Hummm
How about looking at it from a data consumers view point?
Who would use boundary level 6 and what for?
A resident/occupier/potential purchaser/developer may want to know who
is the relevant authority for a particular property ...
A new employee many want confirmation of the boundaries of
On 2016-12-21 16:28, Warin wrote:
:-[
Opps .. line on a map that does not represent what I though it did
only one in NSW... on the mainland.
Nah, you were right the first time. Lord Howe Island is unincorporated.
___
Talk-au mailing list
On 21-Dec-16 04:19 PM, Warin wrote:
On 21-Dec-16 04:09 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 2016-12-21 15:57, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Just want to point out the advice from the wiki:
/Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality/
/Things such as local traffic rules should only
On 2016-12-21 16:19, Warin wrote:
Then how do you then separate out the TWO 'unincorporated areas' in NSW ??
I don't care...provided that you don't use an admin_level 6 boundary.
May I suggest admin_level=-6 ?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Straw men seem to be popular this afternoon. The question is not whether or
not you map an unincorporated area but how should you map it?
One of your first actions was deletion from what I understand of the
changesets, after a brief look.
Until now you havent conveyed that message (your concern
On 21-Dec-16 04:09 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 2016-12-21 15:57, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Just want to point out the advice from the wiki:
/Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality/
/Things such as local traffic rules should only be mapped through the
objects which
On 2016-12-21 15:57, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Just want to point out the advice from the wiki:
/Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality/
/Things such as local traffic rules should only be mapped through the
objects which represent these rules on the ground, e.g. a
Just want to point out the advice from the wiki:
*Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality*
*Things such as local traffic rules should only be mapped through the
objects which represent these rules on the ground, e.g. a traffic sign,
road surface marking. Other rules
On 2016-12-21 15:30, Warin wrote:
There is an authority that performs the role of a 'local council' in
these areas ... I don't care what it is called.
There is in effect a 'local council' there, it is not 'no mans' land',
the 'wild west' etc.
Nice straw man there... Who said that no council
On 2016-12-21 14:53, Warin wrote:
On 21-Dec-16 11:38 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote:
So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by
'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM
for the same function.
The area is
On 21-Dec-16 11:38 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote:
So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by
'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM
for the same function.
The area is managed by the State of New South
On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote:
So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by
'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM
for the same function.
The area is managed by the State of New South Wales and there is already
a admin_level 4
It's pretty simple:
1. Admin level 6 boundaries are supposed to enclose a "Local Government
Authority".
2. In NSW the only form of "Local Government Authority" are councils
incorporated under the Local Government Act.
3. The areas covered by these councils are "incorporated areas".
4. The
On 21-Dec-16 09:15 AM, cleary wrote:
I have been adding administrative boundaries in NSW and SA using the
Government data for which OSM has been given explicit permission. I am
currently working on the "Pastoral Unincorporated Area" in SA and
another mapper commented that it was inappropriate. I
On 21-Dec-16 10:45 AM, Nick Hocking wrote:
As a side issue: I don't believe that a mapper's work should be
deleted by anyone other than the mapper themselves, unless it is
agreed on this list that the work was vandalism or copyright violation.
I too don't like deleting stuff ... even my own.
Its an interesting one - unlike suburbs, LGAs don't really have a physical
presence or much you can survey; even though they have a spatial
relationship/are often defined by physical features.
For being surveyable... maybe you get a 'welcome to foo shire' sign or two.
I would say that* if an LGA
Speaking of SA only I would define the LGA locations administered by the
Outback Communities Authority as Unincorporated as
- thats how other hierarchies used by Government, ABS etc define it, and every
point in SA is either in an LGA or Unincorporated
- Unincorporated means Outback Communities
I have been adding administrative boundaries in NSW and SA using the
Government data for which OSM has been given explicit permission. I am
currently working on the "Pastoral Unincorporated Area" in SA and
another mapper commented that it was inappropriate. I responded but my
response appears not
18 matches
Mail list logo
