Re: [talk-au] Admin level boundaries

Thanks cleary I now see that it is easier to maintain boundary layer segments that are not superimposed over each other. I too am finding that the overlain boundaries are problematic. > On 26 Mar 2016, at 11:20 AM, cleary wrote: > > > Nev > > I have added some of those

Re: [talk-au] Admin level boundaries

Nev I have added some of those boundaries. Where the administrative boundary and the national park boundary share exactly the same way, I have used that single way and included it in two separate relations, one for the administrative area and the other for the national park. If the admin

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] La Poste et la géolocalisation

> Si vraiment ça lui coute tant, qu'elle obtienne une subvention du département. Heu, pas vraiment d'accord : ce n'est pas parce que les personnes de Trévargan ne doivent pas être des pigeons que tous les Finistériens doivent l'être ! Le nom breton ne doit pas poser problème : il suffit que le

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Alan McConchie writes: > Thanks everyone for your strong but sincere criticism so far. In the > thread here on talk-us, I explained _what_ we were trying to do, but I > didn't explain very much about our rationale: _why_ we think this is > an important idea. The wiki

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

On 2016.03.26. 01:10, Alan McConchie wrote: ... Thanks everyone for your strong but sincere criticism so far. In the thread here on talk-us, I explained _what_ we were trying to do, but I didn't explain very much about our rationale: _why_ we think this is an important idea. The wiki proposal

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" of > social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to look and > register opposition, unless they are more opposed to wikifiddling than > to

[Talk-cz] Smazane cesty V od Stihlic

Ahoj! http://mtbmap.cz/#zoom=17=50.005349=14.78746 Kolem tech chatek ve stredu mapy vede cesta, a jsem si pomerne jisty ze v mape byvala jenze ted tam neni. Sterkovka, vyrazna. A kdyz se na tu mapu koukam, tech cest tam chybi vic. Umite nekdo vytahnout z historie kdo to smazal, pripadne

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Hi Greg and others, Following the official procedure for proposing a new tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process ) I created that wiki page a few days ago, and now I've sent an email to the tagging list, to officially

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Hi, On 03/25/2016 11:36 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" of > social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to look and > register opposition, unless they are more opposed to wikifiddling than > to this tag :-) I wouldn't

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Is it just me, or does social_path sound like the way to a "social disease"? -jack On March 25, 2016 6:36:56 PM EDT, Greg Troxel wrote: > >There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" >of >social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to

Re: [talk-latam] Colaboración de fotos ortográficas

Eric, Que sepa OAM aun está en beta y en esa fase aun no es posible subir imágenes. También se puede usar el http://whooms.mapwarper.net/ u otro servicio público. Tareas - Mapazonia está a sus órdenes. Saludos, Humberto Yances El 25 de marzo de 2016, 17:07, Eric Armijo

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" of social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to look and register opposition, unless they are more opposed to wikifiddling than to this tag :-) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Social_path

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage-Layer nicht mehr in JOSM

@nebulon42: Danke für den Hinweis, habe geoimage wieder eingetragen und wird also hoffentlich bald wieder zur Verfügung stehen. LG Wolfgang ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

[OSM-talk-be] Merging way.

I've been fixing walking routes the past few hours and it seems that several people have been merging ways. By merging ways one breaks route relations that only use part of the street. I've been writing a few changeset comments, but I hope to reach a larger audience via this mailing list. So my

Re: [Talk-cat] Dubtes sobre revisió carrers i representació d'edificacions urbanes

Wenes! El primer que diré serà Benvinguda Esther! El segon és donar-te el meu parer (pq no hi ha una veritat absoluta i en aquesta comunitat ningú mana més que un altre). Sempre que el teu municipi no estigui en condicions mínimes d'usabilitat (carrers amb nom, sentits, edificis públics...) és

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

Hi Blake 2016-03-24 16:01 GMT+01:00 Blake Girardot : > > We run into geojson all the time as an interchange format. I can imagine. Reaffirm this at https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10564 so people believe us. > I was not aware of the plugin somehow, but I just tried it

Re: [Talk-cat] Dubtes sobre revisió carrers i representació d'edificacions urbanes

Hola Esther, benvinguda, No et puc donar la versió oficial "del que cal fer" sinó explicar-te com ho faig jo: 1.- Repasso tots els llocs que conec i corregeixo errors i/o afegeixo coses noves tant com puc (fonts, equipaments públics...)2.- Si veig que aporto poc (ja no sé que afegir) vaig a un

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

Danke...  Für die infos... Hat also doch alles so seine richtigkeit...  ‎Etwas verwirrend ist es aber auf den ersten blick schon...  Gruß   Originalnachricht   Von: Joachim Kast Gesendet: Freitag, 25. März 2016 20:29 An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org Antwort an: Openstreetmap allgemeines in

[Talk-cat] Dubtes sobre revisió carrers i representació d'edificacions urbanes

Hola a tots o totes! Després d'uns dies explorant l'OSM i veient el què hi ha fet i el que queda pendent, em vaig registrar per començar a editar un municipi que conec força bé. Les primeres edicions han estat posar nom als carrers, verificar les interseccions i afegir alguns serveis bàsics,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] La Poste et la géolocalisation

Aux frais de la municipalité... espérons qu'elle dépose ça dans son cadastre. Maintenant 146 habitants ça fait peu d'adresses, et ça doit tenir dans un tableau de 2 pages A4. Cependant je ne comprend pas ta phrase "seulement l'adresse et le code postal". Ce n'est pas le cas de tout le monde ? Je

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] (no subject)

Il 25/03/2016 20:27, Davide Ondertoller ha scritto: > ho aggiunto delle info, sempre qua > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4071284378 > > spero sia più chiaro > Mi dispiace essere puntiglioso :) Ma il name=capitello, frega perchè sembra un edicola religiosa, però, se 'è un nome

Re: [Talk-cz] Fotky rozcestniku na osmap.cz

Dne 21. března 2016 8:13 Michal Grézl napsal(a): > 2016-03-19 19:24 GMT+01:00 Tom Ka : >> Zmeny souradnic ted nachystam a poslu soukrome jako SQL UPDATE. Delam upravy OsmHiCheck/gp aby to z toho nejak padalo polo automaticky, poslu pak

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

Am 25.03.2016 um 18:26 schrieb Tobias: > Hi Joachim, > > Wenn ich http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:boundary zu rate > ziehe dann gehört die fläche wohl zu einem anderen Dorf oder? > > Wozu es gehört bekmme ich über die Relationen raus an denen die Enklave > hängt oder? > > Wenn

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] (no subject)

ho aggiunto delle info, sempre qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4071284378 spero sia più chiaro Il giorno 24 marzo 2016 19:53, girarsi_liste ha scritto: > Il 22/03/2016 16:28, Davide Ondertoller ha scritto: > > l'oggetto in questione > >

[OSM-talk-fr] La Poste et la géolocalisation

Lu dans Ouest-France du 23-03-16 : " Tregarvan, commune de 146 habitants... est en zone blanche. La Poste et les secours, … disposent seulement de l'adresse et du code postal. Bientôt, chaque boîte aux lettres se verra attribuer un code de trois lettres, qui lui permettra d'être géolocalisée.

[Talk-tr] mapyear.org

Tesadüfen gördüm mapyear.org - osm katılıyor mu oralarda? ___ Talk-tr mailing list Talk-tr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tr

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

Hallo Tobi, Joachim hat bereits auf den erlaubten Import hingewiesen. Es gibt halt einige Gemeinden, bei denen etliche, zum Teil Minigebiete dazugehören. Wenn Du Josm kennst, das wirst Du darin immer sehen, zu welcher Gemeinderelation das Gebiet gehört (Rolle: outer) oder in welches andere

[Talk-lt] Klaidos Baltijos jūros regione

Sveiki Kiek yra klaidų OpenStreetMap žemėlapyje mūsų regione ir kaip Lietuva atrodo kaimynų kontekste: https://blog.openmap.lt/2016/03/25/klaidos-baltijos-juros-regione/ Gerų švenčių! ;-) -- Tomas ___ Talk-lt mailing list

Re: [Talk-cz] Mapování pro renderer

Ahoj, nevim mam na mysli uplne to same, ale ja uz nekolikrat uvazoval o necem podobnem, ze by bylo dobre aby z OSM slo ziskat plochu zastaveneho uzemi mesta / obce. Tohle by prislo vhod napriklad pro mapy malych meritek. U obci je toto mozne ziskat vetsinou jen pomoci residential (protoze tam

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

Hi Joachim, Wenn ich http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:boundary zu rate ziehe dann gehört die fläche wohl zu einem anderen Dorf oder? Wozu es gehört bekmme ich über die Relationen raus an denen die Enklave hängt oder? Wenn ich es richtig deute ist es ein Teil von Haidmühle oder?

[Talk-cz] Mapování pro renderer

Jak řešit situace, kdy si to vyloženě říká o "mapování pro renderer"? Příklad ze života: mám mapový styl, který při oddálení zobrazuje šedou barvo landuse= residential. To funguje celkem pěkně na většinu vesnic ale ne tak v Praze. V Praze je naopak landuse=residential poměrně málo. Vyloženě si

Re: [Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

Hallo Tobi > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186214003 kreist laut luftbild eine > wiese ein. Das ist eine sogenannte Enklave, meistens historisch bedingt durch kirchliche Besitztümer. Also ok. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enklave > > Als source:url wird in den Tags www.geodaten.bayern.de

[Talk-de] admin_level 8 entfernen

Hi, ich habe in Niederbayern einige admin_level 8,9,10 und 11 ways gefundnen die auf mich wirken als wären sie unachtsam importiert worden. Einige beispile sind: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186213988 oder http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194922912 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186214003

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

a looser qry (and XML readable ;-) http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ffa Think it never existed at all, the zero point is the license change, i.e. around april 2010 I believe. It's not really totally clear on that btw, if you happen to see augmented diffs with negative numbering, they are from before

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

I've been trying to get older versions with the augmented diff in Overpass. But either it never did exist, or I'm not doing it right: see for example http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ff5 ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 294

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 294 týdeníku weeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/7084 Téma čísla: Program konference SotM CZ+SK 2016 * Aplikace pro pořizování dat. * Problémy s OAuth v JOSM. * tag office=goverment. * OpenStreetMap v Maroku. * Kde bude SotM 2017? * Automobilka BMW a OSM.

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Mike Thompson writes: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > >> They tagged them as "social_path", according to their blog entry [1] >> > Totally unacceptable. OpenStreetMap maps what is observable on the ground > (generally). If

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] User Accounts in Ireland (was Re: Mobile speed camera zones)

Am 25.03.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Simon Poole: > ... > > - the number of mappers that edited data in Ireland: this is a bit more > involved to determine and the best way is to simply to look at a full > history extract of the country in question. I'm not aware of current > numbers, but I did do

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] User Accounts in Ireland (was Re: Mobile speed camera zones)

Ignore my previous figure. I didn't see that you are only looking for the number from the last 12 months. Dave On 25 Mar 2016 11:28, "Donie Kelly" wrote: > Hi Dan > Are you making progress with them? > > Donie > > > On 25 Mar 2016, at 09:04, Daniel Cussen

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] User Accounts in Ireland (was Re: Mobile speed camera zones)

Hi Dan Are you making progress with them? Donie > On 25 Mar 2016, at 09:04, Daniel Cussen wrote: > > Have we any rough idea of the numbers of editors say in the last year > who have edited OSM Ireland? Even a wild guess. The Gardai want to > know ... > >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

There are 2 users who are quite busy in that area, plenty of changesets: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lf6648 The changesets I've checked haven't got landuse mods present. I've scanned 1.6 million changesets of the last 30 days and none have the keyword 'landuse' in the comments in that

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] User Accounts in Ireland (was Re: Mobile speed camera zones)

3755 users Based on info from here http://stat.latlon.org On 25 Mar 2016 05:40, "Marc Gemis" wrote: > I hoped for a moment that Pascal Neis' site would be helpful: > http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries=Ireland > > but it only gives an overview on how many mappers

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

Something does show up at zoom level 9, so removal might be relatively recent. Strangely enough, I cannot seem to find any deleted objects where the outline used to be. At least, not with Potlatch 1. 2016-03-25 9:24 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe : > At least, on our map :) >

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] User Accounts in Ireland (was Re: Mobile speed camera zones)

Am 25.03.2016 um 10:04 schrieb Daniel Cussen: > Have we any rough idea of the numbers of editors say in the last year > who have edited OSM Ireland? Even a wild guess. The Gardai want to > know ... That is yet another number, I'll tweak one of my DB queries if I get around to it this weekend.

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] User Accounts in Ireland (was Re: Mobile speed camera zones)

[resending ..seems as if the list doesn't like signed messages] Typically there are two different numbers that are interesting: - number of mappers that started off editing in Ireland (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/36408 and

Re: [Talk-se] Ange förbuden utfart

Man kan skapa en "turn restriction", en relation som säger att man inte får köra från vög A in på väg B. Används normalt för att säga att man inte får svänga vänster i en korsning, men borde funka bra till det här också. Mvh, Fredrik Den 25 mar 2016 09:29 skrev "Tomas Marklund"

[OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

At least, on our map :) My theory is someone mapped it in low detail, someone else deleted that huge polygon but didn't finish mapping in detail yet (or never did start). Anyone know what's going on? (maybe the line or relation is just broken?) I'm tempted to quickly draw a simple outline for

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] User Accounts in Ireland (was Re: Mobile speed camera zones)

Unfortunately Joost's site does not include worldwide information. He does not have to time to continue support for it. Sorry. m. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > I hoped for a moment that Pascal Neis' site would be helpful: >

[OSM-talk-fr] Video du dernier meetup carto à Paris

J'ai fait une brève intervention à propos d'OSM lors du dernier meetup carto parisien. La vidéo est en ligne: https://air.mozilla.org/meetup-carto-paris-5/ Mon intervention commence à 1h18... -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France ___ Talk-fr

Re: [Talk-se] Ange förbuden utfart

Precis så har även jag gjort vid några tillfällen, skapat en liten stump på en meter som får vara enkelriktad. Det ger önskat resultat även om det egentligen är "fel" om man ska vara petig. Har nån annan några bättre idéer? /Tomas Den 24 mar 2016 7:29 em skrev "Jimmy Utterström"

Re: [Talk-cz] JOSM down/up load connection timeout

Zkousel jsem vyvojove servery ale tam zrejme nejsou spravna data, takze to nejsem schopen uplne verne nasimulovat. Podle vseho ale spis ne. I s ohledem na to, ze je to viditelne vazane na zatez hlavniho serveru (kdyz je v americe noc, tak je to vzdy vyrazne lepsi) to ale muze byt tim, ze devel