Le 07/10/2012 05:04, Richard Weait a écrit :
So, who is a good mapper?
me
What makes a good mapper?
the team
You tell me.
done.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Richard Weait wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu wrote:
Equating changeset comment quality with mapper quality is total BS.
Descriptive comments are helpful to other mappers but that is all.
They don't tell you anything about the quality of the changes.
Directly
On 10 October 2012 21:22, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
What are the results?
...
The most common comment quality is 18.
Half of all accounts have comment quality from 13 to 36.
Bots usually have comment quality under one.
Equating changeset comment quality with mapper quality is
Am 11.10.2012 10:20, schrieb Kevin Peat:
On 10 October 2012 21:22, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
What are the results?
...
The most common comment quality is 18.
Half of all accounts have comment quality from 13 to 36.
Bots usually have comment quality under one.
Equating changeset
On 11 Oct 2012, at 09:32, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
Am 11.10.2012 10:20, schrieb Kevin Peat:
On 10 October 2012 21:22, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
What are the results?
...
The most common comment quality is 18.
Half of all accounts have comment quality
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu wrote:
On 10 October 2012 21:22, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
What are the results?
...
The most common comment quality is 18.
Half of all accounts have comment quality from 13 to 36.
Bots usually have comment quality under
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 2012-10-10 22:22, Richard Weait wrote:
What are the results?
I've taken a go at graphing comment quality. This is not science of
course. Try it yourself; how would you measure comment quality?
The question is: how do
What are the results?
Some respondents mentioned that close-but-not-touching ways made for a
bad mapper but were generally very understanding on this point. It
was seen more as an indication of inexperience.
The Big Pet Peeve that identified bad mappers was poor or missing comments.
I've taken
On 2012-10-10 22:22, Richard Weait wrote:
What are the results?
Some respondents mentioned that close-but-not-touching ways made for
a
bad mapper but were generally very understanding on this point. It
was seen more as an indication of inexperience.
The Big Pet Peeve that identified bad
On Domingo, 7 de octubre de 2012 05:04:27 Richard Weait escribió:
What on Earth are you doing, Richard?
There comes a time in life when oneself stops asking this question.
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es i...@geonerd.org
Aviso: Este e-mail es confidencial y no debería ser usado
Le 7 octobre 2012 12:30, Eric SIBERT courr...@eric.sibert.fr a écrit :
Le 07/10/2012 12:01, Pieren a écrit :
Je renvoie sur cette liste un sondage lancé par Richard Weait (qui le
fait à titre personnel) et qui voudrait notre opinion sur qui est un
bon
Moi.
ou un mauvais mappeur,
Les
C'est quoi cette dérive...
Même remarque qu'Éric
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Fwd-OSM-talk-Who-is-a-good-mapper-Who-isn-t-tp5729314p5729403.html
Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Talk-fr
C'est moi ou c'est le sketch des Inconnus ?
Le mauvais mappeur il mappe mais c'est un mauvais mappeur... Le bon
mappeur il mappe mais c'est un bon mappeur.
Oui le bon mappeur, il mappe, mais bon c'est pas pareil hein... ;-)
J'ai pens exactement la mme chose
I like the idea of an automated quality checker for map edits. That can be seen
as an advancement to the simple rules based checking done when a commit is done
in JOSM.
It might be easier to train the classifier if it concentrates on bad edits or
bad commits rather than bad mappers.
Dave
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Dave Sutter sut...@intransix.com wrote:
I like the idea of an automated quality checker for map edits. That can be
seen as an advancement to the simple rules based checking done when a commit
is done in JOSM.
It might be easier to train the classifier if it
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
Date: Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:04 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Who is a good mapper? Who isn't?
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
Ever wanted to 'dish' on another mapper? Like to gossip?
Or do you just want to help improve the OSM data
Le 07/10/2012 12:01, Pieren a écrit :
Je renvoie sur cette liste un sondage lancé par Richard Weait (qui le
fait à titre personnel) et qui voudrait notre opinion sur qui est un
bon
Moi.
ou un mauvais mappeur,
Les autres.
Ok -[]
Éric
___
Très subjectif tout ça. Peut-être tenir plutôt des statistiques sur
les erreurs détectées (moins celles corrigées par le même auteur) par
les statistiques, plus les revert appliqués à un changeset, à comparer
avec le nombre de bonnes contributions. Ce sera plus fiable.
Note: seulement des vraies
Ever wanted to 'dish' on another mapper? Like to gossip?
Or do you just want to help improve the OSM data and community?
Here is your opportunity. :-)
I've created a survey. You can tell me who you consider to be a good
mapper and who you consider to be a bad mapper. And you can do this
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 23:04:27 -0400
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Ever wanted to 'dish' on another mapper? Like to gossip?
Not really
Or do you just want to help improve the OSM data and community?
If I can
What on Earth are you doing, Richard?
Make sure you are wearing your
20 matches
Mail list logo
