On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Peter Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that Robert. A few other questions:
1) How does one tag something that is being considered seriously (such as
the Mottram Tintwistle bypass), but which may well never get built? I think
I will just put the
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
To add a way/whatever to a relation, use the new link icon on the
right, then select a nearby relation from the menu (or Create a new
relation).
Thanks for the
* Rendering engines could handle it much easier if it were just a
cycleway=* tag added to the road.
Please show me the simple rendering algorithm for mapnik and osmarender you
have envisioned to make this working for all the special cases above. Until
you do, I keep believing the
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008, Dave Stubbs wrote:
---- cycleway
---- road
---- road
---- cycleway
I count 8 ways?
Unless you are splitting all the ways at absolutely every
intersection
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Jo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob wrote:
the logical solution would be to use the overlays in openlayers
make a nice (basic) basemap and add some transparent overlays
- amenities
- powerlines
- and so on..
bus line1, bus line2, etc... That's what
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Alex Mauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sven Grüner wrote:
I agree with you that some terms in this process might not be optimal,
same applies to depricated. But as a non-native speaker I never thought
about that and just took these words for what they mean
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Steve Chilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
PS. Why are trunk_links rendered above primary/secondary streets. It
make
ugly junctions.
This has bothered me for a while now but I have not got round to fixing
it. It does look ugly and I think is quite
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Why not ditch the whole notion of approved features altogether. It
doesn't cut any meat in our community anyway. What does approved
mean, and who has the right to approve something?
Having
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Those who make the decision have no authority anyway. So why not
record the rationale without the decision, as it is anybody's free
choice to follow them or not.
Then welcome, everyone, to
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 10:55 +, Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
Sent: 18 March 2008 10:49 AM
To: Blake Crosby
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Tourist/Leisure Trails
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Contours layer presented by openpistemap is simply great. Does it
exist a server publishing only this layer?
I'm not sure how that would work - you really need the contours data set
to be the bottom layer, with the
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Dave Stubbs wrote:
There's also the amount of time it would take to render the tiles. It
takes over 15 hours to render the contours used on the cycle map, and
all things considered that covers
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
it's faster to just let it use swap,
I I/O load hits my server pretty hard. Trying to do anything else while
that's happening is quite painful. :-/
Doing it without the heavy I/O load
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:44 PM, OJ W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where an area of natural=wood is inside an area of amenity=university, the
woodland doesn't appear unless you put it at layer0
http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.9356064080633lon=-1.2017670228240827zoom=17layers=B000F000F
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Lambertus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a question about the update times: I've made a start in mapping the
cycle node routes in the NL.Apeldoorn area [1] last week but I don't see
them on the map now. Is that probably a tagging error on my part or is
the
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you select a point (POI) just for seeing the tags and then press Esc for
quitting, Potlatch always warns about server connection failure. Esc just
escapes if a way or a node of a way is selected and I think
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Pieren Pieren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think about this idea :
- select two or three small islands somewhere on the planet, but really in
the middle of 'nowhere', means no humans, no constructions, absolutely
nothing.
- call these islands 'mapnik',
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Pieren Pieren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can create a standalone .osm file with all this in it if you/we
need a test file. That's a much better idea than polluting the
database with junk!
ok, forget my comment for developers who have a local environment
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Pieren Pieren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wow, I'm surprised about the hostility of some answers. I mean, remember me
the name of this ML...
So, lets continue the talk (and not the fight):
if you are already speeding 15 mph over the speedlimit in
your car, you
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Better but I now get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/osmosis-0.24$ sh do_it
Exception in thread main java.lang.ClassFormatError:
com.bretth.osmosis.core.Osmosis (unrecognized class file version)
at
find all the nodes inside
areas. If there are any that are just outside, we will miss them, whici
is annoying, but not the end of the world. In order to find them, we can
use a Simple postGIS query as suggested by Dave Stubbs (which I have
attempted to reformat a bit):
select
find all the nodes inside
areas. If there are any that are just outside, we will miss them, whici
is annoying, but not the end of the world. In order to find them, we can
use a Simple postGIS query as suggested by Dave Stubbs (which I have
attempted to reformat a bit):
select
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Hughes wrote:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Unfortunately removing the related node isn't going to
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Lauri Hahne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/02/2008, Igor Brejc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lauri Hahne wrote:
IMHO The symbol is ugly. Even the old one looked better than the
current one.
In humble opinion we shouldn't judge other people's
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Jo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do the transparent layers take the same amount of time to render as the
base layer
it's the right URL, but:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/557
patches welcome I'm guessing.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me if this is the correct url to get the complete
history of a relation from the OSM API:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Guilhem Bonnefille
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any layer presenting ONLY raw GPS data?
Actually, we have Mapnik, Osmarender, Maplint, but what about a layer
with
On Feb 18, 2008 11:21 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
By co-incidence, I was in contact with another mapper who's been doing
something like this to make low zoom osmarender rendering a bit
prettier. What's everybody's opinion of this kind of practice? Is it
not an
On Feb 7, 2008 11:38 AM, maning sambale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 7:26 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you got a card in the microSD slot? If so, you can either pull it
out and stick it in a card reader, or else you can set the GPS to USB
mass storage mode. Either
On Feb 7, 2008 12:12 PM, maning sambale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, do I still need to make GMAPSUPP.IMG even if I just have one img file?
My GPS only seems to pay attention to GMAPSUPP.IMG files, so yes, I think so.
It may be enough to just rename it, but I don't know about that.
Dave
On Feb 6, 2008 1:39 PM, wiseLYNX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm new to th OSM project, but I'm getting quite involved, as Torino
(Italy), where I live, is well covered with Yahoo aerials, and it's
quite effortless to fill in the neighborhoods of my home (which of
course I know
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
number nodes that have been utterly destroyed. Basically 522-603 and a
few others in the 1000's have
On Feb 6, 2008 8:39 PM, Jon Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:23 +, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know who/what
On Feb 5, 2008 4:08 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 2:47 PM, Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, and Andy in particular,
Hi Ben. An excellent selection of suggestions - I'll reply to them inline.
I'll translate into the relation equivalents...
as the past
On Feb 1, 2008 8:37 AM, Foppe Benedictus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Andy,
I just asked in IRC if somebody knew if the cyclemap was not updated the
last 2 weeks, they came up with the why don't you email him solution, so
here it is..
No
Hi,
I've added a slightly modified London rendering to the progress images
I've been making.
The rendering dehighlights parts of the data that have probably just
been traced.
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/progress/?region=london-noname
There's nothing clever going on here, it just
On Jan 30, 2008 12:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:16:25PM -, Andy Robinson (blackadder)
wrote:
Why is it not a property like bridge, cutting etc. and
will it render correctly? Should it be changed to
viaduct=yes?
Ewww, yuck... boolean flags.
On Jan 30, 2008 8:42 AM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asking them to install and configure their own copy of Mapnik seems
somewhat unreasonable...
You could try osmps, and then convert the PostScript to the
required format.
Mapnik was just an
On Jan 29, 2008 12:13 PM, Michael Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:59 AM 1/29/2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
I wrote the following two weeks ago because I felt that the talk list
was a bit flooded by administrative voting ends, voting opens,
comments requested etc. messages:
On Jan 28, 2008 12:33 PM, Steve Chilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been asking to write a review of the peoplesmap.
As part of the process I wanted to revisit the discussion on talk.
Can anyone tell me whether it is possible to interrogate
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/
On Jan 22, 2008 2:17 PM, Dermot McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/01/2008, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maxspeed=110 -- assumed km/h
maxspeed=70mph -- unit stated
maxwidth=2.14 -- assumed metres
maxwidht=7ft -- unit stated
I'm uneasy about this - up till now,
On Jan 22, 2008 5:02 PM, Simon Hewison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
And what is the exact SI equivalent of 30mph?
According to the current UK Highway Code, 30mph = 48km/h.
It's wrong ;-)
I can give you an approximation: 48.28032km/h.
What happens though if everyone
On Jan 22, 2008 5:39 PM, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
This is really not difficult to handle.
You check for a unit, if you don't understand the unit you pretend the
tag didn't exist.
So this means that some renderers won't render some values; whereas if
we
On Jan 20, 2008 11:10 PM, Jo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just walked part of a cycle route. In fact we walked three cycle
routes at once. I would like to create a relation, type=route and then
copy this to the two other relations containing the same ways. Or is
there a smarter way to go about
On Jan 9, 2008 2:06 PM, Stefan Baebler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'd imagine that OSM's as on ground rule for primary names should
also apply for country nodes (tagged with place=country), however this
doesn't seem to be the case at the moment.
On Jan 9, 2008 4:22 PM, Michael Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:06 PM 1/9/2008, Stefan Baebler wrote:
Hi!
I'd imagine that OSM's as on ground rule for primary names should
also apply for country nodes (tagged with place=country), however this
doesn't seem to be the case at the
On 03/01/2008, bvh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:29:16AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I agree. It is however again one of the problems where different
relations will need different actions - when a way in a route relation
is split, both new ways need to be members, but
a priority for me at the moment - though I think Dave
Stubbs has started work on implementing it.
Yep, started on it.
But got distracted a bit though... I'll probably get back working on it soonish.
The implementation will only handle route type relations, which is
what you want here. Relations
On 21/09/2007, Jonathan Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote
Leaving the units off is quite a bit like not bothering with the first
2 digits of the year for whatever reason.
It's more like not stating that the year is in the Gregorian calendar
every time you write one. Yes
On 05/09/07, Daniel Glassey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Editors reply on your letters page (A to B 61) you said:
The Open Street Map project is a fascinating co-operative global
venture, allowing individuals to upload mapping data from their GPS
receivers, producing royalty-free street
On 16/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has just been brough to my attention.
http://maps.camdencyclists.org.uk/
Had a quick look but nothing too understand it properly. Was wondering if
it may be of use to those working on the cycle routes if you werent aware
of it
On 16/08/07, Rik van der Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My own suggestion is:
whateverkey=road/track/path/trail (4m/4m/2m/1m)
cycle=yes;foot=yes
network=ncn;byway;burnswalk;kmtrail;
network_ref=ncn7
and if you like to gather info on the pavement, also:
301 - 352 of 352 matches
Mail list logo
