Hi,
I suppose I'm the culprit for the "todo=continue" and "todo=junction"
tags, since I've used them internally for some time and then added them
to GroundTruth hiking rules once I developed GroundTruth.
These tags are not primarily rendering-oriented, they are just pointers
(for me and anyone
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Dave F. wrote:
> I'm repeatedly told "don't tag for the renderers"
OK, let me even it out a bit and give you some guidance:
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Don't delibera
John Smith wrote:
> 2009/9/28 Dave F. :
>
>
>> I'm not saying we should bend over backwards in our tagging to ensure it
>> will immediately render in all the different rendering flavours, but to
>> tag without /any/ consideration for multitude of uses OSM could be used
>> for is, I think, lazy,
2009/9/28 Dave F. :
> I'm not saying we should bend over backwards in our tagging to ensure it
> will immediately render in all the different rendering flavours, but to
> tag without /any/ consideration for multitude of uses OSM could be used
> for is, I think, lazy, selfish & bordering on the arr
John Smith wrote:
> 2009/9/28 Dave F. :
>
>
>> The database on its own is useless. It needs to be represented in some
>> manner such as a visual map. To tag randomly ie 'tag whatever you want &
>> let the renderers sort it out' seems illogical & counter productive.
>>
>
> It's more of a cas
2009/9/28 Dave F. :
> The database on its own is useless. It needs to be represented in some
> manner such as a visual map. To tag randomly ie 'tag whatever you want &
> let the renderers sort it out' seems illogical & counter productive.
It's more of a case of converting the real world into a da
ed...@billiau.net wrote:
>> You see, this is where I get /really /confused
>>
>> I see no reference to 'todo' or 'continue' in the general OSM wiki.
>> In the Groundtruth wiki page they're highlighted red, saying there there
>> no reference page.
>>
>> I'm repeatedly told "don't tag for the rendere
2009/9/26 David Paleino :
> k...@vielevisels wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
>> with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
>> intended for this. I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this
>> and to render b
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Dave F. wrote:
> You see, this is where I get /really /confused
>
> I see no reference to 'todo' or 'continue' in the general OSM wiki.
> In the Groundtruth wiki page they're highlighted red, saying there there
> no reference page.
>
If you think there is a need,
You see, this is where I get /really /confused
I see no reference to 'todo' or 'continue' in the general OSM wiki.
In the Groundtruth wiki page they're highlighted red, saying there there
no reference page.
I'm repeatedly told "don't tag for the renderers"
Yet it appears in this case the render
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:15 AM, David Earl wrote:
> On 26/09/2009 19:09, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>
>>But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, "more to do
>>here" tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
>> not a good idea for the normal map. have you ev
On Saturday 26 September 2009 20:09:34 Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
There are GroundTruth styles
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GroundTruth_Hiking_Map#IconTodoJunction)
with support for tags todo=continue and todo=junction
In this sample
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:GroundTruth_
On 26/09/2009 19:09, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
> But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, "more to do
> here" tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
> not a good idea for the normal map. have you ever seen any other
> commercial map with "hey look this ma
>
> But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, "more to do
> here" tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
>
not a good idea for the normal map. have you ever seen any other commercial
map with "hey look this map is incomplete BS" info?
sure it makes sense to get th
On 26/09/2009 18:20, Dave F. wrote:
> David Earl wrote:
>> On 26/09/2009 15:00, k...@vielevisels wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the
>>> beginning, with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag
>>> noexit=no is intended for this.
>>> I thin
David Earl wrote:
> On 26/09/2009 15:00, k...@vielevisels wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
>> with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
>> intended for this.
>> I think it would be helpful have one way to tag th
On 26/09/2009 15:00, k...@vielevisels wrote:
> Hi,
> many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
> with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
> intended for this.
> I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this and to render both
> (dead
k...@vielevisels wrote:
> Hi,
> many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the
> beginning, with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag
> noexit=no is intended for this.
> I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this and to render
> both (dead-ends and incomplete
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning, with
the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is intended for this.
I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this and to render both
(dead-ends and incomplete ways), to show where work has to be d
k...@vielevisels wrote:
>Hi,
>many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the
>beginning, with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag
>noexit=no is intended for this. I think it would be helpful have one
>way to tag this and to render both (dead-ends and incomplete ways), to
k...@vielevisels wrote:
> Hi,
> many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
> with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
> intended for this. I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this
> and to render both (dead-ends and incomplete ways
21 matches
Mail list logo
