Re[2]: BAV plug-ins

2002-04-09 Thread Marek Mikus
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, DG Raftery Sr. wrote: > Marek> plugin of AVG for The Bat! is already created in betaversion, I'm contact > Marek> with main AVG developer, but there are some things to solve. > Marek> You can try it: http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip > > Thank you sir. Much ap

Re[2]: BAV plug-ins

2002-04-09 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:12:35 AM RE: "BAV plug-ins" Greetings Marek, On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 6:50:26 AM, you wrote: Marek> plugin of AVG for The Bat! is already created in betaversion, I'm contact Marek> with main AVG dev

Re[2]: BAV plug-ins

2002-04-09 Thread Joseph N.
ail (sender and subject and, possibly, date); the name of the malicious code; and some choices. JN Jacek Wojaczynski wrote on Tuesday, April 09, 2002: > On Tuesday, April 9, 2002 Stefan Tanurkov wrote: >> We've made several BAV plug-ins, they are working using a particular

Re: BAV plug-ins

2002-04-09 Thread Daniel Friedmann
Hello John, > Try a test virus, used for this purpose at > http://www.rexswain.com/eicar.html I finally managed to get that file sent to me. The Sophos plugin works indeed. ;-) Now I have one new folder called "Quarantine" in my account and have also received a warning mail automatically generat

Re: BAV plug-ins

2002-01-25 Thread Terry L Fritts
Lars On Friday, January 25, 2002 1:19 PM you wrote: L> The only problem I see is in the communication between TB! and the AV L> program. How to tell TB! that a virus was found? Via a return code? We use a program for our IMAIL mail server that does this very thing. It is called Declude by Scott

Re: BAV plug-ins

2002-01-25 Thread Alastair Scott
On 25 January 2002 at 09:11 Den wrote: > Hello. > GMM> I have tested many AVP releases with the bat. For me it only worked with > GMM> AVP 3.5.1.3 Platinum (although it may works with Gold or Std) > What file is necessary for connection AVP to The BAT! ? We may find out eventually ;) >From w

Re: BAV plug-ins

2002-01-25 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Terry, On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 13:09:49 [GMT -0600], you wrote: TLF> Seems to me though that you'd have to parse the message and look in TLF> the mime-segments for anything and everything that could carry a TLF> virus, then present the parsed segment(s) as file(s) to the command TLF> li

Re: BAV plug-ins

2002-01-25 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Sergey, On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 19:45:18 [GMT +], you wrote: SU> This is *exactly* what I mean. Many AV checkers have command-line SU> interface (CMI), why not use it? CMI is described in AV manuals and SU> can be easy imlemented by most of users themselves. I agree with you on tha