-- Original Message --
From: "Dave F via Talk-GB"
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: 14/12/2019 15:54:13
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] What is farmland?
On 14/12/2019 15:19, Martin Wynne wrote:
Is this "farmland"?
http://85a.uk/haws_hill_960x600.jpg
I would say yes, as I believe both
-- Original Message --
From: "Devonshire"
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: 12/07/2019 07:44:55
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] UK coastline data
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, at 10:41 PM, Borbus wrote:
The Dart cuts the coastline off right at the mouth, which doesn't seem
right...
I think the
-- Original Message --
From: "Mike Evans"
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Cc: "David Groom"
Sent: 28/08/2018 19:22:16
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:09:47 +
"David Groom" wrote:
There is no consensus.
t it would be advantageous to have consensus
on this matter, and a consistent tagging paradigm in OSM? I am not
prejudging what that consensus position might be, just sounding out if
there is any point in having the discussion in the first place.
On 2018-08-28 13:09, David G
There is no consensus.
Personally I'm not in favour of the view that any body of water which is
tidal should be bounded by a way tagged as coastline.
Reasons for this
1) Ask any one who lives in say central London "do you live on the
coast" or do you live beside a river", most would I'm
How about
1) Change "OpenStreetmap Collaborative Mapping" to "OpenStreetmap
Distaster Mapping"
2) Link the word "OpenStreetmap" to the OSM web site
Regards
David
-- Original Message --
From: "Blake Girardot HOT/OSM"
To: "Christoph Hormann"
In southern Mindanao there are a number of highways which have
duplicated ways, but often with different highway classifications (for
example one way being marked as trunk, the other as primary).
As an indication of where they are see here
Alternatively in JOSM:
File > Download from Overpass API
Then put ref:Chiltern_Society = * in the text box next to "Build
query", then click "Build Query".
Next select download area, and then click "Download"
David
-- Original Message --
From: "Bob Hawkins"
Thanks for showing me those previous discussions
-- Original Message --
From: "Eugene Alvin Villar" <sea...@gmail.com>
To: "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net>
Cc: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: 02/05/201
Message --
From: "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net>
To: "talk-ph" <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: 27/04/2017 16:46:15
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Bridges mapped as link roads or ramps
I think it would be OK to re-tag these as the appropriate highway type
with &
oach 3 as it keeps the field data in OSM
(someone might have a use for this)
What are your thoughts?
Regards
David
-- Original Message --
From: "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net>
To: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: 31/
If they also sell air conditioning units then maybe
shop=hvac (used 34 times in OSM already
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dhvac)
repair=yes
This would be similar to tagging for a computer shop,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcomputer
David
--
ot;Eugene Alvin Villar" <sea...@gmail.com>
To: "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net>
Cc: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: 30/03/2017 00:56:18
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] landuse = farm
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, David Groom
I've just seen this discussion on the main OSM talk list
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-March/077741.html
The standard OSM rendering will soon drop the rendering of "landuse =
farm".
There are :
66 Relations
7,390 ways
71 Nodes (interestingly the wiki did not recommend
I've just forced a refresh of the affected tiles.
David
-- Original Message --
From: "Jim Morgan"
To:
Cc: "OpenStreetMap Philippines"
Sent: 22/02/2017 03:55:48
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Residential.
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote on Wednesday,
There seems a lot of duplication in these two route relations:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2171660
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1573805
Both are titled "Calder Aire link"
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Rendering OK now, presumably as a result of
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45519828
-- Original Message --
From: "Edward Catmur"
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: 26/01/2017 16:00:22
Subject: [Talk-GB] Rendering (?) bug at Marble Arch
Not quite sure what you had in mind by the tags map_type and map_size,
but maybe need a tag something along the likes of "sign_type" withn
values of "bollard | monolith | finger_post | totem" ( see
http://content.tfl.gov.uk/legible-london-product-range.pdf)
David
-- Original Message
Although "beet" could also refer to "sugar beet"
I think the wiki pages may be confused
The wiki page for crop in Japanese
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:crop does seem to have crop =
beet translating as sugar beet
Whereas the Polish page I think has crop = beet translating a
ot;Robert Norris" <rw_nor...@hotmail.com>
To: "Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>; "David
Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net>
Sent: 10/01/2017 00:36:41
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref
If I remember correctly the use of "pro
Has any one got any instances of any providers of OSM data using the
prow_ref on rendering / routing
I recently pointed out to a mapper that if the reference numbers he was
adding to footpaths were official PROW reference numbers it was
recommended to use the "prow_ref" tag rather than the
I have came across a similar issue where areas of mainly grass, but with
some gorse bushes, on chalk downland had been changed to natural=heath,
when I contacted the mapper about it he said something along the lines
of, "well I've seen it done like that elsewhere"
David
-- Original
of problems you saw in the IoW?
//colin
[1]
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5386032,0.6292606,3a,24.7y,277.12h,84.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMl8cwBlLLuOVtPES_DfkOQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
On 2016-12-11 22:30, David Groom wrote:
I suspect that even though much of the coastline is tagged
"source
I suspect that even though much of the coastline is tagged "source=PGS"
is has been amended by reference to Yahoo and after that Bing imagery,
but the subsequent editors did not remove the "source=PGS" tag.
Certainly comparing your gpx file for the Isle of Wight with the
coastline currently
I'm aware that Bing & Mapbox imagery may be out dated, but is
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353779765 really a riverbank?
David
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
hen I
do not tag the mangrove at all.
Just my opinion...
Cheers
Totor
On April 30, 2016 10:14:43 AM GMT+08:00, David Groom wrote:
There are two different approaches used in mapping mangrove areas in
OSM
1) Treat the boundary of the mangrove and the openwater sea as the
coastline, and then
Hopefully fixing the geometries in this area is now complete
David
On 19/03/2016 17:53, David Groom wrote:
Its now been one month with no major objections to my proopesed
cnages, so I have made them, but with the suggestion made by Eugene.
However the exisiting geometry of the landuse
nges 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
landuse=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being
meadows.
On 2/14/16, David Groom <revi...@pacific-rim.net> wrote:
While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come
across a number which do not seem to fit
=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being
meadows.
On 2/14/16, David Groom <revi...@pacific-rim.net> wrote:
While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come
across a number which do not seem to fit the tagging structure on the
main OSM wiki, and I ca
Eugene
the coastline ways which I am improving seem to derive from an import of
IFSAR 2012 data (See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33871982)
So these are after the 2010 mini project to improve the coaastline
David
>As for the saw-tooth coastlines, I'm actually surprised they
>Might be good to probe more. Can you give me sample changesets so I
>can ask around.
As far as I can see its https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33871982
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
reas . This may result in a large part of Leyte "turning green"
on the map.
Regards
David Groom
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
- Original Message -
From: Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM: prow_ref=
Arg! We were converging on prow_ref when I last looked at tag info a few
months
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:43 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Data consumer use cases
Goal-oriented wiki page, first draft:
- Original Message -
From: Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:32 AM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] importing ODBl data
Hi there,
I have a question about imports and the
- Original Message -
From: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
To: sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
On 19/09/12 at 16:24 +0200, sly (sylvain
Just wondering if it might be time for the mapnik coastline files to be
updated. It seems over two months since this was last done.
The number of coastline errors each day is now small.
The only reason I can see for not updating is that the redaction bot may
have reduced the accuracy of the
As others have said , I'd re-use the existing nodes.
I'd probably tag this as natural = water
David
- Original Message -
From: Chris Barham
To: talk-au
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:21 PM
Subject: [talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature
Hi,
I'm working
islandmonkey seems to have been at it again
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12772095
which just seems to consist of mass deletions, including deleted coastline, and
no meaningful changeset comment
I also note 4 other changesets by him / her today
Can we get this reverted and
in a while.
David
- Original Message -
From: Paul Norman
To: 'osm-talk'
Cc: David Groom
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:42 AM
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
Minor update: I am now running three times a day. Exact upload times depend
on runtime
...@systemed.net wrote:
David Groom wrote:
However at the north end there is a (newly erected) public footpath
sign showing a footpath ref of B64, pointing straight down this road,
and the definitive map shows this as a footpath.
I use admin:ref for refs that are predominantly intended
Longwood Lane when driving a car along it looks pretty much like a normal
highway, although it is rather narrow. It has an asphalt surface, and when
turning in from the north, or south there is nothing to show there is
anything special about this road at all from a vehicles point of view.
- Original Message -
From: Pierre BĂ©land infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr
To: talk-ca talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 11:27 PM
Subject: [Talk-ca] Coastline rendering problems, Richelieu River
There are also Coastline rendering problems on the Richelieu river around
- Original Message -
From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council
2012/6/11 Nick Whitelegg
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council
On 11/06/12 17:16, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Martin
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council
On 11/06/12 17:16, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Martin
On talk-gb Nick Whiteleg recently announced what initially seemed to be
some good news , that Hampshire County Council have released their Rights of
Way data under the OS OpenData licence.
However, my initial thoughts, and those of Robert Whittaker, was that this
might not seem as good news
- Original Message -
From: Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hampshire Rights of Way Data released under OS
OpenData licence
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 13:29 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hence,
I've had some additional thoughts on this, but will now be discussing these
on legal talk rather than here
David
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
- Original Message -
From: Robert Whittaker (OSM) robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 9:08 AM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Attributing Sources used in OSM
I've just been given permission
- Original Message -
From: Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Have you contacted a UK local authority in regards to
Rights of Way?
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 16:22 +,
- Original Message -
From: Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 7:14 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Islands that will vanish in the license change
Thanks to Paul Norman's efforts and visualizations based on it[1],
I've now added
- Original Message -
From: Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 3:14 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Signing of Contributor Terms
Hi All,
Would it be possible to have someone sign the
- Original Message -
From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
To: Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines?
Ok, is there someone with JOSM expertise that can actually do this?
I
- Original Message -
From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines?
- Original Message -
From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
To: Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
- Original Message -
From: Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com
To: Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines?
A week or so ago there were a group of people working intent on
- Original Message -
From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
To: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
There are no
Paul
A big thank you for providing all of the data.
It has helped to greatly reduce the number of error points over the last
week.
Regards
David
- Original Message -
From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 4:26 AM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk
To: 'Toby Murray' toby.mur...@gmail.com; talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
Toby wrote:
Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: Jack Burton j...@saosce.com.au
Cc: talk-au talk-au@openstreetmap.org; osm-f...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Plea to Australian decliners
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:14 AM,
- Original Message -
From: Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What licences (other than ODbL) are compatible
with OSM after 1st April
On 23
- Original Message -
From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:34 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the
latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I
- Original Message -
From: Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com
To: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my
- Original Message -
From: Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted or
declined are
make it easy as that is your mean high tide mark, but few places have
such a wall.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:43 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
wrote:
With the high resolution imagery its usually quite easy to differentiate
between permanently dry areas, and areas which was been covered
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Allison andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com
To: talk-ca talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 3:33 PM
Subject: [Talk-ca] Clean up - natural coastline
Hello:
I'm in the process of recreating non-ct data.
Any gotchas that I should look
- Original Message -
From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
To: 'James A. Treacy' tre...@debian.org; 'Andrew Allison'
andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com
Cc: 'talk-ca' talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Clean up - natural coastline
From:
- Original Message -
From: malenki
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Big Blue Something in Colombia
bastien wrote:
Have a little look in talk-co,
Thanks for the hint, but my knowledge of Spanish consists of three to
five
- Original Message -
From: Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in
determining tainted ways
Yeah, a healthy chunk of the interstates in Kansas are
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in
determining tainted ways
On 15/12/2011 12:40, David Groom wrote:
- Original
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming
deletions - implication
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelan
- Original Message -
From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com
To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 6:33 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?
On Dec 12, 2011, at 8:38 AM, David Groom wrote:
I recently made some updates
- Original Message -
From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com
To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?
On Dec 9, 2011, at 3:29 AM, David Groom wrote:
Martin
Someone had been tidying
- Original Message -
From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
To: Sax-Barnett, Melelani barne...@trimet.org
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?
a similar problem is also observable for
- Original Message -
From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?
2011/12/9 David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
- Original Message -
From: Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?
Sax-Barnett, Melelani schrieb:
I've actually noticed the same problem over in Portland, Oregon, USA as
- Original Message -
From: Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com
To: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Argh, Canvec imports
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:40, Michal Migurski
- Original Message -
From: Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Argh, Canvec imports
On 17-11-2011 18:13, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com
- Original Message -
From: Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 3:48 PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] How to tag marine lights on posts
I've just tagged a row of 18 marine hazard lights, on tall posts,
- Original Message -
From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
To: Kimon Berlin ki...@deepskymarines.org; talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Japan coastline errors
I think I fixed all coastline errors in Japan which showed up
- Original Message -
From: Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure
On 05/10/2011 16:36, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
The status of Jerusalem as part of
- Original Message -
From: Pieren pier...@gmail.com
To: OSM talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Lambert Carsten lhc@solcon.nl
wrote:
As an
- Original Message -
From: Lambert Carsten lhc@solcon.nl
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:39:16 -0400
Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On
- Original Message -
From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com
To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 9:42 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] There are new coastline shapefiles
Hi,
I've started including new coastline shapefiles with the metro extracts:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:14 AM
Subject: [talk-au] OSM Inspector
Hi Everyone,
I recently found OSM Inspector and Keep Right and have been slowly fixing
the problems found
- Original Message -
From: Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu
To: Steve Dobson st...@dobbo.org
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Looking For Unconnected Cycleways
Keep right seams to lag a bit behind the current state, just click
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbl and collective databases
Hi,
On 07/12/11 01:05, David Groom wrote:
Well that's what I asked to this list on 17
- Original Message -
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org;
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com; Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org;
David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbl and collective databases
David,
David Groom wrote:
This seems to be quite
- Original Message -
From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org
Cc: p...@opengeodata.posterous.com
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 8:00 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au
[snip]
Maybe you have a better option?
Yes. Do
The ODbL defines a Collective Database as this Database in unmodified
form as part of a collection of independent databases in themselves that
together are assembled into a collective whole.
Now I had assumed that as far as the above definition was concerned that:
Database meant Database
- Original Message -
From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
To: t...@openstreetmap.org; talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Cc: p...@opengeodata.posterous.com
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 8:00 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au
[snip]
Maybe you have a better option?
Yes. Do
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways
David Murn wrote:
I think the biggest problem people in .au had
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways
David Groom wrote:
Are you sure? ODbL defines 'Collective Database Means this Database
in unmodified form
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways
David Groom wrote:
Which seems to me to that you are agreeing with my point, that these
are derivative
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways
David Groom wrote:
But as I said earlier, the ODbL seems quite clear that you cant make
a Collective
- Original Message -
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Cc: OSM Fork osm-f...@googlegroups.com; openstreetmap
t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] offering adapted databases
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:27
One of the main requirements of compliance with ODbL [1] is set out in
Section 4.6.As yet there are no community guidelines on how OSM / OSMF
interprets this section.
There seem to be at least three areas where guidelines might be necessary:
A) The term offer as used in the first
Frederick
I have just posted a series of questions to the OSM legal talk mailing list.
In one point I cite an earlier point you made in an email to the list, and
what I inferred from that email.
I am in no way meaning to be critical of you, and it may be that I have
inferred the wrong
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Guidelines on interpretation of section 4.6
od ODbL
Hi,
David Groom wrote
1 - 100 di 318 matches
Mail list logo