Silly question, why would you trace from Mapnik, since it's OSM anyway?
On 8 January 2016 at 23:13, Steve Doerr wrote:
> When editing in Potlatch 2, the list of background layers seems rather
> short. In particular, Mapnik (the default style) is not on the list.
>
> Bug? Or change of policy?
>
>
hould also be a requirement that people add a
comment upon every commit to avoid such arguments. I'm getting a
little tired of seeing constant updates in my area from people who
don't add comments on why or what they've changed.
Tony
On 14 November 2015 at 18:04, Michał Brzozowski wrot
The woodland change looks much better, but would it not be possible to
render broadleaved, needleleaved and mixed using different tree
images, as seen on other maps? This would, I think, give people more
incentive to add this information when mapping woodland.
Regards
Tony
On 15 August 2015 at
I can recommend most of East Yorkshire in the UK
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/53.8689/-0.6582. It's very well
mapped, most fields are traced, landuse, buildings, etc..
Tony
On 22 July 2015 at 10:30, Simone Cortesi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Mateusz Koniecz
motivates people to
contribute and what sort of people they are.
Tony
On 20 August 2014 10:27, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>
> I have to admit I filled the thing in - I assumed the middle questions were
> perhaps psychology related (psychology of OSM users, etc).
> It never asks for name
:-)
Hit refresh, it seems to be fixed now.
On 18 August 2014 10:17, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>
> The endless rain of 2014 might though ;-)
>
> (sorry for the flippant comment)
>
> -SomeoneElse wrote: -
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> From: SomeoneElse
> Date: 17/08/2014 09:41PM
> Subject:
27;t find the error. Does anyone know what
else we can do here?
Tony
On 18 June 2014 08:27, Colin Smale wrote:
>
>
> It only appears to be happening on areas with the "default" landuse -
> residential, farms etc are rendered normally. That might be a clue. So far
> it see
On 27/09/12 16:56, Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
> "Tony Morris" wrote on 27/09/2012 at 17:46:53 +1100
> subject "[OSM-talk] Pre-delete-bot" :
>
>> On 27/09/12 16:30, Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
>>> "Tony Morris" tonymor...@gmail.com wrote on 27/09/201
On 27/09/12 16:50, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/27/12 08:46, Tony Morris wrote:
>>> http://download.geofabrik.de/ gives you all what you need...
>
>> I don't see pre-deletion data there. Only the latest CC-BY-SA data.
>
> The "pre-redaction&quo
On 27/09/12 16:30, Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
> "Tony Morris" tonymor...@gmail.com wrote on 27/09/2012 at 16:29:23 +1100
> subject "[OSM-talk] Pre-delete-bot" :
>
>> Hello,
>> I am trying to get the OSM data prior to the running of the deletion
>> bot.
Hello,
I am trying to get the OSM data prior to the running of the deletion
bot. I am able to access CC-BY-SA licenced data from geofabrik, but the
deletion occurred prior to the licence change. Is it possible to access
this data, even if it is by region? Thanks for any tips.
--
Tony Morris
http
anyone I can contact
who might be able to assist?
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
way to say whether it's an open
border or a closed border seems much simpler than trying to model
relationships at a country level.
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
t of date data or crude estimates. And, when better data is available,
it's trivial to change it.
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
speak
> german or i'd do it
Why does it need a proposal? It was already on Map Features until a
unilateral decision to remove it. Now that it's been explained what it
is, why not just put it back and document it?
Tony
___
talk ma
almost certainly agree
with it. Saying that it was removed because there was no real response
or no good explanation of what it is, is rather different, though.
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
in the meantime this was only confusing ...
Was my explanation not valid?
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
teArticle
These would allow us to create a little 'form' that people can type into
when proposing a feature, that will then create the relevant wiki page.
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
ensibly also be areas? (Plus lots on
proposed features)
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
ones (Campione and Büsingen are Italian
and German towns in Switzerland, Llívia a Spanish town in France, etc)
Usually these are enclaves or exclaves, so slightly easier to deal with,
but we need to constantly remember that the world is a very tricky thing
to model, with large numbers of quirky
discussion on this somewhere? Would it not make sense
to allow all amenity / shop / tourism / historic etc to be areas unless
specifically decided otherwise?
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
ikely to fix data
that's wrong, or to add data that's missing?
I don't have an answer to that. I suspect for wikis in general it's the
first, but moving misplaced roads in OSM is harder than an average wiki
edit, so I'm even less sure here.
Tony
___
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> Freemap ... starts with a map of the
> whole UK making it easier to locate any part of the country.
As long as you don't want to go further north than Edinburgh?
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetm
h'.
It would be nice if this worked with TAB as well, of course, but in the
meantime if you can retrain your fingers then you can avoid that up-arrow.
Tony
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
hoo's,
particularly in cities. But there are also quite a few places where
Yahoo provides traceable imagery in locations where Google doesn't,
mostly outside cities. It's not quite as simple as breadth vs depth but
I'd hope that if we got permission to use Google then we'
ot / whatever in each location.
A favourite of many a freshers' week is the Three-legged golf pub crawl,
where teams of two have one leg each tied together and and they have to
down a shot apiece at each of 18 pubs. (Less versions allow them to
altern
s to make sense to add it.
I'm not sure though whether this is just a feature request for Potlatch,
or whether there's previous discussion that led to its current behaviour.
Thoughts?
Tony
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary
[2] Although they're
27 matches
Mail list logo
