On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone decided on a admin_level to tag for neighborhoods in a city?
I'd like to import some neighborhood boundary data that my local
municipalities have given out.
Assuming these neighborhoods do indeed have some kind of
On 12/3/09 12:50 AM, Randy wrote:
I'm reposting this, as it was rather stupid to post it under a
San Fransico/Bay topic that was only remotely related (i.e. being regional).
This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
suggest that we establish a best practice
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Richard Welty
This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
suggest that we establish a best practice of prefixing subjects which are
regionally directed with a 2-4 character region prefix followed by a colon?
Can you point to some
On 12/3/09 8:18 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Richard Welty
This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
suggest that we establish a best practice of prefixing subjects which are
regionally directed with a 2-4 character region
Hello,
I would like to know if there is a source to get rivers in OSM in Upstate
NY. I have lived 4 years in Binghamton, where I was attending SUNY
Binghamton for grad school and I am always sad to see that Binghamton has no
rivers displayed. I would be interested in importing them. Does anyone
On 12/3/09 8:41 AM, Emilie Laffray wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if there is a source to get rivers in OSM in
Upstate NY. I have lived 4 years in Binghamton, where I was attending
SUNY Binghamton for grad school and I am always sad to see that
Binghamton has no rivers displayed. I would
2009/12/3 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
the NHD data sets provide this information, but are mostly not done for
Upstate yet. i've volunteered for the Hudson basins, but am only just
getting started.
general information is here:
I see from the notes that Charlotte suggested going into an area with an
established community. I would like to throw out the idea of the
opposite approach. It might help to jump start activity in an area that
is currently inactive by having the SOTM there.
I don't know which cities would
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Richard Shank deve...@zestic.com wrote:
I see from the notes that Charlotte suggested going into an area with an
established community. I would like to throw out the idea of the opposite
approach. It might help to jump start activity in an area that is
Agreed that at this point in time, having everything centralized here is the
best way forward.
I would like to make a request for the future though, that if a list is
marked for deletion that a message is sent out on that list informing them.
(maybe a week ahead of time). I was the admin for the
I'm coming to this thread late and apologize for not knowing, but has a date
for SOTM-US been set yet? I think one criterion for an area might be the
ability to hold the SOTM-US meeting immediately before or after a meeting of
another organization that might have interest. For example, the
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
Hi All,
The U.S. SOTM Working Group would like to announce a call for venue bids.
We will be discussing bids and deciding on the Jan 4th US SOTM call.
Please link you bid to this page in the OSM
wiki:
Ian,
I totally agree that the import I referenced is not perfect. I really just
wanted to show a place that had already completed an import for reference. The
points you bring up are very relevant and you were not belittling the effort in
the least :) If nothing else we have an example to
On 3 Dec 2009, at 9:08 , Ian Dees wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Thea Clay t...@cloudmade.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am so excited that more land use imports are in the works. They make such a
huge visual difference. Check out the border between a state with the import
complete and
The land use in Georgia is nice in that it lends visual interest
to the map and gives a bit more information than a blank background.
I don't find the resolution a problem, much more detail would not
really be much more useful.
Most of my editing is in Georgia, so I see this land use coverage
a
Richard Welty wrote:
On 12/3/09 12:50 AM, Randy wrote:
I'm reposting this, as it was rather stupid to post it under a
San Fransico/Bay topic that was only remotely related (i.e. being
regional).
This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
suggest that we establish a
David ``Smith'' wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone decided on a admin_level to tag for neighborhoods in a city?
I'd like to import some neighborhood boundary data that my local
municipalities have given out.
Assuming these neighborhoods do
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com wrote:
David ``Smith'' wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone decided on a admin_level to tag for neighborhoods in a city?
I'd like to import some neighborhood boundary data that my
I thought I mailed all the talk-us-* lists when I asked for input?
On Dec 3, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Sarah Manley wrote:
Agreed that at this point in time, having everything centralized here is the
best way forward.
I would like to make a request for the future though, that if a list is
Hi,
I'm new here and a little unsure of how best to proceed. I'm
having some issues getting JOSM to run but I expect to get those
sorted out soon. Then I want to start working on TIGER fixup.
I'm located in central Oregon, near Bend. I see a lot of mapped
roads around here, imported from TIGER,
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 15:50 -0800, Jeff Barlow wrote:
I'm new here and a little unsure of how best to proceed. I'm
having some issues getting JOSM to run but I expect to get those
sorted out soon. Then I want to start working on TIGER fixup.
I'm located in central Oregon, near Bend. I see a
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Richard Shank deve...@zestic.com wrote:
I see from the notes that Charlotte suggested going into an area with an
established community. I would like to throw out the idea of the opposite
approach. It might help to jump start activity
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 15:50 -0800, Jeff Barlow wrote:
I'm new here and a little unsure of how best to proceed. I'm
having some issues getting JOSM to run but I expect to get those
sorted out soon. Then I want to start working on TIGER fixup.
I'm located in central Oregon,
Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
Cool, more Oregon mappers! :)
Well, I'll try anyway.
If you've been there and can confirm that there's nothing there, or
they're bad enough that you can't figure out what they correspond to,
delete them. But, I personally don't want people deleting everything
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Barlow j...@wb6csv.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm new here and a little unsure of how best to proceed. I'm
having some issues getting JOSM to run but I expect to get those
sorted out soon. Then I want to start working on TIGER fixup.
I'm located in central Oregon,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Jeff Barlow j...@wb6csv.net wrote:
Others, all unnamed, I'm less sure how to handle. Many are not
roads at all. Some just simply don't exist. I'm not sure where
they came from. Others seem to roughly correspond to irrigation
canals.
If it's unnamed, says
On 12/3/09 8:21 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Jeff Barlowj...@wb6csv.net wrote:
Others, all unnamed, I'm less sure how to handle. Many are not
roads at all. Some just simply don't exist. I'm not sure where
they came from. Others seem to roughly correspond to
I am trying to figure out how to mark up a foot bridge that is closed.
The bridge is still standing, but it is gated off because it is
unsafe.
To me, it doesn't make sense to remove the bridge, like in the case of
a bridge that has been washed out. The bridge is still standing, but
I want to be
On 12/3/09 9:44 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
I am trying to figure out how to mark up a foot bridge that is closed.
The bridge is still standing, but it is gated off because it is
unsafe.
To me, it doesn't make sense to remove the bridge, like in the case of
a bridge that has been washed out.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jeff Barlow j...@wb6csv.net wrote:
Some of the local bogus roads seem to at least roughly
correspond to irrigation canals.
One of the ways TIGER segments were generated is by scanning satellite
photos and/or old maps for things that looked like roads. That's
I am trying to figure out how to mark up a foot bridge that is closed.
The bridge is still standing, but it is gated off because it is
unsafe.
To me, it doesn't make sense to remove the bridge, like in the case of
a bridge that has been washed out. The bridge is still standing, but
I
What's wrong with access=no?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:44 PM, David Fawcett david.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to figure out how to mark up a foot bridge that is closed.
The bridge is still standing, but it is gated off because it is
unsafe.
To me, it doesn't make sense to remove the bridge, like in the case of
Also you can use the description tag for any additional explanation:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
-Kate
Try access=no, which I think works with mapnik rendering.
You can use that in combination with other tags, like closed=yes or
whatever else you think is
On 12/3/09 10:28 PM, Seth Fitzsimmons wrote:
for that matter, marking roads closed would be good as well. i know of
several examples of closed
roads and bridges in upstate NY that may or may not be reopened
depending on rehab/replacement,
etc.
something as simple as
I agree that it would be good to have a standard answer. I am
thinking that the tag should be used for both symbology and
connectivity.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 12/3/09 10:28 PM, Seth Fitzsimmons wrote:
for that matter, marking roads
On 12/3/09 11:00 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
I agree that it would be good to have a standard answer. I am
thinking that the tag should be used for both symbology and
connectivity.
i'm going to try out the suggested access=no/description=blahblahblah method
see what i think about it.
On 12/3/09 11:27 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 12/3/09 11:00 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
I agree that it would be good to have a standard answer. I am
thinking that the tag should be used for both symbology and
connectivity.
i'm going to try out the suggested
The Crown Point bridge
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28436071) comes to mind; it's
constructed of non-reinforced concrete and was essentially condemned
recently with only a few hours notice
(
http://www.poststar.com/news/local/article_e77cd748-ba8b-11de-9ff0-001cc4c03286.html
).
something as simple as closed=yes/closed=temporary/closed=indefinite
would seem to suffice.
I like this proposal as it could also encompass regular seasonal closures.
There are many roads through the mountains in Vermont that are generally
closed from Nov 1st through May 30th each year due
40 matches
Mail list logo
