Re: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #338 03/01/2016-09/01/2017

lines schedules, but our goal is to make it much more accurate. Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] School project Ghana

I think the materials available in http://learnosm.org/en/ would be situable. Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Bus Routes

avels over it twice in the same direction of travel (either outwards or returning). Are there any good tutorials to add bus routes? I cannot point to one. I had to learn it the hard way. Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap

Re: [OSM-talk] Taginfo updates

/ Details about all of this at: http://blog.jochentopf.com/2015-08-15-hacking-on-taginfo.html Thank you! Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Some thoughts against remote mapping

ou're over-analyzing everything a bit too much recently? I mean, wouldn't the energy be better spent? I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks so. Let's leave this discussion to philosophers and head back map. Eduardo ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality of OSM Notes

don't want or cannot contribute data would be too small to this to be worth. Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-NI] [HOT] Resume the Night of the living maps

On 2014-01-30 18:03, Pierre Béland wrote: I also think that this is a fantastic proposition. What do you think if we would try to cover various parts of the world that are neglected in OSM. We could prepare a serie of Tasks in the Task Manager and invite people to contribute to these in this 24 h

Re: [OSM-talk] Relations + splitting ways on JOSM (was Re: Ways on bus route relations)

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:15:14AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 03:04:33PM +0200, Ben Laenen wrote: > > On Monday 16 June 2008, Jo wrote: > > > What is a bit problematic with how it is done now, is that when one > > > splits a road that is

[OSM-talk] Relations + splitting ways on JOSM (was Re: Ways on bus route relations)

it didn't happen on JOSM (Version 645). Can we say this is a bug? -- Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways on bus route relations

osals to see the real pros and cons of the proposals (and I mean the pros and cons of those proposals, not the pros and cons of the old segment model; they are different things). [1] That would bad for my first month contributing to OSM and my third message to this mailing list. :) -- Eduar

Re: [OSM-talk] Ways on bus route relations

At first I thought the collected-ways approach to be better and more intuitive, but the way-section approach now seems to be better, the more I think about it. (The collected-ways proposal may be useful on other cases, but I was thinking about the cases of splitting d

[OSM-talk] Ways on bus route relations

you have other suggestions on how to avoid splitting the highway ways into small pieces on those cases? -- Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] HTTP Server Error (500) when using JOSM

elation without the bogus node. Thanks! -- Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] HTTP Server Error (500) when using JOSM

und this problem? I have been using Potlatch to edit the map after I started getting this error, but I would like to be able to use JOSM again. -- Eduardo ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk