An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20181102/8a751edf/attachment-0001.html>
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:31:35 -0400
From: John Whelan
To: Jonathan Brown
Cc: "talk-ca@open
if anyone needs a TM or micro data service, I'm available for this
On Fri., Nov. 2, 2018, 7:32 p.m. John Whelan This approach seems very sensible however Pierre has raised the issue of
> poorly mapped buildings and we are aware that some were mapped in a
> mapathon environment so whilst Ottawa
This approach seems very sensible however Pierre has raised the issue of
poorly mapped buildings and we are aware that some were mapped in a
mapathon environment so whilst Ottawa used a"leave existing buildings
alone" approach is this an area where some judgement should be used?
and yes I am
Of course.
Could use the ottawa import approach: "leave existing buildings alone".
Matthew Darwin
matt...@mdarwin.ca
http://www.mdarwin.ca
On 2018-11-02 7:03 p.m., OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
On Nov 2, 2018, at 3:58 PM, John Whelan wrote:
So to paraphrase your reply. A centralised import
I think we should identify who would like to be involved in import for
each municipality. (on a wiki page). On the page, identify roles,
like:
* coordinator
* import data preparation
* QA
* import execution
* data enrichment (commercial, residential, etc... tagging)
* etc..
Then we
On Nov 2, 2018, at 3:58 PM, John Whelan wrote:
> So to paraphrase your reply. A centralised import plan in the wiki which
> says the data is approved for import and should be tackled in chunks of some
> sort of region since we are a decentralized organization. Which I think is
> similar to
So to paraphrase your reply. A centralised import plan in the wiki
which says the data is approved for import and should be tackled in
chunks of some sort of region since we are a decentralized
organization. Which I think is similar to the way Task Manager works.
The project is broken
On Nov 2, 2018, at 3:35 PM, Pierre Béland wrote:
> La rédaction d' une page wiki pour l'ensemble du Canada peut répondre aux
> exigences du groupe Import de OSM. Mais l'organisation doit être
> décentralisée.
Je conviens qu'il est plus facile de rédiger un "plan d'importation" unique
pour
Pour le Québec, je retrouve les données de plusieurs municipalitésMontréal,
Longueuil, Repentigny, Shawinigan, Québec et Rimouski.
Première observation rapide, aussi, elles sont de bonne qualité et proviennent
je suppose des cadastres des municipalités. En milieu urbain, cela facilite
beaucoup
Merci Javi
Comme mon hébergeur est au Canada, cela serait surprenant.
Pierre
Le vendredi 2 novembre 2018 17 h 15 min 56 s HAE, Javi Rodriguez
a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
Maybe your internet provider has bad connections with Canadian/US carriers.
I mirrored all the data for you.
Hi Pierre,
Maybe your internet provider has bad connections with Canadian/US carriers.
I mirrored all the data for you. Download it here:
https://www.illot.cat/ODB/
Salutations,
Javi___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
merci,
ip... téléchargement ok, moins de 2min pour chaque fichier.
Pierre
Le vendredi 2 novembre 2018 16 h 39 min 55 s HAE, Javi Rodriguez
a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
I did not found any problem with the StatCan website.
I mirrored those files only to test your connection. Test it:
That sounds like a reasonable approach.
Thank you
Cheerio John
Begin Daniel wrote on 2018-11-02 4:19 PM:
I would agree to one import plan with an appropriate validation
mechanism. I am concerned that the buildings they provide in rural
areas come from Canvec. Over the years I have
I know the City of Kingston are very interested in the project but they
aren't the ones who can make the decision.
Cheerio John
James wrote on 2018-11-02 4:07 PM:
From my initial glance at the data...seems pretty good and
accurate(again I didn't check all the cities nor do I expect them all
Begin, these datasets are from the cities themselves, not canvec. Stats can
is relicensing them under a common umbrella
On Fri., Nov. 2, 2018, 4:20 p.m. Begin Daniel I would agree to one import plan with an appropriate validation mechanism.
> I am concerned that the buildings they provide in
Hi Pierre,
I did not found any problem with the StatCan website.
I mirrored those files only to test your connection. Test it:
https://www.illot.cat/ODB/BDOI_Quebec.zip
https://www.illot.cat/ODB/ODB_Quebec.zip
Salutations,
Javi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 2, 2018 3:38
I would agree to one import plan with an appropriate validation mechanism. I am
concerned that the buildings they provide in rural areas come from Canvec. Over
the years I have deleted/modified thousands of them (Canvec buildings) and I
would not like to see all of them coming back.
Daniel
>From my initial glance at the data...seems pretty good and accurate(again I
didn't check all the cities nor do I expect them all to be having same
level of accuracy)
The two I've been eye balling are Kingston and Rimouski which seem to be
very accurate at first assessment. If we do want to
This is just a formal post to get a feel.
In Ottawa the building outlines were of high quality and I feel have
enriched the map.
If we do should we consider it one project across the country or leave it
to the local chapters to make the decision?
I'm thinking that Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver
Your points are well taken but in this case when the building outlines are
imported by someone like James and are of high quality to start with as
they were in Ottawa then these concerns are less relevant.
At the moment Stats Canada have released some building outline data under
the Federal
Bonjour Alessandro
Je rencontre depuis hier des problèmes à télécharger les fichiers pour le
Québec (fr ou en). Je ne suis sans doute pas le seul et les navigateurs ne nous
offrent pas d'outils pour reprendre les transferts interrompus ou bien
diagnostiquer les problèmes, sinon message Échec de
On Nov 2, 2018, at 9:31 AM, John Whelan wrote:
> My feeling is OpenStreetMap has two sides. The first is local adding local
> knowledge to the map. The other I'll call armchair mapping. When Stats
> Canada did the pilot it tapped the local Ottawa mappers who meet physically.
Speaking from
My feeling is OpenStreetMap has two sides. The first is local adding
local knowledge to the map. The other I'll call armchair mapping. When
Stats Canada did the pilot it tapped the local Ottawa mappers who meet
physically.
I would agree that amongst mappers with the most edits there is a
23 matches
Mail list logo
