Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread John Robert Peterson
I hate to sound pesemeistic, and may have missed somthing, but... Do we have any gaurentee that this inacuracy isn't some messed up copy protection/obfucation/deliberate error/easter egg thing introduced by OS? I know they shouldn't have, but they are a relitivly clumsy organisation, and I'm sure

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread James Hogan
On Sunday 30 May 2010 12:16:33 Tim François wrote: > By the way, which method are people using to re-project the VectorDistrict > data? I'm using the inbuilt datum in gdal - is anyone using the correct > *.prj file, and is there a difference? I'm using vectormap in Merkaartor from Git with the ori

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Robert Scott
Funny this subject should come up. Working with the OS Locator data, I'm finding the bounding boxes to be constantly about 50m to the east. In the south, they're also about 30m south. In scotland they're about 10m north. I'm using the srid transform 27700 -> 4326. What am I doing wrong? robe

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Steve Doerr
From: "Chris Hill" Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 11:53 AM > I believe the StreetView tiles are offset south(ish) by a few metres in > East Yorkshire too. Reprojected shape files line up well with surveyed > data. I have traced a few buildings from StreetView but I've stopped > until I had worked out

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Tim François
So... I take that to mean that I should really be using the correct *.prj file, rather than gdal's inbuilt datum? Tim --- On Sun, 30/5/10, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote: From: Jerry Clough - OSM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg) To: ta

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Jerry Clough - OSM
ris Hill wrote: >From: Chris Hill >Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with >mapseg) >To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >Date: Sunday, 30 May, 2010, 11:53 > > >I believe the StreetView tiles are offset south(ish) by a few metres in >East York

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Tim François
By the way, which method are people using to re-project the VectorDistrict data? I'm using the inbuilt datum in gdal - is anyone using the correct *.prj file, and is there a difference? Tim --- On Sun, 30/5/10, Chris Hill wrote: From: Chris Hill Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between O

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Chris Hill
I believe the StreetView tiles are offset south(ish) by a few metres in East Yorkshire too. Reprojected shape files line up well with surveyed data. I have traced a few buildings from StreetView but I've stopped until I had worked out what was wrong. Now given other people's comments I do think

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Jason Cunningham
I'm in London and using the method, linked to by Kevin, the VectorDistrict looks very good. I also converted to kml to see how some some of the old docks near sea level matched up in google earth and I was more than happy. Overlaying Vector District and 'StreetView tiles' in Josm indicates the Stre

Re: [Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Kevin Peat
I'm in Devon and I see the same thing although whether it is just the SW I don't know. The Streetview tiles (as I see them in JOSM) are all offset to the SE by 5-10 metres. I've converted some woods in my area from the VectorDistrict data using this process, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki

[Talk-GB] Offsets between OS and OSM data (was Building with mapseg)

2010-05-30 Thread Tim François
> On a side note, has anybody noticed a consistent tendency > for existing > independently surveyed roads to be offset northwards (by > around 5-10 > metres) from the OS data (vectormap and streetview)? I've > seen various > cases of existing roads being edited to be consistent with > OS data, > bu