Re: [OSM-talk-be] waymarked or not?

Tendency in Toerisme Vlaanderen > ALL hiking nodes will go virtual within 10 years or so. (At least, that is their vision) So if you do not follow this tendency, you make OSM irrelevant for routes. I'd make a thorough choice in the official operators AND their choices. Eg. Natuurpunt DOES stick to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mapping disapPeared vicinal paths

Hi all, wegspotter on the line. Allthough I regret we cannot put legal rights of way (not usable on the field due to constructions or fences) on the map (like in the UK for example), I fully comply with the decision not to map them. I only map when: - the right of way is in use; - there is an

Re: [OSM-talk-be] RFC: explicit tagging of 'Jaagpaden'

, or sometimes even perpendicular to the river... Op di 3 mrt. 2020 om 21:09 schreef Marc Gemis : > As we map what is on the ground, we do not have to care about that, I > would assume. Let someone else fight with the people that place the signs. > > m > > Op di 3 mrt. 2020 20

Re: [OSM-talk-be] RFC: explicit tagging of 'Jaagpaden'

To make it more complex, not every signposted towpath in Flanders is legally a towpath. Check http://www.start2boat.be/vaaropleiding/downloads/reglementen/Bijzondere%20reglementen.pdf Op di 3 mrt. 2020 om 19:38 schreef Stijn Rombauts via Talk-be < talk-be@openstreetmap.org>: > Hi, > >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Weekly Riot chat digest - Volume 1 - 10/12/2018 - 16/12/2018

Wow, nice work. Very efficient. I hope you can keep this up! Op ma 17 dec. 2018 om 11:47 schreef Tim Couwelier : > First of all, a short introduction. Based on discussion in chat, we feel > it'd be good to open up about what's discussed in the Riot (or IRC) chat > channel, and distribute a

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Update Slow Roads conventions Belgium

You could combine 'vicinal_type' with 'vicinal_ref', but then again, in one municipality everthing is on the signs as Baan, in the other it is Buurtweg and in yet another it is even Chemin (even in Flanders). Good luck with that... Op za 15 dec. 2018 om 15:38 schreef Steven Clays : > To m

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Update Slow Roads conventions Belgium

In the end, there is no legal distinction between a vicinal path and a vicinal road. We might even choose to delete that vicinal_type tag. On the other hand there is a lesser known vicinal_type = particular 'Particulier / Bijzonder'. For the vicinal_ref tag, there is indeed no straightforward way

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Update Slow Roads conventions Belgium

n there, > the type of road is in the vicinal_type tag. > > > > Ben > > > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2018, 12:33 Steven Clays >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I made a slight overhaul of the slow roads Belgium page, based on the > discussion of Friday D

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Update Slow Roads conventions Belgium

Sure, thank you. Op za 15 dec. 2018 om 12:32 schreef Steven Clays : > Hello, > > I made a slight overhaul of the slow roads Belgium page, based on the > discussion of Friday December 14th. A new tagging scheme is also proposed, > seperating vicinal_ref and oficial_vicinal_ref. Lin

[OSM-talk-be] Update Slow Roads conventions Belgium

Hello, I made a slight overhaul of the slow roads Belgium page, based on the discussion of Friday December 14th. A new tagging scheme is also proposed, seperating vicinal_ref and oficial_vicinal_ref. Links are restored and some pictures added. Comments and improvements welcome.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM Belgium Local Chapter application, community feedback wanted

Looking forward to participate in an official local chapter!  2018-03-30 9:42 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis : > I have confidence that the people behind the application know what > they do and I hope that a local chapter will be beneficial for > OpenStreetMap in Belgium. > >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] trage wegen in het Dendermondse

Hier >> https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/wwm Op 26 februari 2018 om 13:17 schreef Steven Clays <steven.cl...@gmail.com>: > Oh ja, en dan zijn er ook nog deze in Alken die óók allemaal zijn > opgenomen en de tag historical=path meegekregen. Hierbij staat specifiek > trai

Re: [OSM-talk-be] trage wegen in het Dendermondse

Oh ja, en dan zijn er ook nog deze in Alken die óók allemaal zijn opgenomen en de tag historical=path meegekregen. Hierbij staat specifiek trail_visibility ingevuld. Op 21 februari 2018 om 18:26 schreef joost schouppe < joost.schou...@gmail.com>: > Hoi, > > Vijf jaar geleden, I kid you not,

[OSM-talk-be] Kom naar de Trefdag Trage Wegen / 24 maart 2018 in Herzele

aams parlementslid (N-VA) en stuwende kracht achter het decreet. Zij motiveert de principes van het initiatief en situeert de voortgang van het overleg. Trage Wegen vzw houdt de vinger aan de pols: juridisch specialist *Steven Clays* duidt het belang van het decreet voor de trage wegen. Hij wijst op k

Re: [OSM-talk-be] building = staketsel

Strange, because http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465851481 renders perfectly. 2017-10-18 14:47 GMT+02:00 Ruben : > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:04:01 +0200, Pieter Brusselman < > pieter.brussel...@tragewegen.be> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some time ago I mapped some 'man_made =

Re: [OSM-talk-be] strange styling of waterway=drain + intermittent=yes

; > Ben Abelshausen > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Steven Clays <steven.cl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> How do you perform a hard refresh? >> >> >> 2017-06-07 15:37 GMT+02:00 Ben Abelshausen <ben.abelshau...@gmail.com>: >> >>>

Re: [OSM-talk-be] strange styling of waterway=drain + intermittent=yes

How do you perform a hard refresh? 2017-06-07 15:37 GMT+02:00 Ben Abelshausen : > Works here, maybe because I'm not in Belgium... > > > On 7 Jun 2017 12:37, "joost schouppe" wrote: > > They are definitely already on this, but I saw something

Re: [OSM-talk-be] many mappy meetings this March

And don't forget to announce the Trefdag Trage Wegen in Kortrijk, next Saturdag 25th, with a mapping/routing workshop focussing on making your own routable application, based on OSM 'slow roads' data. >>> www.tragewegen.be/trefdag 2017-03-20 10:45 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Aanpassingsmeldingen / Notifications

o follow. > > I do not always follow this rule of communication, especially when the > same user keeps on making the same mistake or has not made an edit in > a long time > > OSM is a community project, so communication is important. > > regards > > m > > On Thu, Dec 2

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Aanpassingsmeldingen / Notifications

Thanks! Is there a procedure for reverting outright errors or sabotage? Can I do this myself? (To be clear: it is a hypothetical question, untill now it did not happen!) 2016-12-22 19:15 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be>: > On 22-12-16 17:36, Steven Clays wrote: > > Hal

[OSM-talk-be] Aanpassingsmeldingen / Notifications

Hallo, dit is misschien een beetje een basisvraagje, maar ik vond het antwoord nergens. Is er een mogelijkheid om op de hoogte gehouden te worden van de aanpassingen die een andere gebruiker maakt aan de wijzigingen die je zelf hebt toegevoegd? This is perhaps a basis question, but I cannot

Re: [OSM-talk-be] voetbalkantine

@Jorieke: *Raf Verbruggen * Stafmedewerker ruimte, mobiliteit en wonen 02 551 13 93 *raf.verbrug...@ambrassade.be is de persoon die je nodig hebt!* Op 1 december 2016 20:25 schreef Marc Gemis : > 2016-12-01 18:32 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe