Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

sent from a phone > On 31. May 2019, at 22:13, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > > Hello Kathleen and Milo, > > Thanks! > > No-one besides myself has uploaded anything yet, so happy to change to ODbL. > The panoramas are a different dataset to OSM however, now I think about it, > it could well be

Re: [Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 2:03 PM Andreas Lattmann wrote: > > Scusate, ma i distributori d'acqua potabile (naturale, naturale fredda e > frizzante) si mappa amenity=vending_machine vending=? fee=yes o no per quei > distributori che forniscono l'acqua gratis. > Sbaglio? Perdonatemi per questo

Re: [Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

Non si mappa per il rendering. Se non ha un nome (C'è anche chi gli ha dato il nome, ad esempio in un comune con un sindaco egocentrico l'ha nominato "L'acqua del sindaco" quindi è corretto metterlo nel name ma per il resto lo leverei. Andreas ___

Re: [Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

Ciao! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dwater Spero sia d'aiuto! Francesco Il sab 1 giu 2019, 14:03 Andreas Lattmann ha scritto: > Scusate, ma i distributori d'acqua potabile (naturale, naturale fredda e > frizzante) si mappa amenity=vending_machine vending=? fee=yes o no per

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

Hello Martin, Yes, that sounds a good idea. So (and asking everyone) if I was to license the panos themselves under CC-SA, but their locations, and data derived from them, as ODBL - does that sound acceptable? Thanks, Nick From: Martin Koppenhoefer

[Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

Scusate, ma i distributori d'acqua potabile (naturale, naturale fredda e frizzante) si mappa amenity=vending_machine vending=? fee=yes o no per quei distributori che forniscono l'acqua gratis. Sbaglio? Perdonatemi per questo stupido dubbio. Andreas -- I❤️ Software Libero.

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

some don't stitch the image either as it requires too much processing, which you have to do with hugin or a proprietary software i.e. the Xiaomi Sphere 360 On Sat., Jun. 1, 2019, 8:29 a.m. Dave F via talk, wrote: > Hi > > I was thinking of purchasing a 360 camera & assumed all would have this >

Re: [Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

Se ne sei a conoscenza anche il tag operator ed eventualmente gli orari di erogazione. In genere l'acqua viene erogata 24H ma conosco un distributore nei miei paraggi che dopo le 24 non eroga acqua (regolamento comunale). Il 01/06/19 16:51, Andreas Lattmann ha scritto: Grazie mille.  Il 1

Re: [Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

A tal proposito, vorrei aggiungere che per quanto un amenity di questo tipo non dovrebbe avere un name.. Per certi casi ho scelto di usare comunque quel tag in modo che si possa ricercare ed esca fuori il nome anche sui render. Il sab 1 giu 2019, 17:37 Gianluca Boero ha scritto: > Se ne sei a

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

Hello Andrew, >A neat thing you can do is infill the base of the image where your >hand/body/head are to make it less distracting. For example all >my 360 images >on Mapillary do this -> https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xfQGW4eK_ntjhRNyXDW5bQ >The script I use for this is

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

Hi I was thinking of purchasing a 360 camera & assumed all would have this feature built in. I was clearly mistaken. Can anyone recommend one which does? Cheers DaveF On 01/06/2019 04:58, Andrew Harvey wrote: A neat thing you can do is infill the base of the image where your hand/body/head

Re: [Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

Grazie mille.  Il 1 giugno 2019 14:06:06 CEST, Francesco Ansanelli ha scritto: >Ciao! > >https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dwater >Spero sia d'aiuto! >Francesco > >Il sab 1 giu 2019, 14:03 Andreas Lattmann ha >scritto: > >> Scusate, ma i distributori d'acqua potabile

Re: [Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

Il sab 1 giu 2019, 14:03 Andreas Lattmann ha scritto: > Scusate, ma i distributori d'acqua potabile (naturale, naturale fredda e > frizzante) si mappa amenity=vending_machine vending=? fee=yes o no per > quei distributori che forniscono l'acqua gratis. > Sbaglio? Perdonatemi per questo stupido

Re: [Talk-it] Distributore d'acqua

Il sab 1 giu 2019, 17:44 Francesco Ansanelli ha scritto: > A tal proposito, vorrei aggiungere che per quanto un amenity di questo > tipo non dovrebbe avere un name.. Per certi casi ho scelto di usare > comunque quel tag in modo che si possa ricercare ed esca fuori il nome > anche sui render. > >

Re: [OSM-talk] Organised editing activity - updating assets of OMV group

Note that in case of importing external datasets it is necessary to follow also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ("Importing is the process of uploading external data to OSM. " -

Re: [talk-au] Caltex on name-suggestion-index

Is there a simple, easy to read (ie not Github code! :-)) list of these preset names? Thanks Graeme On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 22:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Can you link to an affected OSM object? It sounded like something caused > by > name-suggestion-index, but I see no matches in > >

Re: [talk-au] Caltex on name-suggestion-index

It’s pretty easy here http://osmlab.github.io/name-suggestion-index/brands/amenity/fuel.html Cheers - Phil, On the road with his iPad > On 1 Jun 2019, at 4:43 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Is there a simple, easy to read (ie not Github code! :-)) list of these > preset names? > >

Re: [talk-au] Local Chapter

Andrew John, Ed et al, The proposal looks good however do we need to discuss the inclusion of Hawaii and perhaps Guam as they may be more appropriate under a US auspices or is it best to use the UN definition that excludes a number of these to be succinctly clear what is in and what is not.

Re: [talk-au] Caltex on name-suggestion-index

There is http://osmlab.github.io/name-suggestion-index/brands/index.html intended as readable index of data. Though it is containing only partial extract - for example match information seems currently missing, maybe it would be

[OSM-talk-fr] Réseau de transport : intégration OD

Bonjour, Ma région a mis en ligne en OD les fichiers GTFS de réseaux de bus départementaux (https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/organizations/nouvelle-aquitaine-mobilites/ on remarquera que la licence n'est pas précisée :/) Précédemment, j'ai déjà commencé à en cartographier certains "à la main".

Re: [talk-cz] Vyhledávání v předdefinovaných (nalezených) trasách

Ahoj, "[...] highway=track jako akceptovatelnou cestu. Což v Africe je normální silnice - akorát po ní nemůžeš jezdit tak rychle" to by nemělo být, silnice by měly být tagované podle důležitosti, ne podle stavu, viz např. "The road conditions in African countries do not always correspond to their

Re: [talk-cz] Vyhledávání v předdefinovaných (nalezených) trasách

On 31/05/2019 22:03, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Co mě osobně spíše chybělo, že neexistuje routovací appka pro 4x4, která by brala v potaz highway=track jako akceptovatelnou cestu. Což v Africe je normální silnice - akorát po ní nemůžeš jezdit tak rychle. To je zvláštní, pokud si v OsmAndu zapomeneš

Re: [talk-cz] Body záchrany Lesy ČR

Spratku, cítím to úplně stejně. Nechápu, proč body záchrany nejsou zřizovatelem naopak vnucovány všem společnostem, které mapy vytváří. Jestli je komerční či ne je přeci lhostejné. Má to pomáhat lidem v nesnázi a vše je již uhrazeno. Některé věci jsou padlé na hlavu. OSM mají nějaká pravidla,

[Talk-es] Etiquetado locales anti acoso

Buenas tardes, tal como he avanzado en el grupo de Telegram, en unos días se hará el mapeado de los locales de ocio nocturno de Barcelona adheridos al protocolo "No callem" [1]. Este protocolo garantiza que cuando un agresor está asediando a otra persona, el local activará una serie de medidas y

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Road junctions

Thank you all for your feedback on this. I’ll have a look at the options and hopefully get to tidy it up early next week. From: Brian Prangle Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:35:29 PM To: Rob Nickerson; OSM Group WM Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Road

[Talk-GB] sidewalks

Brighton has also just gained a sidewalk https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JAn which i'm not overly impressed withor am I being a Luddite? Regards, Jez ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

Hi I've yet to hear a valid reasoning for this relation type. It's much more beneficial to add addresses instead. There appears an increasing tendency to collect almost anything together into a relation. See public-transport's 'stop_area' as another example This is not why relations were

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

I noticed a "sidewalk" here too in Brighton: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684610225 I'm ambivalent. Both of these examples are pavements that are fully adjacent (continguous) to their roads, and by default I'd prefer not to map them separately. I guess the long one that you refer to does

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

On 2019-06-01 12:34, Gareth L wrote: > I was about to say, relations of this manner seem duplicitous of simply > having an address. Using only the street name to link objects is unreliable. A street can be divided into multiple segments. Think of a residential side-road with the same name as

Re: [talk-cz] Body záchrany Lesy ČR

Zdravím, mrzí mě, že tě moje příspěvky vytáčí , ale myslím, že to není důvod se tady urážet. Ale byl to vlastně trochu i můj záměr. Co se týče bodu 2. tak to byl důvod proč jsem sem začal přispívat. Taky jsem nepsal, že jsem v tom udělal pořádek, jen se divím proč je v tom takový bordel, když

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

On 2019-06-01 13:32, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > You're talking about a different subject, which 'associatedstreets' won't > resolve. Are you sure? Maybe you would restate concisely the problem as you see it. The relation linked to in Jez' original post was type=associatedStreet and he actually

Re: [talk-cz] Body záchrany Lesy ČR

Takže vyřešeno - takhle se to naimportovat nedá, ten souhlas jako by nebyl. 1. června 2019 14:34:56 SELČ, Spratek napsal: >Zdravím, >co se týče smlouvy, Lesy ČR obávají zneužití nějakým komerčním >subjektem, proto tam je klausule o odvolání souhlasu.

Re: [Talk-lt] iD redaktoriaus problemos

O kodėl negalima tiesiog fork'inti iD? Arba naudoti senesnę versiją be "privalumų", jei OSM pats neturi resursų kurti produktą. Nors tai net sunku forkinimu pavadinti, nes realiai yra keli JSON failai, kuriuose aprašomos žymės ar siūlomi pataisymai. Tai realiai išmetus failą

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

I was about to say, relations of this manner seem duplicitous of simply having an address. Street objects.. like bins and benches might make a bit of sense. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a street address on a bench node. But I’m fairly sure a query could be crafted to detect the nearest way to

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

You're talking about a different subject, which 'associatedstreets' won't resolve. DaveF On 01/06/2019 12:06, Colin Smale wrote: On 2019-06-01 12:34, Gareth L wrote: I was about to say, relations of this manner seem duplicitous of simply having an address. Using only the street name to

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

On 2019-06-01 13:26, Andy Townsend wrote: On 01/06/2019 11:11, Jez Nicholson wrote: Brighton has also just gained a sidewalk https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JAn which i'm not overly impressed withor am I being a Luddite? I personally wouldn't map sidewalks in a dense UK city like that

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

On 01/06/2019 13:55, Michael Collinson wrote: ... I tried, then going out to "just verify" and found that I was hopelessly inaccurate. It defeats the point, to get a highly accurate localised network for folks who might depend on it. I did something similar on the dev server a while back

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau de transport : intégration OD

Bonjour, J'ai regardé rapidement pour ma région. De mémoire il y a un fichier CSV des arrêts. Tu dois pour le charger dans JOSM avec le bon greffon et en renommant éventuellement les colonnes. __ Yves Le sam. 1 juin 2019 10:23, deuzeffe a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Ma région a mis en ligne en OD

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

On 01/06/2019 12:00, Colin Smale wrote: Relations are great to represent real-world relations that cannot be inferred (reliably) from the other data in OSM. Often a geometrical relation exists, such as a node inside a polygon, but not always. OSM loves to allow things to be inferred from the

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

I too was very anti at first. Reykavik was the first time I saw it on a systematic basis, and I thought it made a map I did aesthetically dreadful. But a small tweak, rendering sidewalk-tagged footways as a very unobtrusive narrow line fixed that. I now map them zealously for three reasons:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau de transport : intégration OD

Bonjour. Tu peux trouver la description des fichiers https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference/?hl=fr ⁣Je ne suis pas chez moi, je ne peux pas te donner, pour l'instant, le nom du greffon, si quelqu'un d'autre... Pour pouvoir récupérer le fichier des arrêts dans josm, il faut

[Talk-GB] road relations

Has anyone else come across relations grouping road assets? i.e. the road itself plus shops, buildings, street objects? e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1866997 Has this format become accepted elsewhere in the world or is it experimental? Regards, Jez

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

A surprising number of the new build housing estates around me have few pavements and are not very contiguous. There’s often even a space where they could lay the asphalt, but then it’s left as grass – before then getting sequestered as cars park over it. I’d like to see more affirmative

Re: [talk-cz] Body záchrany Lesy ČR

Zdravím, co se týče smlouvy, Lesy ČR obávají zneužití nějakým komerčním subjektem, proto tam je klausule o odvolání souhlasu. Pokud by se například stalo, že OSM pohltí nějaký nadnárodní konglomerát (stejně jako se to stalo v případě OpenOffice nebo Skype ). Smlouva je psaná na mě, pokud

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau de transport : intégration OD

On 01/06/2019 13:15, Yves P. wrote: Bonjour, Pareil J'ai regardé rapidement pour ma région. De mémoire il y a un fichier CSV des arrêts. Plein de fichiers délimités oui (extension .txt !!!) avec les routes, les trips, les stops, les stop_time, etc. Pas réussi à trouver comment se fait

Re: [talk-au] Local Chapter

Great questions... Re: geographic extent, one of the definitions we've been using for other purposes (eg conference travel grants) is the UN geoscheme for Oceania: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_geoscheme_for_Oceania But I personally agree that we need to reach out and canvass

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

Sidewalks (pavements) are difficult in the compressed and crowded layouts of our towns and cities. I would love them to be more uniformly mapped though. As they rarely are mapped, where they are, they stand out and look a bit out of place. What do you think it lacks? Would it be improved with

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

It is documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet , the terracer plugin used to create it a lot but now doesn’t by default. The Germans have been stripping it out of the database recently [ https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65510 ] and I’d be

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

Agree with both Gareth and Dan. It's all part of the discussion on how detailed the map goes, and possibly more relevant in countries with wider roads and obviously separate sidewalks. In the UK we always assume that a road has a pavement unless stated otherwise. I came slightly unstuck myself

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

On 2019-06-01 12:29, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > Hi > > I've yet to hear a valid reasoning for this relation type. It's much more > beneficial to add addresses instead. > > There appears an increasing tendency to collect almost anything together into > a relation. See public-transport's

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

On 01/06/2019 11:11, Jez Nicholson wrote: Brighton has also just gained a sidewalk https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JAn which i'm not overly impressed withor am I being a Luddite? I personally wouldn't map sidewalks in a dense UK city like that (though some people do, with the intention of

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

Not a fan -- for the more prosaic issue of what happens when you split the street -- I don't think any of the editors will automatically reassign the buildings. Neil On 01/06/2019 11:24, Andrew Hain wrote: > It is documented at > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau de transport : intégration OD

Bonjour, Le 01/06/2019 à 17:09, Leni a écrit : Bonjour. Tu peux trouver la description des fichiers https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference/?hl=fr Je ne suis pas chez moi, je ne peux pas te donner, pour l'instant, le nom du greffon, si quelqu'un d'autre... *De:* deuzeffe

[OSM-ja] 廃止された自治体のマッピング

みなさま 中国地方において廃止された自治体をマッピングしている事例が確認されました。 MLまたはfacebookで合意を取ってほしい旨を変更セットで伝えましたが、拒絶されました。 私は以下の点に問題があると考えました。 (1)廃止自治体リレーションのセンターノードにplace=hamletが用いられているが、現在の日本のタグ体系では place=hamletは定義されていない。 (2)廃止された自治体に対してadmin_levelタグを付与するのは問題が生じる可能性がある。 (3)廃止された自治体の形状のデータソースが不明。

Re: [talk-au] Local Chapter

On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 at 20:08, John Bryant wrote: > > Re: geographic extent, one of the definitions we've been using for other > purposes (eg conference travel grants) is the UN geoscheme for Oceania: > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_geoscheme_for_Oceania > Interesting bit I