>
> something as simple as closed=yes/closed=temporary/closed=indefinite
> would seem to suffice.
>
I like this proposal as it could also encompass regular seasonal closures.
There are many roads through the mountains in Vermont that are generally
closed from Nov 1st through May 30th each year du
>
> The Crown Point bridge
> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28436071) comes to mind; it's
> constructed of non-reinforced concrete and was essentially condemned
> recently with only a few hours notice
> (
> http://www.poststar.com/news/local/article_e77cd748-ba8b-11de-9ff0-001cc4c03286.ht
On 12/3/09 11:27 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 12/3/09 11:00 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
>
>> I agree that it would be good to have a standard answer. I am
>> thinking that the tag should be used for both symbology and
>> connectivity.
>>
>>
>>
> i'm going to try out the suggested access=no
On 12/3/09 11:00 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
> I agree that it would be good to have a standard answer. I am
> thinking that the tag should be used for both symbology and
> connectivity.
>
>
i'm going to try out the suggested access=no/description=blahblahblah method
see what i think about it.
r
I agree that it would be good to have a standard answer. I am
thinking that the tag should be used for both symbology and
connectivity.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 12/3/09 10:28 PM, Seth Fitzsimmons wrote:
>>> for that matter, marking roads closed would be good
On 12/3/09 10:28 PM, Seth Fitzsimmons wrote:
>>>
>> for that matter, marking roads closed would be good as well. i know of
>> several examples of closed
>> roads and bridges in upstate NY that may or may not be reopened
>> depending on rehab/replacement,
>> etc.
>>
>> something as simple as
Also you can use the description tag for any additional explanation:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
-Kate
>
> Try access=no, which I think works with mapnik rendering.
>
> You can use that in combination with other tags, like closed=yes or
> whatever else you think is appropr
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:44 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how to mark up a foot bridge that is closed.
> The bridge is still standing, but it is gated off because it is
> unsafe.
>
> To me, it doesn't make sense to remove the bridge, like in the case of
> a bridge that has
What's wrong with access=no?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>> I am trying to figure out how to mark up a foot bridge that is closed.
>> The bridge is still standing, but it is gated off because it is
>> unsafe.
>>
>> To me, it doesn't make sense to remove the bridge, like in the case of
>> a bridge that has been washed out. The bridge is still standing,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jeff Barlow wrote:
> Some of the local bogus "roads" seem to at least roughly
> correspond to irrigation canals.
One of the ways TIGER segments were generated is by scanning satellite
photos and/or old maps for things that looked like roads. That's
likely where th
On 12/3/09 9:44 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how to mark up a foot bridge that is closed.
> The bridge is still standing, but it is gated off because it is
> unsafe.
>
> To me, it doesn't make sense to remove the bridge, like in the case of
> a bridge that has been washed
Richard Welty wrote:
>Tiger also seems to have some roads which developers imagined might come
>into
>existence. i've found and deleted a few of these.
>
>old rail lines should be switched over to railway=abandoned if the
>tracks are gone.
>if they've been converted into cycleways it's ok to l
I am trying to figure out how to mark up a foot bridge that is closed.
The bridge is still standing, but it is gated off because it is
unsafe.
To me, it doesn't make sense to remove the bridge, like in the case of
a bridge that has been washed out. The bridge is still standing, but
I want to be
On 12/3/09 8:21 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Jeff Barlow wrote:
>
>> Others, all unnamed, I'm less sure how to handle. Many are not
>> roads at all. Some just simply don't exist. I'm not sure where
>> they came from. Others seem to roughly correspond to irrigation
>> ca
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Jeff Barlow wrote:
> Others, all unnamed, I'm less sure how to handle. Many are not
> roads at all. Some just simply don't exist. I'm not sure where
> they came from. Others seem to roughly correspond to irrigation
> canals.
If it's unnamed, says tiger:reviewed=no,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Barlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new here and a little unsure of how best to proceed. I'm
> having some issues getting JOSM to run but I expect to get those
> sorted out soon. Then I want to start working on TIGER fixup.
>
> I'm located in central Oregon, near Bend
Dave Hansen wrote:
>Cool, more Oregon mappers! :)
Well, I'll try anyway.
>If you've been there and can confirm that there's nothing there, or
>they're bad enough that you can't figure out what they correspond to,
>delete them. But, I personally don't want people deleting everything
>that does
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 15:50 -0800, Jeff Barlow wrote:
I'm new here and a little unsure of how best to proceed. I'm
having some issues getting JOSM to run but I expect to get those
sorted out soon. Then I want to start working on TIGER fixup.
I'm located in central Oregon,
Richard Welty wrote:
On 12/3/09 9:15 AM, Richard Shank wrote:
I see from the notes that Charlotte suggested going into an area with
an established community. I would like to throw out the idea of the
opposite approach. It might help to jump start activity in an area
that is currently inactiv
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Richard Shank wrote:
I see from the notes that Charlotte suggested going into an area with an
established community. I would like to throw out the idea of the opposite
approach. It might help to jump start activity in an area that is
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 15:50 -0800, Jeff Barlow wrote:
> I'm new here and a little unsure of how best to proceed. I'm
> having some issues getting JOSM to run but I expect to get those
> sorted out soon. Then I want to start working on TIGER fixup.
>
> I'm located in central Oregon, near Bend. I se
Hi,
I'm new here and a little unsure of how best to proceed. I'm
having some issues getting JOSM to run but I expect to get those
sorted out soon. Then I want to start working on TIGER fixup.
I'm located in central Oregon, near Bend. I see a lot of mapped
roads around here, imported from TIGER, t
I thought I mailed all the talk-us-* lists when I asked for input?
On Dec 3, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Sarah Manley wrote:
> Agreed that at this point in time, having everything centralized here is the
> best way forward.
>
> I would like to make a request for the future though, that if a list is
> m
On 12/3/09 9:15 AM, Richard Shank wrote:
I see from the notes that Charlotte suggested going into an area with
an established community. I would like to throw out the idea of the
opposite approach. It might help to jump start activity in an area
that is currently inactive by having the SOTM t
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Randy wrote:
> David ``Smith'' wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
>>>Has anyone decided on a admin_level to tag for neighborhoods in a city?
>>>
>>>I'd like to import some neighborhood boundary data that my local
>>>municipalities have given
David ``Smith'' wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
>>Has anyone decided on a admin_level to tag for neighborhoods in a city?
>>
>>I'd like to import some neighborhood boundary data that my local
>>municipalities have given out.
>
>Assuming these neighborhoods do indeed have s
Richard Welty wrote:
>On 12/3/09 12:50 AM, Randy wrote:
>>I'm reposting this, as it was rather stupid to post it under a
>>San Fransico/Bay topic that was only remotely related (i.e. being
>>regional).
>>
>>
>>>This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
>>>suggest tha
The land use in Georgia is nice in that it lends visual interest
to the map and gives a bit more information than a blank background.
I don't find the resolution a problem, much more detail would not
really be much more useful.
Most of my editing is in Georgia, so I see this land use coverage
a lo
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Hillsman, Edward wrote:
> I'm coming to this thread late and apologize for not knowing, but has a date
> for SOTM-US been set yet?
No, this will be part of the proposal.
Much of the discussion about the proposals has to do with other events
nearby or timing/sche
On 3 Dec 2009, at 9:08 , Ian Dees wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Thea Clay wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I am so excited that more land use imports are in the works. They make such a
> huge visual difference. Check out the border between a state with the import
> complete and one without:
>
Ian,
I totally agree that the import I referenced is not perfect. I really just
wanted to show a place that had already completed an import for reference. The
points you bring up are very relevant and you were not belittling the effort in
the least :) If nothing else we have an example to improv
2009/12/3 Ian Dees
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Thea Clay wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>> I am so excited that more land use imports are in the works. They make
>> such a huge visual difference. Check out the border between a state with the
>> import complete and one without:
>> http://www.openst
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Thea Clay wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I am so excited that more land use imports are in the works. They make such
> a huge visual difference. Check out the border between a state with the
> import complete and one without:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.896&lon=-
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Kate Chapman wrote:
> Hi All,
> The U.S. SOTM Working Group would like to announce a call for venue bids.
> We will be discussing bids and deciding on the Jan 4th US SOTM call.
> Please link you bid to this page in the OSM
> wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
Hi guys,
I am so excited that more land use imports are in the works. They make such a
huge visual difference. Check out the border between a state with the import
complete and one without:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.896&lon=-85.408&zoom=9&layers=B000FTF
The folks in Georgia completed
I'm coming to this thread late and apologize for not knowing, but has a date
for SOTM-US been set yet? I think one criterion for an area might be the
ability to hold the SOTM-US meeting immediately before or after a meeting of
another organization that might have interest. For example, the Assoc
Agreed that at this point in time, having everything centralized here is the
best way forward.
I would like to make a request for the future though, that if a list is
marked for deletion that a message is sent out on that list informing them.
(maybe a week ahead of time). I was the admin for the
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Richard Shank wrote:
> I see from the notes that Charlotte suggested going into an area with an
> established community. I would like to throw out the idea of the opposite
> approach. It might help to jump start activity in an area that is currently
> inactive by
I see from the notes that Charlotte suggested going into an area with an
established community. I would like to throw out the idea of the
opposite approach. It might help to jump start activity in an area that
is currently inactive by having the SOTM there.
I don't know which cities would qu
2009/12/3 Richard Welty
> the NHD data sets provide this information, but are mostly not done for
> Upstate yet. i've volunteered for the Hudson basins, but am only just
> getting started.
>
> general information is here:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Hydrography_Dataset
>
> ba
On 12/3/09 8:41 AM, Emilie Laffray wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if there is a source to get rivers in OSM in
Upstate NY. I have lived 4 years in Binghamton, where I was attending
SUNY Binghamton for grad school and I am always sad to see that
Binghamton has no rivers displayed. I would
Hello,
I would like to know if there is a source to get rivers in OSM in Upstate
NY. I have lived 4 years in Binghamton, where I was attending SUNY
Binghamton for grad school and I am always sad to see that Binghamton has no
rivers displayed. I would be interested in importing them. Does anyone kn
On 12/3/09 8:18 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Richard Welty
>
>
This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
suggest that we establish a best practice of prefixing subjects which are
regionally directed with a 2-4 charact
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Richard Welty
>>> This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
>>> suggest that we establish a best practice of prefixing subjects which are
>>> regionally directed with a 2-4 character region prefix followed by a colon?
Can you point to
On 12/3/09 12:50 AM, Randy wrote:
> I'm reposting this, as it was rather stupid to post it under a
> San Fransico/Bay topic that was only remotely related (i.e. being regional).
>
>
>> This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
>> suggest that we establish a best pr
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> Has anyone decided on a admin_level to tag for neighborhoods in a city?
>
> I'd like to import some neighborhood boundary data that my local
> municipalities have given out.
Assuming these neighborhoods do indeed have some kind of
administrating b
47 matches
Mail list logo