I don't see that the Wiki is self-contradictory in this case; it quite clearly states the convention for US and US Interstate highway refs. Is there a good argument to omitting the state abbreviation from the ref? Will the end result of changing to just a number be usable by the
On 1 March 2010 03:17, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Is there a good argument to omitting the state abbreviation from the
ref? Will the end result of changing to just a number be usable by the
Highway Shields project? The common reference County road 49 comes to
You can use admin
That doesn't help in this case: for example a US highway crosses multiple states, but is always assigned the same shield. And there is nothing in standard tagging (that I remember) to distinguish a county from state road - I follow the general recommendation that US=primary,
On 1 March 2010 04:03, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
That doesn't help in this case: for example a US highway crosses multiple
states, but is always assigned the same shield.And there is nothing in
This is just a pre-processing problem before going into pgsql for
mapnik, or whatever
To: Mike Nnice...@att.net
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Help! Changeset reverted without explanation
On 1 March 2010 03:17, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Is there a good argument to omitting the state abbreviation from the
ref? Will the end result of changing to just
On 1 March 2010 05:01, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
However, a given administrative area may well contain country-level,
state-level, and county roads. If a given road is tagged with only a number,
what indicates which one of these is meant? Also, it is not unusual for a
On 28 Feb 2010, at 10:18 , John Smith wrote:
On 1 March 2010 04:03, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
That doesn't help in this case: for example a US highway crosses multiple
states, but is always assigned the same shield.And there is nothing in
This is just a pre-processing problem
On 1 March 2010 05:41, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
network=CO (county)
network=S (state)
why duplicate redundant info, requires double care when a roud is
up/downgraded. isn't it better this way
The brackets were meant for explanation purposes only.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 March 2010 05:41, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
network=CO (county)
network=S (state)
The brackets were meant for explanation purposes only.
But in OSM, we try to avoid abbreviations when
On 1 March 2010 06:03, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
But in OSM, we try to avoid abbreviations when possible. Then you don't have
to explaine later again and again what means CO or add a note or a
reference to a wiki page. network=county is not so long and clear for
everyone.
Simply because
moving thread to talk-us where it belongs
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mike N nice...@att.net
Date: 28 February 2010 9:17:01 PST
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Help! Changeset reverted without explanation
I don't see that the Wiki is self-contradictory in this case
Anyone?
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been a day with no response from lkrevert. Can somebody please
take care of this?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lkrevert
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone?
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been a day with no response from lkrevert. Can somebody please
take care of this?
I generally allow other mappers a week to
Richard Weait wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at gmail.com
wrote:
It's been a day with no response from lkrevert. Can somebody please
take care of this?
I generally allow other mappers a week to respond to site-mail before
I send another note. They might be
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at gmail.com
wrote:
It's been a day with no response from lkrevert. Can somebody please
take care of this?
I generally allow other
Richard Weait wrote:
What is in this (big) changeset that ikrevert reverted?
I fixed up the numbered routes in Columbia. You'll see that currently
some of the primary highways just dead-end, because TIGER often
doesn't have the correct routings for numbered routes. Restore the
changeset and you
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
What is in this (big) changeset that ikrevert reverted?
I fixed up the numbered routes in Columbia. You'll see that currently
some of the primary highways just dead-end, because TIGER often
doesn't have the correct routings
On 27 Feb 2010, at 14:33 , Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at gmail.com
wrote:
It's been a day with no response from lkrevert. Can somebody please
take care of this?
I generally allow other mappers a week to respond
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 Feb 2010, at 14:33 , Nathan Edgars II wrote:
And a week from now half the ways in the changeset will probably have
been edited, making a restoration very complicated. Is it the intent
here that those with the
2010/2/28 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
On 27 Feb 2010, at 14:33 , Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at gmail.com
wrote:
It's been a day with no response from lkrevert. Can somebody please
take care of this?
On 27 Feb 2010, at 15:37 , Konrad Skeri wrote:
I.e. guilty until proven otherwise?
there is no court no judge no laws. only volunteers willing to help.
User A edits the map.
User B reverts user A's edits without explaining why.
User A then has to justify before the whole community why
On 28 February 2010 00:37, Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com wrote:
2010/2/28 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
On 27 Feb 2010, at 14:33 , Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at
gmail.com wrote:
It's been a day with no
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Lar Kiesel wrote:
I was the culprit who did the user lkrevert revert to user NE2 change set of
Columbia, SC, US.
Thank you for finally coming forward and explaining.
The reasons for the revert was because NE2 had changed many segments of SC
state
Hi,
Lar Kiesel wrote:
I started to correct the NE2 changes by hand, there were too many and why
should I? So. I decided to do the revert.
Independent of what's wrong or right in this case: You are not the first
one to say that the changeset is too large to easily see what has
happened.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lkrevert has reverted one of my
changesets. I contacted this user, but doubt I'll get a response,
since this is obviously not the primary account. I don't have the
tools to undo this revert, and that's probably not a good idea anyway
without some sort of
Nathan,
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lkrevert has reverted one of my
changesets. I contacted this user, but doubt I'll get a response,
since this is obviously not the primary account.
Your messsage will be forwarded to him by email.
If you do manage to contact
On 26 February 2010 19:03, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
he used the user page to say what his primary account is and what he's
using the lkrevert user for.
ikrevert = i kan revert maybe?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Oops - forgot to choose 'reply to all'. Sorry Fred for the duplicate.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Nathan,
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lkrevert has reverted one of my
changesets. I contacted this user, but doubt I'll
to get an agreement and update the Wiki before changing the
ref format.
--
From: Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 3:56 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Help! Changeset reverted without explanation
Frederik Ramm wrote:
However, Nathan, I see that for example in this way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/12515816/history
you had removed *all* the tags from the way. I haven't investigated
further but maybe the reverter had to assume that there was some editing
error?
I deleted that
Hi,
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I deleted that way (because I had extended the motorway_link to the
west over it). Note that it has no nodes listed.
Apologies, I overlooked that.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
It's been a day with no response from lkrevert. Can somebody please
take care of this?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lkrevert has reverted one of my
changesets. I contacted this user, but doubt I'll get a response,
32 matches
Mail list logo
