it is vandalism.
Most edits had already been reverted by others, I've cleaned up the
rest, including undeletion of Broadcasting House and the Worcester AL8
boundary. I have issued a 24h block and requested more careful editing &
better changeset comments.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ra
e involved with OSM should do some
mapping first, before they embark on anything else. Just to know what
we're about.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@ope
,
add a few opening times, or even trees for that matter - a single hour
of such original work is more useful to OSM that what you are proposing
here.
Remember: OSM is not an IT project.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
__
e
seems to be a lot of cycle-related infrastructure around.
To be honest, given the rules you cite, I would be tempted to use
highway=footway+bicycle=yes OR the dreaded
highway=path+bicycle=yes+foot=yes - but I haven't seen how it looks on
the ground.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@
tor. Most
mappers I know would probably have let themselves be distracted and
traced some buildings while they were there ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing
his is in England and won't offer any - just
saying it is worth thinking about. For example, the edit that prompted
this discussion added a boundary=adminsistrative to West Yorkshire,
which until then was a "hole" in the AL6 map.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik R
ks revival project and the new marina,
> quayside changes etc.
>
> Thanks,
> (Name removed by F.R.)
I'll reply that OSM is what its mappers make of it, and an invitation to
contribute - but if anyone is familiar with the topic, perhaps this is
an incentive to work on it.
Bye
Frederik
n't actually feature the UK as an area but you can do
England/Scotland/Wales separately:
http://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/england/
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_
code findable without actually having to add something
as synthetic as a centroid.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
e the lawnmower over the database and assume that
everything that is called Thomas Cook is now closed without even looking ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB m
ial to all sides
if one is aware of exactly where the parties have the same goals, and
where the goals might differ, and establish clear rules for these cases.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_
if ever. Other
options exist, like creating subsidiary organiations elsewhere, or
simply stick with it.
Nonetheless, it can't hurt to know your options.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
o forward the letter if anyone is interested.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm
Treasurer
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Name & Registered Office:
OpenStreetMap Foundation
St John's Innovation Centre
Cowley Road
Cambridge
CB4 0WS
United Kingdom
A company limited by guarantee, registered in England an
can
be important to know for a rambler if they're on public or private land
because they're more likely to get shot on private land. Hope this is
not so much of a concern in the UK ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E0
on the icon to use.
It would be good if you could link to these discussions instead of just
claiming they were had, for the benefit of those who joined between "a
few years ago" and now.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede..
because else we'll
have 10 mappers edit-warring over if a certain address still belongs to
the posh neighbourhood of Silver Springs or to its seedy neighbour,
Golden Showers.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
to it:
>
> https://goo.gl/maps/LSVnemQ5fxw
Yes, you would normally at least map the sign so there's less potential
for a dispute.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
you and not behind
whoever said that, and an apology is in order.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
hat we
have, we'll make things less and less understandable, less and less
maintainable.
But that's a general remark, not *specificall* aimed at history county
boundaries.
Bye
Frederik
PS: Of course, public transport relations are an even bigger culprit.
There are a handful of ways in OSM in Engl
yeuth an' west yorkshire, greator manchestor
> an' merseyside.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:*Nick Whitelegg [mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk]
> *Sent:* 21 June 2018 15:27
> *To:* Frederik Ramm
> *Cc:* talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* [Talk-GB] Geo
.
--- end
I'll point the person to this post so if you have any questions, I hope
they will read this.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap
is one thing our users love us for.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
outdated" marker. That might make the
map *look* more current but actually it isn't - the script would just be
window dressing.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
k/2018-March/080330.html
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I'd rather see UK mappers have a look
and decide what of this is worth keeping, than deciding it from the
comfort of my armchair.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mail
y done in the prepare-data-for-routing step
and not on OSM! Maybe whatever the use case is here, the user can take a
cue (or even code) from such preprocessing.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
ou") - in my view, a pub in your
town is not "relevant" because the chain operating it thinks that it
should be, but because the locals find it relevant.
I do concede that I've mapped many a business in random places I've been
to without asking the locals if it is relevant to them thoug
ty for what it is. I'm totally ok with you being more
grown up than me.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
uot; -
that we need to finally replace our youthful enthusiasm with a more
resigned "the grown-ups were right after all" attitude.
Luckily, SEO companies are here to help, to enable even more people to
"engage with brands" through our map. Win-win!
Bye
Frederik
--
Frede
nflate, and
interpolate away, instead of a project where all sorts of people from
all walks of life contribute their knowledge.
I think we're not an IT project, and that's good.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09"
always go hand-in-hand with
a plan on how to get the review done in a reasonable time. The 12
million "tiger:reviewed-no" in the US seem to have no intent of dying
out ;-)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
out the flaws in it, and I agree it would be nice if we could
ensure that if researches criticize OSM in the future - and there's
certainly a lot to criticize - they at least get their facts right.
I want to live in a society where everyone is free to say their opinion,
but I don't want to li
have the same proportion of assholes that exists in the whole
of society? And if we do, is it our fault that we need to remedy, or
should we be applauded for representing a diverse part of the population ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMai
sible, takedown on that 2013 Monica Stephens article though. At the
time I thought "oh well, bad research comes and goes, no need to start a
fight every time a researcher writes something wrong about OSM", but
that one seems to be found, believed in, and quoted by other researchers
just too
seums closed several years ago and the area is
now private housing."
I'll leave it to you to figure out what these coordinates mean and which
museums may need to be checked ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09&q
ons for retail
chains as a service) and Mail.ru (the company behind maps.me).
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap
accurate enough, probably get them from Google.
I voiced the same general concern, but a random sample I checked of the
(actually rather few) stations that are proposed to be newly added
seemed to be impeccably placed.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.
Just posted the below to osmf-talk but I want to cast the net a little
wider!
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Osmf-talk] OSMF is looking for an UK accountant
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 23:39:42 +0200
From: Frederik Ramm <frede...@osmfoundation.org>
Organization: OpenStreetMap Foun
e class of "bad imports that
warrant an immediate revert", but they are not issues I would like to
see in an import hailed as an example to be followed by others.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
__
rik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
t; you better have more
than a "short introduction" available for newcomers lest their work may
be worthless.)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB m
s message.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Talk-ja mailing list
>>> talk...@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk...@openstreetmap.org>
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
>>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hi,
guy on the help forum asking for someone to help him edit OSM,
perhaps there's a suitable meetup he can be directed to:
http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/51360/newbie-200-places-to-add-and-i-want-to-get-this-right-the-first-time
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
and not not specifically of OSM.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
hip fees.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
frederik/tmp/gb_schools.zip
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ons people seem to achieve a
service quality that many commercial providers would dream of...
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
uot; and how all
this is somehow related to a few colours changing on the osm.org map, I
think you lost me there.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstre
Hi,
On 10/23/2015 05:19 PM, ael wrote:
> Personally, I think that they should be blocked until they provide a
> proper explanation. The sheer scale is highly suspicious.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/828
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49
nation.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
On 09/21/2015 02:43 PM, Matthias Jessen wrote:
> i noticed some railway tracks which has been deleted in this
> revert/changeset:
I'm looking into this now.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33890248
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
, both Dave and Rob were to set up
competing UK/GB OpenStreetMap groups ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
this does not aim to be a good world map but rather
a good indication of OSM data density.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
consistently
behave like someone who is not interested in peace and harmony one bit.
All your messages are written from the assumption that all of us here in
this project must be idiots, and it shows. Politeness, respect, decency
- any of these mean anything to you?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm
| pub | Princess Louise | -0.12157304700441 |
51.5172546574115
(2 rows)
And the same query for points gives zero results.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
requires of us to make sure our
editors only add the correct spelling (whatever the corporate PR wants
it to be at the moment)?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
that in an area where it is obvious from
visually comparing the 1:1250 map to Bing imagery that the buildings
haven't meanwhile been replaced by something else entirely.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
memberships of the old object. But that,
again, is a very advanced operation that will be difficult to sell to a
newbie.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
aren't any better as a far as I can judge. The
only reason I haven't yet blown these tags to pieces is that I can
occasionally use them in rants like this.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
well there will be a live stream as well as a recording
afterwards. No idea if that is a competitor or if both ideas can be
merged somehow.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
for this Black Forest train ride
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9789#map=13/48.1568/8.2535 for
example ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
On 03/26/2014 05:01 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I've been contacted by someone from the German Museum of Technology
in Berlin (http://www.sdtb.de/English.122.0.html).
Better Link http://www.sdtb.de/Home.623.0.html
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49
continue as soon as they log in and read the message, but they haven't
done so yet.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
relations it is often easier
to revert early.
I'll leave you to battle that out amongst yourselves then ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
Hi,
On 01.12.2013 21:00, Oliver Jowett wrote:
What's the workaround for users that do not wish to retain cookies?
GreaseMonkey could be an option.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB
==
var welcome = $(div.welcome);
if (welcome) welcome.remove ();
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
(if you had wanted to vent
your anger, publishing it without the sender's name would have been
sufficient), maybe we can go back to normal and you can explain which
bits of TomH's explanation of the status quo you haven't understood.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org
://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/401
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
a message myself, and will
block him if he continues.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
On 15.09.2013 23:09, Colin Smale wrote:
Just forwarding this to talk-gb as well as it is on their patch...
Appears Firefishy has already taken care of it
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17858148
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09
will then be acted upon by DWG.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
through all objects
tagged natural=meadow, read potential note tags, look at the other tags
and/or aerial imagery, and *then* change them to landuse=meadow, that
would not be a mechanical edit.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
.
Re. your latest point you don't know what you're doing - my impression
is that your attitude is I know better anyway, an attitude that is
problematic enough in mappers but becomes inacceptable as soon as people
make large-scale edits.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede
to 27 GB today (from
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet/2013/) - both sizes are .osm.bz2
file size.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
being mistaken for OSM.
(Also, someone should tell them about the license change.)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
=53.44899lon=-2.73245zoom=15
It seems that at most of these have been contributed by user Salkunh who
had not agreed to the new license when the redaction was executed. He
seems to have agreed later, but the data cannot be automatically restored.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede
.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
a message
saying that I intend to revert unless mapper has good reason (and I
would be unlikely to accept anything they say as a good reason but
still it would be a little more courteous than simply reverting I guess).
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008
they should work on their This data may not be reproduced in any
form without permission. then ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
of what we currently have.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
there for at
least 6 days until someone brought it up.
Something to keep in mind for automatic vandalism detectors; anything
rendered on small zooms is a more attractive target for playful
contributors.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
that your script does the right thing?
Especially if your IP number for the day is 81.156.53.226?
Thanks
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
. Caution: Trying to re-map with only the filtered.osm
file loaded is bound to cause trouble as you will be deleting nodes that
are still used by other objects; make sure to download an area around
where you plan to remap first.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org
previously.
I'll remove every FIXME from objects he touched in the last week.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
of the world to beware. Because that
way it might actually get fixed.
Thank you.
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
thing was to
signal to the mapper this object has been touched by a decliner but is
still considered ok, you don't have to remap it. I did that hoping that
people would occasionally check if OSMI does the right thing ;) but
maybe the time of the yellow stuff is over.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik
Hi,
On 01/10/12 14:53, David Earl wrote:
Yes, the trouble is when Frederik pointed this out and referred to the
page, it says it is for cases where the suspect edit has been wiped out,
not simply verified from other sources. How can you change the name from
itself to itself and actually have
Hi,
On 01/10/12 15:37, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Yes, the trouble is when Frederik pointed this out and referred to the
page, it says it is for cases where the suspect edit has been wiped out,
not simply verified from other sources. How can you change the name from
itself to itself and actually have
loss.
For this to happen, we need people in OSM who know about the licenses,
who care about the project, and who want to help shape its future.
You could be one of them.
Or you could give up and go home.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
Hi,
On 01/04/12 12:52, Tom Chance wrote:
The only mention I can find of this on the wiki dismisses the issue and
inaccurately suggests these objects do in fact have a user associated
with them, so it's not a problem:
Hi,
On 01/03/2012 10:09 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Can someone revert this changeset 10271153 and ban the user.
It seems that Frederik has already done that.
Yes, sorry, I accidentally replied to John only and not the the list. I
reverted the edit and asked the user what this was about but
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
