I assume that that way (powerline) was downloaded because it also has
nodes in the area you downloaded. JOSM will never complain about
objects that are not downloaded. Powerline ways tend to be long, so
the warning can easily be in another state, that is true.
Furthermore, I thought that it is not
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:53 AM Dave F via talk
wrote:
> I notice these changesets were completed in 30/60 seconds respectively.
> I don't use iD. How is this possible? Does it have a JOSM like mass edit
> ability?
>
> Yes - JOSM does allow mass fixes through the validator. I've even seen
Oh Good Lord, that's dangerous.
'Everywhere' in the 'Where' option accumulates more warnings (1000+) as
you pan around
Even JOSM doesn't go that far.
DaveF
On 28/05/2019 19:17, Markus wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 19:56, Dave F via talk wrote:
I notice these changesets were completed in
Hi,
Am 28.05.19 um 20:28 schrieb Simon Poole:
> The times in the changeset do not reflect the length of the associated
> editing session except if the changeset was opened on purpose at the
> beginning which IMHO no editor does.
A better method to guess the length of the editing session is to
The times in the changeset do not reflect the length of the associated editing
session except if the changeset was opened on purpose at the beginning which
IMHO no editor does.
Am 28. Mai 2019 19:53:22 MESZ schrieb Dave F via talk :
>I notice these changesets were completed in 30/60 seconds
On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 20:00 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Di., 28. Mai 2019 um 19:56 Uhr schrieb Dave F via talk <
> talk@openstreetmap.org>:
> > I notice these changesets were completed in 30/60 seconds
> > respectively.
> >
> > I don't use iD. How is this possible? Does it have a JOSM
Just out of idle curiosity, do we know of any data consumers that understand
crossing=marked?
--
Andrew
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
Sent: 28 May 2019 19:00
To: Dave F
Cc: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] mass iD validation arrives in NYC
Am Di., 28. Mai 2019 um 19
Am Di., 28. Mai 2019 um 19:56 Uhr schrieb Dave F via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.org>:
> I notice these changesets were completed in 30/60 seconds respectively.
> I don't use iD. How is this possible? Does it have a JOSM like mass edit
> ability?
>
>I don't see asking users to split the
I notice these changesets were completed in 30/60 seconds respectively.
I don't use iD. How is this possible? Does it have a JOSM like mass edit
ability?
I don't see asking users to split the changesets as a solution to
what is the clear problem of mass adding/amending tags to
On 5/28/2019 12:25 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
28 May 2019, 17:13 by jm...@gmx.com:
Any other suggestions?
Suggest user to split edits into smaller chunks.
Yes that would be far preferable, and I did message this user. That
doesn't address the immediate question of how to attempt QA on
28 May 2019, 17:13 by jm...@gmx.com:
> Any other suggestions?
>
Suggest user to split edits into smaller chunks.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Am 28. Mai 2019 17:44:25 MESZ schrieb Simon Poole :
>1st thing to do is to ask the napper to slow
... mapper :-)
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit Kaiten Mail gesendet.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
1st thing to do is to ask the napper to slow down in a change set comment.
Am 28. Mai 2019 17:13:49 MESZ schrieb Jmapb :
>See yesterday's changesets:
>
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70676813 (
>https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70676813 )
See yesterday's changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70676813 (
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70676813 )
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70676888 (
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70676888 )
I believe this is just a casual user browsing around in
14 matches
Mail list logo
