Hello Ian,
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:17:24 +1100 GMT (11/12/2005, 14:17 +0700 GMT),
Ian A.White wrote:
TF>> The danger in the corporate world is that messages get sent again and
TF>> it looks unprofessional. "You already send me the information last
TF>> week, why are you sending it again?". I canno
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, at 04:11:46 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:11 where I
live) Maxim Masiutin wrote:
...
> The new beta URL
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb36309.rar
...
I have no problems with my folder views/view modes in Voyager but when I
leave/close The Bat! I loose al
Hello Ian,
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:00:49 +1100 GMT (11/12/2005, 10:00 +0700 GMT),
Ian A.White wrote:
MM>> We have some reports from corporate users that being able to drag
MM>> and drop messages to outbox folder and have them sent is a
MM>> potentially very dangerous feature for corporate users.
Hello Robert,
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:46:26 -0500 GMT (11/12/2005, 10:46 +0700 GMT),
Robert D. wrote:
RD> if you can put a toggle INSIDE TB!, then I am happy to make that
RD> change myself new-version after new-version ... but It's a PITA to
RD> bring up regedit and find the place to add a new dwo
Maxim...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:11:46 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello Tbbeta,
>
>We've implemented Outbox Protection Feature.
>
>It is currently OFF by default. If you add Registry DWORD Value
>"CopyToOutboxProhibited"=1 to "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!", The
>Bat! will prohibit copying me
Hello Robert!
On Saturday, December 10, 2005, 9:46 PM, you wrote:
>> We've implemented Outbox Protection Feature.
> I agree with Ian. Although what he said was due to being down under,
> things are reversed, 1's = 0's and so forth.
I agree with Ian and with you, Robert.
> I think you meant se
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, at 04:11:46 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:11 where I
live) Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> The new beta URL
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb36309.rar
Up and running. Quoting is correct here, it is not using Voyager.
See: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Henk
Hello Maxim!
On Saturday, December 10, 2005, 8:11 PM, you wrote:
> We've implemented Outbox Protection Feature.
I do not want my Outbox to have this Protection Feature.
Therefore I am not going to download and test .09 tonight. It's late
and I don't have time or energy to deal with the problems
Ian,
On Sunday, December 11, 2005, 3:06:12 PM, you (Ian A.White) wrote:
IAW> Robert,
IAW> On Sunday, December 11, 2005, 3:01:04 PM, you (Robert D.) wrote:
RD>> Recently, Ian A.White squawked:
RD>> See, it's acting up for you too. You sent it twice.
RD>> I just put one to TBOT in the outbox af
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, at 01:43:22 [GMT +0200] (which was 0:43 where I
live) Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> We've made installer program for the Voyager which prompts the user
> the destination drive where to copy Voyager files.
> Here it is:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyag
Hi,
It appears as though a new confirmation dialog has been introduced
with this beta. The only problem is that the save confirmation now
appears whenever the message editor is closed, even if the message has
been saved.
As a result, when you send a message and the message editor closes,
you are
Hello All,
Off by default. As a moderator on 5 yahoo lists=getting new spam that
wants=reading,rec. conformation. I DO NOT WANT MY E-MAIL CLIENT SENDING
MESSAGES UNLESS I TELL IT!!. On the [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 'we' are getting some real interesting spam.
Kaspersky does not='get
Robert,
On Sunday, December 11, 2005, 3:01:04 PM, you (Robert D.) wrote:
RD> Recently, Ian A.White squawked:
RD> See, it's acting up for you too. You sent it twice.
RD> I just put one to TBOT in the outbox after it asked me to save. Then I
RD> tried to send and, seeing it was STILL in the outbo
domingo, 11 dic 2005 at 03:11, it seems you wrote:
> The new beta URL
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb36309.rar
Not usable here. It has the same error of the first 3.63 beta.
If you use OTFE, after the "Beta confirm box" you will get the Account
Creation Wizard.
--
/
Recently, Ian A.White squawked:
See, it's acting up for you too. You sent it twice.
I just put one to TBOT in the outbox after it asked me to save. Then I
tried to send and, seeing it was STILL in the outbox, told me there
was nothing to send.
--
Robert D.
_
The Bat! V
Robert,
On Sunday, December 11, 2005, 2:46:26 PM, you (Robert D.) wrote:
RD> Recently, Maxim Masiutin squawked:
>> We've implemented Outbox Protection Feature.
RD> I agree with Ian. Although what he said was due to being down under,
RD> things are reversed, 1's = 0's and so forth.
RD> I thi
Robert,
On Sunday, December 11, 2005, 2:46:26 PM, you (Robert D.) wrote:
RD> Recently, Maxim Masiutin squawked:
>> We've implemented Outbox Protection Feature.
RD> I agree with Ian. Although what he said was due to being down under,
RD> things are reversed, 1's = 0's and so forth.
RD> I thi
I am suddenly seeing two things with this version
after I hit the "Put Message In Outbox" icon, I get prompted for
saving message. When I hit send directly /// It goes out and THEN I
get message asking to save. This aggravates me.
My system has gone dead for up to 30 seconds at a time since I sta
Recently, Maxim Masiutin squawked:
> We've implemented Outbox Protection Feature.
I agree with Ian. Although what he said was due to being down under,
things are reversed, 1's = 0's and so forth.
I think you meant set it to 0 = off = we CAN drag-n-drop INTO the
outbox.
> it should be ON by de
Maxim,
> When this option is ON, and you click "Copy to folder" menu item,
> the Outbox folder is not shown in the list. Also, if you try to use
> Drag-And-Drop to copy messages to Outbox, the cursor gets
> "prohibited" shape.
> Please let us know whether it should be ON by default.
I much pref
Hello Tbbeta,
We've implemented Outbox Protection Feature.
It is currently OFF by default. If you add Registry DWORD Value
"CopyToOutboxProhibited"=1 to "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!", The
Bat! will prohibit copying messages to Outbox from other folders. You will be
only able to fow
Hello Maxim Masiutin,
on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:49:24 +0200 (2005-12-11 01:49:24 in .nl) in the
message with reference you [MM]
wrote (at least in part):
MM> Within an hour I will update the fixed installation of Voyager
MM> that resolves the issue of copying "userdic.tlx"
Uhm, the hour you ment
Hello Tbbeta,
Within an hour I will update the fixed installation of Voyager that resolves
the issue of copying "userdic.tlx"
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.63.08 |
Hello Maxim Masiutin,
on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:43:22 +0200 (2005-12-11 00:43:22 in .nl) in the
message with reference you [MM]
wrote (at least in part):
MM> Here it is:
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
I encountered the same download problem as Richard
Hello Richard,
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 you wrote in
RW> Not here I'm afraid. Downloaded twice just in case the first was a fault
RW> but the same each time.
My bad, well sort of. I didn't look at the file size and had to download
it twice more before it all arrived - that shouldn't happen surely?
Hello Maxim,
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 you wrote in
MM> We've made installer program for the Voyager which prompts the user
MM> the destination drive where to copy Voyager files.
Not here I'm afraid. Downloaded twice just in case the first was a fault
but the same each time. The installation process
Hello Tbbeta,
We've made installer program for the Voyager which prompts the user the
destination drive where to copy Voyager files.
Here it is:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install.exe
There weren't many changes since last update of Voyager:
[-] IMAP: d
Hi Maxim,
on Saturday, December 10, 2005 at 14:56 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
>> It's TB! With other mailprograms I didn't have these problems!!!
> The templates are already stored internally in Unicode, we only now
> have to implement Unicode template editor.
Hello Roland,
Saturday, December 10, 2005, 2:05:30 PM, you wrote:
>> - i have no problems using ąęśżźćó etc letters in TB in templates ,
>> coockies ofr adress book
RB> I think that you have no problems because you have a Polish
RB> Windows! I, however, have a German Windows!
nope :) iam using
Hello Roland,
Saturday, December 10, 2005, 3:49:42 PM, you wrote:
> It's TB! With other mailprograms I didn't have these problems!!!
The templates are already stored internally in Unicode, we only now
have to implement Unicode template editor.
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Hi Paul,
on Saturday, December 10, 2005 at 14:29 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
RB>> I think that you have no problems because you have a Polish
RB>> Windows! I, however, have a German Windows!
RB>> In mails there are no problems ęóąśłńżź, but in addressbooks and templ
12/10/2005 8:28 AM
Hi Roland,
On 12/10/2005 Roland Burger wrote:
RB> I think that you have no problems because you have a Polish
RB> Windows! I, however, have a German Windows!
RB> In mails there are no problems ęóąśłńżź, but in addressbooks and templates
I cannot use them!
Doesn't appear to
Hello Clive,
Saturday, December 10, 2005, 4:39:47 AM, you wrote:
>> I wonder if it has something to do with setting messages to a color
>> group on arrival.
CT> I've no idea, I'm afraid. I did a little unscientific experiment a
CT> few weeks ago, opening the same IMAP mailbases using TB!, Mulber
Hi Krzysztof,
on Saturday, December 10, 2005 at 13:19 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
RB>> before more than 3 1/2 years, I mentioned, that it is not
RB>> possible to use Polish letters in templates and addressbooks. But
RB>> up to now this problem is not solved from Ritl
Hello Roland,
Saturday, December 10, 2005, 10:49:04 AM, you wrote:
RB> Hi,
RB> before more than 3 1/2 years, I mentioned, that it is not
RB> possible to use Polish letters in templates and addressbooks. But
RB> up to now this problem is not solved from Ritlabs though the
RB> solvation has been p
Hello Stuart,
Friday, December 9, 2005, 11:18:18 PM, you wrote:
> I wonder if it has something to do with setting messages to a color
> group on arrival.
I've no idea, I'm afraid. I did a little unscientific experiment a
few weeks ago, opening the same IMAP mailbases using TB!, Mulberry and
Thu
Hi,
before more than 3 1/2 years, I mentioned, that it is not possible to use
Polish letters in templates and addressbooks. But up to now this problem is not
solved from Ritlabs though the solvation has been promised for version 2!!!
--
Best regards,
Roland
:flag-polska:
pgpxz
37 matches
Mail list logo
