Re: [OSM-ja] インポート：HelloCyclingのシェアサイクルポート

[OKADA Tsuneo]

岡田です。

import-MLに投稿して2週間待ちましたが、特にコメントなどありませんでしたので、
これからインポートに着手します。

2023年6月14日(水) 9:01 OKADA Tsuneo :

> 岡田です。
>
> 標記の件アナウンスのメールを出して2週間経ちましたが、特に質問・ご意見などはありませんでした。
> インポートに関しては、Slackの方で関連する投稿をした際に、5名の方から
> 「+1」のリアクションをいただきましたので、これにて賛意をいただいたものと
> 判断しまして、次のステップ(importMLでのアナウンス)に進めます。
>
> 2023年5月30日(火) 13:27 OKADA Tsuneo :
>
>> 岡田です。
>>
>> OpenStreet社が提供するHelloCyclingというシェアサイクルのサービスがあり、
>> そのポートの情報がGBFS(General Bikeshare Feed Specification)という形式で
>> 提供されています。
>> ライセンスはODbL 1.0を含むマルチライセンスの形式ですので、問題ないと思います。
>>
>> そこでこのシェアサイクルのポート情報をOSMにインポートしたいと思い、
>> インポートに必要な情報をwikiにまとめました。
>>
>> つきましては、内容に問題などないかご確認いただければと思います。
>> 質問などもお受けします。
>>
>> wikiページ：
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/GBFS_HelloCycling_Import
>> データ提供サイト：
>> https://ckan.odpt.org/dataset/c_bikeshare_gbfs-openstreet
>>
>> --
>> 岡田常雄(OKADA Tsuneo)
>> tsuneo.ok...@gmail.com
>>
>
>
> --
> 岡田常雄(OKADA Tsuneo)
> tsuneo.ok...@gmail.com
>


-- 
岡田常雄(OKADA Tsuneo)
tsuneo.ok...@gmail.com
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Minh Nguyen]

Vào lúc 05:42 2023-06-27, Yves via talk đã viết:

That would be again discussing with the proponent, as Brian started.
Taginfo chronology already show one mass edit and revert, best to make 
sure there's not another waste of energy beforehand.


The mass edit and revert were performed by the same mapper, who seems to 
be open to performing the edit again. (If not, I'm sure we can find 
others would be.)


The DWG had requested that Brian restore the 9,500 or so occurrences of 
service=driveway2 until the community could reach consensus on this 
issue after a discussion on one of the mailing lists. [1] The most 
definitive answer that came out of the discussion was a suggestion to 
deal with these ways on a case by case basis, which turned out to be 
aspirational.


After a brief pause, the mapper who introduced these tags continued to 
do so at a steady clip. As far as I can tell, no other user has been 
deliberately adding this tag since the matter came before this list; 
most new occurrences by uninvolved mappers have been the result of 
splitting ways. [2]


The tag's proponent is asserting that removing these tags would squander 
their unparalleled effort. [3] The counterargument has been that adding 
these tags in the first place was and continues to be wasteful and 
misguided.


In my opinion, this is an easy call. We should redo the mass deletion. 
To the extent that this episode reveals any gaps in the tagging 
vocabulary, JaLoo(oo)Nz is invited to put forward a reasonable proposal 
through the usual process and respect the outcome.


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125373826
[2] https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wF6
[3] 



--
m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-gb-london] Wed 28th Jun, Barley Mow pub. 7:00pm

[Harry Wood]

TOMORROW! (Wednesday 28th June) we'll have an OpenStreetMap social pub meet-up 
at The Barley Mow pub, Westminster, from 7:00pm. Whether you're a mapper, map 
user, or just curious, come join us for map chat and beers!

The Barley Mow (barleymowhorseferryrd.co.uk) is here on the map: 
https://osm.org/go/euut0FBy?m= , Horseferry Road. Westminster, or is it 
Millbank? Closest tube is St James Park central line. Closest big tube is 
Victoria. Warning: There are several other Barley Mow pubs elsewhere in central 
London! We'll try to get a table but likely to be standing until the after-work 
crowd subsides. If you think you may have trouble recognising anyone, turn up 
at 7:30pm when the group will be more assembled, and look out for maps or 
OpenStreetMap hi-viz vests or polo shirts. Also take Harry's number: O7979815O13

Assuming the pub is serving food, some/most of us will probably be eating there.

Mark yourself as "attending" on this site: https://osmcal.org/event/2179/ if 
you fancy it. Not everyone bothers signing up. We normally expect 5/10 people 
at the pub.


This and other events listed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London
Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/OSMLondon/
And Mastodon: https://en.osm.town/@OSMLondon

___
Talk-gb-london mailing list
Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london

[talk-au] Australia - Add Water Features MapRoulette challenges

[Salim Baidoun]

Dear OSM Australia,

I am delighted to announce a new MapRoulette challenge (Australia - Add Water 
Features), and after careful 
consideration, we have identified potential leads by comparing water features 
in OpenStreetMap (OSM) with TomTom’s map database. The challenge focuses on 
various types of water features, including small ponds and puddles.

Currently, there are 50 tasks in this challenge. The objective is to identify 
and add any missing water features as necessary. We have confidence that 
mappers will utilize suitable imagery and their local knowledge to thoroughly 
investigate each situation.If you have any questions or require assistance, 
please feel free to reach out to me directly or respond to this post.

You can also leave your comments on the Australia 
GitHub or 
MapRoulette challenge page.Thank you, and I wish you a wonderful editing 
experience as always.

Best regards,
Salim A. Baidoun / Community & Partnerships - Global / Community Engagement


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Yves via talk]

That would be again discussing with the proponent, as Brian started.
Taginfo chronology already show one mass edit and revert, best to make sure 
there's not another waste of energy beforehand.
Yves 

Le 27 juin 2023 12:46:50 GMT+02:00, Marc_marc  a écrit :
>Le 27.06.23 à 12:27, Yves via talk a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> Le 25 juin 2023 01:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Brian M. Sperlongano" 
>>  a écrit :
>> 
>>> 
>>> And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten
>>> done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated
>>> editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly
>>> continued to add this nonsense tag to the database unabated:
>>> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology
>>> 
>> 
>> An automated edit or a Maproulette challenge makes no sense in these 
>> conditions.
>
>Could you explain what you think?
>And what solution will you use if neither a mass edition nor an 
>object-by-object edition is suitable in your opinion?
>
>
>
>___
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

Since there seems to be community consensus for the removal, I have
notified the main proponent at:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130249355

And also opened a matching thread on the community forum.

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 6:07 AM Andy Townsend  wrote:

> On 25/06/2023 00:02, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
> > And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not
> > gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about
> > automated editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper
> > has quietly continued to add this nonsense tag to the database unabated:
> > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology
> >
> > For the original thread, see:
> >
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-September/087734.html
> >
> Has anyone actually mentioned this discussion to the proponent of the
> tag?  If I've got the right user (and I may not have)
> http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=741163
> suggests not.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Marc_marc]

Le 27.06.23 à 12:27, Yves via talk a écrit :



Le 25 juin 2023 01:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Brian M. Sperlongano" 
 a écrit :



And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten
done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated
editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly
continued to add this nonsense tag to the database unabated:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology



An automated edit or a Maproulette challenge makes no sense in these conditions.


Could you explain what you think?
And what solution will you use if neither a mass edition nor an 
object-by-object edition is suitable in your opinion?




___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Yves via talk]

Le 25 juin 2023 01:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Brian M. Sperlongano" 
 a écrit :

>
>And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten
>done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated
>editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly
>continued to add this nonsense tag to the database unabated:
>https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology
>

An automated edit or a Maproulette challenge makes no sense in these conditions.
Yves 

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Andy Townsend]

On 25/06/2023 00:02, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not 
gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about 
automated editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper 
has quietly continued to add this nonsense tag to the database unabated:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology

For the original thread, see: 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-September/087734.html


Has anyone actually mentioned this discussion to the proponent of the 
tag?  If I've got the right user (and I may not have) 
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=741163 
suggests not.


Best Regards,

Andy



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Mateusz Konieczny via talk]

Jun 25, 2023, 03:08 by marc_m...@mailo.com:

> Le 25.06.23 à 01:02, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit :
>
>> nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten done, but 
>> while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated editing, we 
>> find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly continued to add 
>> this nonsense tag to the database unabated:
>> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology
>>
>
> I don't remember anyone opposing this mechanical edit but "prefer 
> maproulette/osmose  given the number is quite manageable".
> I don't remember anyone opposing the goal of this mechanical edit (get rid of 
> highwway=service2)
>
> if someone has objected, take their opinion into account by exluding
> the area that this contributor is willing todo for a given lapse of time.
> in the meantime perform the operation outside the contributor's "manual zone".
>
> after "a certain period of time", I think it is reasonable to consider that 
> the objection has been overcome...
> I even think that this "a certain period of time" has already elapsed :
> no one is doing this on a case-by-case basis to add a precise value
> to replace this nonsense, as the chronology graph clearly shows.
>
> so, imho, go ahead next week (or 2) unless someone suddenly start
> obecting and doing it himself case-by-case
>
Given that this tag name is misleading, conflicts with established and
useful tags, is unclear, poorly defined if defined at all, it is highly 
confusing
and its existence is based on someone misunderstanding OSM tagging 
and Florida law and a lot of effort was taken to communicate with
its promoter:

- I support removal of all its presence
- given scale of damage it makes sense to do it with an automated edit
(especially as despite declaration noone reviewed it manually, at least on
scale necessary to bring numbers down)

Maybe it would be useful to check whether this tags were added to
ways without service=* tags or have they removed valid service=* values

But overall just mass removing it would be helpful already.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

[Warin]

On 5/9/22 17:10, Minh Nguyen wrote:

Vào lúc 09:57 2022-09-03, Tomas Straupis đã viết:

2022-09-03, št, 19:17 Mateusz Konieczny via talk rašė:
as sole user of service=driveway2 declared that they are using it 
for all

highway=service where no other service=* value fits, it can be cleanly
removed fully automatically without any review


   If so and "driveway2" was added manually, then "driveway2" means
"checked, no value fits".



The value 'driveway2' does not convey this 'information'.

Possibly the value 'unknown' would be better.

However it would be best if new values that convey the truth would be best.


Example a parking entry/exit road (not within the parking area)? 
service=passage ??? In fact this value looks like it may fit the 
driveway2 description ...



However I normally just extend the parking_aisle to cover it - less work.



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk-fr] hebdoOSM Nº 674 13/06/2023-19/06/2023

[weeklyteam]

Bonjour,

Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 674 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître 
*en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur :

https://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/16561/

Bonne lecture !

Saviez-vous que vous pouvez vous aussi soumettre des messages pour la note 
hebdomadaire sans être membre ? Il vous suffit de vous connecter sur 
https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login avec votre compte OSM. Pour en savoir plus 
sur la rédaction d'un article, cliquez ici: 
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm

hebdoOSM ? 
Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
Où : 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr