It may be that what is happening is that NE2 is deliberately trying to
start an edit war so that he will be allowed back onto this list to discuss
it.
If, as seems to be the case, the bulk of his edits are destructive and need
to be reverted, then the sensible thing to do may be to put an auto
After viewing the satellite imagery for this intersection, it is clear to
me that the turn testifying should be in place. Were the same intersection
in Georgia, a driver going straight across could be charged with Failure
to obey a traffic control device (with the traffic control devices in
These two accounts have a history of conflict with each other.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2010-October/004432.html
NE2 and Paul Johnson have been instructed previously to leave each other
alone.
Anthony DiPierro is the only person, so far, who has been banned from OSM
for
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
In my opinion, if you get in an argument with Anthony or NE2 and you are
right, you are still wrong. They argue for the sport. The entire point of
their argument is the conflict, not the potential for resolution.
So
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14989711
NE2 has ignored the discussion intentionally and reverted against
consensus.
You can't
FYI, an official ruling from Mouseland. This email stuff is pretty cool,
one can actually directly ask somebody who is a Subject Matter Expert! ;-)
Michael
-- Forwarded message --
From: FHP f...@flhsmv.gov
Date: Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:08 AM
Subject: RE: Legal Intersection
On 02/11/2013 08:34 AM, Michael Patrick wrote:
FYI, an official ruling from Mouseland. This email stuff is pretty cool,
one can actually directly ask somebody who is a Subject Matter Expert! ;-)
While I admire the resourcefulness, I do question whether we're doing
the right thing if we are
Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 02/11/2013 08:34 AM, Michael Patrick wrote:
FYI, an official ruling from Mouseland. This email stuff is pretty
cool,
one can actually directly ask somebody who is a Subject Matter
Expert! ;-)
While I admire the resourcefulness, I do question whether
So can we revert NE2's revert from last night?
On Feb 11, 2013 10:35 AM, Michael Patrick geodes...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, an official ruling from Mouseland. This email stuff is pretty cool,
one can actually directly ask somebody who is a Subject Matter Expert! ;-)
Michael
--
I think it's a little ridiculous that this dispute is going so far that
anyone even consulted an expert. Obviously NE2 is wrong; we get it. This
dead horse hasn't just been beaten; it's been liquefied. Let's just let the
OSM gods deal with it, and go on with our lives.
On Feb 11, 2013 10:35 AM,
If it wasn't this dispute then it would have been another. At least now
there's a precedent set for ground truth and following the local laws. One of
the premises of OSM is that crowd-sourcing and local knowledge improves the
quality of the maps, I think this conversation and eventual legal
there is a precedent.
mk408. He was active mainly in one area only. after some edit war and
unwilling to discuss with others he got blocked by DWG and then left for
good.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Michal Migurski m...@teczno.com wrote:
I don't agree. NE2’s edits, most of all the route
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Someone with local knowledge might want to look over the ref=* tags in
Florida, a lot seem to be missing the context that let you know what network
they're a part of.
I'd actually been kicking around proposing a bulk
The SR and SH designations were mostly put in by NE2, IIRC. Go figure.
I'm personally okay with this mass edit, but expect a lot of hate mail from
NE2.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Someone with local knowledge might want to look over the ref=* tags in
Without wading too deeply into the personalities here, there's a
danger inherent to having rules that you will have people who think
they're being very clever by trying to repeatedly bump up against them
in ways that may respect the letter of the rules but not their
underlying spirit. For
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.com wrote:
The SR and SH designations were mostly put in by NE2, IIRC. Go figure.
I'm personally okay with this mass edit, but expect a lot of hate mail from
NE2.
FWIW I did get a pair of emails from NE2 that says, in part, he
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com wrote:
He does reiterate the point it would lead to long ref tags that would
conflict with Mapnik's limitations. He also argues that it would make
the Mapnik rendering erroneous
Tagging for the renderer.
As far as the blade
(While both are important, I begin this thread In the interests of
taking this list out of the OSM social and more into the OSM
technical/practical):
I have questions about landuse polygons. For example, barracks,
where soldiers are quartered (housed) inside of a military base. A
polygon
18 matches
Mail list logo
