Hello Stuart,
>> version thebat_64_9-3-0-2.msi on trying to access the sorting
>> office/filters from account or using short cut FAILS to activate
>> the sorting office with no visible action taking place
>
> Seems to be working fine here.
Same here.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech
Hello Graham,
Friday, November 27, 2020, 6:30:09 AM, you wrote:
> version thebat_64_9-3-0-2.msi on trying to access the sorting office/filters
> from account or using short cut FAILS to activate the sorting office with no
> visible action taking place
Seems to be working fine here.
--
Best
Hello TbBeta,
version thebat_64_9-3-0-2.msi on trying to access the sorting office/filters
from account or using short cut FAILS to activate the sorting office with no
visible action taking place
--
Best regards,
Graham mailto:gh...@mcb.net
I rebuild a virtual folder that shows all parked and flagged messages. The
quick filter does not work for any of the predefined settings. The advanced
filter works, but there is some strange behavior if you try to delete a block
or condition
Confirmations?
--
Rick
. . . in America, we have
Hello Miguel,
Sunday, November 11, 2012, 9:54:37 AM, among other things, you wrote:
M Hello Roger,
M
M I went back, one at a time, all the way to v5.3.2.5 (which I'm using
M right now) and Read filters work fine in this version. So, it seems the
M problem was introduced with v5.3.2.6.
M
Hello Roger,
Sunday, November 11, 2012, 5:18:02 AM, you wrote:
M Maybe the difference is you are using Win 7 while I'm still on XP.
RP Yes, I had wondered that too! Richard Newman is also on XP.
I'm on Win7 . . . despite TB reading it as XP6.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Hello Richard,
Sunday, November 11, 2012, 6:29:58 PM, among other things, you wrote:
RN Hello Roger,
RN Sunday, November 11, 2012, 5:18:02 AM, you wrote:
M Maybe the difference is you are using Win 7 while I'm still on XP.
RP Yes, I had wondered that too! Richard Newman is also on XP.
RN I'm on
Hello Roger,
Sunday, November 11, 2012, 1:11:28 PM, you wrote:
RP Hmmm, I think it is just not reading anything, it just displays stored
RP information.
You were right. Now the right macros are there and displaying
correctly. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Hello Richard,
Sunday, November 11, 2012, 11:09:49 PM, among other things, you wrote:
RN Hello Roger,
RN Sunday, November 11, 2012, 1:11:28 PM, you wrote:
RP Hmmm, I think it is just not reading anything, it just displays
stored
RP information.
RN You were right. Now the right
Hello all,
I use Read filters to file messages to appropriate folder once I have
read them (with SmartSpace) in Inbox-Known. I just noticed that none of
the messages read these past few days had been moved.
I went back, one at a time, all the way to v5.3.2.5 (which I'm using
right now) and Read
Hello MAU,
Saturday, November 10, 2012, 1:32:38 PM, you wrote:
M Can anyone confirm?
I noticed some weren't for a couple of weeks and thought it was
something I did. So yes, I can confirm.
--
Best regards,
Richardmailto:the...@newmangroup.com
Hello Richard,
I noticed some weren't for a couple of weeks and thought it was
something I did. So yes, I can confirm.
Thank you. Just opened BT report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=119
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.3.2.5
Hello Miguel,
Saturday, November 10, 2012, 8:32:38 PM, among other things, you wrote:
M Hello all,
M I use Read filters to file messages to appropriate folder once I have
M read them (with SmartSpace) in Inbox-Known. I just noticed that none of
M the messages read these past few days had been
Hello Roger,
M I went back, one at a time, all the way to v5.3.2.5 (which I'm using
M right now) and Read filters work fine in this version. So, it seems the
M problem was introduced with v5.3.2.6.
M Can anyone confirm?
No, they are still working here, but there was a programme change
Hi TB Beta list members,
A complex filter with multiple (OR) conditions where one of the
conditions is a block of multiple AND conditions - the filter fails
to operate correctly. In particular, a message from theregister is
stopped by this filter when it should not be, being explicitly
excluded
Hello,
I have not been following for the last month. I had to revert back to
4.2.44.2 because of all the issues with filters and av's and hangs with version
5. I was just wondering, how is version 5 doing?
Is it finally stable?
Are filters working as good as they did in version 4?
Does v5
5 doing?
J Is it finally stable?
It's been a long since I had AVs.
J Are filters working as good as they did in version 4?
AFAIK all of my filtrers are functioning properly.
J Does v5 still hang after a few hours/days of continuos running?
Dunno. I'm heading back to my green roots and shut
Hello Joe,
Monday, October 10, 2011, 4:08:42 PM, you wrote:
J Are filters working as good as they did in version 4?
Only filter not working consistently for me is mark read. Otherwise,
I haven't found any filters that don't currently work.
J Does v5 still hang after a few hours/days of continuos
Hello all,
Tuesday, January 26, 2010, Rick wrote:
I have 2 filters, one account filter that sorts mail into common
folders and then a common filter that moves all remaining mail to a
common folder inbox. This has always worked correctly
Now the account filter sorts a copy of the mail to
I have 2 filters, one account filter that sorts mail into common
folders and then a common filter that moves all remaining mail to a
common folder inbox. This has always worked correctly
Now the account filter sorts a copy of the mail to the correct
folder AND the (final) common filter is
Hello all,
Tuesday, January 26, 2010, Rick wrote:
I have 2 filters, one account filter that sorts mail into common
folders and then a common filter that moves all remaining mail to a
common folder inbox. This has always worked correctly
Now the account filter sorts a copy of the mail to the
I have 2 filters, one account filter that sorts mail into common folders and
then a common filter that moves all remaining mail to a common folder inbox.
This has always worked correctly
Now the account filter sorts a copy of the mail to the correct folder AND the
(final) common filter is also
Hello steverio,
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 8:47:09 PM, you wrote:
Hello RMorris...
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:56:38 -0600, you wrote:
Thanks for the interesting comments on Regula. Please drop a note
later when you find out more from testing the bayesian filters. Talk
about anti-spam
RMorris...
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:26:37 -0600, you wrote:
Regula is very aggressive=had to set all my filters to the 'over
ride' option just to get my normal mail to their folders. Trained it
with 3000 spams and 2000 hams=after resetting filters=zero spams. All
went to each spam folder.
Hello steverio,
Friday, December 9, 2005, 8:49:37 PM, you wrote:
RMorris...
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:26:37 -0600, you wrote:
Regula is very aggressive=had to set all my filters to the 'over
ride' option just to get my normal mail to their folders. Trained it
with 3000 spams and 2000
I am recently receiving a new kind of spam. Spammers instead of writing a text
inside the email are attaching a gif file containing the ad and the product
image. The subject and the text of the email are always changing and also the
name of the attachment is always changing. I have tried to teach
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!!
Someday, and that was in Thursday morning, Fabio wrote something like
this:
Anyone having the same problem and any suggested solution?
Regula: http://www.gaijin.at/tbpregula.php
--
Thanks and best regards,
Sebastian Murawski
On 05-12-08 (09:47), you wrote:
I have tried to teach both bayesit and bayes filter but
Try AGAVA AntispamServant - works like charm. :)
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl |
Hi Fabio,
on
Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:47:41 +0100GMT (08.12.2005, 09:47 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
FC I am recently receiving a new kind of spam. Spammers instead of writing a
text
FC inside the email are attaching a gif file containing the ad and the product
FC image. ...
FC Anyone having the same
Hello Sebastian,
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 3:04:58 AM, you wrote:
Anyone having the same problem and any suggested solution?
SM Regula: http://www.gaijin.at/tbpregula.php
I get an error message when I try to load this plug-in. Any
suggestions.
Could not initialize plugin. It is
Stuart Cuddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get an error message when I try to load this plug-in. Any
suggestions.
You need to download and install pcre too. Look for the dpcre download on the
same page. (I don;t read German either - but its fairly obvious). There is an
installer
Hello Fabio Cipparone,
Anyone having the same problem and any suggested solution?
I have the feeling that many people are asking non-beta questions here,
because they think to find better answers among the tbbeta members; and I
think this is a little bit unfair towards the TBUDL users.
--
Hello
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:18:44 +0100, you wrote:
On 05-12-08 (09:47), you wrote:
I have tried to teach both bayesit and bayes filter but
Try AGAVA AntispamServant - works like charm. :)
Best regards, Krzysztof Kud³acik
I have AGAVA and it is not totally effective against image-type
Hello Fabio...
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:47:41 +0100, you wrote:
I am recently receiving a new kind of spam. Spammers instead of writing a text
inside the email are attaching a gif file containing the ad and the product
image. The subject and the text of the email are always changing and also the
Hello Krzyszto...
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:18:44 +0100, you wrote:
On 05-12-08 (09:47), you wrote:
I have tried to teach both bayesit and bayes filter but
Try AGAVA AntispamServant - works like charm. :)
Best regards, Krzysztof Kud³acik
To add to my previous post to you:
If you are getting
Hello Graham,
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 8:28:34 AM, you wrote:
You need to download and install pcre too. Look for the dpcre download on the
same page. (I don;t read German either - but its fairly obvious). There is an
installer batch file (in the download) for NT/XP and another for Win9x.
Hello RMorris...
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:56:38 -0600, you wrote:
Hello All,
I downloaded Regula and it really works. What AGAVA does not get
regula does. I usually get 200-300 spams a day between 6 mailboxes.
The 'new' type of spam agava seems to have a hard time picking
up,regula does not.
Alexander on November 29, 2005, at 4:01 PM wrote
Can anyone else confirm this?
No problem here - POP3 only.
THANX...
With all the responses about Not seeing this issue I figured I'd go
back and try 3.63.05 again... and sure enough first 3 emails I
received via POP did Not filter
Hello Jim,
The filter in this case was one of my simpler ones ...
IF MESSAGE SOURCE Contains
OR IF MESSAGE SOURCE Contains
THEN Copy Message to Folder ZZZ
AND Mark Message as Read
CONTINUE Processing Other Filters
As soon as I exit, swap back
Hello Jim,
Can anyone else confirm this?
Ok, I can confirm this, also managed to track down the bug:
IF MESSAGE SOURCE Contains
Filters based on Message source are broken in the latest beta. Make
a BT, I support it.
(Not many people filter by Message source, that is why you got no
Hello Vili everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2005 at 16:47 you (Vili) wrote:
IF MESSAGE SOURCE Contains
Filters based on Message source are broken in the latest beta. Make
a BT, I support it.
AH!!
Its not only broken in the sorting office, but in Virtual Folders, too!
Seems they use the
Hello Alexander,
IF MESSAGE SOURCE Contains
Filters based on Message source are broken in the latest beta. Make
a BT, I support it.
AH!!
Its not only broken in the sorting office, but in Virtual Folders, too!
Seems they use the same filtering mechanism (which is good).
You think,
Vili on November 30, 2005, at 10:47 AM stated,
Can anyone else confirm this?
Ok, I can confirm this, also managed to track down the bug:
IF MESSAGE SOURCE Contains
Filters based on Message source are broken in the latest beta. Make
a BT, I support it.
(Not many people
I needed to revert to 3.62.14 as, after upgrading to 3.63.05, though
it seemed that latest Beta was working well I noticed that Many of my
hundreds of filters were no longer working... on reverting to 3.62.14
the filters became operational again...
Can anyone else confirm this?
Hello Jim,
I needed to revert to 3.62.14 as, after upgrading to 3.63.05, though
it seemed that latest Beta was working well I noticed that Many of my
hundreds of filters were no longer working... on reverting to 3.62.14
the filters became operational again...
Can anyone else confirm this?
Recently, Jim Brown squawked:
Many of my hundreds of filters were no longer working.
Alas, I have but 6 active out of 20. And they all work, filtering on
header content into respective folders; maybe sending an auto-reply in
some cases. But, they work on my sys in this newest build.
--
became operational again...
Can anyone else confirm this?
I can confirm using IMAP. I use about 20 basic move-to-alternate-folder
filters. They stopped working with the latest beta.
All POP account filters worked as expected.
--
Matt
Hello Jim,
Tuesday, November 29, 2005, 11:40:24 AM, you wrote:
Can anyone else confirm this?
Current beta is 3.63.05 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta
Hello Jim Brown everyone else,
on 29-Nov-2005 at 19:40 you (Jim Brown) wrote:
Can anyone else confirm this?
No problem here - POP3 only.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
In every man of genius a new strange force is brought into the world.
-- Havelock
Dear Michael,
@20-Aug-2005, 01:30 +0200 (20-Aug 00:30 UK time) Michael Schneider
[MS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to George:
I've noticed a strange thing. While I tested search, a new message
had come. But instead of being filtered it stayed in the Inbox.
When I run refilter, the filter
Hello Marck,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 6:39:42 AM, you wrote:
MDP They work neither automatically on mail receipt nor manually.
MDP Can anybody confirm this? A pretty serious bug IMO.
IMAP or POP? Do you have more specific examples?
--
Best regards,
Stuart
Hello Marck,
Okay - let's bring this one up again. I just added an OR condition
to an old filter and messages that used to be intercepted by that
filter ended up in my spam bucket (unfiltered).
Looking deeper, I find that, starting today and since making that
change to that one filter of
Dear Stuart,
@1-Sep-2005, 07:31 -0500 (01-Sep 13:31 UK time) Stuart Cuddy [SC] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP They work neither automatically on mail receipt nor manually.
MDP Can anybody confirm this? A pretty serious bug IMO.
SC IMAP or POP?
POP. There's a surprise!
SC Do you
Dear Vili,
@1-Sep-2005, 09:17 -0400 (01-Sep 14:17 UK time) Vili [V] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
... snip
They work neither automatically on mail receipt nor manually.
Can anybody confirm this? A pretty serious bug IMO.
V I know, you are not a rookie, but is not it possible that
Hello Marck,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 8:22:15 AM, you wrote:
SC IMAP or POP?
MDP POP. There's a surprise!
SC Do you have more specific examples?
MDP This was the original filter:
Have you seen Vili's post about continue processing. When I paste you
filters none of them have continue
Dear Stuart,
@1-Sep-2005, 08:39 -0500 (01-Sep 14:39 UK time) Stuart Cuddy [SC] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP This was the original filter:
SC Have you seen Vili's post about continue processing. When I paste
SC you filters none of them have continue processing set.
(See my reply
Hello Marck,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 8:57:24 AM, you wrote:
MDP I changed nothing. The filter was OR sender CONTAINS
MDP @underscore.org.uk. That means the filter was corrupt when repasted.
MDP I wonder if this is a symptom of the underlying problem?
I see. I just realized that what I am
Dear Stuart,
@1-Sep-2005, 09:29 -0500 (01-Sep 15:29 UK time) Stuart Cuddy [SC] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP I changed nothing. The filter was OR sender CONTAINS
MDP @underscore.org.uk. That means the filter was corrupt when
MDP repasted. I wonder if this is a symptom of the
Hello TBBETA Members!
Over the past two days I again tried to clean up my Sorting Office
by moving all my filters from accounts to Common. The result is as
grey as the weather in Hamburg today:
1. Filters when pasted under CF rename themselves to one already in.
The original
Hallo Dierk,
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:31:08 +0100GMT (10-2-2005, 18:31 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
DH 1. Filters when pasted under CF rename themselves to one already in.
DH The original vanishes.
Can't confirm.
I tried it and when I had the category selected, the filters was
added,
Hello Roelof!
On Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 7:01:28 PM you wrote:
Can't confirm.
I tried it and when I had the category selected, the filters was
added, when I had another filter selected I was asked whether to
replace the old filter or not.
Closed the dialogue, worked in TB and come
Hello tbbeta,
I have just installed a fresh copy of V3 home and I am remaking my filters
as messages arrive (Using NFS) .
One refuses to work.
8
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID:
David, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 11:06:14 PM, you wrote:==
Hello tbbeta,
I have just installed a fresh copy of V3 home and I am remaking my filters
as messages arrive (Using NFS) .
One refuses to work.
Only 2 of mine work. It isn't worth rebuilding the others. I re-installed
2.12
Hello Steve,
Only 2 of mine work.
Had you previously tried NFS with any of the betas? If so, you should
delete any *.srb files you have in your account directories and then let
v3.0 convert again your OFS to NFS.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0
-installed
2.12 and my filters work fine again. Also, I just downloaded Becky and Poco
and will decide between them for a Bat replacement -- unless somebody can
recommend a better email program. Ritlabs gets no more of my money.
Steve . . .
Filters working here fine.
I've been updating
Hi Miguel / all
Had you previously tried NFS with any of the betas? If so, you should
delete any *.srb files you have in your account directories and then let
v3.0 convert again your OFS to NFS.
I noticed the selective download filters came in as total garbage
I recreated from scratch but
Steve Mary King, [SMK] wrote:
lso, I just downloaded Becky and Poco and will decide between them
for a Bat replacement -- unless somebody can recommend a better
email program.
I've been around the block and TB! still stands alone for POP. For
IMAP, it still stands alone for me. However, your
I transferred a number of messages (about 30) from a pop3 inbox folder
in TB! to the inbox of an IMAP account. Now, that account no longer
filters messages. I've run folder maintenance, but it still won't
work. I can re-filter using Folder/Re-filter and it works just fine.
Any suggestions?
--
68 matches
Mail list logo
