Hi Frederik
The Overpass query shows me this morning that with your last redaction the
names are back for the 620 highways.
Thanks
Pierre
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 13:08:42 HAE, Pierre Béland
a écrit :
Re-visiting this changeset I see that of the 620 ways
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Kevin Kenny
wrote:
> With that in hand, I can probably finish up New Jersey this week.
Noo Joisey is done.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details
>
> A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county
> information. I've eliminated all objects that have been reported to be
> ok, and plan to
Re-visiting this changeset I see that of the 620 ways with tag
"source:name"="geobase.ca", 552 ways have no name restored. See for example way
32798176 where I validated the name + added source:name Overpass query
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sh6
Pierre
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017
Great, thanks Frederik.
Pierre
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 11:26:35 HAE, Frederik Ramm
a écrit :
Hi,
On 10.10.2017 03:16, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I still have the raw data and I'll write a quick script
> that finds these cases and restores the names.
Should
Hi,
On 10.10.2017 03:16, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I still have the raw data and I'll write a quick script
> that finds these cases and restores the names.
Should be done here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52829433
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ##
Just a heads up for everybody-
I'll handle the redactions in the Dallas-Fort Worth area of Texas (Collin,
Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Tarrant, Johnson, and Wise Counties)
Thanks,
Andrew Matheny
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Max Erickson wrote:
> I reviewed about 40 ways
I reviewed about 40 ways in New York. Here's an Overpass script for
finding the ways that have not been changed since the redaction:
https://gist.github.com/maxerickson/e02651cce99af983949b91f8d471fb23
The ways are clustered quite a lot.
Max
___
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details
>
> A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county
> information. I've eliminated all objects that have been reported to be
> ok, and plan to
Thanks
Pierre
Le lundi 9 octobre 2017 21:16:19 HAE, Frederik Ramm a
écrit :
Hi,
On 10/10/2017 02:54 AM, Pierre Béland wrote:
> Hi Frederik, as a bad armchar mapper, I have revised the Quebec
> highway names before redaction, validating names with an
Hi,
On 10/10/2017 02:54 AM, Pierre Béland wrote:
> Hi Frederik, as a bad armchar mapper, I have revised the Quebec
> highway names before redaction, validating names with an acceptable
> source + adding source:name=geobase.ca.
I took some precautions to "save" names; if you have indeed
Hi Frederik, as a bad armchar mapper, I have revised the Quebec highway names
before redaction, validating names with an acceptable source + adding
source:name=geobase.ca. After redaction, names are removed + even if I try to
re-import - review all the conflicts throug JOSM, I loose all my
FYI, I reviewed the ways with redacted names in California (all in San Diego
County) and where possible set the names per Tiger 2017 data. In most cases the
names set by chdr matched the Tiger names but there were some exceptions.
There are a roads that did not have names showing in the Tiger
Hi,
On 27.09.2017 21:49, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> That is helpful. Let us know when you have re-executed the analysis and
> posted the results.
http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details
A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county
information. I've eliminated
Hi,
On 27.09.2017 21:49, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> That is helpful. Let us know when you have re-executed the analysis and
> posted the results.
http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details
A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county
information. I've eliminated
Hi Frederik,
That is helpful. Let us know when you have re-executed the analysis and
posted the results.
A list of IDs per county would be helpful. We can work together as US
community to identify viable sources for re-assessing the correct names, as
well as organizing mapping efforts for
Hi,
On 27.09.2017 06:43, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> In your email from Aug 28 you proposed to wait a while as a first step
> to gather some feedback on your assessment. Did you receive any? When do
> you think you want to proceed with the redaction? Anything we can do to
> help?
I haven't
Hi Frederik,
In your email from Aug 28 you proposed to wait a while as a first step to
gather some feedback on your assessment. Did you receive any? When do you think
you want to proceed with the redaction? Anything we can do to help?
I can assist with preparing the MapRoulette challenge to
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Bianca Hambasan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We, the map analysts team from Telenav started editing in Phoenix by
> adding and reviewing the road geometry and road name, so we found this
> issue too. In our area of interest, we found about 5
Hi,
We, the map analysts team from Telenav started editing in Phoenix by adding and
reviewing the road geometry and road name, so we found this issue too. In our
area of interest, we found about 5 200 ways with this tag. We want to help with
this since we already edit in the area. Do you have
Thanks Frederik - I will pass that on to talk-es.
My next question was going to be about name:xx, but you beat me to it!
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Redacting-75-000-street-names-contributed-by-user-chdr-tp5901701p5901775.html
Sent from the General
Hi,
On 30.08.2017 09:29, alan_gr wrote:
> However there is confusion about the process. Several mappers on talk-es
> think that if the name of the affected streets can be verified using the
> cadastre ahead of time, this will avoid them being deleted. Some mappers
> have already started checking
(I will continue in Nelson's thread as my post also relates to a specific
"other country")
The impact on Spain is currently being discussed in the talk-es mailing
list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/2017-August/015416.html
Spain has a legitimate source of street names in the
(sorry to break the thread; I was following the discussion through the
archive, but I wasn't subscribed)
Simon Poole wrote:
> Our concern should be more about Mexico, Brazil and other countries
> where it is at least not obvious to me if the local communities are
> aware of the issue and if we
Simon Poole wrote
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you want to do, but it would seem as if that
just amounts to doing the work twice.
After revising 126 elements, I agree with Simon. Let's avoid doing the job
twice.
Below is an evaluation for Quebec / Canada with a sample of 126 of 1,316 id's
Am 28.08.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Pierre Béland:
> Simon Poole wrote
>
> PS: naturally simply assuming that all name expansions are
> legit is a bit iffy, consider Circle vs. Circuit and other
> expansions that you often can't decide without external
> sources, I
Simon Poole wrote
PS: naturally simply assuming that all name expansions are legit is a bit iffy,
consider Circle vs. Circuit and other expansions that you often can't decide
without external sources, I don't know if there are any such cases in the
affected data, but it seems to be silly to
Hi,
On 08/27/2017 08:51 PM, Mikel Maron wrote:
> Also, Frederik, I think your script picked up false positives. Spot
> checked in DC, and these are expansions of both the street and the
> quadrant ("St NW" -> "Street Northwest"(. Can we fix the script and
> regen the list?
I have modified my
Am 28.08.2017 um 12:16 schrieb James:
> As Stewart has pointed out there are some changes that are valid(name
> expansion). I think Mr.Ramm needs to revise his selection algorithm
> before mass deletion
I'm not quite sure why we are again discussing the center of the known
universe again, but I
I agree with John that many ways flagged by Frederik look like they are
legitimate CanVec imports. In a random sampling of chdr's flagged ways
in Canada, fewer than 15% were created by that user. Some had existing
names cleaned up (eg: Libersan → Rue Libersan in way 23456048) by chdr.
Perhaps more
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> I don't understand what people mean with 'verifying' objects. We're
> not trying to find factually-incorrect data. The data is legally
> tainted. It's questionable whether looking at the current names
>
> we can find a good workflow for that. I wasn't expecting the community to
>start working on this pre-redaction but if people prefer that to fixing issues
>later...
Absolutely, let's do this!
Also, Frederik, I think your script picked up false positives. Spot checked in
DC, and these are
On balance I'd go rip it out then go back in and clean it up.
Cheerio John
On 27 August 2017 at 12:04, James wrote:
> As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed.
>
> When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in Québec and wouldnt be
> hard
FYI, 717 roads will be affected by this redaction in the Philippines.
Let's discuss next actions.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Frederik Ramm
Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:19 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75,000 street names contributed by user chdr
To:
Then it wouldn't be hard either to add the names again from a legal source
after the redaction.
> El 27 ago 2017, a las 13:04, James escribió:
>
> As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed.
>
> When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in
As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed.
When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in Québec and wouldnt be
hard to validate streetnames for 1400 something items.
On Aug 27, 2017 11:24 AM, "Paul Norman" wrote:
> On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john
Either directly or indirectly, and it is a suggestion only.
Cheerio John
On 27 August 2017 at 11:21, Paul Norman wrote:
> On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote:
>
>> I would suggest that any street names added by chdr in Canada were more
>> than likely derived from CANVEC
What do you think is google source for names in Canada ;)
Pierre
De : Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com>
À : talk@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Dimanche 27 août 2017 11h24
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr
On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM
On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote:
I would suggest that any street names added by chdr in Canada were
more than likely derived from CANVEC sources
What makes you believe this to be so?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
As James said earlier, canvec/geobase opendata provides the street names. This
can be easily corrected. But we need to establish a procedure and identify
which ways chdr originally added the name.
We can look simply at the history with a link to the OSM APIexample adding the
id after way/ :
In Canada as James has said CANVEC which has been accepted as Open Source
acceptable to OSM has most street names in Canada. There are a few
exceptions locally where the city has renamed streets and these changes
have not yet been reflected in CANVEC.
I would suggest that any street names added
In Canada as James has said CANVEC which has been accepted as Open Source
acceptable to OSM has most street names in Canada. There are a few
exceptions locally where the city has renamed streets and these changes
have not yet been reflected in CANVEC.
I would suggest that any street names added
If we validate via survey say in Canada, will we be able to remove the id
from the revert list? Canada has Canvec we can reference to as well as
OpenStreetCam and Mapillary
On Aug 27, 2017 9:50 AM, "Frederik Ramm" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>in 2010 I was privately contacted by
43 matches
Mail list logo