On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:08:20PM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
@Ben : The legal definition (see website url) of 'Jaagpad' starts with:
Het jaagpad is een private dienstweg of exploitatieweg . That means
it's not a
On Monday 08 December 2014 10:58:58 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
access=private
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
If we go this way, I'd prefer to stay closer to the signs and have it
vehicle=private + bicycle=yes
For the paved roads I guess it would then become highway=service, should we
add a service=towpath
Kurt Roeckx schreef op 8/12/2014 om 10:58:
Every few months I find that someone changes is back to cycleway,
but it's always someone else as far as I know. I've been fixing
this for years. It's really annoying.
I was looking for the write answers
Missing of correct info and
I would suggest this tagging scheme because access = private is wrong :
access:conditional=yes @ permit_holder
bicycle=yes
description=Jaagpad
highway=track
mofa=yes
source=survey
surface=unpaved
tracktype=grade2
traffic_sign=BE:C3,BE:Type-IV
vehicle=no
highway=service
service=towpath
access=private
jaagpaden tekst vermeld met nadruk met vergunning
acces= permissive
nederlandse item keuze Algemene toegang=met vergunning
of zou deze service=towpath te niet doen?
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
surface=asphatl/earth/
maxspeed=30
Marc Gemis schreef
No, Met vergunning, than the best choice is what I suggested and it's
legit OSM tagging:
access:conditional=yes @ permit_holder
It covers it all. Simple, elegant and readable. Permissive doesn't
cover it.
I haven't seen service=towpath being used on a jaagpad yet, but that
kind of makes sense
But vehicle= is more specific than access=. This holds even for tags
extended with conditionals (else the bicycles would need a permit).
So, since a car is a vehicle, it would have not access at all.
2014-12-07 11:12 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be:
No, Met vergunning, than the
Well, that was covered as well in my full copy/paste
access:conditional=yes @ permit_holder
bicycle=yes
description=Jaagpad
highway=track
mofa=yes
source=survey
surface=unpaved
tracktype=grade2
traffic_sign=BE:C3,BE:Type-IV
vehicle=no
website=http://www.wenz.be/nl/burger/Jaagpaden/
It's a one
What about horses ? I know several places where they come on the Jaagpad,
especially where there is no asphalt. I don't know whether they are legally
allowed to do so.
m
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
Well, that was covered as well in my full
Ok, thanks. Some valid points. But highway=track tag does allow
implicit access I figured. I can't seem to find it in the wiki what is
allowed for track.
I do read for highway=track what 'can' : Roads for agricultural or
forestry uses etc, often rough with unpaved/unsealed surfaces, that can
Hi,
jachtpaden near the Leie Schelde Albert Kanaalenz... are tagged
as cycleway but in serveye there is no sign
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fietspad
And the owner of those ways says:
http://www.descheepvaart.be/Rubriek/Recreatie/Jaagpaden.aspx
This topic pops up from time to time, see e.g.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2013-July/004376.html .
Don't remember the outcome, besides that they are not cycleways and do not
have names in general.
If I would start completely afresh I would propose:
highway=service
12 matches
Mail list logo
