Hello everyone,
what a time for writing this message :-) but as I just sent some christmas
greetings to some friends I noticed this, and before I forget it...
With v3.64.01, when I start a new message and fill the "TO" field with text
(typing the address manually), the headers below it are "jumpi
Hello ...in addition to my previous message...
on 24-Dez-2005 at 17:46 you (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
> With v3.64.01, when I start a new message and fill the "TO" field with text
> (typing the address manually), the headers below it are "jumping" up and
> down one pixel with each keystroke.
> W
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, December 24, 2005, 5:46:21 PM, you wrote:
ASK> With v3.64.01, when I start a new message and fill the "TO" field with text
ASK> (typing the address manually), the headers below it are "jumping" up and
ASK> down one pixel with each keystroke.
When I do the above, a list
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:42 AM, you wrote:
>> With v3.64.01, when I start a new message and fill the "TO" field
>> with text (typing the address manually), the headers below it are
>> "jumping" up and down one pixel with each keystroke.
Confirmed.
>> When I tab down int
Hello Mary Bull & everyone else,
on 26-Dez-2005 at 19:42 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
> But when I try to Tab back up into the headers, I just get the
> response of tabbing on through the message body.
I'm sorry, to get back "upwards" into the header fields it should be
shift+TAB of course.
Glad that
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, December 26, 2005, 4:09 PM, you wrote:
>> But when I try to Tab back up into the headers, I just get the
>> response of tabbing on through the message body.
> I'm sorry, to get back "upwards" into the header fields it should be
> shift+TAB of course.
Ah. That works.
Hello Mary Bull & everyone else,
on 26-Dez-2005 at 23:33 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
>> I'm sorry, to get back "upwards" into the header fields it should be
>> shift+TAB of course.
> Ah. That works. Glad to learn this "new" (for me) thing.
This is not TB specific btw., you can use it (almost) everyw
On 24/12/2005 at 11:46:21 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> Confirmations?
Curiously, I can't confirm this.
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition / http://specs.aimlink.name
PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name
...Always remember no matter where you go, there you are.
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, December 26, 2005, 4:46 PM, you wrote:
>> If you write a BT report, I will confirm it there, also.
> Thank you.
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5520
Done. You're so very welcome. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1
Hello Curtis!
On Monday, December 26, 2005, 4:51 PM, you wrote:
> On 24/12/2005 at 11:46:21 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
>> Confirmations?
> Curiously, I can't confirm this.
It happens with every keystroke for me. Even with the backspace. I
used the backspace with this Reply for yo
On 26/12/2005 at 6:09:36 PM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote:
>> Curiously, I can't confirm this.
> It happens with every keystroke for me. Even with the backspace. I
> used the backspace with this Reply for you, because I erased the To
> field in my Edit Mail Message window just now in order to test
Hello Curtis & everyone else,
on 27-Dez-2005 at 00:19 you (Curtis) wrote:
> Nothing like that here. My system makeup is available for perusal (see
> my sig). Maybe there's something unique to the systems that have the
> problem and those that don't.
I have to check if it has something to do with
Hello Curtis!
On Monday, December 26, 2005, 5:19 PM, you wrote:
>>> Curiously, I can't confirm this.
>> It happens with every keystroke for me. Even with the backspace. I
>> used the backspace with this Reply for you, because I erased the To
>> field in my Edit Mail Message window just now in or
Hallo Alexander,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:46:21 +0100GMT (24-12-2005, 17:46 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
ASK> With v3.64.01, when I start a new message and fill the "TO" field with text
ASK> (typing the address manually), the headers below it are "jumping" up and
ASK> down one pixel with each k
Alexander...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:46:21 +0100, you wrote:
>With v3.64.01, when I start a new message and fill the "TO" field with text
>(typing the address manually), the headers below it are "jumping" up and
>down one pixel with each keystroke.
>
>When I tab down into the message body, the he
Hello Ian!
On Monday, December 26, 2005, 6:58 PM, you wrote:
ASK>> With v3.64.01, when I start a new message and fill the "TO"
ASK>> field with text (typing the address manually), the headers below
ASK>> it are "jumping" up and down one pixel with each keystroke.
ASK>> Confirmations?
> I cannot
On 26/12/2005 at 10:10:09 PM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote:
> I can't find out what the name of my video card is.
Try this:
- right click your 'My Computer' icon and select 'Properties'.
- Select the tab marked 'Hardware'.
- Hit the 'Device Manager' button.
- A new window should now appear. Lo
Hello Curtis!
On Monday, December 26, 2005, 9:18 PM, you wrote:
>> I can't find out what the name of my video card is.
> Try this:
> - right click your 'My Computer' icon and select 'Properties'.
> - Select the tab marked 'Hardware'.
> - Hit the 'Device Manager' button.
I didn't think of looking
Hello ...in addition to my previous message...
on 27-Dez-2005 at 00:37 you (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
> I have to check if it has something to do with the font I'm using (Segoe
> UI, I think size 9). I'll get back to you when I tried it.
OK, I found it. Its the font size that matters.
Tahoma 8,
Hallo Alexander,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:40:58 +0100GMT (27-12-2005, 11:40 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
ASK> OK, I found it. Its the font size that matters.
ASK> Tahoma 8, 9 and 10 are no problem. Tahoma size 11 makes the lines jump up &
ASK> down by one pixel.
Confirmed with Tahoma size 12,
Hello Alexander!
On Tuesday, December 27, 2005, 4:40 AM, you wrote:
> OK, I found it. Its the font size that matters.
> Tahoma 8, 9 and 10 are no problem. Tahoma size 11 makes the lines
> jump up & down by one pixel.
Confirmed.
> Segoe UI sizes 8 and 9 are no problem either, but here it starts
On 27/12/2005 at 5:40:58 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> Please, anyone, try to open Options / Preferences / Messages / Header
> Layout and set the font to Tahoma 11, or some other font, using a larger
> size.
Ok. I confirmed it using Verdana at size 11. Quite a whacky effect. :)
Good
Hello Paul Van Noord & everyone else,
on 27-Dez-2005 at 12:45 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
> I use Tahoma at 8 point in 1280 X 1024 resolution with no problem.
OK.
> Moving to 11 point is way beyond the design
I think thats up to the end user, and not the programmer. The year is 2005
and GUIs s
On 27/12/2005 at 6:36:35 AM [GMT -0500], Paul Van Noord wrote:
> I agree, the drop-downs are very distracting and slow the process,
> especially using Voyager on a flash drive. Here's hoping they drop
> dead!
And here was I hailing it's arrival. ;)
In the past, I'd -<+> through possible matche
On 27/12/2005 at 6:22:12 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote:
> Done. I had my setting for Arial Black, font size 9. It still jumps at
> font size 8, the lowest possible setting. But I need Arial Black for
> the contrast. It's a vision disability that I have.
I can't confirm with Arial Black at size
Hello Curtis,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:53:19 -0500 GMT (27/12/2005, 18:53 +0700 GMT),
Curtis wrote:
>> I agree, the drop-downs are very distracting and slow the process,
>> especially using Voyager on a flash drive. Here's hoping they drop
>> dead!
C> And here was I hailing it's arrival. ;)
I h
On 27/12/2005 at 7:27:18 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I have nothing against the drop-down, but it seems to take a second or
> two to appear. That's slow. Only here?
No. Not here, and I agree. While I can see the reason for delaying
in-line auto-complete, I fail to see the reason for
Hello Curtis!
On Tuesday, December 27, 2005, 5:58 AM, you wrote:
>> Done. I had my setting for Arial Black, font size 9. It still jumps at
>> font size 8, the lowest possible setting. But I need Arial Black for
>> the contrast. It's a vision disability that I have.
> I can't confirm with Arial B
Hallo Thomas,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:27:18 +0700GMT (27-12-2005, 13:27 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
TF> I have nothing against the drop-down, but it seems to take a second or
TF> two to appear. That's slow. Only here?
After I've typed the second letter of the recipient the drop down list
app
On 27/12/2005 at 8:04:38 AM [GMT -0500], Roelof Otten wrote:
> After I've typed the second letter of the recipient the drop down list
> appears on the count of two.
> It may have something to do with the size of the AB (1147 entries over
> here) and the speed of the system.
I doubt this since I h
Hello Curtis,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:22:56 -0500 GMT (27/12/2005, 20:22 +0700 GMT),
Curtis wrote:
C> I know that the original auto-complete had a deliberate delay for it's
C> appearance. Someone queried the delay and the answer by one of the
C> developers was that the delay was put there to preve
Alexander...
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:40:58 +0100, you wrote:
>OK, I found it. Its the font size that matters.
>
>Tahoma 8, 9 and 10 are no problem. Tahoma size 11 makes the lines jump up &
>down by one pixel.
>
>Segoe UI sizes 8 and 9 are no problem either, but here it starts to jump at
>size 10
Het was op maandag 26 december 2005 om 18:42 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Jumping headers when filling the "TO" field' :
Hoi Alexander,
>> With v3.64.01, when I start a new message and fill the "TO" field with text
>> (typing the address manually),
12/26/2005 7:24 PM
Hi Curtis,
On 12/26/2005 Curtis wrote:
C> Nothing like that here. My system makeup is available for perusal (see
C> my sig). Maybe there's something unique to the systems that have the
C> problem and those that don't.
I do not experience the problem either. I see we both use
12/27/2005 6:31 AM
Hi Mary,
On 12/27/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB> 2 listings here:
MB> GIGABYTE MAYA RADEON 9000 PRO
MB> GIGABYTE MAYA RADEON 9000 PRO Secondary
Uou also have an ATI video ship but it isn't DirectX 9 enabled whereas
all the others(including mine) are DirectX 9 capable?
MB> Th
12/27/2005 6:43 AM
Hi Alexander,
On 12/27/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK> Please, anyone, try to open Options / Preferences / Messages / Header
ASK> Layout and set the font to Tahoma 11, or some other font, using a larger
ASK> size.
I use Tahoma at 8 point in 1280 X 1024 resolution with no
12/27/2005 6:54 AM
Hi Alexander,
On 12/27/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK> Besides that,
ASK> this problem did not occur in previous versions (IIRC).
OK, but I suggest it came with the annoying drop-down feature.
ASK> It doesn't seem very "logical" to me that the entire header pane is jumpi
12/27/2005 7:01 AM
Hi Curtis,
On 12/27/2005 Curtis wrote:
C> On 27/12/2005 at 6:36:35 AM [GMT -0500], Paul Van Noord wrote:
>> I agree, the drop-downs are very distracting and slow the process,
>> especially using Voyager on a flash drive. Here's hoping they drop
>> dead!
C> And here was I h
12/27/2005 7:48 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 12/27/2005 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> I have nothing against the drop-down, but it seems to take a second or
TF> two to appear. That's slow. Only here?
Here too. It is slower using Voyager on the flash drive than Pro w/o
OTFE on the hard drive. Understandable
Hallo steverio2k,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:54:29 -0800GMT (27-12-2005, 19:54 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
S> Confirmed...Tahoma size 11 makes the lines jump while typing the
S> address manually.
S>
S> Current beta is NONE | 'Using TBBET
Hello Roelof...
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:05:59 +0100, you wrote:
>...
>Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
>just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
>instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out steverio2k.
>
> )<)))'>
>
>Please inc
41 matches
Mail list logo
