Hi,
Am Samstag, den 03.01.2015, 17:50 +0100 schrieb Rainer Fügenstein:
> in accordance to the mechanical edit policy, I'd like to open the
> discussion on this list:
>
> a recently approved proposal introduced new tags for pipelines and
> marker [1] and changed an established tag:
>
> type=* was
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 23.12.2014, 04:19 + schrieb Russ Nelson:
> Hi. I'm editing the Hudson River all as one entity, from its beginning
> in the Adirondacks to its end at NYC. Along the way, there are some
> islands that need to be excluded, so it's not just riverbank,
> riverbank, riverank. It
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2014, 19:20 +0100 schrieb Dave F.:
> http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=18159&_noCache=on
>
> This route relation appears to be just for the B3070. Isn't that a waste
> of time as it's covered by the ref tags on the ways?
>
> I thought route relati
Hi,
some years ago I've started this article in the wiki about empty
relations, the reasons and the cleanup:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Empty_relations
Am Montag, den 16.06.2014, 13:17 -0700 schrieb Paul Norman:
> I'm proposing a regular mechanical edit to remove relations over two
> da
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 12.01.2014, 10:33 + schrieb Ed Loach:
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/werner2101/diary
>
> I thought OSB wasn't allowing new bug reports? There seem to be a
> few from Géovélo, such as
> http://openstreetbugs.schokokeks.org/?zoom=19&lat=47.12282&lon=-1.63
> 087&layer
Just a small update, posted on my blog about the progress:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/werner2101/diary
Am Montag, den 23.12.2013, 12:18 +0100 schrieb Werner Hoch:
> [1] http://www.h-renrew.de/h/osm/osmchecks/09_osb_phaseout/
> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStre
Hi all,
the adding of new bugs with the OSB homepage has been disabled two month
ago. Since last week the Notes system has more open bugs than OSB has.
OpenStreetbugs: 29000 open bugs
Notes: 31000 open bugs
Since that about 1/3 of all open bugs in OSB has been fixed. But if we
keep that pace it w
another update ...
Am Sonntag, den 03.11.2013, 13:13 +0100 schrieb Werner Hoch:
> Am Montag, den 28.10.2013, 23:42 +0100 schrieb Werner Hoch:
> > Currently there are about 41000 open bugs in the OSB database.
>
> dropped to 39500 and is decreasing with a good rate, thanks to all.
Am Sonntag, den 03.11.2013, 13:37 +0100 schrieb Carsten Nielsen:
> When i look at http://osmbugs.org/ is see several bugs which I have commented
> on via the
> notes feature on the http://www.openstreetmap.org site.
> So I dont think the original request "In about two month, make a mapping
> par
Just a small update.
Am Montag, den 28.10.2013, 23:42 +0100 schrieb Werner Hoch:
> Currently there are about 41000 open bugs in the OSB database.
dropped to 39500 and is decreasing with a good rate, thanks to all.
> I think the best strategy is to fix as many open bugs as possible and
&
Hi all,
the Notes features is active since April now.
Many users have started creating Notes (OSN) instead of OpenStreetBug
(OSB) entries.
I'm currently trying to push the phase out of OSB with various methods:
* Updating the wiki with deprecation notices of OSB [1]
* Collecting infomations abo
Am Sonntag, den 14.04.2013, 23:38 +1000 schrieb Steve Bennett:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
> > Just a further data point. As of the end of last month we had edits from
> > 324'152 unique UIDs, not quite 30% of all accounts (some of the
> > changesets are likely to be emp
Hi Frederik,
Am Sonntag, den 30.12.2012, 22:53 +0100 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> It is quite possible that the program has bugs so if you notice
> something strange, do mention it.
o.k. I'm at the bottom of the list:
-680 werner2101
What does the negative number mean?
I've not mapped many adress
Am Sonntag, den 29.07.2012, 02:06 -0700 schrieb Paul Norman:
> Now that the redaction bot has finished running, I want to propose what
> should be a simple uncontroversial mechanical edit (hah).
>
> I propose cleaning up two types of empty relations that are not members of
> other relations.
>
>
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 20.05.2012, 19:46 +0300 schrieb Worst Fixer:
> Also I propose removal of "addr:housenumber=?" on these objects, and
> move "name=N" to "addr:housenumber=N".
>
Maybe this is not the same.
Larger industrial plants or universities often have a single address but
multiple buildi
Hi there,
Am Freitag, den 27.04.2012, 02:28 +0100 schrieb SomeoneElse:
> I noticed this while looking at the map here:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.001059&lon=34.825519&zoom=18&layers=M
>
> The "Hires coverage of Bing imagery in the Near East" label is from the
> name on this relat
Hi Norman,
Am Freitag, den 13.04.2012, 02:12 -0700 schrieb Paul Norman:
> Through editor errors or other mistakes there are a number of relations in
> OSM which have no members. I propose a mechanical edit to delete these where
> they are not members of some other way. My proposed procedure, docum
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2011, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > Maybe removing the private message function in osm.org (like
> > wikipedia) and replacing it with a forum would be enough. This has
> > several advantages, such as a possibility to spot predatory
> > behavior on new comers.
>
> I really wan
Hi NE2,
On Montag, 18. Juli 2011, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
> > With orphaned I mean relations that have no members and are not
> > member of any other relation. Some are completely empty but most
> > still have some tags. I have created a list of the relations sorted
> > by
Hi Sarah,
On Sonntag, 17. Juli 2011, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
> I recently stumbled upon some empty route relations, so I had a
> closer look at the OSM planet and found that there are about
> 10.000 orphaned relations in the database and the number is growing.
>
> With orphaned I mean relations tha
Hi there,
in the latest planet there are 768632 relations.
25094 of them don't have any relation member.
That means more than 3% of all relations are affected.
I've created a wikipage about empty relations:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Empty_relations
I wrote down my guesses why the empty
Hi Dave,
On Dienstag, 12. Oktober 2010, Dave F. wrote:
> On 05/10/2010 10:44, Werner Hoch wrote:
> > The change DaveF doesn't like is the change of the tags
> >
> >type=route route=canal
> >
> > into:
> >type=waterway waterway=canal
>
Hi there,
On Montag, 4. Oktober 2010, Dave F. wrote:
> User werner2101 has been busy today amended relations:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/werner2101/edits
First, all of the edits are done manually, not with a bot.
All the edits are done one by one. I check every relation before editing
Hi John,
On Samstag, 31. Juli 2010, John Smith wrote:
> On 31 July 2010 20:17, David Earl wrote:
> > sad, sad, sad to be so selfish towards your colleagues.
>
> Oh and I'm still waiting for the comment example based on people that
> make a lot more edits than a simply changing the direction a on
On Donnerstag, 3. Juni 2010, John Smith wrote:
> I'd still like to know the actual stats of users v accounts, to me a
> user isn't a user unless they've made 5 or more edits.
I've some statistic about the planet file of the last week:
http://www.h-renrew.de/h/osm/osmchecks/03_Statistik/planet/stat
On Mittwoch, 7. April 2010, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> You can find the tool at http://compression.ca/pbzip2/
Just for the logs:
I've found bug reports that describes the problem:
http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=41793
http://bugs.python.org/issue1625
I haven't mentioned
Hi there,
I'm currently playing on a random access tool for compressed osm files.
While my tool works fine for all files from
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/europe/, I've problems with the latest
planet file.
While all files from geofabrik are only single bz2 streams it seems that
the pl
Hi there,
smarties and I (werner2101) have created a proposal about waterway
relations.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Waterway
The proposed tagging is already used a lot, thus the proposal is more a
documentation of the current tagging.
We've started to talk to all majo
28 matches
Mail list logo
