[talk-cz] Únorový mapathon Missing maps v Praze

Dobrý den, ráda bych Vás informovala o tom, že příští úterý 25. února proběhne další pražský mapathon, tentokrát v sídle KPMG Česká republika, Pobřežní 648/1a, 186 00 Praha. https://www.facebook.com/events/504043236919552/ Hezký den Katka Panczaková

Re: [Talk-se] Ortnamnsimport från Lantmäteriets GSD-Terrängkartan

Hej! Lång historia kort: jag har skapad en privat OSM API server som nu innehåller samtliga 118 tusen importnoder. Man kan använda den för att ladda ner, jämföra, redigera, radera flytta och eventuellt ladda upp punkter till den offentliga OSM-databasen. Man "öppnar" både servrarna som två JOSM:s

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL Advice — POIs and private / personal data

Hi Robin, Have you had a chance to review the Community Guidelines? https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines In particular, I would think that the Horizontal Layers Guideline ("Examples of where you DO NOT need to share your non-OpenStreetMap data: You use OpenStreetMap as

[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL Advice — POIs and private / personal data

Hello, I'm hoping to get some help to better understand how the ODbL licence applies with my use of OSM data. I understand that the discussion here is not official — nor a replacement for proper legal advice — however I'm hoping you can provide some guidance so I can come to my own conclusion as

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Vandalisme utilisateur "PARIS SUD", le retour

MERCI, Jean-Yovn! Je suis désolé de ne pas avoir pu mettre la main à la pâte. Il faut que je m'écrive un petit script autour de l'API d'OSM pour pouvoir ocntribuer et je n'ai aps encore trouvé le temps, le courage, l'énergie... de le faire. Mais j'espère y arriver bientôt. @Jean-Yovn: lorsque tu

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Remplacer ref:ERDF:gdo par ref:FR:Enedis / ref:FR:gdo

Bonsoir Quentin, Attention, à ma connaissance sur les réseaux GRDF, seuls les postes de distribution publics ont un code GDO affichés. Les valeurs qui commencent par GI ne sont pas des codes GDO Cela n'empêche pas de les décrire avec pipeline=substation substation=delivery operator=GRDF

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Vandalisme utilisateur "PARIS SUD", le retour

J'ai supprimé plus de la moitié des *sortie* dans les noms de bouches. Il en reste encore environ 200, c'est pénible mais ça avance. En espérant que personne ne casse... Jean-Yvon ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nettoyage Enedis / GRDF

Bonsoir Quentin, Merci pour les informations, tel qu'expliqué ici ces modifs devraient être ok. N'hésitez pas à faire de même chez vous pour se séparer de operator=ERDF Je m'aperçois que j'en ai encore un peu à faire dans les Alpes Bonne soirée François Le lun. 17 févr. 2020 à 13:17, Quentin

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

20 Feb 2020, 12:09 by o...@imagico.de: > That an attribution  > hidden under an 'i' visible only on user interaction does not qualify > as such is self evident i think. > +1 I am quite confused why it is explicitly listed as acceptable. Is someone thinking that typical people  click on every

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

20 Feb 2020, 18:44 by si...@poole.ch: > > Am 19.02.2020 um 14:24 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > >> In this case the statement that "small maps or multiple data sources" >> are the only cases where the document does not require visible >> attribution is wrong. For example it is later stated

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Am Do., 20. Feb. 2020 um 19:19 Uhr schrieb Christoph Hormann : > On Thursday 20 February 2020, Simon Poole wrote: > For example it is later stated that > > > visible attribution is not required if "there is legal or safety or > > > privacy information that needs to be presented with similar or >

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

On Thursday 20 February 2020, Simon Poole wrote: > Am 19.02.2020 um 14:24 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > > In this case the statement that "small maps or multiple data > > sources" are the only cases where the document does not require > > visible attribution is wrong. For example it is later

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Am 19.02.2020 um 14:24 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > In this case the statement that "small maps or multiple data sources" > are the only cases where the document does not require visible > attribution is wrong. For example it is later stated that visible > attribution is not required if

Re: [Talk-it] Aggiornamento OSMit

Per esigenze organizzative è stato scambiato l'ordine degli interventi di Maurizio Napolitano e Andrea Albani: Napo : h10,30 - 11,30 Andrea: h 11,30 - 13,00 La pagina aggiornata: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Italy/Events/OSMit_2020 Il giorno dom 16 feb 2020 alle ore 20:18 mbranco2 ha

[talk-cz] Mapování za peníze

Pokud chcete někdo mapovat za peníze a na čerstvém vzduchu: https://www.clovekvtisni.cz/en/career/hiking-trail-coordinator-723jo #nalezeno v inboxu Mirek ___ talk-cz mailing list talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-cz] OpenStreetMap Česká republika Local Chapter application

Ah, really happy to get some positive feedback. We'll be adapting our standard "community consultation" mail to make it clear that a simple encouragement is also really welcome! Joost Op do 20 feb. 2020 11:26 schreef Tomas Novotny : > Hi, > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:16:35 +0100 > Joost Schouppe

Re: [talk-cz] Dotaz z OSM fóra - jak otagovat nepoužívanou tramvajovou trať?

Cus, presne abandoned=tram bys pouzivat nemel vubec nikde. Pouziva se to takhle: railway=disused disused:railway=tram nebo samo railway=abandoned abandoned:railway=tram A duvod je ten, ze tohle tagovani muzes mit klidne na silnici, kde pak neni zjevny, k cemu se to vztahuje. Dne

[OSM-talk-fr] Osmose et Id

Osmose via OpenRailwayMap me dit que la gare de Bannalec, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493447175 devrait être modélisée comme nœud et non comme chemin. Premier soucis : sur le wiki ça peut-être un nœud ou une surface (mais

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bon usage de tracktype

Le jeu. 20 févr. 2020 à 12:48, rainerU a écrit : > Merci pour vos commentaires. Ma conclusion est que je continue de saisir > tracktype comme je l'ai fait dans le passé, conformément à la définition > du wiki > grade1="revêtement dur de type asphalte ou composée de matériaux très > compactés".

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bon usage de tracktype

Merci pour vos commentaires. Ma conclusion est que je continue de saisir tracktype comme je l'ai fait dans le passé, conformément à la définition du wiki grade1="revêtement dur de type asphalte ou composée de matériaux très compactés". La version anglaise est plus précise car elle parle de

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

On Thursday 20 February 2020, Simon Poole wrote: > > Artificial "yes", but the main thing is that it is small enough to > ensure that it will essentially never be a substantial extract, on > the other hand large enough that you can cover the location of your > entrance, parking lot or whatever in

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

On Thursday 20 February 2020, Simon Poole wrote: > > > > So the recommendation for small devices can and should only be that > > if a data user uses OSM data under conditions where the usual > > attribution is technically not possible or economically not > > desirable they have to choose a

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Am Do., 20. Feb. 2020 um 11:53 Uhr schrieb Simon Poole : > The ODbL requires the attribution to be "reasonably calculated ...", > which includes, naturally, "where the user would typically expect to > find attribution". indeed, that's why I posted extracts of the requirements of the

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Am 20.02.2020 um 11:34 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > What you don't seem to understand is that there is nothing in the ODbL > that allows the conclusion that for OSM data use on certain devices > there is a *lesser* requirement for making the user aware of the use of > OSM data than on others

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Am Do., 20. Feb. 2020 um 11:32 Uhr schrieb Simon Poole : > Am 20.02.2020 um 11:19 schrieb Christian Quest: > > > > - the 10.000m2 limit, this is completely artificial > > > > > Artificial "yes", but the main thing is that it is small enough to > ensure that it will essentially never be a

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

I agree that talking about specific forms of attribution is pointless here. Each corporate OSM data user has a huge department of people who every day do no other thing than thinking about new and creative ways to pry for their users' attention and use it in the company's interest. They do

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Am 20.02.2020 um 11:19 schrieb Christian Quest: > > - the 10.000m2 limit, this is completely artificial > > Artificial "yes", but the main thing is that it is small enough to ensure that it will essentially never be a substantial extract, on the other hand large enough that you can cover the

Re: [OSM-talk] missing maps? no: missing GPS traces.

Hi Mario, I switched from an app to the dedicated GPS device. It is for now the Garmin eTrex 35 Touch (no affiliation). It is capable to record a GPS trace for about 20 hours on the pair of cheap AA alkaline batteries. Here is, for example, the 431 km GPS trace I recorded in Mexico from

Re: [talk-cz] OpenStreetMap Česká republika Local Chapter application

Hi, On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:16:35 +0100 Joost Schouppe wrote: > Hi, > > Glad to hear no opposition. We have put a vote on accepting the Local > Chapter on the agenda of the next OSMF Board meeting. > > However, we would really like to hear from those that support the chapter > too. Anyone here

Re: [talk-cz] MapTiler mapy na OpenStreetMap.cz

Ahoj Vope, tu Topo mapu čeká velká úprava (vezme si to na starosti člověk, který rozumí kartografii), ale chvilku to potrvá. Každopádně díky za připomínku, určitě ji dám jako jeden z bodů, co by se mělo zlepšit. Jirka On 19. 02. 20 0:10, Petr Vozdecký wrote: Ahoj Jirko, díky za vrstvu! ...

Re: [talk-cz] OpenStreetMap Česká republika Local Chapter application

Hoi Joost, Of course, we are excited to join the OSMF as a Local Chapter! :-) Best regards, Jiri On 20. 02. 20 9:16, Joost Schouppe wrote: Hi, Glad to hear no opposition. We have put a vote on accepting the Local Chapter on the agenda of the next OSMF Board meeting. However, we would

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Le 19/02/2020 à 09:59, Simon Poole a écrit : The LWG has now integrated feedback from the initial airing in August last year, from a total of three sessions at SOTM-US and SOTM in Heidelberg, feedback from the OSMF board and from the wider OSM community. Barring any major late developing

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Good luck with Mapbox trying to comply with odbl, OSMF corporate foundation and community expectations, to their their of service and the attribution you just quoted. They will try to close the ticket several times without solving the issues. wall hammering. The examples you gave were checked and

Re: [talk-cz] OpenStreetMap Česká republika Local Chapter application

Hi, Czech openstreetmap community is relatively small and OpenStreetMap Česká republika z.s. already is (de facto) local chapter, as it maintains openstreetmap.cz website. I hope making it official will help the community. -- Mikoláš Štrajt / Severák -- Původní e-mail

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Am Do., 20. Feb. 2020 um 01:06 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org>: > And "mobile devices may have attribution after one interaction" > absolutely MUST be removed. > > This part looks like written by Mapbox copyright lawyers > to legitimise their unacceptable

Re: [talk-cz] OpenStreetMap Česká republika Local Chapter application

Hi Joost, yes, please. I would like this. Best regards, Dalibor From: Joost Schouppe Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 9:17 AM To: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-cz] OpenStreetMap Česká republika Local Chapter application Hi, Glad to hear no opposition. We have

Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Folks, I was being a bit tongue in cheek, obviously the point didn't get across. I apologize and re-state: For many legal and marketing reasons providing attribution to "OSM" is not something that is likely ever going to be supported or recommended by the OSMF as sufficient. This is nothing new

Re: [talk-cz] OpenStreetMap Česká republika Local Chapter application

Hi, Glad to hear no opposition. We have put a vote on accepting the Local Chapter on the agenda of the next OSMF Board meeting. However, we would really like to hear from those that support the chapter too. Anyone here who would like to see the OSM Czech organization become an official Local