Re: [Taps] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-taps-interface-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> On 12 Dec 2023, at 19:12, Michael Welzl wrote: > > > >> On Dec 12, 2023, at 6:48 PM, Tommy Pauly > > wrote: >> >> Hi Lars, >> >> Responses inline. >> >> >>> On Dec 12, 2023, at 3:38 AM, Lars Eggert >> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>

Re: [Taps] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-taps-interface-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

hi Roman, (inline per tradition) > On 28 Sep 2023, at 23:01, Roman Danyliw wrote: > > Hi Brian! > > Thanks for the response and sorry for the delay. More inline ... > >> -Original Message- >> From: iesg mailto:iesg-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-arch-19.txt

es (TAPS) WG of the IETF. > > Title: Architecture and Requirements for Transport Services > Authors: Tommy Pauly > Brian Trammell >Anna Brunstrom >Godred Fairhurst >Colin Perkins > Name:draft-ietf-taps-arch-19.txt >

Re: [Taps] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-taps-interface-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

hi Roman! Thanks for the questions. Points not addressed inline below will be tracked at https://github.com/ietf-taps/api-drafts/issues, but there’s a DISCUSS here, so let’s discuss. :) > On 5 Sep 2023, at 19:50, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker > wrote: > >

Re: [Taps] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-taps-arch-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

confirm these were > correctly resolved in the latest revision). +1 to this as well! Cheers, Brian > > On 05/09/2023 10:11, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> +1 to everything said in this thread by TAPS folks (and +2 thanks to Michael >> for the

Re: [Taps] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-taps-arch-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, all, +1 to everything said in this thread by TAPS folks (and +2 thanks to Michael for the history). IMO there’s a pattern of confusion in this discussion between *prescriptive* and *descriptive* architecture, which I’ve seen before, as the term “architecture” has been AIUI used in the

Re: [Taps] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-taps-arch-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, all, +1 to everything said in this thread by TAPS folks (and +2 thanks to Michael for the history). IMO there’s a pattern of confusion in this discussion between *prescriptive* and *descriptive* architecture, which I’ve seen before, as the term “architecture” has been AIUI used in the

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-arch-18.txt

ces > (TAPS) WG of the IETF. > > Title : An Architecture for Transport Services > Authors : Tommy Pauly > Brian Trammell > Anna Brunstrom > Godred Fairhurst > Colin Perkins >

Re: [Taps] The last two reviews... issues for one of them are now filed in github

> On 9 May 2023, at 23:57, Michael Welzl wrote: > > Friends and fans of TAPS, esteemed colleagues, > > >> On May 9, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Michael Welzl > > wrote: >> >> Dear Dale, >> >> Many thanks for this very thoughtful review! (and sorry for the delay) >> I’ll

Re: [Taps] Normative language change in the Interface document (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-interface-19.txt)

;https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1125> > > One out of two remaining PRs … after these, we should probably issue a new > version. > > Cheers, > Michael > > >> On Mar 10, 2023, at 5:55 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) > <mailto:i...@trammell.ch>&

Re: [Taps] Normative language change in the Interface document (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-interface-19.txt)

Adding a sentence making it clear it’s safe to skip the glossary if you’re going to read the rest of the document would address my approachability concern completely. :) Sent from my iPhone > On 10 Mar 2023, at 17:34, Gorry Fairhurst wrote: > > On 10/03/2023 14:57, Brian Tramm

Re: [Taps] Normative language change in the Interface document (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-interface-19.txt)

, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Transport Services WG of the IETF. >> >> Title : An Abstract Application La

Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-06-15

hi Reese, thanks for the reminder! I’ll probably only be able to make the middle hour of this one — golden hour slots are very difficult to defend when your whole dev org is in Sunnyvale. :) Cheers, Brian > On 13 Jun 2022, at 22:41, Reese Enghardt wrote: > > Dear TAPS, > > Just a quick

[Taps] ~40m late to today's meeting; golden hour conflicts

___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26

I’m planning on being there. If we reschedule, pushing to 2 Feb will work for me, but after that my next available Wednesday at the normal slot is 2 Mar. Cheers, Brian > On 15 Jan 2022, at 22:26, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Can folks who are planning to attend the TAPS interim on Jan 26 at 11am

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-arch-12.txt

nsport Services WG of the IETF. > >Title : An Architecture for Transport Services >Authors : Tommy Pauly > Brian Trammell > Anna Brunstrom > Godred Fairhurst >

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-interface-14.txt

ces WG of the IETF. > >Title : An Abstract Application Layer Interface to Transport > Services > Authors : Brian Trammell > Michael Welzl > Theresa Enghardt > Godred Fairhurst >

Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2021-12-08

Hi, all, Will be a bit late to this meeting, $dayjob thing intervenes... See you all soon, cheers, B > On 30 Nov 2021, at 18:17, Theresa Enghardt wrote: > > Dear TAPS, > > Reminder that we're having an interim meeting next week on Wednesday at 16:00 > UTC. > > To join: >

Re: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

al posting by the secretariat. So tl;dr arch-11 (minor tweaks) is in, interface-13 may or may not make the deadline. Cheers, Brian > On 9 Jul 2021, at 14:30, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > > Greetings, all, > > As you can see, I finally found time to close out my editorial backl

Re: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

Greetings, all, As you can see, I finally found time to close out my editorial backlog; thanks Anna, Colin, Gorry for the editorial suggestions! While there are a few other discussions ongoing, I expect those will continue at 111 (have fun without me :( ), and I believe we're ready for the

Re: [Taps] TAPS Interface draft - Publish before draft deadline on Feb 22 (Monday)?

And now I’m caught up enough to see that this was already done; thanks! Back to dayjob firefighting, see you all Friday! Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Feb 2021, at 06:57, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > > Didn’t manage to get this done yesterday. since we’re still in > working-th

Re: [Taps] TAPS Interface draft - Publish before draft deadline on Feb 22 (Monday)?

Didn’t manage to get this done yesterday. since we’re still in working-the-queue mode (we’ll be discussing PRs and the working copy) IMO it makes more sense to publish post-interim, I.e. IETF Monday. Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Feb 2021, at 15:22, Kyle Rose wrote: > >  > My PR had been

Re: [Taps] Reminder: TAPS interim tomorrow (Jan 24)

greetings, all, apologies for late notice, had a call scheduled over this, will be there in 30... cheers B > On 23 Jan 2020, at 22:24, Aaron Falk wrote: > > We’re meeting tomorrow at 1100 EST (1600 GMT). > > Agenda: > > • Pending -arch changes following wglc > • Open issues

Re: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

l assigned, which will result in two more smallish PRs. I've done an editorial pass on the plane which will result in a tiny PR and one hopefully-simple issue to discuss. Cheers, Brian > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:04 PM Brian Trammell (IETF) > wrote: > Wow! The robot can write long mess

Re: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

Wow! The robot can write long messages, too. Good work, everyone! Cheers, Brian > On 22 Nov 2019, at 16:00, TAPS WG status robot > wrote: > > Friday November 22, 2019 > > Issues > > ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+12/-25/38) > 12 issues created: > > • #384 Experimental cost property: cost

Re: [Taps] Authors' meeting, Thursday 12:00 - 13:30 in Clark (IESG room, near the terminal room)

tomorrow > morning? > Colin > > > >> On 21 Nov 2019, at 09:50, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: >> >> Now with a better subject line, including coordinates. >> >>> On 21 Nov 2019, at 08:46, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: >>> >>> ..

Re: [Taps] Authors' meeting, Thursday 12:00 - 13:30 in Clark (IESG room, near the terminal room)

Now with a better subject line, including coordinates. > On 21 Nov 2019, at 08:46, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > > ...and we've confirmed the IESG room reservation over lunchtime. It seems at > least Michael and I will be there, please join if you can and we can all > cl

Re: [Taps] Authors' meeting, Friday 08:30 - 10:00, VIP B (IAB room)

...and we've confirmed the IESG room reservation over lunchtime. It seems at least Michael and I will be there, please join if you can and we can all close some issues together. Cheers, Brian > On 20 Nov 2019, at 23:34, Michael Welzl wrote: > >> On Nov 20, 2019, at 11:15 PM, Br

Re: [Taps] Authors' meeting, Friday 08:30 - 10:00, VIP B (IAB room)

case the plan is to sit down and write, discussing suggested text and merging PRs to take advantage of higher bandwidth of everyone being here. Thanks, cheers, and apologies for the organizational skill, Brian > On 19 Nov 2019, at 18:46, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > > Greet

[Taps] Authors' meeting, Friday 08:30 - 10:00, VIP B (IAB room)

Greetings, all, We'll have a TAPS author's meeting (laptops open, writing PRs) from 8:30 - 10:00 on Friday in the VIP B room at the venue (across from the Olivia / Sophia rooms, since the signage is suboptimal). Cheers, Brian ___ Taps mailing list

Re: [Taps] finishing things

+1; we should allocate time on our agenda here to actually set the schedule for these interims, to avoid the ”let’s think about that later” problem. Sent from my iPhone > On 16 Nov 2019, at 15:13, Michael Welzl wrote: > > I think this is a great idea. > > Cheers, > Michael > > >> On Nov

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda topics

> I can lead the discussion around implementation issues, as Anna will be > remote. > > Best, > Tommy > >> On Nov 6, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Aaron Falk wrote: >> >> Thanks, Brian. >> >> We need discussion leads for -architecture, -implementation, and -s

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda topics

5 > IETF last call comments on draft-ietf-taps-security-09 (30m) > Ref [from Ekr] [from Christian] > What are our next steps? > --aaron > > On 4 Nov 2019, at 16:26, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > > hi Philipp, all, > > parachuting-into-the-thread comments in

Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda topics

hi Philipp, all, parachuting-into-the-thread comments inline below. > On 4 Nov 2019, at 21:36, Philipp S. Tiesel wrote: > > > > AVE! > Philipp S. Tiesel > > -- > Philipp S. Tiesel > https://philipp.tiesel.net/ > >> On 4. Nov 2019, at 19:18, Kyle Rose wrote: >> >> Evidently, the

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

of active wg folks wanting an interim. Seems > like we should cancel. Anyone want to argue otherwise? > > --aaron > > On 18 Sep 2019, at 8:33, Colin Perkins wrote: > > Likewise. And I’m also not convinced we’d make good use of an interim just > now. > > Colin >

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

I've scheduled over that :(. can possibly reschedule now but would prefer running another poll. Cheers, Brian > On 17 Sep 2019, at 14:46, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Ugh, well it turns out that I’m moving on 9/27 and Zahed has a conflict. The > doodle poll looked pretty good for Monday, 9/23. I

Re: [Taps] On Profiles for TAPS Preconnections

hi Tommy, all, > On 22 Jul 2019, at 19:15, Tommy Pauly > wrote: > > > >> On Jul 22, 2019, at 6:56 PM, Philipp S. Tiesel wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> On 22. Jul 2019, at 15:09, Tommy Pauly >>> wrote: >>> >>> An issue we discussed today in the TAPS meeting was whether or not we >>> should

Re: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

n 29 Mar 2019, at 10:06, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Thanks to Brian Trammell for making this happen! > > On 29 Mar 2019, at 9:28, TAPS WG status robot wrote: > > Friday March 29, 2019 > > Issues > > ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+5/-12/22) > 5 issues created: > &

Re: [Taps] call for agenda items at TAPS IETF-104

> On 4 Mar 2019, at 19:53, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Hi All- > > What should we use our time to discuss? Let’s focus on things that would > benefit from f2f discussion, consensus building, or just argument. :) > > • TAPS docs: are there open topics that need group attention? Seems > like

[Taps] API drafts repository has been migrated

Greetings, all, The API drafts repository is now at: https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts To update your working directories to point to the new repo: git remote set-url origin g...@github.com:ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (Or, as with all things git, just re-clone if you want to be sure :) )

Re: [Taps] Standardising Transport Property Names

hi Philipp, Thanks for pulling this together. I've finally had time to look at it. > On 1 Feb 2019, at 16:49, Philipp S. Tiesel wrote: > > Hi, > > during the January interim, we had some discussions regarding whether we want > to standardise strings for representing Transport Property Names

Re: [Taps] Reminder: call today at 10am EST

(I'll also volunteer as a minute taker, but I also intend to shuffle things around in GitHub, as well as having opinions on things, so I'd really appreciate a backup, or to be the backup :) ) > On 15 Jan 2019, at 15:45, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > > I have this on calendar

Re: [Taps] Reminder: call today at 10am EST

I have this on calendar for today at 11am EST (i.e., in 1 hour 15 minutes)? > On 15 Jan 2019, at 15:43, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Also: we need a minute taker for the meeting. If no one volunteers by email > we’ll add that as the first item on the agenda. > > --aaron > > On 11 Jan 2019, at

[Taps] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-arch-02.txt

ne Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Transport Services WG of the IETF. > >Title : An Architecture for Transport Services >Authors : Tommy Pauly > Brian Trammell > Anna

Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2018-09-12

> On 11 Sep 2018, at 09:43, Zaheduzzaman Sarker > wrote: > > Good!! > Updated agenda- > AGENDA > 1. Partial Send/Receive, Tommy > 2. 0-RTT, Brian (to be confirmed) confirmed cheers, Brian > 3. Connection & Message Properties, Michael Welzl > 4. draft-pauly-quic-interface-00.txt, Tommy >

Re: [Taps] To registry, or not to registry?

Hi, all, I'd see the contents of the appropriate sections of taps-interface (7.3 and 12.3 in the current editor's copy at https://taps-api.github.io/drafts/draft-ietf-taps-interface.html) as the initial contents of these registries, and MTI as per the (normative) RFC taps-interface will

[Taps] open issues on -interface

Hi, all, In advance of tomorrow's meeting, here are a few changes and issues we'd like to discuss: Reorganization of Properties See [the PR][1]. We've reorganized the properties (selection, protocol, send, etc) into a single section. We (the authors) are sure

Re: [Taps] Agenda for IETF 102

hi Zahed, Sign me up to present -interface. Thanks, cheers, B Sent from my iPhone > On 5 Jul 2018, at 23:29, Zaheduzzaman Sarker > wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the agenda proposal > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/agenda-102-taps-00.txt) > for IETF 102. > > Note: for

[Taps] new (arch, interface, impl)-01 drafts

Enghardt" > , "Christopher Wood" , "Philipp > S. Tiesel" , "Colin Perkins" , > "Brian Trammell" , "Gorry Fairhurst" > , "Mirja Kuehlewind" , > "Philipp Tiesel" , "Godred Fairhurst" > , &qu

[Taps] minset WGLC

Greetings, all, I've done a final pass of minset; it is IMO ready to go up to the IESG. (One last impression on reading the document again after having been away from it for so long: the density of parenthetical (!UDP) remarks really does make me wonder why we persist in pretending that UDP is

Re: [Taps] ACTION REQUIRED: updating session conflicts

> On 17 Apr 2018, at 17:22, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Hi Folks- > > We should update our conflict list for scheduling TAPS meetings during the > IETF week. Here’s the algorithm I’d like you to consider: > > • If you are an author/editor in TAPS and an author/editor

[Taps] Github repository for arch/interface/implementation drafts...

is https://github.com/taps-api/drafts. We're using the issue tracker at https://github.com/taps-api/drafts/issues; please feel free to add comments or file issues there. Cheers, Brian signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ Taps

Re: [Taps] Call for agenda items

hi Zahed, Aaron, all, > On 27 Feb 2018, at 18:28, Tommy Pauly wrote: > > Hi Zahed & Aaron, > > We’ve posted the first of three new documents proposed for milestone 3, "An > Architecture for Transport Services” (please go read it, everyone!): > >

Re: [Taps] call for agenda items

We'd like some time (~15-20 min) to talk about a soon-to-be-submitted update to draft-trammell-taps-post-sockets. Thanks, cheers, Brian > On 23 Oct 2017, at 19:22, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Please send your interest for TAPS agenda time. > > Already have:

Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

As did I. But if we want to separate the discussions more explicitly, I'm happy to throw together five minutes of slides to frame the discussion in a proposal-neutral way; I think we'll need at least twenty for the discussion though. Cheers, Brian > On 06 Jul 2017, at 17:20, Mirja Kühlewind

Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

hi Aaron, > On 29 Jun 2017, at 17:36, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Updating. Our agenda time is much more productive if we can home in on > specific questions to discuss rather than just give document overviews. > Authors & other folk: what’s interesting, unclear, or

Re: [Taps] WGLC start for -transports-usage- docs

hi Aaron, all, I've read these, and IMO they're ready for publication. Many thanks to the authors for the impressive amount of work that went into them! Cheers, Brian > On 29 May 2017, at 18:30, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Dear TAPS working group: > > The authors have

[Taps] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-trammell-post-sockets-00.txt

> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-trammell-post-sockets-00.txt > Date: 27 October 2016 at 11:57:39 GMT+2 > To: "Mirja Kuehlewind" <mirja.kuehlew...@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, "Tommy Pauly" > <tpa...@apple.com>, "Brian Trammell" <i...@

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transports-12.txt

is draft is a work item of the Transport Services of the IETF. > >Title : Services provided by IETF transport protocols and > congestion control mechanisms >Authors : Godred Fairhurst > Brian Trammell >

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transports-07.txt

hi Karen, Thanks for the comments and review! Commentcomments inline, anything not remarked on is accepted into -08 as-is. > On 28 Oct 2015, at 13:16, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen > wrote: > > HI, > > Please accept the following comments. > Use them as/if you see

Re: [Taps] IETF planning

hi Michael, > On 22 Oct 2015, at 18:19, Michael Welzl wrote: > > >> On 22. okt. 2015, at 16.14, Aaron Falk wrote: >> >> >> > draft-welzl-taps-transports currently only covers TCP and SCTP. But then: >> > how many other protocols? >> > It seems

Re: [Taps] New Version Notification for draft-welzl-taps-transports-00.txt

> On 07 Oct 2015, at 09:17, Michael Welzl wrote: > > Hi, > > >> On 05 Oct 2015, at 20:42, Aaron Falk wrote: >> >> Have others read this draft yet? It is clearly aimed at addressing charter >> deliverable #1. Do other folks have an opinion on how

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transports-06.txt

> -Original Message- >> From: Taps [mailto:taps-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- >> dra...@ietf.org >> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:07 AM >> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org >> Cc: taps@ietf.org >> Subject: [Taps] I-D Act

[Taps] Progress on taps-trasports

Greetings, all, We've integrated the FLUTE/ALC text into the working copy of the document (github.com/britram/taps-transports) as well as moving over to a slightly more streamlined Makefile (though, due to smart quote replacement issues I'm still debugging -- don't ask -- the toolchain to

Re: [Taps] document progress update?

hi Aaron, the status is pretty much "August is over and people are finally back from vacation, and are dusting off their inboxes." On specific points: > On 03 Sep 2015, at 21:09, Aaron Falk wrote: > > TAPS Editors- > > Can you provide an update on the draft revisions

Re: [Taps] document progress update?

Ah, didn't see this was sent to the list, so: >> On 03 Sep 2015, at 21:09, Aaron Falk wrote: >> >> From the minutes I have the following changes (this may not be complete): >> • Karen & Michael will add some text on SCTP > > - will twist arms tomorrow or Tuesday. >

[Taps] New open IAB list to discuss stack evolution issues

for discussion any and all aspects of evolution of the IP protocol stack. List membership is open; please join at https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo-discuss Thanks, cheers, Brian Trammell (IAB IP Stack Evolution Program Lead) signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using

Re: [Taps] Comments on draft-gjessing-taps-minset-00.txt

hi Michael, ...inline... On 16 Jul 2015, at 13:23, Michael Welzl mich...@ifi.uio.no wrote: snip Ideally, I think, then one would use a common term for Nagle(-like) bundling for TCP and SCTP. Agreed, we actually did that in Michael Welzl, Stefan Jörer, Stein Gjessing: Towards a

Re: [Taps] TCP components

hi Michael, A few replies inline. On 18 Jun 2015, at 15:54, Michael Welzl mich...@ifi.uio.no wrote: On 17 Jun 2015, at 12:13, Brian Trammell i...@trammell.ch wrote: hi Michael, all, A couple of random points inline at various levels of quotation... On 17 Jun 2015, at 10:44

Re: [Taps] A proposal to throw out RTP

Sounds to me like we know we want to cover some of the unique features/components of RTP without having to go to the trouble of wedging a full description of the protocol (as in the other section) into the doc, a task complicated by the fact that RTP assumes a more fluid separation of

Re: [Taps] A proposal to throw out RTP

On 03 Jun 2015, at 16:48, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote: Hi, I know this has been discussed before, but only briefly. I have two arguments that I'd like to bring forward towards removing RTP (/RTCP) from draft-ietf-taps-transports-04 and the documents that will follow it. I understand that

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transports-04.txt

Fairhurst Brian Trammell Mirja Kuehlewind Filename: draft-ietf-taps-transports-04.txt Pages : 35 Date: 2015-05-26 Abstract: This document describes services provided by existing IETF protocols

Re: [Taps] draft minutes from IETF-91 meeting

is an independent submission from two volunteers: Gorry Fairhurst and Brian Trammell, neither of whom could be here. We’ll be asking whether the people in the room want to adopt this as a Working Group document. ——— 13:08 Charter Overview (Falk) – 10 min

[Taps] terminology for draft-fairhurst-taps-transports

Greetings, all, As promised, here's an initial suggestion for terminology in draft-fairhurst-taps-transports, compatible with but elaborating on the minimal terminology in the charter, which would we would propose applies to all TAPS work derived from this document: Transport Service: An

Re: [Taps] new draft available: draft-fairhurst-taps-transports-00

hi Marie-Jose, The intention with this document is to include as much of the work in the IETF that provides services for transport (for some definition of transport and some definition of service; we're working now on a strawman terminology to shoot holes in in Honolulu), so the broad answer

Re: [Taps] TAPS charter rev 20140818

hi, Aaron, all, was just in the middle of trying to catch back up with this thread, thanks for giving me a point to hang this off of... :) Speaking, as Spencer said, for myself (thanks, Spencer!)... On 21 Aug 2014, at 16:29, Aaron Falk aaron.f...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 20, 2014, at 6:00

Re: [Taps] TAPS charter rev 20140818

On 19 Aug 2014, at 11:41, Michael Welzl mich...@ifi.uio.no wrote: Hi Brian, thanks getting into this discussion! In line below: On 19. aug. 2014, at 11:32, Brian Trammell wrote: snipping away the vast majority of the charter we seem to agree on Per the third point of the charter, I

Re: [Taps] TAPS charter rev 20140818

. Works for me. Cheers, Brian On 19 Aug 2014, at 16:27, Anna Brunstrom anna.brunst...@kau.se wrote: On 2014-08-19 14:01, Brian Trammell wrote: snip M18: Submit to the IESG an Experimental document specifying methods for providing the Transport Services identified by the WG