Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 06/10/2023 14:23, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 14:24, Tom Hughes wrote: Maybe it would be easy to avoid and maybe it wouldn't but until we know what the actual problem is we can't tell and none of the developers are likely to have such an old browser to reproduce it even if they

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 06/10/2023 12:53, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 13:41, Tom Hughes wrote: On 06/10/2023 12:12, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 06/10/2023 12:12, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have been any deliberate changes that I know but given the error it's entirely possible

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have been any deliberate changes that I know but given the error it's entirely possible that FF has fixed something in what CSP rules it checks for what requests. I don't see that

Re: [OSM-talk] mapilio? (street-level imagery)

On 24/05/2023 13:31, Greg Troxel wrote: I just got spam from mapilio, implying that I was a "Mapilio contributor". This was, to my memory, the first I had heard of them. There have been a handful of mentions on the forum of various lists in the last few months. I too just got spammed by

Re: [OSM-talk] AT Email

On 30/01/2023 13:25, Mike N. wrote: Not sure where to report this but it seems that AT Email has placed OpenStreetMap Emails on the block list in the past week. Might I suggest that AT Email would be the place to report it? I mean I'm not sure what you think we can do about it remotely. Tom

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM and Google

No it couldn't - the google problem he refers to was with their authentication service not their DNS service. Tom On 14/12/2020 19:10, James wrote: are you using 8.8.8.8 or 4.4.4.4 as a dns? could explain it. On Mon., Dec. 14, 2020, 1:58 p.m. Niels Elgaard Larsen, >

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM and Google

On 14/12/2020 18:54, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: Google services was down for an hour today. I noticed that at the same time I could not push my edits with JOSM due to "internal server error" Was that a coincidence or do we somehow depend on Google? It was a coincidence. Tom -- Tom Hughes

Re: [OSM-talk] Please SWITCH to Mailman 3 & hyperkitty

That's just the instructions on how to migrate the data and it doesn't cover anything related to actually installing and configuring all the components of mailman 3 from a quick look which is a big issue given that it's not packaged and it's a not a single tool like mailman 2 but rather is a

Re: [OSM-talk] Please SWITCH to Mailman 3 & hyperkitty

It's not going to happen. Virtually nobody uses mailman 3 with the exception of Fedora and I know from using it there that the UI is a disaster. Also it's not packaged for Ubuntu and it's far more complicated to deploy than what we have. Don't think of mailman 3 as an upgrade - it's basically

Re: [Talk-GB] Nominatim oddity

On 07/12/2020 17:23, Mark Goodge wrote: This may be a dim question, and this may possibly be the wrong place to ask it. But, at the risk of being both dim and out of place... Why does Nominatim return "Britanniarum Regnum" as the country name for objects in the UK? For example:

Re: [OSM-talk] I’m running for OSMF board and I’ve set up office hours for questions

On 02/12/2020 09:27, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Michal Migurski wrote: > FB’s attribution approach in keeping with best practices seen from other commercial users of display maps. In the spirit of Twitter footnoting one of Donald Trump's "I won the election" tweets, this is your respectful

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

So that can't possibly be when the copyright expires, rather it's a question of contractual provisions in a license agreement between them and NLS not copyright as such. Of course it's only claiming they do have a copyright that they can make such a license necessary. Tom On 01/12/2020 09:49,

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

If we assume that a new copyright is created by the scanning (which is a complicated question) then there is no way it expires next year. What exactly do you think the term is for this copyright and when do you think it starts from? I don't think it's relevant anyway as I thought NLS had given

Re: [Talk-GB] Turn Restrictions at roundabouts

On 03/10/2020 16:57, Philip Barnes wrote: They are intended to stop this type of routing https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car=52.64994%2C-1.20491%3B52.64983%2C-1.2049 Which is techincally not illegal and in real world usage is not going to happen. But unless the

Re: [Talk-GB] Turn Restrictions at roundabouts

On 03/10/2020 14:05, Brian Prangle wrote: There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions , either no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts to prevent turning back into the entry flares where there are no explicit signed restrictions. I suspect this is

Re: [Talk-GB] Overpass query strangeness within iD

Hopefully I've fixed them on TW for the next update. Tom On 16/09/2020 12:44, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote: That would be because somebody on TranslateWiki has added a bunch of bogus strings to the en-GB translation: https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/config

Re: [Talk-GB] Overpass query strangeness within iD

That would be because somebody on TranslateWiki has added a bunch of bogus strings to the en-GB translation: https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/config/locales/en-GB.yml#L621 Tom On 16/09/2020 12:00, Paul Berry wrote: Sorry, I wasn't in edit mode so nothing to do

Re: [Talk-GB] Flatholm Island Boundary Problem

If you think Bristol or Aberdeen are mad then try Norwich: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/172506 Again presumably due to Norwich's history as a port and therefore having control of the river. Tom On 12/09/2020 22:53, Russ Garrett wrote: Yeah, I assume what happened is that the City

Re: [Talk-GB] Pedestrian priority and highway=cycleway

I suspect that the real clue is in the changeset tags: resolved:outdated_tags:incomplete_tags=10 So the iD validator has presumably claimed that the tagging of those paths was "out of date" in some way and this was likely a misguided attempt to fix that. Of course that was likely based on

Re: [OSM-talk] Referential integrity of https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz

On 12/08/2020 13:56, Roland Olbricht via talk wrote: in the minute diff, in file https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz the way 40657824 uses node 7804408284, but that node is contained neither in 694.osc.gz nor in any earlier minute diff. It's in 693 as far

Re: [OSM-talk] Deprecated feature template in the wiki

On 10/06/2020 13:07, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: This doesn't make sense. Why is the definition for the tag removed? Why should someone not " (semi-)automatically change “deprecated” tags to something else in the database" if these tags are completely synonymous as the template suggests? It

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM nicknames are Unicode characters? (not Ascii?)

On 28/05/2020 14:02, mbranco2 wrote: I was surprised finding an OSM username written in gothic characters: I'm not sure if this mailing list could show such font, the nickname is 햒햆햘햙햗햔 ("mastro" in normal characters). The problem is that, if you want to access this user profile, you've to

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 189, Issue 24

I don't believe you can migrate to StackExchange - we would have to start over if we went that route. You definitely can't pay for a StackExhange site - they specifically say that they no longer offer that. Tom On 20/05/2020 22:17, Allan Mustard wrote: Simon, et al, if money is required from

Re: [OSM-talk] our Q site help.openstreetmap.org is dying

On 20/05/2020 14:48, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: Migrate to Stack Exchange? Even assuming that this company will agree it has plenty of potential issues. They have a public process for proposing new sites: https://area51.stackexchange.com/faq So long as enough people are interested

Re: [OSM-talk] our Q site help.openstreetmap.org is dying

Where on earth do you get the idea that they're using the same software? They're not. In fact OSQA and all the other similar open source projects are attempts to recreate the Stack Overflow experience and they're basically all dead or, if still on life support, then very poor clones.

Re: [Talk-GB] List moderator - volunteers needed

On 14/03/2020 11:37, Dan S wrote: Op za 14 mrt. 2020 om 11:20 schreef Tom Hughes via Talk-GB : On 14/03/2020 11:13, Rob Nickerson wrote: As may have seen in Simon's response it sounds like we currently lack list moderators. If this is something you would like to do please email this mailing

Re: [Talk-GB] List moderator - volunteers needed

On 14/03/2020 11:13, Rob Nickerson wrote: As may have seen in Simon's response it sounds like we currently lack list moderators. If this is something you would like to do please email this mailing list. Likewise we probably need to think about the criteria of what makes a good list