.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 3/7/2017 12:14 PM, Alan Richards wrote:
From what I've seen so far, the opinion seems to be that the OGL-BC
devived licenses like this one require a statement about the Freedom
of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. This was done for the
City
collection of the best available, license-compatible data.
Bulk uploads are usually frowned upon, due to the ease of overwriting
existing data, so extra care must be taken.
I'll CC the OSM-Ca list (and we should drop out of the QGIS list unless
we have QGIS-related issues)
Best Regards,
Brent Fras
You may want to also keep an eye on
http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/news/2012/rnte.html
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 1/20/2013 10:03 AM, fk270...@fantasymail.de wrote:
As requested, I would like to give an explaining statement on those Canadian
powerlines which I have edited so far
or even 10 meters.
And as others have pointed out, the positional [in]accuracy of Bing and
Canvec could exceed 10 meters.
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 11/19/2012 8:29 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
I will do a resurvey in the way you suggest. It was really
disappointing to find I couldn't trust my GPS
I've got a copy of v6 on my network. Did you want one sheet or all of it?
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 10/15/2011 2:06 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find old CanVec versions? I was looking
into
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.608497lon=-63.629537zoom=18layers
Daniel,
The SRTM data has 90m cell size, while the CDED (from the Geobase
site) has 30m cells (and 1m height resolution) which might rendered
better contours.
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 5/27/2011 11:52 AM, Daniel Begin wrote:
Bonjour tous le monde,
I have generated a 30m and 31m
preventing bolding of major contours
Stream Layer (HD_1470009_1): major streams broken at tributary
intersections preventing single label for streams
Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http
Tyler,
The values for the name keys look good! Is the highway geometry from
the road network or Statscan?
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 3/2/2011 9:57 PM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
On 2011-03-02, at 8:38 PM, Brent Fraser wrote:
Tyler,
The problem I have with the Statscan data is they have
Hmmm. Maybe I'll hold off on importing any more Canvec roads until
Edition 8 (due in April?). Are there any other major changes in Ed. 8?
If not, I may continue to upload non-road features from Ed 7...
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 3/1/2011 11:57 AM, Bégin, Daniel wrote:
Bonjour Brent
- newer geometry but positional accuracy poor
- incomplete street names (unless you combine NAME and TYPE
attributes) MacLeod AVE
- has address ranges
--
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http
)
The transportation file has roads with 10 to 20 classes
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
Tyler Gunn wrote:
Hello,
I'm ALMOST done importing the entirety of the 062N* area of Canvec data
and wanted to pass along something I observed:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.171lon=-100.413zoom=11layers=M
rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:52:14 -0600, Brent Fraser bfra...@geoanalytic.com
wrote:
Tyler,
Have you considered using the 1:20k data published by the Manitoba
government? I think the license
My friend is very comfortable traveling around the property. I'm not
so comfortable with his offer to take me around the property (he has
an employee ID, I don't). The airspace overhead is not restricted (at
least not any more than non-company property nearby), so the road grid
information
My personal favorite, Waterton Park (82H04)in Alberta, specifically the
townsite:
49.0 to 49.1
-113.9 to -114.0
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
Bégin wrote:
Bonjour!
I'm ready to release some samples to get your feedback on the Canvec.osm
product. I wont be able to release complete NTS
John,
Maybe someone at some of the Open Source software outfits (like DMSolutions,
Mapgears, or Gateway Geomatics) could help? Or maybe ask on the OSGeo email
list...
Best regards,
Brent Fraser
john whelan wrote:
http://opendataottawa.ca/ It's at City Hall and it looks like the press
Sam,
Each CanVec tile has a date in its XML metadata (in the
lineagesrcinfosrctime tag). Perhaps it might be useful.
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Thanks,
I even have access to it on my mobile :)
'year valid' is what we need (doesnt need to be exact).
In other news
/CanVec_release_4.txt
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
GeoAnalytic Inc.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
And for those who like to parse latitude and longitude:
http://www.internationalboundarycommission.org/products.html#coordinates
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
GeoAnalytic Inc.
Calgary, Alberta
Mepham, Michael wrote:
Stupid spell checker GeoBase, not Georgia.
The values in GeoBase
TYPE=AVE
DIRECTION=SW
ADDR_FM_LE=707
ADDR_TO_LE=707
ADDR_FM_RG=700
ADDR_TO_RG=744
Brent Fraser
GeoAnalytic Inc.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
...
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
Richard Weait wrote:
Hi folks,
From the good folks at Natural Resources Canada (GeoBase).
Yes you can use the data found on GeoGratis site . The licences are
identical. The only differences are the copyrights, one is GeoBase,
the other one is NRCan
20 matches
Mail list logo