2010/3/15 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
... I have no
intention to deprecate Potlatch 1, but would like to keep it available
in parallel.
have you thought about deprecating the live-mode in PL1 though? I
really think it is a pain and was happy when you wrote in another
thread that
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
have you thought about deprecating the live-mode in PL1 though? I
really think it is a pain and was happy when you wrote in another
thread that it will not be available in PL2.
Indeed, you've mentioned one or two (million) times before you're no
fan of it. :)
To
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
If all the code and all the tools we used were to be licensed costly
software, who would pay for OSM?
We'd all use Google Map Maker then. Under Safari ;-)
What about Mapzen under IE? *ducks*
Mapzen doesn't count - it is open source ;-)
Bye
Frederik
On 12 March 2010 18:27, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Mapzen doesn't count - it is open source ;-)
So is potlatch, but that doesn't seem to have stopped people from
complaining about it being non-free for some reason...
___
talk mailing
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:45 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 March 2010 18:27, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Mapzen doesn't count - it is open source ;-)
So is potlatch, but that doesn't seem to have stopped people from
complaining about it being non-free for
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
On 12/03/2010 07:54, John Smith wrote:
On 12 March 2010 17:50, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
If all the code and all the tools we used were to be licensed costly
I have started to port mapzen to haxe, all help appreciated.
http://osmopenlayers.blogspot.com/2010/03/start-of-port-of-mapzen-to-haxe.html
mike
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:56 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 March 2010 18:52, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
Hi folks,
Regarding Flash development with OpenSource tools:
On Vie 12 Mar 2010, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think the issue with flash is not the software, but the runtime.
[...]
I am going to try and use this :
ActionScript 2 to Flash (SWF) compiler
http://www.mtasc.org/
Richard Fairhurst:
Personally? I don't give a shit about free software. Or
respectability.
cheers
Richard
OK. May I then conclude mine and your off-topic posts ended on this
thread? So it's up for anyone else to post on-topic replies regarding
this topic.
Kind regards,
Niklas
--
All,
Dirk (the current JOSM maintainer) has just announced on josm-dev
that JOSM will move to Java6 around the end of this month. This means
that anyone who does not have Java6 may continue to work with the
current JOSM release but will not be able to use the new builds from
April on.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
If you are in the unfortunate situation of having willfully
chained yourself to one Hardware/OS supplier and that
supplier is unwilling to release Java6 for your platform,
it may be time to finally ditch
...JOSM in anticipation of imminent Potlatch 2 wondrousness.
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
The world doesn't require Potlatch 2 wondrousness. The world would
already sigh with relief if Potlatch could be made to not break
relation ordering when a way is split ;-)
Has the world lodged a trac ticket?
I'm not sure; my guess is that the world is silently
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
The world doesn't require Potlatch 2 wondrousness. The world would
already sigh with relief if Potlatch could be made to not break
relation ordering when a way is split ;-)
Has the world
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'm not sure; my guess is that the world is silently waiting for
Potlatch 2 to be released and will *then* complain about everything
that *still* doesn't work.
(My info comes from several mentions on, you guessed it, talk-de.)
Oh, I'd guessed that much. No-one outside
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:30, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Java6 has been around for more than three years now (and other OSM
software, e.g. Osmosis, already depends on it) so if you are still using
an older version it might be time to upgrade. (If you are in the
unfortunate
El día Thursday 11 March 2010 11:40:56, Frederik Ramm dijo:
I'm not sure; my guess is that the world is silently waiting for
Potlatch 2 to be released and will *then* complain about everything that
*still* doesn't work.
The world is trying to *preemptively* ban potlatch 2 :-P
--
Iván Sánchez
grin :D
Any clues or teasers as to what this might contain?
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM will move to Java6
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Frederik Ramm wrote:
If you
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
multiple snips
...JOSM in anticipation of imminent Potlatch 2 wondrousness.
How can potlatch be respectable if it is based on non-free software?
(non-free flash, and you can't touch their source code!) You can run
JOSM using only libre and/or open source software. Not
2010/3/11 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
El día Thursday 11 March 2010 11:40:56, Frederik Ramm dijo:
I'm not sure; my guess is that the world is silently waiting for
Potlatch 2 to be released and will *then* complain about everything that
*still* doesn't work.
The world is trying
Hi,
Niklas Cholmkvist wrote:
How can potlatch be respectable if it is based on non-free software?
(non-free flash, and you can't touch their source code!) You can run
JOSM using only libre and/or open source software. Not only JOSM,
there's much more software that can be run on fully free
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Niklas Cholmkvist wrote:
How can potlatch be respectable if it is based on non-free
software? (non-free flash, and you can't touch their source
code!)
Personally? I don't give a shit about free software. Or
Hi,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
If all the code and all the tools we used were to be licensed costly
software, who would pay for OSM?
We'd all use Google Map Maker then. Under Safari ;-)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
On 12 March 2010 17:50, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
If all the code and all the tools we used were to be licensed costly
software, who would pay for OSM?
We'd all use Google Map Maker then. Under Safari ;-)
What about Mapzen under IE?
23 matches
Mail list logo
