes

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

tion. >>> >>> Control center looks, from imagery, to not only control but supply? >>> >>> There is a fire & rescue station in 'town' that is mapped into OSM. >>> >>> There are a number of rural fire stations around Narrabri .. some of >>&g

Re: [talk-au] Shoulder and cycle usage

On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 22:51, Sebastian Spiess wrote: > Hi, > > your case 1 appears to me like a parking lane. With or without cycle lane > this is a common occurrence in most suburbs. I've asked about parking lanes > some time ago. > The parking lane is separate though, it's not shared with

Re: [talk-au] Shoulder and cycle usage

On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 14:19, Sebastian S. wrote: > Hi, what is the view of tagging road shoulders and particularly when they > have painted bicycle signs? > > Motorways would be another candidate. > I've seen a few different scenarios. - a dedicate cycle lane (only used as a cyclelane, not an

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

It's probably easier to use the mosaic at https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/763#issuecomment-575933772 On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 14:13, Andrew Harvey wrote: > That's right it only shows up where the imagery covers, it's not a mosaic. > See the index at > https://gist.g

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

this easier. On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 11:11, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 09:43, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > >> You can take one of the URLs from above, but without the "tms:" at the >> start eg. >> >> https://{switch

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

ick wrote: > Load into iD to start with! > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 23:18, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > >> How to load into iD/JOSM or how to make use of it for mapping? >> >> On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 08:24, Graeme Fitzpatrick &g

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

How to load into iD/JOSM or how to make use of it for mapping? On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 08:24, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Thanks for putting these up Andrew. > > The silly question though is how do we use them? :-) > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ Talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 19:53, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have tagged some buildings that have been fire damaged to a large degree. > I have used building=razed however I think this is wrong. > > I think the lifecycle prefix should be used. > > The choices are; > > ruins:* > > or > >

Re: [talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 20:45, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 06:56, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > > > Maxar have generously donated some satellite imagery of bushfire affected > > areas and they explicitly allow tracing for OSM, > > > > > https://b

[talk-au] Maxar bushfire imagery

Maxar have generously donated some satellite imagery of bushfire affected areas and they explicitly allow tracing for OSM, https://blog.maxar.com/open-data-program/2020/open-data-response-to-the-australian-wildfires . So far they haven't released any post event imagery but I'll try to keep an eye

Re: [talk-au] "Missing" Roads in Queensland

Thanks for the diligent report Nemanja. On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 23:54, Nemanja Bracko (E-Search) via Talk-au < talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Hi! > > As it has been a month since we got this report at talk-au, we wanted to > make a follow up to inform the community what were the results of

[talk-au] Australian Taginfo Instance

Geofabrik are now hosting regional taginfo instances, the one just covering Australia only is at https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/australia-oceania/australia/ ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] NPWS landing sites task

On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 17:56, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Question re this Map Roulette task, thanks. > > I take it these details have come from a NPWS list of some form that says > there is a landing site at "this" spot. > Yes that's right. > So, even if it shows as just a patch of bare

Re: [talk-au] A nice website for a bush fire over view

There is no requirement. They can be anonymous if they prefer, best option is whois data, but like many sites this one is by proxy so that doesn't reveal anything. On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 19:16, Sebastian S. wrote: > I often wonder who puts these pages together. > Is there no requirement to give

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

t. I can't tell if the old one was closed down. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79336870 If you're not sure and street level imagery doesn't help, just mark it as too hard and skip it. You can create a note so that someone with local knowledge can help. > > > > Am 2020-01

Re: [talk-au] Over 55’s Lifestyle Village = retirement_home ?

Those tags look good. place=neighbourhood seems appropriate. On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 15:54, cleary wrote: > > Sorry I'm a little slow to respond to this question. I have been thinking > about it. particularly in the context of a similar property that I mapped a > few years ago. I had previously

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

as the areas administration name too. > > The LPI Base Map also gives the area so it can be mapped as a way. > > > On 08/01/20 16:13, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > No, just confirming details was all I was thinking about! > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

It's normally considered okay to check a business website as a reference and picking up their contact details, but to err on the side of caution taking a whole database from fire.nsw.gov.au and mass importing is not advised. So I'd suggest not just copying everything from that website. For the

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

2020 at 1:14 PM Andrew Harvey > wrote: > >> This MapRoulette challange is mostly about adding the operator and >> operator:wikidata tags and also branch if you can. >> >> > If you do see other attributes like solar (rare), or water tanks (less > rare);

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

I'd normally just leave the name as is it, since the name should be as signposted which could vary. This MapRoulette challange is mostly about adding the operator and operator:wikidata tags and also branch if you can. The branch is usually just the suburb eg. if it's named "Heathcote Fire

Re: [talk-au] Calling all geogeeks in the Sydney region!

import and make the map worse, so trying to only do this where we have a few sources all agreeing with a high confidence. On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 14:43, Andrew Harvey wrote: > For those in in Sydney, quoting from John Bryant's announcement at > https://t.co/r80D9yNw0h?amp=1 ... > >

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

us volunteer Rural Fire > Brigades come under the Rural Fire Service, but that in turn is subordinate > to QFES. > > Qld RFS doesn't have it's own Wikidata tag - should I list it as well, > possibly with the same tag number? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

Thanks Seb and Warin. The wiki page is perfect. On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 09:47, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have taken the liberty of making a few corrections to the > amenity=fire_station and building=fire_station > > regarding multiple buildings and name ... to conform to normal

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

streetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fire_station > > > On 5 January 2020 4:55:26 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey > wrote: >> >> Yes, this is >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature.2C_one_OSM_element, >> there should only be one amenity=fire_station fo

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

it makes sense to only have one feature tagged with > amenity=fire_station, and the rest of the tags. Should this be the > building, or the site border? > > See link below: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id=724460466#map=20/-34.05818/150.67674 > > Regards, >

[talk-au] Calling all geogeeks in the Sydney region!

For those in in Sydney, quoting from John Bryant's announcement at https://t.co/r80D9yNw0h?amp=1 ... With Andrew Harvey & Stella Blake-Kelly, we're pulling together an informal, hands-on, geospatial social hacking/training/meetup session, around the general theme of bushfires and maps. A co

Re: [talk-au] presenting #NorthernBeachesSolar pet project

while the start > date stays. > > Can we go back in time with LPI images? > > On 4 January 2020 9:20:15 am AEDT, Andrew Harvey > wrote: >> >> Nice work, would love to see more roof top solar panels mapped. >> >> The Tasking Manager https://wiki.openstreetma

Re: [talk-au] Fire Station Operators

On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Sebastian Spiess wrote: > Andrew, > I've done one. Just clarifying regarding the branch. > > branch = Narrabeen Fire Station > name = Fire and Rescue NSW Station 068 Narrabeen > I can't see clearly from Mapillary what the singe looks like, but branch should be

[talk-au] Bush Fire Neighbourhood Safer Places

I'm not sure what these are called or look like in other states, but in NSW they look like https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/49324333543/ and they are operated by the NSW RFS. emergency=assembly_point seems like the best tag to use per the wiki

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 19:42, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > For safety I think you will find all bicycle lanes end before any > roundabout and restart after the roundabout.. helps stop cars exiting over > cyclists, well it is supposed to... > The exception to that could be 3 road

Re: [talk-au] Addresses/street numbers

The GNAF license is pretty open, just not open enough for importing to OpenStreetMap. I'd still recommend any services trying to do geocoding to also use GNAF as fallback source if not found in OSM. On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 11:04, Michael Shafer wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I noticed that street

Re: [talk-au] presenting #NorthernBeachesSolar pet project

Nice work, would love to see more roof top solar panels mapped. The Tasking Manager https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tasking_Manager might suit this better than MapRoulette, since Tasking Manager breaks an area up into tiles and you go in, choose a tile, complete it, then upload. It helps

Re: [talk-au] Did the Earth just move for you?

On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 21:17, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > The change is ~ 1.8 meters so most people are unlikely to know as > general GPS accuracy is greater than the 1.8 metres. > Agreed. We do have aerial imagery in NSW and ACT which are reportedly accurate enough that the datum

[talk-au] Fire Station Operators

I've updated the Australian Tagging Guidelines with NSW fire station operators https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Fire_Stations . I'm proposing: for NSW Rural Fire Service stations to use operator=NSW Rural Fire Service operator:wikdata=Q7011777 for Fire and

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

gh. > Should the roundabout have cycle=designated or yes to ensure routing goes > through it? > > > On 30 December 2019 6:56:31 am AEDT, Andrew Harvey < > andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If there's nothing marked on the road in the roundabout, t

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

If there's nothing marked on the road in the roundabout, then you can just omit the cycle lane tag from the roundabout. On Sun., 29 Dec. 2019, 2:21 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 16:52, David Wales wrote: > >> I prefer to use separate ways for

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

Hi Sebastian, 1. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes is says "Use the lanes =* key to tag how many traffic lanes there are on a highway ." and "Count excludes cycle lanes.". So in this case there are only 2 traffic lanes. So simply use:

Re: [talk-au] Adding polygons of the aerodromes

I think if there's some kind of distinguishable boundary from the imagery it's okay to convert to an area, even if it's approximate. There's not too much harm since you can always take the centroid if you prefer a node. On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 20:59, Nemanja Bračko wrote: > Hi, > > I have

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Address changes

They may be legally obligated to make it public, but that doesn't mean they waive all rights under the copyright act and so hence we err on the side of caution. 27 Dec 2019, 06:44 by graemefi...@gmail.com: > > Assuming for a moment that it is actually open data (why else would they > be offering

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Address changes

In South Australia neither the state government nor any of the local governments publish their address data as open data, since it's not open data there's no possibility of importing it, so all we could really do with these notifications is create notes of areas that someone local might want to go

[talk-au] Sydney #geobeers

For any Sydneysiders on the list, John Bryant[1] and I have organised a #geobeers in Sydney this Wednesday 18th, 5pm at the Albion Place Hotel, all welcome. Hope to see some OSM faces there. [1] who you may know from being instrumental in getting our local chapter OSGeo Oceania and the FOSS4G

Re: [talk-au] 1300 / 1800 phone number format

This sounds good to me. On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 12:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Just opened a Map Roulette challenge for phone numbers not being in the > "correct" format. > > The first one that came up was a local Dan Murphy's with it's number > entered correctly as 1300 723 388, which has

Re: [talk-au] City Of Melbourne 2019 Aerial Imagery available

00 -co BIGTIFF=YES -overwrite AerialImagery_190203.ecw COM_Imagery190203.tiff On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 16:46, Andrew Harvey wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 16:23, Sebastian S. wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, I'm curious what you mean by processing this the same way... >> > > wget ' > http

Re: [talk-au] City Of Melbourne 2019 Aerial Imagery available

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 16:23, Sebastian S. wrote: > Hi Andrew, I'm curious what you mean by processing this the same way... > wget ' https://gis-aerialimage2019-03-02.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/AerialImagery_190203.ecw ' docker run -ti --rm -v $(pwd):/data klokantech/gdal gdalwarp -t_srs

Re: [talk-au] City Of Melbourne 2019 Aerial Imagery available

Oh that's great, I'll process this in the same way as the 2018 imagery and update the editor-layer-index. On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 16:02, Matt D wrote: > Hi everyone, first time poster here. > I've been doing a bit of work on OSM in the City Of Melbourne LGA with > streetcomplete and ID and have

Re: [talk-au] Kathmandu + OSM

There is also a wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution to try to keep track of these kinds of issues. On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 23:39, Ben Kelley wrote: > Hi. > > I noticed that Kathmandu's web site (the clothing retailer, rather than > the city in Nepal) uses OSM

Re: [talk-au] Residential street, parking lane

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes used to be about marked lanes, but the wiki has been updated to tag implied lanes, even those not marked. A typical residential street might have no centerline at all but still would be lanes=2 as in practice there are two lanes in use (one for each

Re: [talk-au] Merging of Imported Address nodes with Ways and Relations

nodes that were created in the import with existing features. > On 22/11/19 5:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > Do you have an example? I don't quite understand what you mean by > combining the nodes? Combining the nodes with what? Is this about if the > address point should exis

Re: [talk-au] Merging of Imported Address nodes with Ways and Relations

Do you have an example? I don't quite understand what you mean by combining the nodes? Combining the nodes with what? Is this about if the address point should exist on a dedicated node or on a building or other amenity or poi? On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 15:20, Reuben via Talk-au wrote: > I am just

Re: [talk-au] Whereis copyright?

Do you have a link to the changesets? On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 15:13, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have found a contributor who is using 'whereis' as a source. I believe > that is a copyright breach? > > Anyone know .. I don't want to go asking them and their web site is not > clear to

Re: [talk-au] Are we allowed to use PTV datasets (CC 4.0)?

Interstate │ 11 11 >>> SkyBus │ 5 2 >>> >>> For completeness, here's the summary from OSM using the tags >>> railway=station, railway=tram_stop and highway=bus_stop inside the area >>> ISO3166-2=AU-VIC. >>

Re: [talk-au] SA location imagery

I just heard back from Location SA. The basemaps and imagery are still not able to be released as CC BY, so we'll need to keep waiting for now. On Mon., 18 Nov. 2019, 2:37 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > > Thanks, Andrew > > Graeme > > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 09:09, A

Re: [talk-au] SA location imagery

On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 09:36, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:56 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick > wrote: > >> We've now got permission & a waiver to use that Data >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Data.sa.gov.au_CCBYPermission_Open_Street_Map.pdf >> so >> that would now

Re: [talk-au] Aust Data Catalogue

You certainly don't need my permission, although I started it, it's in the hands of the community now. I think it's great to group by state by default. The sorting can always be user set on the client side by clicking on the header you want to sort by. On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 17:33, Graeme

Re: [talk-au] local traffic only

> >> So the sign is put up by the council. Is it not an official sign? >> >> Could someone elaborate on the legal side mentioned here. E.g. is there >> catalogue of street signs in the road rules and this one is not among them? >> >> Are people confusing

Re: [talk-au] local traffic only

On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 02:24, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Why it would be irrelevant? > > access tag family is for legal access (with some space for officially > discouraged access), > access=destination is for "transit is illegal", not "local residents > dislike transit traffic". > > OSM is not

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >