[OSM-talk-be] #equalstreetnames

Hi all, Today, #equalstreetnames was launched, something Open Knowledge / OSM Belgium (among others) can be very proud of if you ask me. The project combines OSM and Wikidata (+ extra data crowdsourced during a workshop) to make this map: https://equalstreetnames.brussels/ (stunning isn't

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 17/02: Towards Equal Street Names with Open Data

process will get the gender from the wikidata "page" (if there is a wikidata "page" for every person that have a street with their name). Thanks for the feedback ! Jonathan Beliën Mar 11 févr 2020, à 10:56, Santens Seppe a écrit : Hi Jonathan, Workflow sounds good! If

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 17/02: Towards Equal Street Names with Open Data

Hi Jonathan, Workflow sounds good! If I may, a few remarks: · Given this workflow, I wonder whether we can drop the focus on Wikipedia (to save work/time): 1) If there is an existing Wikipedia page, it will probably already be linked to the corresponding Wikidata item. 2) If we put a

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 17/02: Towards Equal Street Names with Open Data

name. > > Is that what we will be doing? Or did I somehow misunderstand? > > Polyglot > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Santens Seppe wrote: >> >> Hi community, >> >> >> >> Open Knowledge Belgium, OpenStreetMap Belgium and Wikimedi

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 17/02: Towards Equal Street Names with Open Data

). I created a wikidata entry both for the person and for the street itself. Things are complicated by the bilingual nature of the city and because this street also had an old name. Is that what we will be doing? Or did I somehow misunderstand? Polyglot On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Santens

[OSM-talk-be] 17/02: Towards Equal Street Names with Open Data

Hi community, Open Knowledge Belgium, OpenStreetMap Belgium and Wikimedia Belgium want to map all the streetnames by gender in Brussels, as a first step to change the imbalance in reality. We need your help on 17/02 to get the OSM data linked to wikidata. Register here to join the mapping

Re: [OSM-talk-be] folk sports in Belgium

I've added quite a few krachtbal pitches and popinjay (staande wip) masts in recent times, so it's cool to see all of these on a dedicated map! I agree with Jakka that bolletra and krulbollen/staakbollen (and maybe other variants) should be added, but I'm not sure how/if these are mapped.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Neighbourhoods in Ghent mapped as a point

Hi Pieter, It might take a bit more work to join the boundaries of the neighbourhoods with the existing boundaries of the city and the city sections. If the open data of the city of Ghent should diverge from what is already in OSM, it should be decided upon which dataset has the truth, which

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: Open Belgium 2019: Call for Speakers + Early Bird Tickets!

Cool idea, Marc! Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 8 januari 2019 20:32 Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: Open Belgium 2019: Call for Speakers + Early Bird Tickets! I cannot make it to Open Belgium, but I have been thinking about a

[OSM-talk-be] JOSM preset "Mapping in Belgium" updated

Hi all, I've done an update of the JOSM preset "Mapping in Belgium" (thanks a lot Escada for all the work he put into this). The result can be found here: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/BENELUX I've added a few chain stores based on

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nodes or areas to tag amenities

For this particular example, I thought it was quite appropriate. The different shops are in the same building (according to GRB), but can also be clearly separated ‘architecturally’ (see

[OSM-talk-be] FW: Nieuwe tabel ‘Stand van zaken’ Basiskaart Vlaanderen (GRB)

ter info Van: Informatie Vlaanderen [mailto:informatie.vlaanderen=vlaanderen...@mail139.atl121.mcsv.net] Namens Informatie Vlaanderen Verzonden: dinsdag 13 maart 2018 11:41 Aan: Santens Seppe Onderwerp: Nieuwe tabel ‘Stand van zaken’ Basiskaart Vlaanderen (GRB) VLAANDEREN.be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] AIV import tool - discussie

I'm afraid I've started it :-) (08/01 - 13:42) https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$1515415335803049JoFbB:matrix.org -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jakka [mailto:vdmfrank...@gmail.com] Verzonden: woensdag 10 januari 2018 9:25 Aan: talk-be@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Re:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] mapping ALPR cameras (in Ghent)

from node is fine. For a way drawn right to left, any node to the left of the from node is OK. regards m On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I was triggered by a tweet from a journalist > (https://twitter.com/b

[OSM-talk-be] mapping ALPR cameras (in Ghent)

Hi all, I was triggered by a tweet from a journalist (https://twitter.com/bertstaes/status/918017848844476416) to start mapping ALPR cameras in Ghent that control access to the "car free area". Could you have a look at one example I tried to work out? All advice is welcome.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] meerdere postcodes voor één gemeente

2017 22:33:49 + Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent> wrote: > Hi all, > > Osmose complains that my hometown has two postal codes: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/721879 > In fact, 9880 is the "general" postal code for Aalter, but there is also &

[OSM-talk-be] meerdere postcodes voor één gemeente

Hi all, Osmose complains that my hometown has two postal codes: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/721879 In fact, 9880 is the "general" postal code for Aalter, but there is also 9881, which is used for Bellem, a town that is part of Aalter (deelgemeente). Should the relation for Aalter

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Speed pedelec

We discussed this with a few mappers when we were preparing the changes due to the introduction of the "circulation plan" in Ghent. The consensus was to use moped_P like Ben suggests below. See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qx4 Seppe -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ben Laenen

[OSM-talk-be] FW: GRB 5.0: wijzigingen en nieuw product

ter info Van: Informatie Vlaanderen [mailto:informatie.vlaanderen=vlaanderen...@mail107.atl31.mcdlv.net] Namens Informatie Vlaanderen Verzonden: woensdag 12 juli 2017 10:52 Aan: Santens Seppe Onderwerp: GRB 5.0: wijzigingen en nieuw product VLAANDEREN.be/informatievlaanderen<h

[OSM-talk-be] duplicates originating from GRB merge

Hey guys, >From time to time, I'm seeing duplicate nodes or areas that I reckon are due >to (wrong use) of the GRB merge tools. One striking example: >https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1017110 (let the JOSM validator run on this >area) Is there any news about the tools? I see they are being

Re: [OSM-talk-be] persbericht Stad Gent - OSMAND

Nieuwe, vl betere versie van het persbericht: https://stad.gent/mobiliteitsplan/nieuws-evenementen//help-mee-om-digitale-kaarten-te-updaten Van: joost schouppe [mailto:joost.schou...@gmail.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 18 april 2017 20:08 Aan: Ruben CC: OpenStreetMap Belgium Onderwerp: Re:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] persbericht Stad Gent

uot;Santens Seppe" <seppe.sant...@stad.gent<mailto:seppe.sant...@stad.gent>> wrote: FYI (in Dutch) Van: Santens Seppe Verzonden: zaterdag 15 april 2017 16:07 Aan: … Onderwerp: RE: … Collega’s, Ik zie dat er een tekst is gepubliceerd over het updaten van kaarten: https://stad

[OSM-talk-be] persbericht Stad Gent

FYI (in Dutch) Van: Santens Seppe Verzonden: zaterdag 15 april 2017 16:07 Aan: … Onderwerp: RE: … Collega’s, Ik zie dat er een tekst is gepubliceerd over het updaten van kaarten: https://stad.gent/mobiliteitsplan/nieuws-evenementen//help-mee-om-digitale-kaarten-te-updaten<https://stad.g

[OSM-talk-be] FW: Basiskaart Vlaanderen (GRB) - Wijzigingen GRB-producten vanaf juli 2017

: Santens Seppe Onderwerp: Basiskaart Vlaanderen (GRB) - Wijzigingen GRB-producten vanaf juli 2017 VLAANDEREN.be/informatievlaanderen<http://vlaanderen.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=75cf74117d8248dc5420d71eb=b23693ae6e=f7d0b207cc> Bekijk deze mail in je browser.<http://us3.campaign-archiv

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

Kan iemand misschien nog wat tips geven over het mappen/taggen van turn restrictions (vooral hoe de uitzonderingen best gemapt worden)? https://hackpad.com/OSM-mapping-Circulatieplan-Gent-qBu1NBPGjSn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Santens Seppe [mailto:seppe.sant...@stad.gent] Verzonden

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

zullen moeten worden aangepast, er is immers erg veel veranderd aan de kaart in Gent in twee dagen tijd... Ga gerust een kijkje nemen dus! Seppe -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Santens Seppe [mailto:seppe.sant...@stad.gent] Verzonden: dinsdag 28 maart 2017 10:36 Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

, natuurlijk). Dat ze dat in Gent van de ene dag op de andere willen doen, lijkt me een logistieke nachtmerrie, maar dat is niet echt ons probleem. mvg, Jo Op 28 februari 2017 om 10:55 schreef Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent<mailto:seppe.sant...@stad.gent>>: De data: •O

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

Am I correct moped_A and moped_B are only used in Belgium? Can we have a moped_P? Or would it be better to review the moped tag and make it something like moped=yes + moped:A=yes + moped:P=yes? (by the way, a lot of new class A + P exception signs will be introduced in the city of Ghent on

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

Oh yes, one more thing: traffic signs are often contradictory (e.g. different message at beginning and end of the street), which of course is very frustrating… Van: Santens Seppe Verzonden: vrijdag 3 maart 2017 10:45 Aan: 'OpenStreetMap Belgium' Onderwerp: RE: [OSM-talk-be] Missing

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

Thanks for this script André. It’s simple, but it clearly shows where there is work to do. I’ve corrected a few situations in Ghent. Some remarks/questions: ·I’ve seen the combination of oneway=no and cycleway=opposite. I guess the latter tag should (always?) be deleted in this case (of

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

De data: ·OSM-bestanden: https://we.tl/3jpyFMuf0t (let wel: enkel road network, hier en daar quick and dirty oplossingen, want enkel met het oog op routering) ·GIS-materiaal: https://we.tl/ExJZGWLJ8L (mag hergebruikt worden onder Open Data Licentie

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

en' op de eigenlijke situatie. Jo Op 27 februari 2017 om 11:40 schreef Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent<mailto:seppe.sant...@stad.gent>>: // in Dutch as this concerns the local situation in Ghent Hallo allemaal, Op 3 april 2017 wordt in Gent het circulatieplan ingevoerd

[OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

// in Dutch as this concerns the local situation in Ghent Hallo allemaal, Op 3 april 2017 wordt in Gent het circulatieplan ingevoerd (https://stad.gent/mobiliteitsplan/het-circulatieplan). Heel wat straten worden "geknipt" (voor autoverkeer zonder vergunning), heel wat rijrichtingen

Re: [OSM-talk-be] car sharing

rom the head of “Data en Informatie” that the attribution requirement can be handled in the same way as it is done for e.g. Agiv data. Anything more we need to know? Seppe Van: Santens Seppe [mailto:seppe.sant...@stad.gent] Verzonden: donderdag 23 februari 2017 23:40 Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium O

Re: [OSM-talk-be] car sharing

at 11:18 AM, Santens Seppe <seppe.sant...@stad.gent<mailto:seppe.sant...@stad.gent>> wrote: On the topic of car sharing: on the data portal of the City of Ghent (the organization I work for), there is a dataset with all Cambio locations (not only the ones in Ghent): https://data.stad.g

Re: [OSM-talk-be] car sharing

On the topic of car sharing: on the data portal of the City of Ghent (the organization I work for), there is a dataset with all Cambio locations (not only the ones in Ghent): https://data.stad.gent/datasets/standplaatsen-cambio No doubt this could be a great extra help to improve OSM (of course

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Namen van kerken

Ook hier niet zo’n vrome ziel, maar als ik kijk naar hoe overheden verwijzen naar kerken op hun grondgebied, dan zie ik bijna uitsluitend kerk. Parochiekerk lijkt me eerder iets specifiek voor Erfgoed. Voorstel van Marc om kerk als name op te nemen lijkt me dus goed, dan rest er nog de vraag

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 90 --> 70 km/h

Instellingen > Map > Kleine objecten niet weergeven als POI Van: Ruben [mailto:talk-be.ru...@janmaes.com] PPS: Does anyone know how to get rid of those way placeholders on Overpass Turbo? I'm talking about those nodes that are all over the place when there are a lot of ways that are 'too

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Groen in de steden

Ik heb de discussie enkel diagonaal gelezen. Als ik het goed begrijp, zou er eigenlijk een tag moeten zijn die overeenkomt met het Nederlandse woord "perk" (Vandale: tuinvak met bloemen of planten). Ik denk wel dat het moeilijk is om daar in het Engels een goed equivalent voor te vinden. Seppe

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mapillary vs OpenStreetCam

Ik ben benieuwd naar de reacties. Bij mij staan beide apps klaar om te gebruiken, maar ik heb dezelfde twijfel. Het mooiste lijkt me om gewoon foto's te maken met geotag en die naar de verschillende platformen te uploaden, maar ik weet niet of daar gemakkelijke manieren voor zijn. Groeten,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GRB hackday december 11th

Looking forward to it! I had a quick look at the documentation and tried the tools, but I don’t feel confident enough to have a go at it. A short training would be nice. Seppe Van: Ben Abelshausen [mailto:ben.abelshau...@gmail.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 13 december 2016 14:10 Aan: OpenStreetMap

Re: [OSM-talk-be] MissingMaps National

I think Joost wraps it up nicely. Some remarks: ·It might be a good idea to have some promotional material for future occasions. I’m thinking: an OSM(.be) banner in the background; flyers that explain OSM in a few words and that participants can take home; a way to identify the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nieuw verkeersplan Gent

live with the route planner at the end of April. Best regards, Seppe -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Santens Seppe [mailto:seppe.sant...@stad.gent] Verzonden: maandag 11 januari 2016 17:15 Aan: talk-be@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nieuw verkeersplan Gent Dag Marc, Ik werk

Re: [OSM-talk-be] road axes in pedestrian areas

these in? See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/GRB What is the added value in your view ? Glenn On 18-02-16 12:30, Santens Seppe wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Are there any sensitivities I should know of when adding “road” axes > in pedestrian areas? My idea is to add

[OSM-talk-be] road axes in pedestrian areas

Hi all, Are there any sensitivities I should know of when adding "road" axes in pedestrian areas? My idea is to add to OSM the axes that are in the GRB (Agiv) to aid pedestrian routing. I've seen this in some places, in others not (yet?). Is it considered ok to do this? Or would you advice

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nieuw verkeersplan Gent

Dag Marc, Ik werk voor het Mobiliteitsbedrijf van de Stad Gent. We hebben het idee om (wellicht begin maart) samen met de OSM-community een mapping party rond het circulatieplan te organiseren. Ik moet nog wat punten en komma's zetten om alles rond te krijgen, maar ik hoop jullie binnenkort