Hi Paul,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:mve...@gmail.com]
Subject: [Talk-us] importing bus stops
Hi,
Anyone here with experience importing bus stops? Any particular
considerations?
To make it more concrete, I
Hi,
Imported data turns down potential new mappers.
I really disagree with this statement. I think the mappers would be turned
off if we didn't import it when available. So you have all 250,000
address points for the city but instead of using them you'd rather us go
collect all of them a
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
That is exactly the wrong message. Between the lines, it reads: Importing
is for professionals and you can earn laurels by doing it right.
The message we should be sending is:
Imports are nearly always bad; they are
At 2012-04-16 13:24, stevea wrote:
At 2012-04-12 17:36, you wrote:
I see excellent progress in California during the recent eight days of
re-mapping. If you are an editing maniac...
Can you comment on your process? I see very little real, coordinated info
about tools, concrete solutions, or
At 2012-04-16 13:52, stevea wrote:
At 2012-04-12 17:36, you wrote:
I see excellent progress in California during the recent eight days of
re-mapping. If you are an editing maniac...
Can you comment on your process? I see very little real, coordinated info
about tools, concrete solutions, or
On 4/16/2012 8:56 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
So, we're basically duplicating the existing way and then blessing it.
Is this really sufficient - to verify the tainted geometry instead of
re-drawing it?
Only if the nodes are clean.
Another point, at least in SoCal, is that many of our tainted ways
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
object (e.g. it was split from a TIGER way and the splitting is something
you would have done anyway).
Is this really sufficient? Can someone from the redaction squad comment?
On 4/16/2012 9:18 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
object (e.g. it was split from a TIGER way and the splitting is
something you would have done anyway).
Is this really sufficient? Can
From: Alan Mintz [mailto:alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:18 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Excellent progress, u.s.
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
I just saw this post on the rebuild list, so you guys might want to be a tad
careful when you're doing cleaning work by creating a new way and keeping the
old tainted nodes in it.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/2012-April/000206.html
On 4/16/2012 11:04 PM, James Mast wrote:
I just saw this post on the rebuild list, so you guys might want to be a
tad careful when you're doing cleaning work by creating a new way and
keeping the old tainted nodes in it.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/2012-April/000206.html
One possible enhancement: add a border of the same color as the highway
(e.g. red for primary). This would make it easier to identify which
highway the shield refers to, which isn't always clear. This may of
course be very complicated, in which case never mind.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/16/2012 9:18 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
object (e.g. it was split from a TIGER way and the splitting
13 matches
Mail list logo
