On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Stephen Gower <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:48:18PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
> >
> > if we are going to have an 'attribution' page on the wiki[1], with the
> > fine print regarding sources of various chunks of data, would a link
> > to
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:48:18PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
>
> if we are going to have an 'attribution' page on the wiki[1], with the
> fine print regarding sources of various chunks of data, would a link
> to it be possible, on the main map page? titled say 'data attribution'
> or 'data sourc
2008/4/3 Robert Vollmert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I may be missing something, but why would we need to introduce a read-
> only attribution tag if we already have it? It's the source tag of the
> first version of an object, in
>
> http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5///history
fantastic. like it
Robert Vollmert wrote:
> I may be missing something, but why would we need to introduce a read-
> only attribution tag if we already have it? It's the source tag of the
> first version of an object, in
>
> http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5///history
+1
Sebastian
__
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, David Ebling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > well, the attribution they want is so close to that
> >demanded by
> > cc-by-sa as to have no real-world difference
>
> >>whenever we display NZ we would have to display
> "crown
> >>copyright" somewhere totally u
> I may be missing something, but why would we need to introduce a read-
> only attribution tag if we already have it? It's the source tag of the
> first version of an object, in
>
> http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5///history
>
> Cheers
> Robert
>
>
+ 1
Cheers, Chris
_
Robert Vollmert wrote:
> I may be missing something, but why would we need to introduce a read-
> only attribution tag if we already have it? It's the source tag of the
> first version of an object, in
>
> http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5///history
cheers
Richard
_
On Apr 2, 2008, at 13:08, Cartinus wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 April 2008 12:02:49 Robin Paulson wrote:
>>
>> true, but as i suggested in a previous mail, i'm not sure why someone
>> would need to do this. if a user is importing another dataset which
>> needs attribution, they would likely be someon
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Robin Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/04/2008, Cartinus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > there's no reason (in theory) the person carrying out the import of
> > > the second, or third, or whatever, 'approved' source, couldn't
> > > temporarily be g
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 12:02:49 Robin Paulson wrote:
> On 02/04/2008, Cartinus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > there's no reason (in theory) the person carrying out the import of
> > > the second, or third, or whatever, 'approved' source, couldn't
> > > temporarily be given write-status for
On 02/04/2008, Cartinus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there's no reason (in theory) the person carrying out the import of
> > the second, or third, or whatever, 'approved' source, couldn't
> > temporarily be given write-status for that tag. it was only intended
> > to be read-only for the majo
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 00:03:37 Robin Paulson wrote:
> "I'm talking about combining the best parts of the data from two "approved"
> sources and reflecting both sources in the source tag. This is not
> possible, without deleting and recreating the original object, if the
> source tag becomes re
On 02/04/2008, David Ebling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I the only person observing this conversation on
> the mailing list who is deeply, deeply concerned by
> the notion of importing data that requires attribution
> other than the standard OSM CC-by-SA? The fact that
well, the attribution
Am I the only person observing this conversation on
the mailing list who is deeply, deeply concerned by
the notion of importing data that requires attribution
other than the standard OSM CC-by-SA? The fact that
whenever we display NZ we would have to display "crown
copyright" somewhere totally unde
we and linz are happy with
> cheers, Chris
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Robin Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: talk@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other legal discussions. <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, 1 April, 2008 9:
On 02/04/2008, Cartinus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 April 2008 22:46:39 Robin Paulson wrote:
> > *osm will carry out:
>
> > 4. ??? creating an 'attribution' tag, which can only be edited by
> > select members of the community. this tag will be applied only to
> > items requiri
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 22:46:39 Robin Paulson wrote:
> *osm will carry out:
> 4. ??? creating an 'attribution' tag, which can only be edited by
> select members of the community. this tag will be applied only to
> items requiring attribution ???
This one is definitely in the wrong one of the
many thanks to all that participated in the recent discussions on
attributing data provided by land information new zealand. i've read
through all that was discussed and written down a brief summary of
what osm will do and won't do, on the wiki:
i don't recall if there was ever a definite 'yes' or
18 matches
Mail list logo
