If you use the tool, you know that fixAddresses plugin (who follows what
the wiki told them) takes care of the postal code in one simple click on
the 'guess button, the editor just needs to verify them. The
postalcode + street are the most important ones to put on a building.
On Tue, Apr
On 04/16/2013 05:41 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
I use most of these plugins. But recently I started using them less,
because now I convert my GPX waypoints to OSM data points automatically.
The only thing I do not do is repeating the postal code over and over,
but since you insist, I'll do that
I never put address details on sheds or garages.
The building=house is on the
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Building page. That's as
official as it can get for me.
Also use building=apartment whenever I can/remember/wrote down.
I did use AGIV for some of my more recent
On 04/16/2013 10:08 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
I never put address details on sheds or garages.
Didn't mean to sound like you did. I actually did in the past by not
paying enough attention to the plugins, I'm in the process of fixing
this btw :)
The building=house is on the
On 04/16/2013 11:01 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
Maybe I should start using the fixaddresses plugin
I've been using the plugins terracer, building tool, etc. for over 1
1/2 year. I even wrote a page on it:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Escada/JOSM_and_Housenumbers :-)
But now that I have
I ended up adding all the shop tags on the building. It only works for
buildings with only 1 shop/restaurant/pub/...
m.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
On 04/16/2013 11:01 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
Maybe I should start using the fixaddresses plugin
I ended up adding all the shop tags on the building. It only works for
buildings with only 1 shop/restaurant/pub/...
Doesn't that remove the nice icon on the map when done on a way ? I
really like those icons.
Just found an example:
Hi,
In December there was a thread (start:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2012-December/003367.html)
containing some numbers/stats.
@Sander, *: is it possible to share your used method to pull these stats
(or just pull them again) and publish them on a 'frequent' base (I'm
Your complain about street being placed in wrong cities, is exactly why we
should use associatedStreet relations instead of repeating addr:street
addr:city over and over on individual buildings. In that case you only have
to correct it once, on the relation, and the data is corrected.
But I'll
There are good reasons for addr:street on individual building. A lot of
programs (like some apps) don t show the associated street, or are
difficult to find (Potlach). Not every contributor uses JOSM
2013/4/15 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Your complain about street being placed in wrong
It doesn't matter where they are , you still have to put those tags on a
relation, so they better be in the correct city to start with ... Wrong
postal codes, wrong city I would rather _NOT_ have wrong ones than
the 'close enough for me' type of data. My point was introducing wrong
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought the consensus was that we repeat addr:street for each house but
not the other information like addr:city, addr:postcode, addr:country and
whatnot. Imagine what happens to the size of the DB (and all its
derivatives like
12 matches
Mail list logo
