Re: [talk-au] Topic B: inconsistencies, idiosynchrosies and vagueness

2019-09-20 Thread Warin
There are inconsistencies from one place to another around the world. These idiosyncrasies are what make the world so interesting for travellers. OSM needs to cater for that. Reading the OSM wiki can be reading the last change by some editor 'fixing' it for their view, which may well be fine

Re: [talk-au] topic A: the platform itself

2019-09-20 Thread Sebastian S.
Hello, I think it is important to be precise in the language we use. Therefore I'd like to point out that this is a mailing list and not a forum. If you find the UI poor then this likely due to the way you use the mailing list. Browsing the archives on the list website is not how I

Re: [talk-au] Topic B: inconsistencies, idiosynchrosies and vagueness

2019-09-20 Thread Sebastian S.
Hi Andrew, I fully, whole heartedly agreed. Wiki is supposed so evolve. Gardening to fix little broken or spelling issues. Bigger changes are best outlined here on the list to capture common sentiment. I must admit I often just look up things in the wiki, so for me it is mostly a reference and

Re: [talk-au] Topic B: inconsistencies, idiosynchrosies and vagueness

2019-09-20 Thread Andrew Harvey
I completely agree the "how to map" of OpenStreetMap (not just tags, but also things like when to split a highway, when to snap nodes, what should be mapped etc) is full of "inconsistencies, idiosyncrasies and vagueness". But when I look at where OSM is today I think we've done a pretty amazing

[talk-au] Topic B: inconsistencies, idiosynchrosies and vagueness

2019-09-20 Thread Herbert.Remi via Talk-au
A special thank you for the links yesterday. I have read them. "Australian Tagging Guidelines" and "Good practice" are worth knowing and I am very grateful for our forefathers that put so much effort into writing these documents. It worth noting, however, when you compared the two that they are

Re: [talk-au] topic A: the platform itself

2019-09-20 Thread Marc Gemis
Please allow me to share some experiences of moving to another platform we had in our community. In Belgium we moved from the mailing list to Matrix/Riot . Most active participants in the community made the move, but in the process we lost some people Matrix/Riot is good for short questions, but

Re: [talk-au] topic A: the platform itself

2019-09-20 Thread Edoardo Neerhut
Thanks for bringing this up Herbert. *Similar sentiments* This has actually been bothering me the last few weeks as I started to realise how much of my day is spent reading through talklists that do not have relevance to me or that I do not have time to respond to. For those of us subscribed to

Re: [talk-au] topic A: the platform itself

2019-09-20 Thread David Wales
I am a member of some international OSM Slack channels. However, because it requires a whole different app (which I only have space for on my computer), I only check it monthly at best. On the other hand, I read every talk-au message within a few days of original posting, because they all

Re: [talk-au] topic A: the platform itself

2019-09-20 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 9/20/19 03:14, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote: > I will post several concerns and information on several issues, but the > first is this platform itself. You call this platform a "forum" which is ok in the abstract sense, but note that there is actually an Australia forum in addition to