Re: Update on the Status of Software

Greg Strong wrote: С Respect I believe that would be "WITH Respect". :-) -- Keith Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Goncalo, On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, at 04:11:56 [GMT +] (which was 9:11 PM where I live) you wrote: GF> Noun: demagog GF> 1. An orator who appeals to the passions and prejudices of his audience Aren't semantics great? Merriam Webster: Noun: a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and fals

Re[4]: Update on the Status of Software

PVN> 1/20/2005 9:41 PM PVN> Hi Goncalo, >>You're being demagog. >>No big deal with that. I already justify all the text and that >>really ONLY affects people that actually reply to the message. PVN> I believe this list existed before you joined it. Since that is PVN> the case you hav

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

GF>> You're being demagog. LG> Has nothing to do with trying to gain power. I already have it, LG> always did. That kind of happens when your the creator of LG> something. What matters is wielding that power for the greater I never meant it had anything to do with gaining power. Goo

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

1/20/2005 9:41 PM Hi Goncalo, >Gesh! Huge task.. don't know how you can manage that just by yourself. >You're being demagog. >No big deal with that. I already justify all the text and that really >ONLY affects people that actually reply to the message. I believe this list existed before you

Multipart message question

Hello tbbeta, I'm really not sure if this is a beta issue or not. I receive Web statistics reports that are multipart html messages with embedded images. Forwarding these messages leaves the recipient without images since the embedded images are sent as part_01.jpg, part_02.jpg, etc.. Also, dou

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Maxim, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 10:32:41 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > I think that WIR will be the most exact estimate ;-) Good answer, and good signature! > С уважением, > Maxim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Translating your signature per http://translation2.paral

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Goncalo, On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, at 23:33:53 [GMT +] (which was 4:33 PM where I live) you wrote: GF> Gesh! Huge task.. don't know how you can manage that just by yourself. Netiquette exists for the same reason it's considered impolite to eat mashed potatoes with your hands. The adults learned

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

C>> Is this ALL that is bothering you? I'd say that the way people C>> address each other is a way more important item to follow. And C>> please don't come with the argument of message sizes. LG> Primarily it's messy. When someone replies to your messages, they LG> must manually cut out

Re: BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release

On Friday, January 21, 2005, at 00:18:15 [UTC+0100] (Friday, January 21, 2005 00:18 my local time) Kian Andersen wrote: KA>>> Does this mean you have the translators? >> I don't know. This is just mean that these language are supported by RitLNG >> implementation. > How to I translate BayesIt! t

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

N> jueves, 20 ene 2005 at 08:26, it seems you wrote: >> As read below in my prior message. TB! doesn't focus on John Doe >> home users in the first way but advanced home users and >> semiprofessionalls. And they will use IMAP more and more often. N> A lot of companies use at wor

Re[3]: BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release

Alexey N. Vinogradov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Kian. > You wrote 21.01.2005 @ 1:40 KA>> Lithuanian, Norvegian, Belarusian, Danish, Sertian (latin), Greek, KA>> Serbian (Cyrillic), Croatian, Catalan, Hebrew, Galician) may be included KA>> in the future. KA>> Does this mean you have the

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Dear Leif, @20-Jan-2005, 14:31 -0700 (20-Jan 21:31 UK time) Leif Gregory [LG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Cees: C>> apparently it does. why is that my fault? I'd say that The Bat! C>> should handle this particular issue in a different way. As do most C>> emailprograms as I remember LG>

Re[2]: BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release

Hello, Kian. You wrote 21.01.2005 @ 1:40 KA> Lithuanian, Norvegian, Belarusian, Danish, Sertian (latin), Greek, KA> Serbian (Cyrillic), Croatian, Catalan, Hebrew, Galician) may be included KA> in the future. KA> Does this mean you have the translators? I don't know. This is just mean that the

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Cees, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 2:01:12 PM, you wrote: C> no... why should I? Let's see. (for reference, please read the welcome message you were sent when you subscribed). 1. You are violating section "G" of the list rules which state that you sig should be about 4-6 lines. You

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Cees! On Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 10:01:12 PM you wrote: > no... why should I? 1. Because a moderator said so. 2. Leif explained it. > I'd say that The Bat! should handle this particular issue in a different > way. As do most emailprograms as I remember How? How shou

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

Het was op donderdag 20 januari 2005 om 21:22 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Authenticated-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Processed: shhh.nl, Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:11:

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Cees, > Hope that the new beta will not crash on me, as the latest started doing > ever since two days ago now. Still don't get it why that began to happen. I had the same problem till I understood that my bat doesn't like a dial-up connection if it comes to IMAP. Dialing on myself s

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

jueves, 20 ene 2005 at 17:46, it seems you wrote: > I will give a little technical update. The batskin.ini, which was a > temporary glyph definition file, will no longer be read, the new file > which will persist will be batskin.xml; the format of the language > file for the people who translate T

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Update on the Status of Software)

Hello Maxim, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 1:41:23 PM, you wrote: M> Is the sig delimiter now OK? Perfect... Thank you! :-) -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__)

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> I've a lot of questions, but maybe one short (because they can be > answered with yes, no or maybe) one: > Are you planing another BugFixing-Beta cycle after the current cycle? Let us finish the current cycle first. Current beta is 3.

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> As you count the major changes of the coming Version may I ask the > follow: Have there being any changes in the AB? I'm asking as I feel > many times the need to have more than one (1) subfolder. No, we didn't plan this for the upcoming version.

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Update on the Status of Software)

> Not often a moderator gets to moderate a developer! Is the sig delimiter now OK? -- Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

jueves, 20 ene 2005 at 08:26, it seems you wrote: > As read below in my prior message. TB! doesn't focus on John Doe home > users in the first way but advanced home users and semiprofessionalls. > And they will use IMAP more and more often. A lot of companies use at work an Exchange server, so th

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Cees, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 9:51:28 AM, you wrote: C> first off I feel free to say thank you guys for all the hard work. C> Because I know it's a hell of a lot of work. C> Secondly, the first question that pops to mind is: will the C> languagefiles automatically be updated to the new

GnuPG: UID not accepted

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I use GnuPG and have a free form primary user ID, i.e., just the name, nothing else. The sub-UIDs contain the email addresses. The Bat! only accepts the first email address for her implemented GPG use. So, if I try to sign this message with ++

Re: Update on the Status of Software

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Boris, on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:13:49 +0100GMT, you wrote: BA> Are you planing another BugFixing-Beta cycle after the current cycle? I'm just a list member with no particularly close relations to RITlabs, but I dare to say, yes, certainly! Unless /

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Thursday, January 20, 2005, 4:46:37 PM, you wrote: >> OK, it'd be nice if someone gave us the occasional update on what was >> happening, but they don't /have/ to; for what it's worth I don't even >> believe they've a moral obligation to. They're going to tell us when >> they tell us. It may be t

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Eddie, Eddie Castelli wrote (in ): > Have there being any changes in the AB? I agree that in the AB there is much potential for improvements: (Here my favorite ones) https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1861 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2202 https://www.ri

Re: BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release

Alexey N. Vinogradov skrev: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/solutions/bayesit/ (in English) Hello, On the download page you wrote this: Other languages (Romanian, Ukrainian, Bolgarian, Swedish, Finnish, Italian, Hungarian, Portuguese, Lithuanian, Norvegian, Belarusian, Danish, Sertian (latin), Greek,

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Dear Maxim, -->> Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005, 17:46:37: > I will give a little technical update. The batskin.ini, which was a > temporary glyph definition file, will no longer be read, the new > file which will persist will be batskin.xml; the format of the > language file for the people who

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Maxim Masiutin skrev: How about imap support? 9Val is currently working on that. Nice to know! But what about my other question? [quote] Also would it be possible to define a imap folder as the spam folder? I have a folder on my server named SPAM which gathers the most but I would like it to show

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Max, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 17:04 my local time; Has much work been done in progressing with IMAP? Much work have been done, but you will have to evaluate whether it was successful :-) Great, I look forward to testing it :-) Thanks Max. __

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Maxim, Maxim Masiutin wrote (in ): > I will give a little technical update. Thanks you very much. > Feel free to ask questions. I've a lot of questions, but maybe one short (because they can be answered with yes, no or maybe) one: Are you planing another BugFixing-B

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> Was any work done on Unicode support What do you mean exactly? Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http:/

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> How about imap support? 9Val is currently working on that. Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> Has much work been done in progressing with IMAP? Much work have been done, but you will have to evaluate whether it was successful :-) Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.h

Re[4]: Update on the Status of Software

> Secondly, the first question that pops to mind is: will the languagefiles > automatically be updated to the new format when launching new 'batty'? The Bat! will read localized strings from the old LNG files as usual. Current beta is

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Maxim, On Thursday, January 20, 2005, at 18:46, you wrote: MM> Feel free to ask questions. Was any work done on Unicode support? -- Edvinas Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.c

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Maxim Masiutin skrev: Feel free to ask questions. How about imap support? I had so much trouble with it that I am using Thunderbird! And I really miss some of The Bat!'s features! My problems being: 1) Sometimes messages would not load. 2) Sometimes messages are shown to be there more then once whe

Re: Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

Quoting Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I will give a little technical update. The batskin.ini, which > was a > temporary glyph definition file, will no longer be read, the > new file > which will persist will be batskin.xml; the format of the > language > file for the people who translate

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

Het was op donderdag 20 januari 2005 om 17:46 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Hallo Maxim, >> they tell us. It may be they don't give us an update until they >> actually release the next version. Whatever. > I will give a little technical update. The batskin

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Max, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 16:46 my local time; Feel free to ask questions. Has much work been done in progressing with IMAP? -- Chris Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.s

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> OK, it'd be nice if someone gave us the occasional update on what was > happening, but they don't /have/ to; for what it's worth I don't even > believe they've a moral obligation to. They're going to tell us when > they tell us. It may be they don't give us an update until they > actually release

Re[5]: Update on the Status of Software

Het was op donderdag 20 januari 2005 om 17:32 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Hallo Maxim, >> A simply inquiry which I'm sure Max will provide an answer to as he >> did before Christmas. > We could have compiled the beta today, but some things don't yet work

Re[4]: Update on the Status of Software

> A simply inquiry which I'm sure Max will provide an answer to as he > did before Christmas. We could have compiled the beta today, but some things don't yet work after the rework. Such things are Quick Search etc. I think that WIR will be the most exact estimate ;-) -- С уважением, Maxim

Re: Mod: DEAD HORSE (was: any new betas in process?)

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:39:52 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > A new version is underway - it will come when it is ready for testing. > > Please do not post these kinds of questions here anymore. Sorry to have offended, Marck. My question was simple and sincere. Marek gave a satisfactory reply

crash behaviour

Het is donderdag 20 januari 2005 en 10:26:02 uur : Hallo tbbeta, since yesterday the latest beta tends to crash with me everytime I fire it up. Nothing worked. No repair or modify option. Just uninstall and reinstall worked. After that, I tried the latest beta again of course,

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Dierk, Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005, 09:01: > Apart from Leif declaring this thread DH'ed Sorry, but i read the DH-message afterwards. > I chime in with the biggest mantra of shareware: > Try, try, try ... before you buy. As you said. You can *try*. But only try. In 30 days you are not

Access violations at exiting

Hello, Today (and yesterda) when I was closing TB suddenly AV error window appears. Please see entries in my except.log: PREZES/Admin 2005-01-17 15:24:43 Records:6 EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00066D6F. Read of address 00066D6F PREZES/Admin 2005-01-17 15:24:43 Records:FolderD

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Michael! On Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 8:26:18 AM you wrote: > They promised working IMAP and the working NFS for v2 ... > Now I payed for v3 (for the same features they promised/advertised in > v2) - and still bugs, bugs, bugs. > Don't you think I have the right for a working version?