Hello,
I was just wondering if any one had tried to return to a
non-encrypted state after they had used the ver. 3.0.2.10 in the
encrypted mode?
I was going to use the regular Tools backup. Then reinstall TheBat!
Will I be able to use the backup since it will be in the encrypted
state?
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, at 03:19:26 [UTC-0600] (Wednesday,
January 5, 2005 10:19 my local time) Dean wrote:
I was going to use the regular Tools backup. Then reinstall TheBat!
Will I be able to use the backup since it will be in the encrypted
state?
The backup copy is not encrypted
Hello Thomas Fernandez everyone else,
on 05-Jan-2005 at 02:23 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote:
However, I need the account level filters only to makr the messages with
something so I know which account they were first sent to, before being
moved to the folders that they share, so I know which
Hello hggdh,
A reminder of what hggdh on TBBETA typed on:
04 January 2005 at 23:08:53 GMT +0100
h If I am correct, then what you propose could not work.
Your not correct as I've just done the very thing I suggested and had no
trouble at all.
I transferred my OTFE installation from WinXP
Hello Dean,
A reminder of what Dean on TBBETA typed on:
05 January 2005 at 09:36:51 GMT +0100
D I was just wondering if any one had tried to return to a
D non-encrypted state after they had used the ver. 3.0.2.10 in the
D encrypted mode?
I have, see my previous posts.
--
Best
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 02:23, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
BA Yes, I can confirm this behavior, but can't say whether this is a
BA bug or wanted. But I think this is wanted, because if a filter
BA matches a message, filtering stops (if not [X] Continue processing
BA with other filters is
Hi Tony,
Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 4:37:50 AM, you wrote:
TB I have, see my previous posts.
Thanks guys, evidently one of my servers must have gone down with all
the snow that's falling around us. I received double the normal
amount of email and the entire thread where your message was
Hello James,
Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 11:00:53 PM, you wrote:
AdG Well, judging from screenshot1, this SPX thingy may have something
AdG to do with it.
JO As a side topic... I may be mistaken, but given the icon and where
JO this 'splash' is placed I believe the SPX program is what he used to
Hello,
i released a bugfixed version of the Bayes Filter Plugin to kill some
strange bugs of v2.0.0. I hope you will enjoy it.
- Added: edit button for the regular expression filter
- Added: loading of included regular expression filter lists (see
B_INCLUDE_LIST feature)
- Improved: usage of
Hello Achim
i released a bugfixed version of the Bayes Filter Plugin to kill some
strange bugs of v2.0.0. I hope you will enjoy it.
Mmmh - couple of points
a) The version number still reads 2.0.0?
b) the macro to give the version name still doesn't work
.. I'm sure I've just installed it though.
Hello Graham,
FG a) The version number still reads 2.0.0?
On mine, the version number is 2.0.1 after automatuc update (The Bat!
must be closed)
--
Regards,
Francismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is
Marcus Ohlström wrote:
MO Create a parent filter matching all messages and make your common
MO filters subfilters of this catch-all-filter. Make sure Continue
MO processing with other filters is ticked for the parent filter.
Nice idea. If only common sub-filters worked:
2005-01-05|16:45 you wrote:
a) The version number still reads 2.0.0?
Not confirmed.
b) the macro to give the version name still doesn't work
Not confirmed - see footer.
--
GH/P/SS d- s:+ a38 C++ L+ W+++ N++ K- w O-- M-- PS--- PE+ Y+ PGP++ t---
5-- X R- b++ DI- D-- G e+++ h r+++
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:08:21 -0600, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
As for the Beta I am using, it is the last beta listed on the
beta page, but I will see if I can track down 3.0.2.10.
Take a look at:
http://thebat.orgavision.de/download.html
Arjan
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been
Hello Alexander,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:57 +0100 GMT (05/01/2005, 17:01 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Wouldn't it be possible to pick the original TO information in a %IF
ASK clause and automagically determine the correct account to use for the
ASK reply?
No, because the address
Hello Marcus,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:49:30 +0100 GMT (05/01/2005, 17:49 +0700 GMT),
Marcus Ohlström wrote:
MO Create a parent filter matching all messages and make your common
MO filters subfilters of this catch-all-filter. Make sure Continue
MO processing with other filters is ticked for the
Hello list,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:23:11 +0700 GMT (05/01/2005, 08:23 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I need to be able to reply from the account that the mail was
TF originally sent to, though. Maybe I am think along the wrong track.
TF Does anybody have an idea how I could do what I
Hæ!
Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 18:03, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Another idea is an optional setting in the common filters continue
processing with account filters, so that only those, and not the
other common filters, are processed when a match is found. Any
seconders?
Me!!!
--
Kveðja,
Hello Achim,
Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 3:38:38 PM, you wrote:
Hello,
i released a bugfixed version of the Bayes Filter Plugin to kill some
strange bugs of v2.0.0. I hope you will enjoy it.
Your can download the setup file from my homepage or you can use the
update function of the
Hello Sean,
Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 9:45:08 PM, you wrote:
Hello Achim,
Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 3:38:38 PM, you wrote:
Hello,
i released a bugfixed version of the Bayes Filter Plugin to kill some
strange bugs of v2.0.0. I hope you will enjoy it.
Your can download the setup file
Hello Sean!
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005 at 10:45:08 PM you wrote:
I dunno if you noticed but I cannot seem to get the macros to work :(
Do you mean the Update program? I couldn't make it work correctly at
first - until I remembered to shut down TB before using it. Since it
exchanges files
Hello Thomas,
I think this would work: If the account-level filters were processed
before the common filters, what I need to do could be accomplished.
Would anybody else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish
list as an option?
No, please. The problem is that Common filters are
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF If the account-level filters were processed before the common
TF filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody
TF else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish list as an
TF option?
It's already there:
Hello George,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:47:45 -0800 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:47 +0700 GMT),
George Mitchell wrote:
TF If the account-level filters were processed before the common
TF filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody
TF else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish
Hello MAU,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:11:10 +0100 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:11 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
I think this would work: If the account-level filters were processed
before the common filters, what I need to do could be accomplished.
Would anybody else find this useful, and should I put it in the
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:11:10 +0100 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:11 +0700
TF GMT), MAU wrote:
M No, please. The problem is that Common filters are still buggy.
M Otherwise you could easily do what you wish.
TF How can I do what I want to do with subfilters in common filters?
TF
26 matches
Mail list logo
