I get this same view. All too often I look at a place and think wow, that
looks complete, but when I drum down into the data a bit it its clear
that
there are general gaps and the density of streets is not what you would
expect. That's why I was testing out a completeness metrics method. But I
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many*
people, we could just have a button somewhere along the margin of the
page that says: I know the area and what I see here looks correct.
Would it not make more sense to have a button saying This map is
Gervase Markham wrote:
Sent: 14 May 2008 2:01 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many*
people, we could just have a button
On Monday 12 May 2008, Skywave wrote:
Freek recently created this image which shows how much of the AND data is
untouched:
http://www.vanwal.nl/osm/author_density_nl_20080502_full.png(warning 3 MB
image).
(Blue is untouched AND, green and red have relatively more changes by the
community.)
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of us map out an area completely in one go rather than doing it
piecemeal. Even if I come across some existing roads in a new area I ignore
them and do a new survey so that the whole area makes
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many*
people, we could just have a button somewhere along the margin of the
page that says: I know the area and what I see here looks correct.
Given that this will be the default very soon ( :-) ), I'd rather
On 13/05/2008 15:35, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many*
people, we could just have a button somewhere along the margin of the
page that says: I know the area and what I see here looks correct.
Given that this will
David Earl wrote:
Sent: 13 May 2008 6:48 PM
To: Sebastian Spaeth
Cc: OSM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On 13/05/2008 15:35, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many
On 12/05/2008 11:59, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Posted to talk and dev
This post really follows on from my consideration of Completeness metrics. A
number of experienced OSMers who have mapped out there areas have either
contacted me directly or posted through the lists about
David Earl wrote:
Here is what I was going to do:
1. use a set of ways like coastline (i.e. with an on the right rule,
because they'd be too long as one way), to define areas of completeness.
By definition, coastline would form one boundary.
2. Render these plus coastline to a new set
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
a) Being able to expand the boundary after each session is likely to be
a great motivator. I suspect that this progressive taming of the
wilderness or making order out of the void is what drives many mappers.
b) Applicability to small or
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
Starting with a single level of completeness makes sense, but I think it
should be public roads, named where feasible.
I have a different view. I think we should have a leveled scheme from the
beginning. I suggest the following:
Level 1:
On 12/05/2008 18:06, Inge Wallin wrote:
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
Starting with a single level of completeness makes sense, but I think it
should be public roads, named where feasible.
I have a different view. I think we should have a leveled scheme from the
David Earl wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On 12/05/2008 18:06, Inge Wallin wrote:
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
Starting
On 12/05/2008 20:02, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On 12/05/2008 18:06, Inge Wallin wrote
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:06:20PM +0200, Inge Wallin wrote:
Yes, but it would be good if we planned for at least some of the subsequent
levels right from the start.
I support this idea - I would call them levels as some areas might work
completely different. I would call the different
I'm very far from this in Korea, but I would guess in time some parts of the UK
will need to be rechecked at some point. How can we make a system
for rechecking an area? Maybe the completeness should be retired
after a period of time.
--
http://bowlad.com
Hi,
I'm very far from this in Korea, but I would guess in time some
parts of the UK will need to be rechecked at some point. How can we
make a system for rechecking an area? Maybe the completeness should
be retired after a period of time.
Once we have a few applications in place that get
Freek recently created this image which shows how much of the AND data is
untouched: http://www.vanwal.nl/osm/author_density_nl_20080502_full.png(warning
3 MB image). I think the z18 idea is good idea.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:36 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 12/05/2008 21:02,
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is terribly hard to know whether you have all the footpaths,
and I think we'd hardly ever mark anywhere complete if we did that.
I think it's terribly hard to know when a map is correct and complete,
regardless
On 12/05/2008 22:51, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is terribly hard to know whether you have all the footpaths,
and I think we'd hardly ever mark anywhere complete if we did that.
I think it's terribly hard to know when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Lohoff schrieb:
| On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:06:20PM +0200, Inge Wallin wrote:
| Yes, but it would be good if we planned for at least some of the
subsequent
| levels right from the start.
|
| I support this idea - I would call them levels as
Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 10:52 PM
To: David Earl
Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED
David Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 11:06 PM
To: Andy Allan
Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On 12/05/2008 22:51, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008
24 matches
Mail list logo
