I keep coming across cases where marking the access to a way based on
primary category will imply that the way is not suitable for use on
foot. That becomes particularly interesting with barriers, as in
those cases, the sidewalk may bypass the barrier.
For concrete examples, I'll use Northwick
OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
I keep coming across cases where marking the access to a way based on
primary category will imply that the way is not suitable for use on
foot. That becomes particularly interesting with barriers, as in
those cases, the sidewalk may bypass the barrier.
In that
Sent from my android device so the quoting is crap!
-Original Message-
From: SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 12:16
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Urban Mixed Access Ways and Barriers (restricted to
motor
Sent from my android device so the quoting is crapp!
-Original Message-
From: OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 13:44
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Urban Mixed Access Ways and Barriers (restricted to
motor vehicles, open to foot)
On 7
Is there a mechanism for getting requests onto the wish list for the
Open Street Map Mapnk style sheets?
The particular issue is that now that people can trace quite small
features, some areas are getting overloaded with private foot paths
and private car parks (not to mention alleys and
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 13:43 +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
On 7 September 2013 12:15, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
In that instance isn't there effectively a short footway that runs parallel
to the short piece of road that has the barrier on it?
Micro-mapping tends
On 7 September 2013 14:46, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
Streetmaps do tend to be abstractions of the real world, and
openstreetmap ceased to be be a mere streetmap several years ago, and is
a far far better map than a mere streetmap can ever be. The word
streetmap implies urban,
On 7 September 2013 14:36, les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Sent from my android device so the quoting is crapp!
-Original Message-
From: OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 13:44
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Urban Mixed Access Ways and
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:45:51PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
Is there a mechanism for getting requests onto the wish list for the
Open Street Map Mapnk style sheets?
The particular issue is that now that people can trace quite small
features, some areas are getting overloaded with
Long time discussion but the data is not the map. If a detail is need, such as
adding a way to show the pedestrian route around an object, then it should be
mapped. Not mapping it leaves gaps in the data. Now replacing the obstruction
with a short length of 'footpath' may be an alternative, but
Sent from my android device so the quoting is crap!
-Original Message-
From: OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:07
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Urban Mixed Access Ways and Barriers (restricted to
motor vehicles, open to foot)
On 7
OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
In practice, there is only one renderer for general users
That's a statement that could provoke some discussion, I suspect.
If you have a look at the questions on help.osm.org you'll see lots of
why doesn't X do Y type questions, but it isn't always immediately
I've seen two new users accidentally delete residential landuse areas near
me in the past fortnight:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17695130
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17505646
Could this be a problem with the iD editor? Has anyone else noticed it?
Tom
--
Tom Chance wrote:
I've seen two new users accidentally delete residential landuse areas near me in
the past fortnight:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17695130
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17505646
Could this be a problem with the iD editor? Has anyone else
14 matches
Mail list logo
