Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

I'm sure there will be edge cases where this bot gives us wrong data, but I think overall this will make OSM data better. Thank you for taking the time to improve OSM. CJ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

I'm sure there will be edge cases where this bot gives us wrong data, but I think overall this will make OSM data better. Thank you for taking the time to improve OSM. CJ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

Nov 2, 2023, 15:05 by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk: > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 22:42, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > >> >> I proposed some time ago to fix some surface values. >> > > I support this in general, but the following may be worthy of further > consideration: > >> surface = U →

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 22:42, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > > I proposed some time ago to fix some surface values. I support this in general, but the following may be worthy of further consideration: > surface = U → surface = unpaved Are we sure this is what is meant? > surface =

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

I will review this list. Rare obvious values I will just retag. Some may appear in future proposal. Some are proposed in this one (holz) Some are too complex (pflastersteine) and I will rather create notes for them as it can be not only sett

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

Nov 2, 2023, 10:06 by marc_m...@mailo.com: > Hello, > > Le 01.11.23 à 23:42, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit : > >> French from >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088164.html >> > > wouldn't it be a good idea to make the changes you've already agreed > to first?

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

> Op 02-11-2023 09:57 CET schreef Marc_marc : > Le 02.11.23 à 08:09, Maarten Deen a écrit : > > terre_battue => gravel > > this one is wrong, the correct fix was already in the previous list > terre_battue clay for tennis pitch, earth for others Ah, in dutch we call that gravel as well. I see

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

Hello, Le 01.11.23 à 23:42, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit : French from https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088164.html wouldn't it be a good idea to make the changes you've already agreed to first? because this is the 3rd time we've reviewed the list. or you can

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

I have a few suggestions too: verdichtet => compacted straatstenenc => paving_stones bestraat => paving_stones niet-bestraat => unpaved niet-bestraat2 => unpaved niet-bestraat33 => unpaved щебеночное_покрытие => gravel no_paved => unpaved concreteas => concrete Pflastersteine => sett

[OSM-talk] Proposed bot edit: automatic replacement of surface values where it is safe

I proposed some time ago to fix some surface values. Edit is documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fixing_malformed_surface_tags I propose to expand this by fixing also values listed below. Please comment if any of proposed