Re: [Taps] doc revisions responding to IESG reviews - action due 27NOV

Correcting my previous message, we’re working to close the IESG discusses in parallel with this final wg review. Sorry for any confusion. --aaron On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:37 AM Aaron Falk wrote: > Dear TAPS working group, > > The document authors have worked through the IESG review

[Taps] doc revisions responding to IESG reviews - action due 27NOV

Dear TAPS working group, The document authors have worked through the IESG reviews for the TAPS drafts (including four DISCUSS votes on -interface) and made a number of revisions on all three documents. The authors, shepherds, and chairs believe that the revision process is complete. Before send

Re: [Taps] Taps working group status and way forward

Thanks, Zahed. It's been a long road and I'm gratified the (publication) end is in sight. The TAPS BoF was scheduled in January 2014 so it's been just about exactly a decade this work has been in the IETF. Thanks to all for your longtime commitment to this effort. --aaron On Mon, Nov 13, 2023

Re: [Taps] Doodle for post IETF-118 interim

Looks like Nov 14 is the winner. I'll wait until the end of today before putting in the schedule request in case anyone else wants to weigh in. --aaron On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 9:59 AM Aaron Falk wrote: > Still a number of draft comments to resolve. Time to rinse-and-repeat. > Ple

[Taps] Doodle for post IETF-118 interim

Still a number of draft comments to resolve. Time to rinse-and-repeat. Please provide your availability. https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/erYgBRkd --aaron (for aaron & reese) ___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/lis

Re: [Taps] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-taps-arch-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

I don't have too much to add beyond Mirja's point. The working group felt strongly that TAPS could not be correctly implemented without reading the architecture document. Further https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/informational-vs-experimental/ says: An "Informational" specification is publi

Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-09-26

Hey Folks, It's time to wrap this work up. If you have assignments, please try to complete them before the meeting. If you want feedback on anything, try to get it before the meeting. --aaron On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 9:53 AM Reese Enghardt wrote: > Dear TAPS, > > Reminder that we're having ou

[Taps] Fwd: Result: Monday September 26 (Re: Doodle for TAPS interim in September 2022 - Please fill out by August 12)

Dear TAPS, It looks like Monday September 26 is the date with the most "Yes". So let's schedule our September interim for this date, at the usual time: 8am PT / 11am ET / 17:00 CET. Best, Reese On 8/5/22 16:22, Aaron Falk wrote: > (Apologies if you receive multiple copies

[Taps] Doodle for TAPS interim in September 2022 - Please fill out by August 12

(Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this email -- I suspect that it has not been sent correctly) Dear TAPS, Let's have an interim meeting in September. Please fill out this doodle by next week, i.e., Friday August 12: https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/avgVyqVb Note that we are

Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26

Can folks who are planning to attend the TAPS interim on Jan 26 at 11am EST reply to this message? Let’s see if we still have a critical mass. —aaron On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:26 AM Mirja Kuehlewind wrote: > Hi all, > > I just notice that I have a conflict with the next meeting. In the first >

[Taps] webex for today's meeting

Looks like only Reese & I are able to get into the Meetecho room. Let’s meet in https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps. --aaron___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Re: [Taps] Review of draft-ietf-taps-arch

Hi Michael- Thanks for the review. Glad to see the doc hasn’t ‘aged’ much as the others have been refined. Let’s assume I dropped the ball on reminding you about the review. :) --aaron On 20 Oct 2021, at 9:31, Michael Welzl wrote: [ I don't think this is worth time at today's interim. Th

[Taps] Fwd: Reminder: Call for Papers: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users Workshop

Reading this workshop proposal makes me think that perhaps there’s an extension of TAPS that collects/logs/reports racing results. Have we discussed this? --aaron ps. I’m happy to see several active wg members on the PC! Forwarded message: From: IAB Executive Administrative Manager To: I

Re: [Taps] TAPS meeting at IETF 111?

I’m concluding there are no objections to meeting IETF week. --aaron On 1 Jun 2021, at 18:23, Theresa Enghardt wrote: Dear TAPS, As we briefly discussed at the last interim meeting, we are considering to ask for a 60 minute slot to do a TAPS WG meeting at IETF 111 in July. Topics could in

Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

job. I was still aiming to finish in time, i.e tomorrow, but one or two extra days could be helpful ☺ BR, Anna From: Taps On Behalf Of Aaron Falk Sent: den 25 april 2021 18:51 To: taps WG Cc: Theresa Enghardt ; Zaheduzzaman Sarker Subject: Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to

[Taps] DTN & TAPS

I was marveling the news about exploration on Mars this week and this caused me to wonder if anyone has looked at DTN as a protocol provided by TAPS. My recollection of DTN is rather rusty and I think it might be an informative thought experiment for the API. --aaron__

Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

anyone like to express support for publishing this draft who hasn’t? --aaron On 11 Apr 2021, at 10:13, Aaron Falk wrote: Working group last call for the API draft starts now. Please review the draft and send comments to the list (including ‘ready to publish’ affirmations) or post issues/PRs to

[Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

to "In WG Last Call" from "WG Document" by Aaron Falk: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/ ___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Re: [Taps] Doodle for next interim

Looks like Jan 29 is preferred. I’m putting the request in now. --aaron On 13 Jan 2021, at 11:42, Aaron Falk wrote: Based on the email comments and doodle participation, it looks like weak support for meeting this friday and good availability in the coming weeks. I’m going to cancel the

Re: [Taps] Doodle for next interim

, at 9:30, Kyle Rose wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:21 PM Aaron Falk wrote: I agree but I’m not going to fight the ADs on this. We know that Anna can’t make it. To add to this, I didn't have it in my calendar and didn't find the session when I went to look for it in the data

Re: [Taps] Doodle for next interim

mend to follow the guidelines in the IESG statement for future meetings of course :-) From: Taps on behalf of Aaron Falk Date: Tuesday, 12. January 2021 at 16:39 To: taps WG Subject: [Taps] Doodle for next interim It appears I’ve bolluxed up the meeting scheduling for this Friday by n

[Taps] Doodle for next interim

It appears I’ve bolluxed up the meeting scheduling for this Friday by not getting the notice out in conformance with the approved process. Therefore, I need to ask you to submit your availability in the Doodle below. https://doodle.com/poll/y68hptgavkzxikxn?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link St

Re: [Taps] Interim?

with text for my issues, and I was planning on being unavailable this Friday because I didn't have anything in my calendar. On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:55 AM Aaron Falk wrote: I can’t get to the Etherpad where I took notes last time so I’m uncertain about the plan for the meeting. Curr

Re: [Taps] Interim?

tröm wrote: Hi, I must also have missed putting it in my calendar and will unfortunately not be able to attend on Friday, sorry. BR, Anna From: Taps On Behalf Of Aaron Falk Sent: den 11 januari 2021 17:47 To: Martin Duke Cc: taps WG Subject: Re: [Taps] Interim? It appears that I dropped the

Re: [Taps] Interim?

It appears that I dropped the ball requesting the interim. Will fix now. Sorry! --aaron On 11 Jan 2021, at 11:33, Martin Duke wrote: Is there an interim on Friday? It's not on the calendar but I thought we agreed to this last time? We are missing minutes from all of 2020 so there's nothin

[Taps] Reminder: TAPS meeting today.

Notes from last meeting: * Next meeting: Dec 11 * kyle & martin will do review and issue logging implentation draft, likely starting to review ~Nov 9 * brian will present at TSVAREA on TAPS * update all three drafts by Nov 2 (draft cutoff) -- some editorial updates for arch Etherpad for toda

[Taps] Notes from Oct 23 interim

Notes: * Next meeting: Dec 11 * kyle & martin will do review and issue logging implentation draft, likely starting to review ~Nov 9 * brian will present at TSVAREA on TAPS * update all three drafts by Nov 2 (draft cutoff) -- some editorial updates for arch Etherpad with signin: https://ethe

[Taps] links for Oct 23 interim (date fixed)

Reminder we are meeting tomorrow at 11am US ET. --aaron | what | where | | --- | --- | |Webex | https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps | | Bluesheet / Notes | https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-oct23-2020 | | Github Issues | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues | | Gitbub PRs

[Taps] links for Oct 22 interim

Reminder we are meeting tomorrow at 11am US ET. --aaron | what | where | | --- | --- | |Webex | https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps | | Bluesheet / Notes | https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-oct22-2020 | | Github Issues | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues | | Gitbub PRs

[Taps] next TAPS meeting: Oct 23

Belated followup on scheduling. We discussed a three week cadence. That would mean our next meeting is Oct 23rd. Is that a problem for anyone? --aaron___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

[Taps] links for Oct interim

Reminder we are meeting today at 11am US ET. I have a conflict for the 1st 30 min and Zahed will be opening the meeting. From last meetings notes: The group hasn’t focused on the implementation doc in some time so the goal for the next meeting will be to take a quick pass on open issues in

[Taps] Notes from September interim

We discussed pull requests and issues for the API draft but did not resolve all of them. There was general agreement that another 1-2 meetings would be required to settle the remaining issues so that the doc could go to WGLC. Given the tight relationship between the arch, API, and implementat

[Taps] links for Sept interim

Reminder we are meeting tomorrow (Friday, Sept 11) at 11am US ET. --aaron | what | where | | --- | --- | |Webex | https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps | | Bluesheet / Notes | https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-sept-2020 | | Github Issues | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issue

[Taps] notes from Aug interim

Etherpad w/attendance here: https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-aug-2020 We reviewed all the PRs and open issues, many of which came from a deep review by Martin Duke (thanks!!). A number of clarifications & other revisions are planned, mostly on the API draft. An additional revie

[Taps] links for August interim

See you in 20min! --aaron | what | where | | --- | --- | |Webex | https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps | | Bluesheet / Notes | https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-aug-2020 | | Github Issues | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues | | Gitbub PRs | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/a

[Taps] Summary of the July interim call

Etherpad / bluesheet [here](https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-july-2020). Thirteen folks joined on the webex where all the PRs & open issues were reviewed and updated [here](https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues). The API draft is waiting for a few bits of revised text

[Taps] links for July interim

| what | where | | --- | --- | |Webex | https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps | | Bluesheet / Notes | https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-july-2020 | | Github Issues | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues | | Gitbub PRs | https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pulls | _

Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-19

Etherpad for blue sheets & other notes: https://etherpad.ietf.org:9009/p/taps-interim-june-2020 On 18 Jun 2020, at 12:04, Aaron Falk wrote: Reminder that there’s a TAPS call tomorrow. Suggest checking issues & PRs in preparation... https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issu

Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-19

Reminder that there’s a TAPS call tomorrow. Suggest checking issues & PRs in preparation... https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pulls --aaron On 8 Jun 2020, at 15:02, IESG Secretary wrote: The Transport Services (taps) WG will hold a vi

Re: [Taps] June & July interim availability poll

The poll showed pretty good availability so we’ll have the meetings on the dates previously discussed. I’ll submit the required form to the secretariat. --aaron On 1 Jun 2020, at 15:33, Aaron Falk wrote: https://doodle.com/poll/atw6bdm92bizgev8 Last week we discussed holding calls in

[Taps] June & July interim availability poll

https://doodle.com/poll/atw6bdm92bizgev8 Last week we discussed holding calls in June & July continuing with our ~monthly cadence of Webex meetings. If we don’t have a critical mass, I’ll run it again with more date options. --aaron___ Taps mailing

[Taps] May interim notes

In today’s interim we focused on draft-ietf-taps-interface. We reviewed the [PRs](https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pulls) and [Issues](https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues) without owners, resolving several and assigning owners to those that could not be sorted. We may be

[Taps] Should TAPS meet during IETF-108?

Dear TAPS working group & ADs, Scheduling has begun for the online IETF-108 meeting in July. Should we request a meeting slot for IETF week? Frankly, I can’t think of a good reason to do so. We’ve been making good progress with ~monthly Webex sessions and my hope is to continue them. Tryin

Re: [Taps] May interim (mea culpa)

through the GitHub issues list. --aaron On 20 May 2020, at 12:10, Aaron Falk wrote: I added another option to the pool for the time you’re suggesting. On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:05 PM Mirja Kuehlewind < mirja.kuehlew...@ericsson.com> wrote: Any chances we can start an hour earlier (give

Re: [Taps] May interim (mea culpa)

ot. Not sure how this > got shifted last time (maybe because me and the IESG meeting…?) > > > > Mirja > > > > > > *From: *Taps on behalf of Aaron Falk < > aaron.f...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, 20. May 2020 at 17:41 > *To: *taps WG > *Subje

[Taps] May interim (mea culpa)

Folks- It looks like I dropped the ball and didn’t schedule an interim for May. Further, the [etherpad](http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-taps-interim-2020-apr) is empty so I have no notes. :( Anyway, sticking to our prior cadence, we **could** have a meeting on May 29 at the sam

[Taps] Fwd: Reminder: Survey on planning for possible online IETF meetings

Of you haven’t already done so, please complete this survey on future virtual meeting preferences. —aaron -- Forwarded message - From: IETF Executive Director Date: Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:04 AM Subject: Reminder: Survey on planning for possible online IETF meetings To: IETF Announ

Re: [Taps] TAPS April Interim Scheduling

uld we use 15 minutes on this? > > Thanks, > Tommy > > On Mar 24, 2020, at 8:33 AM, Aaron Falk wrote: > > OK, let’s do the meeting at the time described below (April 17, 1600 > UTC). I’m attaching an .ics file for those with fancy calendars. :) > Agenda to come. > >

[Taps] April interim: call for agenda items

What shall we discuss in April? How about: * Normative language in -arch * Issue review Some questions: Is it timely to seek a deep review of -implementation? Are there open issues to discuss from Kyle’s review of -interface? What else? --aaron___ Ta

Re: [Taps] TAPS April Interim Scheduling

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Helloka, LLC//World Time Buddy//EN BEGIN:VEVENT DESCRIPTION:\nhttps://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps DTEND:20200417T18Z DTSTAMP:20200324T145328Z DTSTART:20200417T16Z LOCATION: SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-us:TAPS April Interim TRANSP:OPAQUE UID:5a73af2b-63df-9e14-7148-faf179786..

Re: [Taps] TAPS April Interim Scheduling

IESG meeting will have end at 16:00 UTC on the 17th of April, it is 16:00-18:00 CEST. The TAPS meeting scheduled is 19:00-21:00 CEST. It would work for me, but so you have the right information. Cheers Magnus On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 14:49 -0400, Aaron Falk wrote: The IESG call runs until 5pm UTC

Re: [Taps] TAPS April Interim Scheduling

ex.com/meet/taps Sorry for the confusion! --aaron On 19 Mar 2020, at 15:26, Aaron Falk wrote: Looks like everyone responding can make April 17, 11am - 1pm EDT / 8am - 10am PDT / 4pm - 6pm UTC. If you cannot, please complete the doodle poll ASAP. Thanks, --aaron On 17 Mar 2020, at 10:59,

Re: [Taps] TAPS April Interim Scheduling

Looks like everyone responding can make April 17, 11am - 1pm EDT / 8am - 10am PDT / 4pm - 6pm UTC. If you cannot, please complete the doodle poll ASAP. Thanks, --aaron On 17 Mar 2020, at 10:59, Aaron Falk wrote: Doodle to select meeting date for April interim. We’ve had good luck with

[Taps] TAPS April Interim Scheduling

Doodle to select meeting date for April interim. We’ve had good luck with Fridays 11am EDT so please vote. (Preference given to authors.) Date will be selected at the end of this week. https://doodle.com/poll/7b6p6a9twgrtf7ib --aaron___ Taps mailin

[Taps] regrets for today's interim

Friends, I can’t make the meeting today due to day job obligations. Zahed will be there and managing the meeting. Here’s my take on priorities: 1. To review all PRs and open issues and assign owners to propose solutions to anything that can’t be resolved on the call. 2. Revisit normative la

[Taps] notes from TAPS Jan 24 interim

Architecture doc * Resolved most open issues with writing assignments; resolved all open PRs; revised draft needed * Open issue about use of normative language ([issue](https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/418)); * Agreed to hold publication request until API and implementation docs

Re: [Taps] Reminder: TAPS interim tomorrow (Jan 24)

30 seconds or minutes? On 24 Jan 2020, at 11:01, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: greetings, all, apologies for late notice, had a call scheduled over this, will be there in 30... cheers B On 23 Jan 2020, at 22:24, Aaron Falk wrote: We’re meeting tomorrow at 1100 EST (1600 GMT). Agenda

[Taps] Reminder: TAPS interim tomorrow (Jan 24)

We’re meeting tomorrow at 1100 EST (1600 GMT). Agenda: 1. Pending [-arch](https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-taps-arch-06.txt) changes following wglc 2. [Open issues](https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues) for [-interface](https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-taps-interface-05.txt) 3

Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-arch (Jan 7-20, 2020)

Last call concludes today. Please send recommendations to publish or comments requiring revision ASAP. --aaron On 7 Jan 2020, at 10:50, Aaron Falk wrote: This is notice to open working group last call for “An Architecture for Transport Services”, to conclude January 20, 2020. Please

[Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-arch (Jan 7-20, 2020)

This is notice to open working group last call for “An Architecture for Transport Services”, to conclude January 20, 2020. Please review this document and send comments to the list, preferably with an indication of whether it is ready for publication and, if not, what your concerns are. http

[Taps] Notes from 12/20/19 interim

My notes from today’s call. Corrections welcome. * -security * Major issues addressed but not all comments * Theresa will turn unresolved comments into issues * Kyle will address tcpcrypt comments * Tommy will address others and will re-assign as needed * Goal to update draft

[Taps] Interim call this Friday

We’re having a call on Friday (11am US ET). The goals of the call are to resolve any open issues that would prevent -arch from going to last call. We can also use the time to resolve any open issues on -security. Can the authors for -arch and -security outline topics to discuss? Then we can

Re: [Taps] interim meeting dates

All calls are 11am - 1pm EDT, 8am - 10am PDT, 4pm - 6pm UTC since we span EU & US west coast. Agendas will be refined as we get closer to the call. On 26 Nov 2019, at 16:17, Aaron Falk wrote: Based on the Doodle results here are the meeting dates for the upcoming TAPS interims: Dec 20,

[Taps] interim meeting dates

Based on the Doodle results here are the meeting dates for the upcoming TAPS interims: Dec 20, FRI, 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM Jan 24, FRI, 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM Feb 21, FRI, 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM Please add them to your calendar. --aaron___ Taps mailing list Taps

Re: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

Yes, indeed. This is awesome. Brian, do you think you can create a last cal-able version of -arch by the 1st week of December? On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:04 PM Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > Wow! The robot can write long messages, too. Good work, everyone! > > Cheers, > > Brian > > > On 22 Nov 2

[Taps] ACTION REQUIRED BEFORE NOV 26: Interim scheduling

Here are doodle polls for the interim meetings we discussed leading up to IETF-107. We’ll close the polls Tuesday, November 26. December w/o Dec 16: https://doodle.com/poll/7fctt4tvh7zzf2d3 Topics: -arch WGLC discussion, -interface WGLC prep January w/o Jan 20: https://doodle.com/poll/gwif6y5a

Re: [Taps] Authors' meeting, Thursday 12:00 - 13:30 in Clark (IESG room, near the terminal room)

I believe so, Colin. Tomorrow AM is a backup for add’l time. I plan to attend at lunch. --aaron On 21 Nov 2019, at 10:22, Colin Perkins wrote: Sorry, I’m confused – is this moving to lunch today, rather than tomorrow morning? Colin On 21 Nov 2019, at 09:50, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote

Re: [Taps] Authors' meeting, Friday 08:30 - 10:00, VIP B (IAB room)

Does the IESG room have another name for routing purposes? On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 8:46 AM Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > ...and we've confirmed the IESG room reservation over lunchtime. It seems > at least Michael and I will be there, please join if you can and we can all > close some issues to

Re: [Taps] finishing things

, IMO, will dramatically increase the chances that we’ll need to issue errata or live with regrets on the published language on taps RFCs. Maybe that’s fine, there are many imperfect RFCs, but worth thinking about. Best, Jake From: Aaron Falk Date: 2019-11-18 at 10:28 To: tom petch Cc: taps WG

Re: [Taps] finishing things

On 17 Nov 2019, at 22:48, tom petch wrote: I am not sure which three you have in mind but suspect that it does not include draft-jholland-taps-api-yang Tom Petch Thanks for bringing this up, Tom. Note that TAPS hasn’t adopted this draft as a working group item. We have some options. It c

Re: [Taps] finishing things

, Aaron Falk wrote: Hey Working Group, Before we meet on Tuesday I wanted to put an idea on the table that I think will shape our wg discussion. What do you think of setting a goal of WGLC for our three in-progress docs before the March IETF? This would require increasing wg activity, for example

[Taps] finishing things

Hey Working Group, Before we meet on Tuesday I wanted to put an idea on the table that I think will shape our wg discussion. What do you think of setting a goal of WGLC for our three in-progress docs before the March IETF? This would require increasing wg activity, for example, having monthl

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda topics

Thanks, Tommy. Who will talk about -architecture & -security? --aaron On 6 Nov 2019, at 19:53, Tommy Pauly wrote: I can lead the discussion around implementation issues, as Anna will be remote. Best, Tommy On Nov 6, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Aaron Falk wrote: Thanks, Brian. We need discus

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda topics

Thanks, Brian. We need discussion leads for -architecture, -implementation, and -security. --aaron On 5 Nov 2019, at 0:58, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: I can do the issue scrub for -interface. Sent from my iPhone On 5 Nov 2019, at 00:09, Aaron Falk wrote: Draft agenda based on what

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda topics

(end 2019) or ship without. Cheers, Brian - Implementation - Are we satisfied with the structure - Proxies/Tor/etc… - Multicast On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:33 AM Aaron Falk wrote: Ok, gang, what should we discuss in Singapore? --aaron ___ Taps ma

[Taps] call for TAPS agenda topics

Ok, gang, what should we discuss in Singapore? --aaron___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

ffect (at least on me), so I'm not going to argue not to cancel. Cheers, Brian On 19 Sep 2019, at 16:01, Aaron Falk wrote: I’m not hearing a critical mass of active wg folks wanting an interim. Seems like we should cancel. Anyone want to argue otherwise? --aaron On 18 Sep 2019, at 8:33,

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

2019, at 14:01, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: I've scheduled over that :(. can possibly reschedule now but would prefer running another poll. Cheers, Brian On 17 Sep 2019, at 14:46, Aaron Falk wrote: Ugh, well it turns out that I’m moving on 9/27 and Zahed has a conflict. The doodle

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Agenda?

I did have a plan to put in a fair amount of effort in mid-October :-( Cheers, Michael On 17 Sep 2019, at 15:01, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: I've scheduled over that :(. can possibly reschedule now but would prefer running another poll. Cheers, Brian On 17 Sep 2019, at 14:46, Aa

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

absence... --aaron On 9 Sep 2019, at 9:45, Aaron Falk wrote: Actually, **Friday, Sept 27, 11:00 AM – 1:00 PM EDT** has the same availability and is slightly better for me. So, barring other strong objections (received real-soon-now), we’ll go with that. I’ll put in the request with the

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

? --aaron On 6 Sep 2019, at 11:21, Aaron Falk wrote: Looks like Mon, Sept 23, 11:00 AM – 1:00 PM EDT is the likely candidate for an interim. If you want to attend and haven’t completed the doodle, please do so now. Thanks, --aaron On 5 Sep 2019, at 16:41, Aaron Falk wrote: We agreed in Montreal

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

Looks like Mon, Sept 23, 11:00 AM – 1:00 PM EDT is the likely candidate for an interim. If you want to attend and haven’t completed the doodle, please do so now. Thanks, --aaron On 5 Sep 2019, at 16:41, Aaron Falk wrote: We agreed in Montreal that we’d have a virtual meeting in September

[Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

We agreed in Montreal that we’d have a virtual meeting in September. Please complete the scheduling doodle below ASAP. https://doodle.com/poll/msxgzyrv5b8ess3c Best, --aaron___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ta

[Taps] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-08

Aaron Falk has requested publication of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-08 as Informational on behalf of the TAPS working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/ ___

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda items

On 8 Jul 2019, at 4:48, Philipp S. Tiesel wrote: • Parameters & Defaults I’d volunteer for this one too. OK Ok, it sounds to me like this slot should be called “Profiles / choosing specific protocols”. Sounds like a nice short discussion to me. I would like to move this point

[Taps] TAPS agenda for IETF-105

Transport Services (TAPS) Working Group 13:30-15:30 Monday Afternoon session I Room: Van Horne * Administrivia - Aaron & Zahed (5m) * Need a shepherd for draft-ietf-taps-transport-security * September interim? * Framing - Tommy Pauly (15m) * Status & examples * Parameters & Defaults - M

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda items

Thanks, Theresa! On 3 Jul 2019, at 11:39, Theresa Enghardt wrote: Hi, On 30.06.19 23:34, Aaron Falk wrote: What shall we use our face-time for in Montreal? Some topics from our last interim <https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/nots-interim-2019-taps-02?useMonospaceFont=true> seem lik

[Taps] Draft TAPS agenda

Draft agenda below. Comments? Additions? Revisions? * Administrivia - Aaron & Zahed * Need a shepherd for draft-ietf-taps-transport-security * September interim? * Framing - Tommy Pauly - Status & examples * Parameters & Defaults - Michael Welzl - Should we specify rather than recomme

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda items

On 2 Jul 2019, at 15:26, Tommy Pauly wrote: * Framing I can give a brief update here on the status of framing, as we just merged in the PR (). I’ll also pair that with some sample framers implemented in Swift and C that we added into o

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda items

On 2 Jul 2019, at 4:20, Philipp S. Tiesel wrote: * ARCH & API open topics I’ll volunteer to lead the discussion on the last one. Similar to my comment to Michael, I think it would be helpful to focus on the open items and frame a question or decision that is needed. Since this is a bit

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda items

On 2 Jul 2019, at 3:24, Michael Welzl wrote: * Parameters & Defaults I’d volunteer for this one too. Michael- Can you frame a question or decision we want to target for the discussion? It would help me (& maybe others) keep the right focus. --aaron

[Taps] call for TAPS agenda items

What shall we use our face-time for in Montreal? Some [topics from our last interim](https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/nots-interim-2019-taps-02?useMonospaceFont=true) seem like good candidates for updates. Can we refine them with specific to discuss (and ID someone to launch/lead the discussion)?

[Taps] IETF schedule -- conflict check

You all have probably noticed that the [preliminary schedule](https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/agenda.html#2019-07-22-08) for IETF-105 has been posted. I note that TAPS conflicts with ANRW, Sec Dispatch, and the Media Operations BoF. Does this create any hard conflicts (particular

Re: [Taps] agenda for TAPS interim (today!)

://etherpad.ietf.org/p/nots-interim-2019-taps-02?useMonospaceFont=true). --aaron On 8 May 2019, at 8:44, Aaron Falk wrote: Agenda: 1. Framing - Tommy * See https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/323 2. Implementation draft - Tommy & Anna * See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/d

[Taps] agenda for TAPS interim (today!)

Agenda: 1. Framing - Tommy * See https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/323 2. Implementation draft - Tommy & Anna * See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-impl/ 3. Parameters & Defaults - Gorry or Phil * Default for Use 0-RTT session establishment #314 * Default for

Re: [Taps] updated agenda - Re: Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2019-05-08

t; Default for Control checksum coverage #315 > The recommended default and can we specify rather than recommend? #317 > Section 7 default #319 > > Gorry > > On 07/05/2019, 19:52, Aaron Falk wrote: > > > > Collating the input from the thread. Who will lead the discussion

[Taps] updated agenda - Re: Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2019-05-08

Collating the input from the thread. Who will lead the discussion on the implementation draft? --aaron Agenda: 1. Framing - Tommy * See https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/323 2. Implementation draft - ?? * See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-impl/ 3. Yang Mode

Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2019-05-08

Reminder that we are having an interim meeting this Weds. 1. Do we have any additional topics to add to the agenda? 2. For existing topics below, who should lead the discussion? --aaron On 10 Apr 2019, at 8:10, IESG Secretary wrote: The Transport Services (taps) Working Group will hold a virt

Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-transport-security (ending 4/29)

Thanks, folks, for the reviews. I’ve seen a number of nit reviews and support for publishing this doc. No major issues identified. Let’s conclude the LC. --aaron On 10 Apr 2019, at 10:12, Aaron Falk wrote: Dear TAPS working group, It’s time to perform a last call review of “A Survey of

Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-transport-security (ending 4/29)

Reminder that the working group last call for this draft ends next Monday. Please send comments and opinions on whether the doc is ready to publish to this list. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-06 --aaron On 10 Apr 2019, at 10:12, Aaron Falk wrote: Dear TAPS

  1   2   3   4   >