On 23/09/2015 11:53, joost schouppe wrote:
... I don't know how we could expect OSM-carto to reflect all our
needs. Apart from being a tool for mappers (i.e. showing as much as
possible), it also wants to be pretty and useful for non-mappers.
Trying to make everyone happy might make everyone
While I am guilty of some of the same reflexes (see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/110 ), I don't
know how we could expect OSM-carto to reflect all our needs. Apart from
being a tool for mappers (i.e. showing as much as possible), it also wants
to be pretty and useful
On 23/09/15 13:59, Andy Townsend wrote:
> To add to that, creating "a personal map style" of a small area using
> https://switch2osm.org/serving-tiles/manually-building-a-tile-server-14-04/
> whilst not for everyone, isn't that difficult these days, and it doesn't
> require huge server resources.
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:59:43 +0100
Andy Townsend wrote:
> For comparison I
> recently had a look at the OSM map style as it was in April 2014 (...)
> and it's not any easier to customise.
This is less subjective than two others - and in that case I am pretty
sure that
> W dniu 22.09.2015 15:49, Mateusz Konieczny napisa?(a):
>
> > Note that it is not including the latest changes that are not deployed
> > on the OSM website (currently it includes the new road style).
>
> One can preview those changes here (for some testing places):
>
>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:10:44 +0200
henk van der laan wrote:
>
>
> > W dniu 22.09.2015 15:49, Mateusz Konieczny napisa?(a):
> >
> > > Note that it is not including the latest changes that are not
> > > deployed on the OSM website (currently it includes the new road
> > >
On 23/09/2015, henk van der laan wrote:
> Now I'm really getting confused. osm-carto is the current version and
> gsoc the new one, right?
There's been a tremendous amount of discussion, feedback, a tweaks
about this change:
*
Hi Mathijs,
In response I've combined some answers for readablilliity.
> Hi Henk,
>
> On 22 September 2015 at 12:43, henk van der laan
> wrote:
>
> To aid the discussion, here you can compare the old and new rendering
> (Netherlands/Belgium/Luxembourg only):
>
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:32:42 +0200
Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> To aid the discussion, here you can compare the old and new rendering
> (Netherlands/Belgium/Luxembourg only):
> http://bl.ocks.org/tyrasd/raw/67a00dbb869456094373/#9.00/52.3535/5.0572
Note that it is not
Hi Henk,
On 22 September 2015 at 12:43, henk van der laan wrote:
> Over the past couple of month some big changes in the rendering of the
> map have been made.
> These changes do not improve the readabillity of the map, and despite
> it's good intentions do not seem to take
On Tuesday 22 September 2015, henk van der laan wrote:
> Over the past couple of month some big changes in the rendering of
> the map have been made.
> These changes do not improve the readabillity of the map, and despite
> it's good intentions do not seem to take into account the basics of
> map
W dniu 22.09.2015 15:49, Mateusz Konieczny napisał(a):
Note that it is not including the latest changes that are not deployed
on the OSM website (currently it includes the new road style).
One can preview those changes here (for some testing places):
> On Tuesday 22 September 2015, henk van der laan wrote:
> > Over the past couple of month some big changes in the rendering of
> > the map have been made.
> > These changes do not improve the readabillity of the map, and despite
> > it's good intentions do not seem to take into account the basics
On Tuesday 22 September 2015, henk van der laan wrote:
>
> Stating that something is a bad job by someone does not mean that
> person is incompetent.
No, but if someone does a bad job he/she is either incompetent or has
bad intentions and since you specifically say you assume good
intentions...
14 matches
Mail list logo