On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, DG Raftery Sr. wrote:
> Marek> plugin of AVG for The Bat! is already created in betaversion, I'm contact
> Marek> with main AVG developer, but there are some things to solve.
> Marek> You can try it: http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
>
> Thank you sir. Much ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Tuesday, April 09, 2002
10:12:35 AM
RE: "BAV plug-ins"
Greetings Marek,
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 6:50:26 AM, you wrote:
Marek> plugin of AVG for The Bat! is already created in betaversion, I'm contact
Marek> with main AVG dev
ail (sender and subject and, possibly, date); the name of
the malicious code; and some choices.
JN
Jacek Wojaczynski wrote on Tuesday, April 09, 2002:
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2002 Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
>> We've made several BAV plug-ins, they are working using a particular
Hello John,
> Try a test virus, used for this purpose at
> http://www.rexswain.com/eicar.html
I finally managed to get that file sent to me. The Sophos plugin works
indeed. ;-)
Now I have one new folder called "Quarantine" in my account and have
also received a warning mail automatically generat
Lars
On Friday, January 25, 2002 1:19 PM you wrote:
L> The only problem I see is in the communication between TB! and the AV
L> program. How to tell TB! that a virus was found? Via a return code?
We use a program for our IMAIL mail server that does this very thing.
It is called Declude by Scott
On 25 January 2002 at 09:11 Den wrote:
> Hello.
> GMM> I have tested many AVP releases with the bat. For me it only worked with
> GMM> AVP 3.5.1.3 Platinum (although it may works with Gold or Std)
> What file is necessary for connection AVP to The BAT! ?
We may find out eventually ;)
>From w
Hi Terry,
On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 13:09:49 [GMT -0600], you wrote:
TLF> Seems to me though that you'd have to parse the message and look in
TLF> the mime-segments for anything and everything that could carry a
TLF> virus, then present the parsed segment(s) as file(s) to the command
TLF> li
Hi Sergey,
On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 19:45:18 [GMT +], you wrote:
SU> This is *exactly* what I mean. Many AV checkers have command-line
SU> interface (CMI), why not use it? CMI is described in AV manuals and
SU> can be easy imlemented by most of users themselves.
I agree with you on tha
8 matches
Mail list logo